Error-Making Questionnaire Test

In about 10 minutes, uncover thinking traps that can fuel anxiety or depression. Get a fast, objective snapshot of key distortions to guide treatment and track progress over time.

Start Online Test

Questions: 5010 minutes

Hi! My name is Freudly, i am an AI therapist, I will give you an interpretation of the test after you complete it.

08:30

October 2, 2025

October 2, 2025
Material has been updated

October 2, 2025
Material has been published

20404 views

2081 completion

1658 likes

Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

example score

18/20

Yes, But... (YB)

Measures how strongly a person tends to respond to positives with a “yes, but…” counterpoint that highlights negatives or justifies negative outcomes.

Low

Moderate

High

0 – 6: Low | 7 – 13: Moderate | 14 – 20: High

A score of 18 falls in the High range, suggesting a frequent tendency to discount positives by focusing on drawbacks or exceptions.

example score

13/20

Must Statements (MS)

Measures the tendency to hold rigid, absolute “must/should” demands toward oneself that can increase inner pressure and guilt.

Flexible demands

Elevated pressure

Rigid demands

0 – 6: Flexible demands | 7 – 13: Elevated pressure | 14 – 20: Rigid demands

A score of 13 suggests an elevated tendency to use self-directed “must” statements, which may heighten internal tension in stressful situations.

example score

6/20

What If (WI)

Measures how often a person engages in hypothetical “what if…” worry that amplifies anxiety about unlikely problems.

Low

Moderate

High

0 – 6: Low | 7 – 13: Moderate | 14 – 20: High

A score of 6 falls in the Low range, suggesting “what if…” worry is present but typically not a dominant thinking pattern.

example score

13/20

Painful Comparison (PC)

Measures how strongly a person tends to compare themselves unfavorably to others or internalize negative judgments.

Low

Moderate

High

0 – 6: Low | 7 – 13: Moderate | 14 – 20: High

A score of 13 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting painful comparisons occur fairly often and may affect confidence in some situations.

example score

3/20

Perfectionism (P)

Measures the tendency to set unrealistically high standards and pursue perfection in thinking and self-evaluation.

Low

Moderate

High

0 – 6: Low | 7 – 13: Moderate | 14 – 20: High

A score of 3 falls in the Low range, suggesting perfectionistic all-or-nothing standards are relatively infrequent for you in this assessment.

example score

10/20

Trust in Critics (TiC)

Measures the tendency to accept criticism automatically without evaluating its accuracy or usefulness.

Balanced

Somewhat trusting

Highly trusting

0 – 6: Balanced | 7 – 13: Somewhat trusting | 14 – 20: Highly trusting

A score of 10 falls in the “Somewhat trusting” range, suggesting you may sometimes take criticism at face value and benefit from pausing to check its relevance and evidence.

example score

15/20

Trust in One's Spokesperson (TiOS)

Measures the tendency to overgeneralize success by assuming achievements in one area guarantee success in others without additional effort.

Low

Moderate

High

0 – 6: Low | 7 – 13: Moderate | 14 – 20: High

A score of 15 falls in the High range, suggesting you often lean toward assuming past wins will carry over to new domains without extra preparation.

example score

7/20

Personalization (P)

Measures how often a person tends to interpret events as being caused by or directed at them, taking responsibility even when factors are outside their control.

Low

Moderate

High

0 – 6: Low | 7 – 13: Moderate | 14 – 20: High

A score of 7 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting a noticeable but not pervasive tendency to take some situations personally and feel undue responsibility.

example score

8/20

Mind Reading (MR)

Measures how often you assume you know what others think or expect others to infer your needs without clear communication.

Low

Moderate

High

0 – 6: Low | 7 – 13: Moderate | 14 – 20: High

A score of 8 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting mind-reading assumptions show up sometimes and may occasionally complicate communication.

example score

15/20

Chicken Little Syndrome (CLS)

Measures the tendency to catastrophize and exaggerate danger based on minor events.

Low

Moderate

High

0 – 6: Low | 7 – 13: Moderate | 14 – 20: High

A score of 15 falls in the High range, suggesting frequent catastrophic interpretations and heightened perceived threat in response to relatively small difficulties.

Start Online Test

just completed the test

DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Anxiety and mood strugglers

44%OF USERS

People dealing with anxiety, low mood, or overwhelm take it to spot the thinking traps that intensify distress and learn what to challenge first.

Therapy and coaching clients

33%OF USERS

People already in therapy or coaching use it to quickly map their common cognitive distortions and track changes over time.

Self-improvement and mindfulness seekers

23%OF USERS

Curious self-reflective people take it to understand biased thought habits in everyday conflicts, decisions, and relationships.

BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.

RESULTS YOU CAN ACTUALLY USE

What You’ll See After You Finish the Test

Scale Results
— Explained Clearly

Your scores across each test scale, translated into plain, usable insights. Not just numbers, but what they actually mean for your daily life, emotional state, and overall well-being.

AI-Powered
Interpretation

A structured, clinically grounded explanation. Our AI analyzes patterns and relationships between scales to provide a coherent interpretation — without alarmist language.

Statistical
Comparison

See how you compare to others. Your scores are placed in a statistical context, showing percentiles and trends based on anonymized platform data to help you understand what`s typical.

Practical
Recommendations

Actionable guidance tailored to your profile. Receive clear, realistic suggestions you can apply immediately — focused on coping, self-regulation, and realistic next steps.

AI-Detected
Insights

Key patterns you might not notice on your own. Surfacing subtle connections in your responses that help you better understand what may be driving your current results.

