Home
Psychological tests
Metacognitive States Questionnaire (SMI)

Metacognitive States Questionnaire (SMI) Test

In 4 minutes, understand how you monitor your thinking, focus, and progress during studying or exams. This 20 question snapshot pinpoints strengths and weak spots so support can be targeted fast.

Start Online Test

Questions: 204 minutes

Hi! My name is Freudly, i am an AI therapist, I will give you an interpretation of the test after you complete it.

08:30

October 2, 2025

October 2, 2025
Material has been updated

October 2, 2025
Material has been published

20816 views

2031 completion

1717 likes

Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

example score

13/20

Self-Monitoring (S)

Assesses how well a person monitors and evaluates their own actions during task performance.

Low self-check

Moderate self-check

High self-check

5 – 9: Low self-check | 10 – 15: Moderate self-check | 16 – 20: High self-check

A score of 13 falls in the Moderate self-check range, indicating a generally consistent ability to track and adjust performance with occasional lapses under demand.

example score

13/20

Task Engagement (TE)

Measures how engaged and focused a person is on the task they are currently performing.

Low engagement

Moderate engagement

High engagement

5 – 10: Low engagement | 11 – 15: Moderate engagement | 16 – 20: High engagement

A score of 13 indicates moderate engagement, suggesting generally adequate focus with occasional lapses in concentration.

example score

13/20

Use of Strategies (UoS)

Assesses how actively a person applies deliberate strategies to solve problems and reach goals during task performance.

Limited strategy use

Moderate strategy use

Strong strategy use

5 – 9: Limited strategy use | 10 – 15: Moderate strategy use | 16 – 20: Strong strategy use

A score of 13 indicates moderate strategy use, suggesting you apply some effective approaches but not consistently across tasks.

example score

11/20

Action Planning (AP)

Action Planning measures how well a person pre-plans their actions and anticipates likely outcomes while working on tasks.

Low planning

Moderate planning

High planning

5 – 9: Low planning | 10 – 14: Moderate planning | 15 – 20: High planning

A score of 11 indicates a moderate level of action planning, suggesting some advance planning is present but may be inconsistent under task demands.

Start Online Test

just completed the test

DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Exam and test takers

44%OF USERS

Students and applicants use it to see how well they monitor focus, control problem-solving, and stay on track under exam pressure.

Teachers and academic tutors

31%OF USERS

Educators take or assign it to quickly spot where learners lose self-control during studying and adjust support strategies.

Educational psychologists and coaches

25%OF USERS

Specialists use it to assess momentary self-regulation and awareness during learning tasks and guide targeted skill-building.

BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.

RESULTS YOU CAN ACTUALLY USE

What You’ll See After You Finish the Test

Scale Results
— Explained Clearly

Your scores across each test scale, translated into plain, usable insights. Not just numbers, but what they actually mean for your daily life, emotional state, and overall well-being.

AI-Powered
Interpretation

A structured, clinically grounded explanation. Our AI analyzes patterns and relationships between scales to provide a coherent interpretation — without alarmist language.

Statistical
Comparison

See how you compare to others. Your scores are placed in a statistical context, showing percentiles and trends based on anonymized platform data to help you understand what`s typical.

Practical
Recommendations

Actionable guidance tailored to your profile. Receive clear, realistic suggestions you can apply immediately — focused on coping, self-regulation, and realistic next steps.

AI-Detected
Insights

Key patterns you might not notice on your own. Surfacing subtle connections in your responses that help you better understand what may be driving your current results.

Discuss with
an AI Psychologist

Clarify, reflect, and explore right away. Talk through your outcomes, ask questions, and explore meanings in a calm, non-diagnostic dialogue environment.

Start Online Test

Used in 52+ countries

Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you finish the test, your results will be compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of the benchmarks we use to place your score in context.

Self-check (S)

Average

12.3

Normal range

9.7 — 15

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Engagement in activity (Eia)

Average

Normal range

6.7 — 11.4

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Using Strategies (US)

Average

Normal range

10.3 — 15.6

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Action Planning (AP)

Average

13.8

Normal range

11.8 — 15.7

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Start Online Test

Featured On

Rated 4.8/5 by Our Customers

“Freudly really helped me discover parts of my personality I hadn’t noticed before. It strengthened the areas where I needed to grow and made me feel more grounded and confident in the parts that already worked well.”

— Emma C., US

“I wanted to understand how serious my ADHD is, and now I finally do. I also realized I need to work on my self-esteem. It has been low for a long time, and that makes daily life harder than it should be.”

— Mateo R., CA

“Reading each question felt like someone really understood me. Even though I’ve already dealt with much of this, reflecting still helped me learn something new about myself.”

— Caroline F., US

“The process is simple. The test covers everything you need, and you’ll get a clear breakdown of your results. For just a few dollars, it’s a great value.”

— Klara N., CZ

“I kept thinking there might be a small chance, but now I know for sure. The questions were easy to understand, and the whole process was straightforward.”

— Bruno M., BR

“I really enjoyed this experience. I learned a lot, and it helped me make sense of my thoughts and the feeling I’ve had for a long time that I may have grown up with undiagnosed ADHD.”

— Alice B., FR

“Great platform — the insights were genuinely meaningful!”

— Daniel W., DE

“Everything was easy to follow. The tools you get at the end are genuinely helpful for self-growth, and the price is very reasonable. I really appreciate that.”

— Sofia M., ES

“Surprisingly accurate — honestly didn’t expect it to nail things so well.”

— Adir B., IL

“There are lots of different tests to pick from, and the price is surprisingly low for how much insight you get.”

— Olivia W., CA

“I was pleasantly surprised when I read the results. It was as if someone had sorted out my messy thoughts and given me useful tips to help me speak with more confidence.”

— Grace O., IE

“It was really solid, very detailed, and it actually helped me make sense of a lot of things.”

— Carla T., TT

“I was really impressed with the report. It was clear, thoughtful, and it reflected things I’ve been noticing about myself.”

— