Home
Psychological tests
Attitudes Toward Moral Decision-Making in Sport Questionnaire

Attitudes Toward Moral Decision-Making in Sport Questionnaire Test

Understand how athletes view honesty, fair wins, and aggression in sport in about 4 minutes. Quick 20 items that support coaching, reduce conflicts, and strengthen ethical team culture.

Start Online Test

Questions: 204 minutes

Hi! My name is Freudly, i am an AI therapist, I will give you an interpretation of the test after you complete it.

08:30

October 2, 2025

October 2, 2025
Material has been updated

October 2, 2025
Material has been published

23376 views

1857 completions

1506 likes

Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

example score

11/30

Rejection of Aggressive Behavior (RoAB)

Measures how strongly an athlete rejects unsportsmanlike aggressive behavior aimed at unsettling an opponent.

Low rejection

Moderate rejection

High rejection

6 – 13: Low rejection | 14 – 22: Moderate rejection | 23 – 30: High rejection

A score of 11 falls in the Low rejection range, suggesting comparatively higher tolerance for aggressive tactics in competition than athletes with higher scores.

example score

17/25

Orientation Toward Fair Victory (OTFV)

Measures the extent to which an athlete values winning through effort and rules rather than at any cost, and can accept defeat with dignity.

Low

Moderate

High

5 – 12: Low | 13 – 19: Moderate | 20 – 25: High

A score of 17 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting a generally fair-play orientation with occasional variability in prioritizing an honest victory under competitive pressure.

example score

21/35

Rejection of Cheating (RoC)

Measures how strongly an athlete rejects cheating and rule violations as acceptable ways to win.

Low rejection

Moderate rejection

High rejection

7 – 16: Low rejection | 17 – 25: Moderate rejection | 26 – 35: High rejection

A score of 21 indicates a moderate rejection of cheating, suggesting the athlete generally prefers fair play but may be somewhat flexible in certain competitive situations.

example score

86/100

Total Score (TS)

This scale reflects the overall tendency to make morally oriented decisions in sport, including rejecting cheating and aggression while valuing fair victory.

Lower moral orientation

Moderate moral orientation

High moral orientation

20 – 56: Lower moral orientation | 57 – 81: Moderate moral orientation | 82 – 100: High moral orientation

A score of 86 falls in the High moral orientation range, suggesting a strong preference for fair play and rejection of cheating and aggressive behavior in competitive situations.

Start Online Test

just completed the test

DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Youth competitive athletes

41%OF USERS

Teen and young adult athletes take it to understand their views on cheating, aggression, and fair play before important competitions.

Coaches and team staff

34%OF USERS

Coaches use it to spot ethical risk areas in a squad and shape training rules that reinforce honest, respectful competition.

Sports psychologists and educators

25%OF USERS

Psychologists and instructors use it for quick screening and to plan discussions or interventions around moral choices in sport.

BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.

RESULTS YOU CAN ACTUALLY USE

What You’ll See After You Finish the Test

Scale Results
— Explained Clearly

Your scores across each test scale, translated into plain, usable insights. Not just numbers, but what they actually mean for your daily life, emotional state, and overall well-being.

AI-Powered
Interpretation

A structured, clinically grounded explanation. Our AI analyzes patterns and relationships between scales to provide a coherent interpretation — without alarmist language.

Statistical
Comparison

See how you compare to others. Your scores are placed in a statistical context, showing percentiles and trends based on anonymized platform data to help you understand what`s typical.

Practical
Recommendations

Actionable guidance tailored to your profile. Receive clear, realistic suggestions you can apply immediately — focused on coping, self-regulation, and realistic next steps.

AI-Detected
Insights

Key patterns you might not notice on your own. Surfacing subtle connections in your responses that help you better understand what may be driving your current results.

Discuss with
an AI Psychologist

Clarify, reflect, and explore right away. Talk through your outcomes, ask questions, and explore meanings in a calm, non-diagnostic dialogue environment.

Start Online Test

Used in 52+ countries

Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you finish the test, your results will be compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of the benchmarks we use to place your score in context.

Rejection of aggressive behavior (Roab)

Average

19.8

Normal range

15.8 — 23.8

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Orientation Towards an Honest Victory (OTaHV)

Average

19.3

Normal range

16.2 — 22.3

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Rejection of deception (Rod)

Average

24.9

Normal range

20.2 — 29.6

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Final score (Fs)

Average

50.4

Normal range

37.6 — 63.3

min.

max.

100

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Start Online Test

Featured On

Rated 4.8/5 by Our Customers

“Freudly really helped me discover parts of my personality I hadn’t noticed before. It strengthened the areas where I needed to grow and made me feel more grounded and confident in the parts that already worked well.”

