Prices
Tests
FAQ
How sessions work
en
es
Log inSign up

Quality of Interpersonal Relationships in the Educational Environment Test

In 9 minutes, understand how supportive student and teacher relationships feel and how safe the school climate is. Get clear, actionable insights to spot trouble areas fast and guide timely support.
Start Online Test
Questions: 489 minutes
Hi! My name is Freudly, i am an AI therapist, I will give you an interpretation of the test after you complete it.
08:30
October 2, 2025
October 2, 2025
Material has been updated
13554 views
804 completions
712 likes
Share
Scale Explorer
How the Scales are Structured
example score
14/24
Manipulative Attitude (MA)
Measures the tendency to use covert pressure and insincere strategies to influence others in interpersonal interactions at school.
Low
Moderate
High
0 – 7: Low | 8 – 16: Moderate | 17 – 24: High
A score of 14 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting a noticeable but not predominant tendency toward manipulative interaction patterns.
example score
10/24
Hostility (H)
Measures the level of negative attitudes and ill will in relationships within the educational environment.
Low hostility
Moderate hostility
High hostility
0 – 7: Low hostility | 8 – 16: Moderate hostility | 17 – 24: High hostility
A score of 10 indicates a moderate level of hostility, suggesting some negative attitudes may be present but are not pronounced.
example score
13/24
Conflict Proneness (CP)
Measures the tendency for conflict situations and disagreements to arise and develop in the educational environment.
Low conflict
Moderate conflict
High conflict
0 – 7: Low conflict | 8 – 16: Moderate conflict | 17 – 24: High conflict
A score of 13 falls in the Moderate conflict range, suggesting occasional disagreements that may affect day-to-day interactions but are not consistently pervasive.
example score
14/24
Aggression (A)
Measures the degree of aggressive behavior and conflict tendency in interpersonal interactions within the educational environment.
Low
Moderate
High
0 – 7: Low | 8 – 16: Moderate | 17 – 24: High
A score of 14 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting noticeable but not extreme aggressiveness that may be associated with increased tension and occasional conflicts.
example score
11/24
Negative Attitude Index (NAI)
Measures the intensity of negative interpersonal relationship features such as conflict, hostility, aggressiveness, and manipulativeness in the educational environment.
Low
Moderate
High
0 – 7: Low | 8 – 16: Moderate | 17 – 24: High
A score of 11 falls in the Moderate range, indicating a noticeable but not extreme level of negative interaction signs that may reflect some tension in relationships.
example score
13/24
Tolerance (T)
Measures acceptance and respect for differences among participants in the educational environment as an indicator of interaction climate.
Low tolerance
Moderate tolerance
High tolerance
0 – 7: Low tolerance | 8 – 16: Moderate tolerance | 17 – 24: High tolerance
A score of 13 indicates a moderate level of tolerance, suggesting generally acceptable respect for differences with some room to strengthen inclusivity in day-to-day interactions.
example score
9/24
Acceptance (A)
Measures the extent to which members of the educational environment accept one another as they are, reflecting tolerance and lack of bias.
Low acceptance
Moderate acceptance
High acceptance
0 – 8: Low acceptance | 9 – 16: Moderate acceptance | 17 – 24: High acceptance
A score of 9 falls in the Moderate acceptance range, suggesting acceptance is present but may be inconsistent across interactions or situations.
example score
7/24
Benevolence (B)
Measures the degree of friendliness, mutual support, and respect in interpersonal relationships within the educational environment.
Low friendliness
Moderate friendliness
High friendliness
0 – 7: Low friendliness | 8 – 16: Moderate friendliness | 17 – 24: High friendliness
A score of 7 falls in the Low friendliness range, suggesting limited expressions of mutual support and respect in current relationships.
example score
15/24
Trust (T)
Assesses how much participants in the educational environment feel openness and confidence in their interactions with one another.
Low trust
Moderate trust
High trust
0 – 7: Low trust | 8 – 16: Moderate trust | 17 – 24: High trust
A score of 15 falls in the Moderate trust range, suggesting generally trusting interactions with some remaining caution or inconsistency in openness.
example score
17/24
Positive Attitude Index (PAI)
Measures how strongly positive, supportive qualities (trust, kindness, acceptance, tolerance) are expressed in interpersonal relationships within the educational environment.
Low
Moderate
High
0 – 7: Low | 8 – 16: Moderate | 17 – 24: High
A score of 17 falls in the High range, suggesting that positive and supportive interaction patterns are strongly expressed in this educational setting.
Start Online Test
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS
Who Usually Takes This Test?
School psychologists and counselors
41%OF USERS
They use it for rapid screening of class climate and psychological safety, especially after incidents or when supporting at-risk students.
Teachers and class advisors
34%OF USERS
They take it to understand student–student and teacher–student dynamics and adjust classroom management and communication.
Adolescent students
25%OF USERS
They complete it to share how safe, supported, and comfortable they feel in their school and classroom relationships.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
RESULTS YOU CAN ACTUALLY USE
What You’ll See After You Finish the Test
Scale Results
— Explained Clearly