Discuss with
an AI Psychologist

Clarify, reflect, and explore right away. Talk through your outcomes, ask questions, and explore meanings in a calm, non-diagnostic dialogue environment.

Start Online Test

Used in 52+ countries

Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you finish the test, your results will be compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of the benchmarks we use to place your score in context.

Yes, but… (Yb)

Average

9.7

Normal range

6.3 — 13.1

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

You must! (Ym)

Average

13.3

Normal range

9.7 — 16.9

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

What if… (Wi)

Average

11.5

Normal range

9 — 14.1

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Painful Comparison (PC)

Average

7.4

Normal range

4.8 — 9.9

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Maximalism (M)

Average

11.2

Normal range

8.5 — 14

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Trusting Critics (TC)

Average

5.7

Normal range

2.6 — 8.8

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Trusting Your Press Secretary (TYPS)

Average

5.5

Normal range

2.7 — 8.2

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Tendency to take everything personally (Tttep)

Average

11.8

Normal range

8.2 — 15.5

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Mind Reading (MR)

Average

9.1

Normal range

6.2 — 12

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

The Little Chick Syndrome (TLCS)

Average

12.5

Normal range

8.9 — 16.2

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Start Online Test

Featured On

Rated 4.8/5 by Our Customers

“Freudly really helped me discover parts of my personality I hadn’t noticed before. It strengthened the areas where I needed to grow and made me feel more grounded and confident in the parts that already worked well.”

— Emma C., US

“I wanted to understand how serious my ADHD is, and now I finally do. I also realized I need to work on my self-esteem. It has been low for a long time, and that makes daily life harder than it should be.”

— Mateo R., CA

“Reading each question felt like someone really understood me. Even though I’ve already dealt with much of this, reflecting still helped me learn something new about myself.”

— Caroline F., US

“The process is simple. The test covers everything you need, and you’ll get a clear breakdown of your results. For just a few dollars, it’s a great value.”

— Klara N., CZ

“I kept thinking there might be a small chance, but now I know for sure. The questions were easy to understand, and the whole process was straightforward.”

— Bruno M., BR

“I really enjoyed this experience. I learned a lot, and it helped me make sense of my thoughts and the feeling I’ve had for a long time that I may have grown up with undiagnosed ADHD.”

— Alice B., FR

“Great platform — the insights were genuinely meaningful!”

— Daniel W., DE

“Everything was easy to follow. The tools you get at the end are genuinely helpful for self-growth, and the price is very reasonable. I really appreciate that.”

— Sofia M., ES

“Surprisingly accurate — honestly didn’t expect it to nail things so well.”

— Adir B., IL

“There are lots of different tests to pick from, and the price is surprisingly low for how much insight you get.”

— Olivia W., CA

“I was pleasantly surprised when I read the results. It was as if someone had sorted out my messy thoughts and given me useful tips to help me speak with more confidence.”

— Grace O., IE

“It was really solid, very detailed, and it actually helped me make sense of a lot of things.”

— Carla T., TT

“I was really impressed with the report. It was clear, thoughtful, and it reflected things I’ve been noticing about myself.”

— Jade H., US

“The questions made me think deeply and helped me become more self-aware.”

— Brooke S., US

“Reading through most of the questions made me feel understood. Although I’ve already worked through some of these issues, the questions still gave me useful insights and helped me learn more about myself.”

— Ryan M., US

“I usually take one or two tests each month, and this has become a good way for me to see how I’m doing.”

— Lucas W., US

“Most of the time, my results are in the 90 to 98th percentile compared to others. It really makes me feel like there’s something unique about me.”

— Ethan C., US

“I tried out some of the AI’s suggestions, and to be honest, they worked much better than I thought they would. Maybe this thing really is smarter than me.”

— Reece D., AU

Trusted by 22k+ Users Worldwide

CLEAR ANSWERS TO COMMON QUESTIONS

Frequently Asked Questions

Any questions left?

What does this questionnaire measure?

It screens for common cognitive distortions and faulty judgments that can affect mood and behavior. Results indicate which thinking patterns occur most often under stress.

Who is this questionnaire intended for?

It is appropriate for adults in clinical, counseling, or research settings, and for self-assessment when guidance is available. It is not designed as a stand-alone diagnostic tool.

How is the questionnaire completed?

Each statement is rated by how often the thought pattern occurs, using the response options provided. Answers should reflect typical experiences rather than rare events.

How long does it take and how many items are included?

Completion time is approximately 10 minutes. The questionnaire includes 50 items.

How should results be interpreted and used?

Scores can support screening, treatment planning, and tracking change over time, including use of established clinical thresholds where applicable. Interpretation should consider current symptoms, context, and other assessment information.

WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

About This Assessment

Error-Making Questionnaire Test

cognitive therapy cognitive distortions cbt

This self-report measure is designed to identify common patterns of cognitive errors that may contribute to emotional distress and maladaptive coping. The Error-Making Questionnaire prompts respondents to rate the frequency of specific thinking styles, supporting clinical formulation and treatment planning.

The instrument contains 50 items and typically requires about 10 minutes to complete. It was originally associated with work by James Reason and Donald A. Norman.

The Error-Making Questionnaire may be used as a screening tool to highlight areas for further clinical assessment, to facilitate discussion of automatic thoughts in cognitive-behavioral interventions, and to monitor change over time when repeated alongside other clinical indicators.

Author: Donald A. Norman, James Reason

Literature: Burns, D. D. Feeling good: The new mood therapy. William Morrow. 1980.; Beck, A. T., Emery, G., & Greenberg, R. L. Anxiety disorders and phobias: A cognitive perspective. Basic Books. 1985.

Test Question Form