— Emma C., US

“I wanted to understand how serious my ADHD is, and now I finally do. I also realized I need to work on my self-esteem. It has been low for a long time, and that makes daily life harder than it should be.”

— Mateo R., CA

“Reading each question felt like someone really understood me. Even though I’ve already dealt with much of this, reflecting still helped me learn something new about myself.”

— Caroline F., US

“The process is simple. The test covers everything you need, and you’ll get a clear breakdown of your results. For just a few dollars, it’s a great value.”

— Klara N., CZ

“I kept thinking there might be a small chance, but now I know for sure. The questions were easy to understand, and the whole process was straightforward.”

— Bruno M., BR

“I really enjoyed this experience. I learned a lot, and it helped me make sense of my thoughts and the feeling I’ve had for a long time that I may have grown up with undiagnosed ADHD.”

— Alice B., FR

“Great platform — the insights were genuinely meaningful!”

— Daniel W., DE

“Everything was easy to follow. The tools you get at the end are genuinely helpful for self-growth, and the price is very reasonable. I really appreciate that.”

— Sofia M., ES

“Surprisingly accurate — honestly didn’t expect it to nail things so well.”

— Adir B., IL

“There are lots of different tests to pick from, and the price is surprisingly low for how much insight you get.”

— Olivia W., CA

“I was pleasantly surprised when I read the results. It was as if someone had sorted out my messy thoughts and given me useful tips to help me speak with more confidence.”

— Grace O., IE

“It was really solid, very detailed, and it actually helped me make sense of a lot of things.”

— Carla T., TT

“I was really impressed with the report. It was clear, thoughtful, and it reflected things I’ve been noticing about myself.”

— Jade H., US

“The questions made me think deeply and helped me become more self-aware.”

— Brooke S., US

“Reading through most of the questions made me feel understood. Although I’ve already worked through some of these issues, the questions still gave me useful insights and helped me learn more about myself.”

— Ryan M., US

“I usually take one or two tests each month, and this has become a good way for me to see how I’m doing.”

— Lucas W., US

“Most of the time, my results are in the 90 to 98th percentile compared to others. It really makes me feel like there’s something unique about me.”

— Ethan C., US

“I tried out some of the AI’s suggestions, and to be honest, they worked much better than I thought they would. Maybe this thing really is smarter than me.”

— Reece D., AU

Trusted by 22k+ Users Worldwide

CLEAR ANSWERS TO COMMON QUESTIONS

Frequently Asked Questions

Any questions left?

What does this questionnaire measure?

It assesses attitudes toward moral decision-making in sport across three areas: rejection of cheating, orientation toward fair victory, and rejection of aggressive behavior.

Who can complete it?

It is intended for athletes and other sport participants who can read and respond to brief statements about common competitive situations.

How long does it take and how many items are included?

Completion typically takes about 4 minutes. The questionnaire includes 20 items.

How should responses be selected?

Select the option that best reflects the usual view or likely reaction in similar situations. Responses should reflect typical attitudes rather than an idealized answer.

How are the results used?

Scores describe the strength of endorsement for each moral attitude dimension. Results can inform coaching or psychological work aimed at supporting ethical conduct and reducing conflict.

WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

About This Assessment

Questionnaire on Attitudes Toward Moral Decision-Making in Sports Test

Attitudes Toward Moral Decision-Making in Sport Questionnaire Test

moral decision making sport

This questionnaire is designed to assess athletes’ attitudes toward moral decision-making in sport contexts. The Attitudes Toward Moral Decision-Making in Sport Questionnaire provides a brief self-report snapshot of how respondents evaluate ethical issues that may arise during competition.

The measure includes 20 items and takes about 4 minutes to complete. Items typically query perspectives on honesty, rule adherence, deception, and aggressive conduct in sport settings, supporting a structured description of the respondent’s moral attitudes.

The Attitudes Toward Moral Decision-Making in Sport Questionnaire is commonly used to inform clinical and applied sport psychology discussions, including values-based coaching, team culture, and interventions aimed at reducing harmful or unsporting behavior. It is attributed to Darcia Narvaez.

Author: Darcia Narvaez, james-rest, mark-r-leary

Literature: Shields, D. L., & Bredemeier, B. J. Moral development and behavior in sport. In T. S. Horn (Ed.), Advances in sport psychology. Human Kinetics. 2008.; Lee, M. J., Whitehead, J., & Ntoumanis, N. Development of the attitudes to moral decision-making in youth sport questionnaire (AMDYSQ). Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2007.

Test Question Form