Trolling Attitudes Questionnaire Test
Understand attitudes toward online trolling and provocations in about 6 minutes. Get a clear snapshot of support or rejection of trolling to guide research and moderation.
Hi! My name is Freudly, i am an AI therapist, I will give you an interpretation of the test after you complete it.
08:30
Scale Explorer
How the Scales are Structured
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS
Who Usually Takes This Test?
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
RESULTS YOU CAN ACTUALLY USE
Benchmarking
See How You Compare
Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Ethnic trolling (Et)
Average
10.2
Normal range
7.5 — 13
min.
0
max.
15
Majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Trolling Fun (TF)
Average
9
Normal range
6.7 — 11.2
min.
0
max.
15
Majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Age-trolling (A)
Average
9.7
Normal range
7.5 — 11.9
min.
0
max.
15
Majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Religious trolling (Rt)
Average
7.7
Normal range
5 — 10.4
min.
0
max.
15
Majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Gender Trolling (GT)
Average
6.5
Normal range
4 — 9
min.
0
max.
15
Majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Trolling interests, hobbies (Tih)
Average
6.2
Normal range
4.1 — 8.3
min.
0
max.
15
Majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Trolling Based on Appearance (TBoA)
Average
9.2
Normal range
6.5 — 11.9
min.
0
max.
15
Majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Political trolling (Pt)
Average
5.4
Normal range
3.4 — 7.3
min.
0
max.
15
Majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Trolling in Social Spheres (TiSS)
Average
6.2
Normal range
3.6 — 8.9
min.
0
max.
15
Majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Trolling of Psychological Characteristics (ToPC)
Average
11.2
Normal range
8.7 — 13.8
min.
0
max.
15
Majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Featured On
CLEAR ANSWERS TO COMMON QUESTIONS
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this questionnaire measure?
It measures attitudes toward online provocations, including irony, baiting, and aggressive forms of provocation. It focuses on acceptance, rejection, and perceived legitimacy of such behavior.
How long does it take, and how many items are included?
Completion time is about 6 minutes. The questionnaire includes 30 items.
How should items be answered?
Select the response option that best reflects the typical view or reaction. Answer all items using the same time frame and interpretation of terms.
Are there right or wrong answers?
No; items assess attitudes rather than knowledge. Accurate results depend on consistent, candid responses.
How are results used and interpreted?
Results provide a profile of stance toward provocative content and related socio-psychological attitudes. Scores are interpreted at the group or individual level as indicators, not as clinical diagnoses.
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES
About This Assessment
/https://freudly.ai/media/tests/995/image/1762169448_day_image_20251103_113047.png)
Trolling Attitudes Questionnaire Test - Symptoms and Signs
This self-report measure assesses attitudes toward online provocation and trolling behaviors. The Trolling Attitudes Questionnaire is intended to characterize respondents’ endorsement, acceptance, or rejection of common forms of trolling in digital contexts.
It consists of 30 items and typically takes about 6 minutes to complete. Items focus on viewpoints and reactions to trolling-related content (e.g., irony, antagonistic provocation) and may be used in research or applied settings to inform understanding of users’ orientations toward online provocation. The Trolling Attitudes Questionnaire has been attributed to Mark D. Griffiths.
Author: Mark D. Griffiths
Literature: Buckels, E. E., Trapnell, P. D., & Paulhus, D. L. Trolls just want to have fun. Personality and Individual Differences. 2014.
Comments
Leave a Comment