Scientific Research Motivation Assessment Test

Learn what truly drives your scientific work in about 13 minutes. Get a clear, detailed motivation profile to support hiring, mentoring, and your own growth.
Start Online Test
Questions7013 minutes
Hi! My name is Freudly, i am an AI therapist, I will give you an interpretation of the test after you complete it.
08:30
October 2, 2025
October 2, 2025
Material has been updated
13820 views
1540 completions
1359 likes
Share
Scale Explorer
How the Scales are Structured
example score
20/49
Indirect Motivation Subsystem (IMS)
Measures how strongly external, mediated factors (e.g., social environment and working conditions) influence engagement in scientific work.
Low reliance on external factors
Moderate reliance on external factors
High reliance on external factors
721Low reliance on external factors2235Moderate reliance on external factors3649High reliance on external factors
A score of 20 falls in the low range, suggesting that external circumstances play a relatively minor role in sustaining your motivation for scientific activity.
example score
35/49
Reflective Motivational Subsystem (RMS)
Measures the extent to which a person reflects on, understands, and self-regulates their motives and goals in scientific activity.
Low reflection
Moderate reflection
High reflection
721Low reflection2235Moderate reflection3649High reflection
A score of 35 indicates a moderate level of reflection, suggesting generally good self-analysis and goal awareness in scientific work with some room for further strengthening of self-regulation.
example score
26/49
Antimotivation Subsystem (AS)
Measures the extent of demotivating factors (e.g., fatigue, disappointment, reduced interest) that can hinder engagement in scientific work.
Low barriers
Moderate barriers
High barriers
720Low barriers2134Moderate barriers3549High barriers
A score of 26 falls in the Moderate barriers range, suggesting noticeable but not overwhelming demotivating factors that may intermittently interfere with sustained scientific engagement.
example score
21/49
Cognitive Motivational Subsystem (CMS)
Measures the strength of motivation to acquire new knowledge, explore, and master the unknown in scientific work.
Low
Moderate
High
720Low2135Moderate3649High
A score of 21 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting a present but not dominant drive for learning and exploration in scientific activity.
example score
43/49
Value-Based Motivational Subsystem (VMS)
This scale measures how strongly scientific activity is integrated into a person's core values, beliefs, and life principles.
Low alignment
Moderate alignment
High alignment
721Low alignment2235Moderate alignment3649High alignment
A score of 43 indicates that scientific activity is highly meaningful for you and closely aligned with your personal values and guiding principles.
example score
26/49
Intrinsic Motivation Subsystem (IMS)
This scale measures the extent to which engagement in scientific work is driven by intrinsic interest, curiosity, and self-actualization motives.
Low
Moderate
High
721Low2234Moderate3549High
A score of 26 indicates a moderate predominance of internal incentives, suggesting intrinsic interest supports your scientific activity but is not the sole driving factor.
example score
29/49
Safety Motivation Subsystem (SMS)
This scale measures the extent to which a person seeks stability, predictability, and risk minimization in scientific work.
Low
Moderate
High
720Low2135Moderate3649High
A score of 29 indicates a moderate preference for stability and predictability, with some openness to uncertainty when necessary.
example score
31/49
Achievement Motivation Subsystem (AMS)
Measures the strength of a person's drive to achieve goals and gain recognition for scientific accomplishments.
Lower drive
Moderate drive
High drive
721Lower drive2235Moderate drive3649High drive
A score of 31 falls in the Moderate drive range, suggesting a generally steady focus on meeting research goals with a balanced need for recognition.
example score
14/49
Competition Subsystem (CS)
Measures the extent to which a person is motivated by rivalry and outperforming others in scientific work.
Low competition drive
Moderate competition drive
High competition drive
720Low competition drive2134Moderate competition drive3549High competition drive
A score of 14 indicates a low competitive orientation, suggesting scientific effort is less driven by rivalry or comparison with others.
example score
44/49
External Motivational Subsystem (EMS)
Measures how strongly external rewards, recognition, and material incentives influence engagement in scientific work.
Low
Moderate
High
721Low2235Moderate3649High
A score of 44 falls in the High range, indicating that external incentives and recognition are an important driver of your involvement in scientific activity.
example score
193/490
Overall Motivation Level (OML)
This scale measures the overall intensity of a person’s motivation to engage in scientific research activities by combining multiple motivational components.
Low
Moderate
High
70209Low210349Moderate350490High
A score of 193 falls in the Low range, suggesting relatively weak overall engagement and drive toward scientific work compared to higher scores on this scale.
Start Online Test
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS
Who Usually Takes This Test?
Graduate Students and PhDs
41%OF USERS
They take it to understand what keeps them engaged in research and how to sustain momentum through long projects and setbacks.
Research Scientists and Lecturers
34%OF USERS
They use it to map their motivational profile, prevent burnout, and align tasks with what drives their best work.
Academic HR and Supervisors
25%OF USERS
They administer it to better support, develop, and place researchers based on the motives that most influence performance and satisfaction.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