Your scores across each test scale, translated into plain, usable insights. Not just numbers, but what they actually mean for your daily life, emotional state, and overall well-being.
AI-Powered
Interpretation
A structured, clinically grounded explanation. Our AI analyzes patterns and relationships between scales to provide a coherent interpretation — without alarmist language.
Statistical
Comparison
See how you compare to others. Your scores are placed in a statistical context, showing percentiles and trends based on anonymized platform data to help you understand what`s typical.
Practical
Recommendations
Actionable guidance tailored to your profile. Receive clear, realistic suggestions you can apply immediately — focused on coping, self-regulation, and realistic next steps.
AI-Detected
Insights
Key patterns you might not notice on your own. Surfacing subtle connections in your responses that help you better understand what may be driving your current results.
Discuss with
an AI Psychologist
Clarify, reflect, and explore right away. Talk through your outcomes, ask questions, and explore meanings in a calm, non-diagnostic dialogue environment.
Start Online Test
Used in 52+ countries
Benchmarking
See How You Compare
Once you finish the test, your results will be compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of the benchmarks we use to place your score in context.
Manipulative Relationships Scale (MRS)
Average
14.9
Normal range
11.2 — 18.7
min.
0
max.
24
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Hostility Scale (HS)
Average
14.1
Normal range
9.7 — 18.5
min.
0
max.
24
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Conflict Scale (CS)
Average
6.3
Normal range
3.2 — 9.4
min.
0
max.
24
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Aggressiveness Scale (AS)
Average
7.8
Normal range
4.4 — 11.2
min.
0
max.
24
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Negative Attitude Index (NAI)
Average
12.4
Normal range
9.1 — 15.8
min.
0
max.
24
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Tolerance Scale (TS)
Average
6.4
Normal range
3.2 — 9.5
min.
0
max.
24
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Acceptance Scale (AS)
Average
13
Normal range
9.4 — 16.6
min.
0
max.
24
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Friendliness Scale (FS)
Average
16.3
Normal range
12.7 — 19.9
min.
0
max.
24
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Trust Scale (TS)
Average
16.1
Normal range
12.9 — 19.3
min.
0
max.
24
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Positive Attitude Index (PAI)
Average
12.2
Normal range
9 — 15.5
min.
0
max.
24
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Start Online Test
Featured On
Rated 4.8/5 by Our Customers
“Freudly really helped me discover parts of my personality I hadn’t noticed before. It strengthened the areas where I needed to grow and made me feel more grounded and confident in the parts that already worked well.”
— Emma C., US
“I wanted to understand how serious my ADHD is, and now I finally do. I also realized I need to work on my self-esteem. It has been low for a long time, and that makes daily life harder than it should be.”
— Mateo R., CA
“Reading each question felt like someone really understood me. Even though I’ve already dealt with much of this, reflecting still helped me learn something new about myself.”
— Caroline F., US
“The process is simple. The test covers everything you need, and you’ll get a clear breakdown of your results. For just a few dollars, it’s a great value.”
— Klara N., CZ
“I kept thinking there might be a small chance, but now I know for sure. The questions were easy to understand, and the whole process was straightforward.”
— Bruno M., BR
“I really enjoyed this experience. I learned a lot, and it helped me make sense of my thoughts and the feeling I’ve had for a long time that I may have grown up with undiagnosed ADHD.”
— Alice B., FR
“Great platform — the insights were genuinely meaningful!”
— Daniel W., DE
“Everything was easy to follow. The tools you get at the end are genuinely helpful for self-growth, and the price is very reasonable. I really appreciate that.”
— Sofia M., ES
“Surprisingly accurate — honestly didn’t expect it to nail things so well.”
— Adir B., IL
“There are lots of different tests to pick from, and the price is surprisingly low for how much insight you get.”
— Olivia W., CA
“I was pleasantly surprised when I read the results. It was as if someone had sorted out my messy thoughts and given me useful tips to help me speak with more confidence.”
— Grace O., IE
“It was really solid, very detailed, and it actually helped me make sense of a lot of things.”
— Carla T., TT
“I was really impressed with the report. It was clear, thoughtful, and it reflected things I’ve been noticing about myself.”
— Jade H., US
“The questions made me think deeply and helped me become more self-aware.”
— Brooke S., US
“Reading through most of the questions made me feel understood. Although I’ve already worked through some of these issues, the questions still gave me useful insights and helped me learn more about myself.”
— Ryan M., US
“I usually take one or two tests each month, and this has become a good way for me to see how I’m doing.”
— Lucas W., US
“Most of the time, my results are in the 90 to 98th percentile compared to others. It really makes me feel like there’s something unique about me.”
— Ethan C., US
“I tried out some of the AI’s suggestions, and to be honest, they worked much better than I thought they would. Maybe this thing really is smarter than me.”
— Reece D., AU
Trusted by 22k+ Users Worldwide
CLEAR ANSWERS TO COMMON QUESTIONS
Frequently Asked Questions

