Gaming Addiction Assessment Test

Understand whether gaming is a habit or an addiction in about 5 minutes. Get clear, fast insights into virtual attachment and actionable next steps for healthier balance.

Start Online Test

Questions: 245 minutes

Hi! My name is Freudly, i am an AI therapist, I will give you an interpretation of the test after you complete it.

08:30

October 2, 2025

October 2, 2025
Material has been updated

October 2, 2025
Material has been published

12052 views

1066 completions

868 likes

Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

example score

84/120

Gaming Addiction (GA)

Measures the overall severity of problematic involvement in online gaming and attachment to the virtual environment.

Low

Moderate

High

24 – 55: Low | 56 – 87: Moderate | 88 – 120: High

A score of 84 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting noticeable signs of problematic gaming involvement that may be affecting daily life and relationships.

example score

19/30

Physical Symptoms (PS)

Assesses the intensity of physical signs associated with problematic gaming involvement, such as sleep disruption and fatigue.

Low

Moderate

High

6 – 13: Low | 14 – 22: Moderate | 23 – 30: High

A score of 19 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting noticeable but not extreme physical strain (e.g., sleep disturbance or fatigue) linked to gaming patterns.

example score

9/15

Behavioral (B)

Measures the degree of behavioral engagement in gaming and readiness to interact with the game world.

Low engagement

Moderate engagement

High engagement

3 – 6: Low engagement | 7 – 11: Moderate engagement | 12 – 15: High engagement

A score of 9 indicates moderate behavioral engagement, suggesting regular involvement in gaming with a noticeable readiness to interact with the game world.

example score

6/15

Cognitive (C)

Assesses interest in gameplay and the tendency to seek out information about the game.

Low

Moderate

High

3 – 7: Low | 8 – 11: Moderate | 12 – 15: High

A score of 6 falls in the Low range, suggesting relatively limited interest in gameplay and infrequent information-seeking about the game.

example score

13/15

Emotional (E)

Measures the emotional tone of gaming and the degree of pleasure derived from playing.

Low pleasure

Moderate pleasure

High pleasure

3 – 7: Low pleasure | 8 – 11: Moderate pleasure | 12 – 15: High pleasure

A score of 13 indicates a predominantly positive emotional tone during gaming and strong enjoyment from playing.

example score

15/45

Attitudes Toward Gaming (ATG)

Assesses the emotional, cognitive, and behavioral importance of gaming in the respondent’s life.

Low importance

Moderate importance

High importance

9 – 20: Low importance | 21 – 33: Moderate importance | 34 – 45: High importance

A score of 15 falls in the Low importance range, suggesting gaming is generally not a central focus of the respondent’s emotions, thoughts, or daily behavior.

example score

10/15

Power (P)

Measures the tendency to seek dominance and control in interpersonal interactions, which in gaming can appear as striving for leadership and influence over others.

Low

Moderate

High

3 – 7: Low | 8 – 11: Moderate | 12 – 15: High

A score of 10 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting a balanced but noticeable preference for taking charge or leading, including in online gaming contexts.

example score

13/15

Susceptibility to Others' Opinions (StOO)

Assesses how strongly the respondent’s behavior and self-evaluation depend on the opinions and expectations of other people or the gaming group.

Low referentiality

Moderate referentiality

High referentiality

3 – 7: Low referentiality | 8 – 11: Moderate referentiality | 12 – 15: High referentiality

A score of 13 indicates high referentiality, suggesting that others’ opinions—potentially including the gaming community—may strongly influence the respondent’s gaming-related choices.

example score

7/15

Attraction (A)

Measures how attractive and personally significant other people are to the respondent, reflecting patterns of social connection relevant to gaming involvement.

Low

Moderate

High

3 – 7: Low | 8 – 11: Moderate | 12 – 15: High

A score of 7 falls in the Low range, suggesting other people are perceived as less attractive or significant as social partners, which may be associated with weaker pull toward real-world connections in the gaming context.

example score

18/45

Interpersonal Relationships (IR)

Assesses how much a person’s significant interactions and emotional support shift from real-life relationships into the gaming environment.

Low shift to gaming

Moderate shift to gaming

High shift to gaming

9 – 21: Low shift to gaming | 22 – 33: Moderate shift to gaming | 34 – 45: High shift to gaming

A score of 18 falls in the Low shift to gaming range, suggesting relatively preserved real-life communication with limited reliance on gaming relationships for significant support.

Start Online Test

just completed the test

DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Concerned heavy gamers

41%OF USERS

People who spend many hours gaming and want a quick check on whether play is starting to replace real-life relationships and responsibilities.

Parents and partners

34%OF USERS

Family members or partners worried that a loved one is withdrawing into games and using virtual connections instead of real support.

Psychologists and counselors

25%OF USERS

Mental health professionals using a fast screening tool to understand gaming involvement and plan focused work on relationships and balance.

BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.

RESULTS YOU CAN ACTUALLY USE

What You’ll See After You Finish the Test

Scale Results
— Explained Clearly

Your scores across each test scale, translated into plain, usable insights. Not just numbers, but what they actually mean for your daily life, emotional state, and overall well-being.

AI-Powered
Interpretation

A structured, clinically grounded explanation. Our AI analyzes patterns and relationships between scales to provide a coherent interpretation — without alarmist language.

Statistical
Comparison

See how you compare to others. Your scores are placed in a statistical context, showing percentiles and trends based on anonymized platform data to help you understand what`s typical.

Practical
Recommendations

Actionable guidance tailored to your profile. Receive clear, realistic suggestions you can apply immediately — focused on coping, self-regulation, and realistic next steps.