RESULTS YOU CAN ACTUALLY USE
What You’ll See After You Finish the Test
Scale Results
— Explained Clearly
Your scores across each test scale, translated into plain, usable insights. Not just numbers, but what they actually mean for your daily life, emotional state, and overall well-being.
AI-Powered
Interpretation
A structured, clinically grounded explanation. Our AI analyzes patterns and relationships between scales to provide a coherent interpretation — without alarmist language.
Statistical
Comparison
See how you compare to others. Your scores are placed in a statistical context, showing percentiles and trends based on anonymized platform data to help you understand what`s typical.
Practical
Recommendations
Actionable guidance tailored to your profile. Receive clear, realistic suggestions you can apply immediately — focused on coping, self-regulation, and realistic next steps.
AI-Detected
Insights
Key patterns you might not notice on your own. Surfacing subtle connections in your responses that help you better understand what may be driving your current results.
Discuss with
an AI Psychologist
Clarify, reflect, and explore right away. Talk through your outcomes, ask questions, and explore meanings in a calm, non-diagnostic dialogue environment.
Start Online Test
Used in 52+ countries
Benchmarking
See How You Compare
Once you finish the test, your results will be compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of the benchmarks we use to place your score in context.
Indirect Motivation Subsystem (IMS)
Average
26.2
Normal range
18.533.8
min.
7
max.
49
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Reflective motivational subsystem (Rms)
Average
34.5
Normal range
28.140.8
min.
7
max.
49
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Subsystem of Antimotivation (SoA)
Average
21.8
Normal range
15.628.1
min.
7
max.
49
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Cognitive Motivational Subsystem (CMS)
Average
25.2
Normal range
17.333.1
min.
7
max.
49
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Value-Motivational Subsystem (VS)
Average
25.4
Normal range
18.732.2
min.
7
max.
49
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Subsystem of Internal Motivation (SoIM)
Average
21.5
Normal range
15.627.4
min.
7
max.
49
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Safety Motivation Subsystem (SMS)
Average
30.4
Normal range
2535.8
min.
7
max.
49
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Achievement Motivation Subsystem (AMS)
Average
24.6
Normal range
19.429.8
min.
7
max.
49
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Subsystem "competition" (S")
Average
32.4
Normal range
27.337.6
min.
7
max.
49
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
External Motivational Subsystem (EMS)
Average
26.2
Normal range
18.633.8
min.
7
max.
49
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Overall Level of Motivation (OLoM)
Average
327.6
Normal range
266389.2
min.
70
max.
490
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Featured On
Rated 4.8/5 by Our Customers
Freudly really helped me discover parts of my personality I hadn’t noticed before. It strengthened the areas where I needed to grow and made me feel more grounded and confident in the parts that already worked well.
Emma C., US
I wanted to understand how serious my ADHD is, and now I finally do. I also realized I need to work on my self-esteem. It has been low for a long time, and that makes daily life harder than it should be.
Mateo R., CA
Reading each question felt like someone really understood me. Even though I’ve already dealt with much of this, reflecting still helped me learn something new about myself.
Caroline F., US
The process is simple. The test covers everything you need, and you’ll get a clear breakdown of your results. For just a few dollars, it’s a great value.
Klara N., CZ
I kept thinking there might be a small chance, but now I know for sure. The questions were easy to understand, and the whole process was straightforward.
Bruno M., BR
I really enjoyed this experience. I learned a lot, and it helped me make sense of my thoughts and the feeling I’ve had for a long time that I may have grown up with undiagnosed ADHD.
Alice B., FR
Great platform — the insights were genuinely meaningful!
Daniel W., DE
Everything was easy to follow. The tools you get at the end are genuinely helpful for self-growth, and the price is very reasonable. I really appreciate that.
Sofia M., ES
Surprisingly accurate — honestly didn’t expect it to nail things so well.
Adir B., IL
There are lots of different tests to pick from, and the price is surprisingly low for how much insight you get.
Olivia W., CA
I was pleasantly surprised when I read the results. It was as if someone had sorted out my messy thoughts and given me useful tips to help me speak with more confidence.
Grace O., IE
It was really solid, very detailed, and it actually helped me make sense of a lot of things.
Carla T., TT
I was really impressed with the report. It was clear, thoughtful, and it reflected things I’ve been noticing about myself.
Jade H., US
The questions made me think deeply and helped me become more self-aware.
Brooke S., US
Reading through most of the questions made me feel understood. Although I’ve already worked through some of these issues, the questions still gave me useful insights and helped me learn more about myself.
Ryan M., US
I usually take one or two tests each month, and this has become a good way for me to see how I’m doing.
Lucas W., US
Most of the time, my results are in the 90 to 98th percentile compared to others. It really makes me feel like there’s something unique about me.
Ethan C., US
I tried out some of the AI’s suggestions, and to be honest, they worked much better than I thought they would. Maybe this thing really is smarter than me.
Reece D., AU
Trusted by 22k+ Users Worldwide
CLEAR ANSWERS TO COMMON QUESTIONS
Frequently Asked Questions

