Sexism Structure Questionnaire Test
Clarify which stereotypes about women shape someone’s views in about 4 minutes. Get fast, specific insight into hidden sexist beliefs for research, clinical, or workplace use.
Hi! My name is Freudly, i am an AI therapist, I will give you an interpretation of the test after you complete it.
08:30
Scale Explorer
How the Scales are Structured
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS
Who Usually Takes This Test?
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
RESULTS YOU CAN ACTUALLY USE
Benchmarking
See How You Compare
Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Egoism (E)
Average
7.8
Normal range
5.5 — 10.2
min.
0
max.
18
Majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Dishonesty and Inconsistency (DaI)
Average
11.8
Normal range
9 — 14.6
min.
0
max.
18
Majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Stupidity (woman behind the wheel) (S(btw)
Average
12.3
Normal range
9.2 — 15.4
min.
0
max.
18
Majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Level of Sexism (LoS)
Average
30.6
Normal range
23.1 — 38.1
min.
0
max.
54
Majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Featured On
CLEAR ANSWERS TO COMMON QUESTIONS
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this questionnaire measure?
It assesses endorsement of common negative stereotypes about women. It helps identify which belief patterns are most strongly supported.
How should the statements be rated?
Rate each statement based on the degree of agreement or disagreement. Use the first response that fits without overthinking.
How long does it take and how many items are included?
Completion typically takes about 4 minutes. The questionnaire includes 18 statements.
Why are the statements brief and aphoristic?
Brief phrasing is used to evoke immediate associations and attitudes. This format can reveal implicit or indirect biases that may not appear in direct questions.
How should results be interpreted?
Scores indicate relative strength of endorsement across different sexist belief themes. Results should be considered alongside other information and not treated as a standalone diagnosis.
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES
About This Assessment
/https://freudly.ai/media/tests/1088/image/1762438163_day_image_20251106_140923.png)
Sexism Structure Questionnaire Test - Symptoms and Signs
This self-report measure is designed to assess endorsement of sexist beliefs and related stereotypes about women. The Sexism Structure Questionnaire includes 18 items and typically takes about 4 minutes to complete.
Items consist of brief statements rated by the respondent to characterize patterns of attitudinal endorsement. Developed by Peter Glick and Susan T. Fiske, the Sexism Structure Questionnaire may be used in research or applied settings to describe the structure and relative prominence of sexism-related beliefs within an individual or group.
Author: Peter Glick, Susan T. Fiske
Literature: Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1996.
Comments
Leave a Comment