Any questions left?

What does this assessment measure?
It measures the quality of interpersonal relationships in the educational setting and the level of psychological safety. It covers peer interactions, teacher–student interactions, and perceived comfort and protection in the environment.
Who can complete the questionnaires?
There are versions for adolescents and for teachers. Each group responds only to its assigned version.
How long does it take and how many items are included?
Estimated completion time is about 9 minutes. The assessment includes 48 items.
When is this assessment typically used?
It is used for rapid screening of classroom climate and perceived safety, including after stressful events. It can also be used for preventive work and monitoring of change over time.
How should results be interpreted and used?
Scores are used to identify areas of strain in communication and gaps in perceived support or safety. Results should be reviewed by qualified staff and used to guide targeted actions within the educational setting.
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES
About This Assessment
Quality of Interpersonal Relationships in the Educational Environment Test

Quality of Interpersonal Relationships in the Educational Environment Test

securityclass climatepedagogy

This measure is designed to support rapid screening of perceived relationship quality and psychological safety within school settings. Quality of Interpersonal Relationships in the Educational Environment is intended to help characterize how students and staff experience the social climate and day-to-day interactions.

The instrument includes 48 items and typically takes about 9 minutes to complete. Content emphasizes interpersonal dynamics (e.g., peer relationships and student–teacher interactions) and perceived comfort and safety in the educational environment, and it may be used to inform targeted consultation, classroom-level supports, or broader school climate efforts. Development is attributed to Urie Bronfenbrenner and John C. Flanagan.

Quality of Interpersonal Relationships in the Educational Environment is generally interpreted as a descriptive indicator of perceived school climate rather than a diagnostic tool; results should be considered alongside other sources of information (e.g., interviews, observation, and additional rating scales) and the respondent’s context.

Author: John C. Flanagan, Urie Bronfenbrenner
Literature: Cohen, J., & Wills, T. A. Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin. 1985.
Test Question Form
You Might Also Like
Interpersonal Relationship Stages Assessment
This measure is designed to characterize perceived stages of peer relations…
Start Test
Psychological Safety of the Educational Environment
This measure is designed to assess perceptions of interpersonal climate and…
Start Test
Dialogicality Scale for Interpersonal Relationships
This self-report measure, the Dialogicality Scale for Interpersonal Relatio…
Start Test
Comments
Leave a Comment