Any questions left?

What does this assessment measure?
It measures multiple directions of motivation related to professional scientific work. Results form a profile showing which motives are stronger or weaker relative to one another.
Who is this assessment intended for?
It is intended for individuals engaged in scientific work, including researchers, lecturers, and graduate students. It may also be used by supervisors or HR staff for selection and development decisions.
How long does it take and how many items are included?
Estimated completion time is about 13 minutes. The assessment includes 70 items.
How should responses be selected?
Select the response that best matches typical behavior and preferences in scientific work. Answer all items and avoid spending excessive time on any single item.
Is there a validity or lie scale in the online version?
No, the online version does not include a lie scale. Scores reflect only the motivational scales included in the profile.
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES
About This Assessment
Methodology for Studying Motivation in Scientific Research Test

Scientific Research Motivation Assessment Test

Motivation is a central determinant of persistence and performance in academic and research settings. The Scientific Research Motivation Assessment is a self-report measure designed to characterize an individual’s motivational profile related to scientific work, including the relative strength of different motivational orientations.

The instrument consists of 70 items and typically requires about 13 minutes to complete. Items are organized to sample multiple, relatively distinct dimensions, supporting a profile-based interpretation rather than a single global score. The Scientific Research Motivation Assessment is attributed to Edward L. Deci and Richard M. Ryan and is intended for use in research, training, and organizational contexts where understanding motivation for scientific activity may inform supervision, professional development, or related decision-making.

Author: Edward L. Deci, Richard M. Ryan
Literature: Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum Press. 1985.
Test Question Form
You Might Also Like
Volitional Organization of Personality Assessment
This measure is designed to assess volitional self-regulation and goal-dire…
Start Test
Value Orientation Assessment
This instrument is designed to assess an individual’s relative prioritizati…
Start Test
Body Image Questionnaire
This measure is used to obtain a brief self-report profile of body image at…
Start Test
Comments
Leave a Comment