Relationship Diagnostic Test

In about 18 minutes, it reveals the emotions and attitudes that shape how someone sees other people and groups. It surfaces hidden stereotypes and tolerance patterns fast, helping you guide better communication and trust.

Start Online Test

Questions: 9618 minutes

Hi! My name is Freudly, i am an AI therapist, I will give you an interpretation of the test after you complete it.

08:30

October 2, 2025

October 2, 2025
Material has been updated

October 2, 2025
Material has been published

12055 views

952 completions

829 likes

Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

example score

-1/1

Other Nationality (ON)

Measures the emotional-evaluative orientation (stereotype coefficient) toward members of a different nationality.

Negative orientation

Ambivalent/uncertain

Positive orientation

-1 – -0.7: Negative orientation | -0.7 – 0.7: Ambivalent/uncertain | 0.7 – 1: Positive orientation

A score of -1 indicates a strongly negative emotional orientation toward people of a different nationality on this scale.

example score

1/1

D: Own Nationality (DON)

Assesses the emotional-evaluative orientation (stereotype valence) toward one’s own nationality.

Negative stereotype

Ambivalent/uncertain

Positive stereotype

-1 – 0: Negative stereotype | 0 – 0.7: Ambivalent/uncertain | 0.7 – 1: Positive stereotype

A score of 1 indicates a strongly positive emotional orientation toward one’s own nationality, consistent with a positive stereotype.

example score

0/1

D Coefficient (Ideal) (DC()

Assesses the emotional-evaluative orientation toward the idealized image, indicating positivity, negativity, or ambivalence.

Negative orientation

Ambivalent/uncertain

Positive orientation

-1 – -0.7: Negative orientation | -0.7 – 0.7: Ambivalent/uncertain | 0.7 – 1: Positive orientation

A score of 0 falls in the ambivalent/uncertain range, suggesting a mixed or unclear emotional attitude toward the ideal image.

example score

0/1

D: Self (DS)

Measures the emotional-evaluative orientation toward oneself (self-attitude) based on the balance of positive versus negative self-perceptions.

Negative self-attitude

Ambivalent/uncertain

Positive self-attitude

-1 – -0.7: Negative self-attitude | -0.7 – 0.7: Ambivalent/uncertain | 0.7 – 1: Positive self-attitude

A score of 0 indicates an ambivalent or uncertain self-attitude, with neither clearly positive nor clearly negative self-evaluations predominating.

Start Online Test

just completed the test

DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Researchers and students

41%OF USERS

They use it in studies or coursework to measure emotional attitudes and hidden stereotypes toward different social groups.

HR and DEI teams

34%OF USERS

They apply it to understand workplace climate, tolerance levels, and unspoken biases that affect collaboration.

Counselors and mediators

25%OF USERS

They use it to clarify feelings behind interpersonal tension and choose better ways to communicate and rebuild trust.

BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.

RESULTS YOU CAN ACTUALLY USE

What You’ll See After You Finish the Test

Scale Results
— Explained Clearly

Your scores across each test scale, translated into plain, usable insights. Not just numbers, but what they actually mean for your daily life, emotional state, and overall well-being.

AI-Powered
Interpretation

A structured, clinically grounded explanation. Our AI analyzes patterns and relationships between scales to provide a coherent interpretation — without alarmist language.

Statistical
Comparison

See how you compare to others. Your scores are placed in a statistical context, showing percentiles and trends based on anonymized platform data to help you understand what`s typical.

Practical
Recommendations

Actionable guidance tailored to your profile. Receive clear, realistic suggestions you can apply immediately — focused on coping, self-regulation, and realistic next steps.

AI-Detected
Insights

Key patterns you might not notice on your own. Surfacing subtle connections in your responses that help you better understand what may be driving your current results.

Discuss with
an AI Psychologist

Clarify, reflect, and explore right away. Talk through your outcomes, ask questions, and explore meanings in a calm, non-diagnostic dialogue environment.

Start Online Test

Used in 52+ countries

Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you finish the test, your results will be compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of the benchmarks we use to place your score in context.

D – Different nationality (D–Dn)

Average

-0.4

Normal range

-0.7 — 0

min.

-1

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

D – Your nationality (D–Yn)

Average

0.1

Normal range

-0.2 — 0.3

min.

-1

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

D – Ideal (D–I)

Average

-0.3

Normal range

-0.6 — 0

min.

-1

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

D – Me (D–M)

Average

0.2

Normal range

-0.2 — 0.6

min.