AI-Detected
Insights

Key patterns you might not notice on your own. Surfacing subtle connections in your responses that help you better understand what may be driving your current results.

Discuss with
an AI Psychologist

Clarify, reflect, and explore right away. Talk through your outcomes, ask questions, and explore meanings in a calm, non-diagnostic dialogue environment.

Start Online Test

Used in 52+ countries

Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you finish the test, your results will be compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of the benchmarks we use to place your score in context.

Game Addiction (GA)

Average

72.7

Normal range

56.6 — 88.8

min.

max.

120

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Physical Manifestations (PM)

Average

Normal range

18.5 — 27.5

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Behavioral (B)

Average

9.7

Normal range

8.2 — 11.2

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Cognitive (C)

Average

8.2

Normal range

6.4 — 10.1

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Emotional (E)

Average

Normal range

6.5 — 9.5

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Attitude toward the game (Attg)

Average

19.1

Normal range

13.2 — 24.9

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Power (P)

Average

7.9

Normal range

6.2 — 9.6

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Referentiality (R)

Average

10.8

Normal range

8.8 — 12.8

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Attraction (A)

Average

7.9

Normal range

6.3 — 9.6

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Interpersonal Relationships (IR)

Average

29.5

Normal range

25 — 34

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Start Online Test

Featured On

Rated 4.8/5 by Our Customers

“Freudly really helped me discover parts of my personality I hadn’t noticed before. It strengthened the areas where I needed to grow and made me feel more grounded and confident in the parts that already worked well.”

— Emma C., US

“I wanted to understand how serious my ADHD is, and now I finally do. I also realized I need to work on my self-esteem. It has been low for a long time, and that makes daily life harder than it should be.”

— Mateo R., CA

“Reading each question felt like someone really understood me. Even though I’ve already dealt with much of this, reflecting still helped me learn something new about myself.”

— Caroline F., US

“The process is simple. The test covers everything you need, and you’ll get a clear breakdown of your results. For just a few dollars, it’s a great value.”

— Klara N., CZ

“I kept thinking there might be a small chance, but now I know for sure. The questions were easy to understand, and the whole process was straightforward.”

— Bruno M., BR

“I really enjoyed this experience. I learned a lot, and it helped me make sense of my thoughts and the feeling I’ve had for a long time that I may have grown up with undiagnosed ADHD.”

— Alice B., FR

“Great platform — the insights were genuinely meaningful!”

— Daniel W., DE

“Everything was easy to follow. The tools you get at the end are genuinely helpful for self-growth, and the price is very reasonable. I really appreciate that.”

— Sofia M., ES

“Surprisingly accurate — honestly didn’t expect it to nail things so well.”

— Adir B., IL

“There are lots of different tests to pick from, and the price is surprisingly low for how much insight you get.”

— Olivia W., CA

“I was pleasantly surprised when I read the results. It was as if someone had sorted out my messy thoughts and given me useful tips to help me speak with more confidence.”

— Grace O., IE

“It was really solid, very detailed, and it actually helped me make sense of a lot of things.”

— Carla T., TT

“I was really impressed with the report. It was clear, thoughtful, and it reflected things I’ve been noticing about myself.”

— Jade H., US

“The questions made me think deeply and helped me become more self-aware.”

— Brooke S., US

“Reading through most of the questions made me feel understood. Although I’ve already worked through some of these issues, the questions still gave me useful insights and helped me learn more about myself.”

— Ryan M., US

“I usually take one or two tests each month, and this has become a good way for me to see how I’m doing.”

— Lucas W., US

“Most of the time, my results are in the 90 to 98th percentile compared to others. It really makes me feel like there’s something unique about me.”

— Ethan C., US

“I tried out some of the AI’s suggestions, and to be honest, they worked much better than I thought they would. Maybe this thing really is smarter than me.”

— Reece D., AU

Trusted by 22k+ Users Worldwide

CLEAR ANSWERS TO COMMON QUESTIONS

Frequently Asked Questions

Any questions left?

What does this questionnaire measure?

It screens for patterns consistent with problematic online gaming and possible addiction. It also assesses whether gaming functions as a substitute for real-life contact and emotional support.

Who is the questionnaire intended for?

It is intended for adolescents and adults who report difficulty controlling time spent in online games. It may be used in psychological or psychotherapeutic assessment and monitoring.

How long does it take and how many items are included?

Completion typically takes about 5 minutes. The questionnaire includes 24 items.

How should items be answered?

Select the response that best matches typical behavior and experiences over recent weeks. Answer all items and avoid overthinking individual questions.

How are results interpreted and used?

Scores indicate the degree of immersion and loss of control, including reliance on a virtual “significant other.” Results support clinical formulation and intervention planning and do not provide a standalone diagnosis.

WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

About This Assessment

Method for Diagnosing Game Addiction, DGA Test

Gaming Addiction Assessment Test

addiction cyberpsychology computer addiction computer games

This measure is designed to screen for problematic patterns of video game use and related impairment. The Gaming Addiction Assessment provides a brief self-report format to support clinical interviewing and case formulation.

The instrument includes 24 items and typically takes about 5 minutes to complete. It may be used with adolescents or adults in outpatient or community settings to quantify symptom severity and identify areas for follow-up.

Items ask respondents to rate behaviors and experiences commonly associated with excessive gaming (e.g., preoccupation, reduced control, and interference with daily functioning). The Gaming Addiction Assessment is attributed to Mark D. Griffiths and is intended to inform, not replace, comprehensive diagnostic evaluation.

Author: Mark D. Griffiths

Literature: King, D. L., Delfabbro, P. H., & Griffiths, M. D. The assessment of Internet gaming disorder: A systematic review. Clinical Psychology Review. 2013.

Test Question Form