-1

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Start Online Test

Featured On

Rated 4.8/5 by Our Customers

“Freudly really helped me discover parts of my personality I hadn’t noticed before. It strengthened the areas where I needed to grow and made me feel more grounded and confident in the parts that already worked well.”

— Emma C., US

“I wanted to understand how serious my ADHD is, and now I finally do. I also realized I need to work on my self-esteem. It has been low for a long time, and that makes daily life harder than it should be.”

— Mateo R., CA

“Reading each question felt like someone really understood me. Even though I’ve already dealt with much of this, reflecting still helped me learn something new about myself.”

— Caroline F., US

“The process is simple. The test covers everything you need, and you’ll get a clear breakdown of your results. For just a few dollars, it’s a great value.”

— Klara N., CZ

“I kept thinking there might be a small chance, but now I know for sure. The questions were easy to understand, and the whole process was straightforward.”

— Bruno M., BR

“I really enjoyed this experience. I learned a lot, and it helped me make sense of my thoughts and the feeling I’ve had for a long time that I may have grown up with undiagnosed ADHD.”

— Alice B., FR

“Great platform — the insights were genuinely meaningful!”

— Daniel W., DE

“Everything was easy to follow. The tools you get at the end are genuinely helpful for self-growth, and the price is very reasonable. I really appreciate that.”

— Sofia M., ES

“Surprisingly accurate — honestly didn’t expect it to nail things so well.”

— Adir B., IL

“There are lots of different tests to pick from, and the price is surprisingly low for how much insight you get.”

— Olivia W., CA

“I was pleasantly surprised when I read the results. It was as if someone had sorted out my messy thoughts and given me useful tips to help me speak with more confidence.”

— Grace O., IE

“It was really solid, very detailed, and it actually helped me make sense of a lot of things.”

— Carla T., TT

“I was really impressed with the report. It was clear, thoughtful, and it reflected things I’ve been noticing about myself.”

— Jade H., US

“The questions made me think deeply and helped me become more self-aware.”

— Brooke S., US

“Reading through most of the questions made me feel understood. Although I’ve already worked through some of these issues, the questions still gave me useful insights and helped me learn more about myself.”

— Ryan M., US

“I usually take one or two tests each month, and this has become a good way for me to see how I’m doing.”

— Lucas W., US

“Most of the time, my results are in the 90 to 98th percentile compared to others. It really makes me feel like there’s something unique about me.”

— Ethan C., US

“I tried out some of the AI’s suggestions, and to be honest, they worked much better than I thought they would. Maybe this thing really is smarter than me.”

— Reece D., AU

Trusted by 22k+ Users Worldwide

CLEAR ANSWERS TO COMMON QUESTIONS

Frequently Asked Questions

Any questions left?

What does this test measure?

It measures emotional-evaluative attitudes toward selected social groups or individuals. It helps identify the affective component behind ratings that may not be stated directly.

How is the questionnaire completed?

Each item is rated on a scale defined by opposite descriptors. The rating should reflect the immediate impression rather than a reasoned judgment.

How long does it take and how many items are included?

Estimated completion time is 18 minutes. The questionnaire contains 96 items.

What types of topics can be assessed?

It is commonly used for interethnic and interpersonal attitudes, including tolerance and stereotypes. The target concepts are defined by the administration based on the assessment purpose.

How should results be interpreted?

Scores summarize the direction and intensity of emotional evaluation across the rated concepts. Interpretation should consider the context and should not be used as a standalone diagnostic conclusion.

WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

About This Assessment

Relationship Diagnostic Test

ethnopsychology identity tolerance

This instrument is designed to assess evaluative and emotional attitudes toward interpersonal or intergroup targets. The Relationship Diagnostic Test uses a structured rating format to capture affect-laden appraisals that may be difficult to articulate directly.

It consists of 96 items and typically requires about 18 minutes to complete. Administration can support clinical or research contexts in which the goal is to characterize patterns of affective evaluation (e.g., valence and intensity) associated with social perceptions, with results interpreted in conjunction with other clinical data.

When used appropriately, the Relationship Diagnostic Test may help identify stable attitude tendencies and potential discrepancies between explicit statements and underlying evaluations. Authorship is attributed to John M. Gottman.

Author: John M. Gottman

Literature: Berry, J. W., Phinney, J. S., Sam, D. L., & Vedder, P. Immigrant youth: Acculturation, identity, and adaptation. Applied Psychology: An International Review. 2006.

Test Question Form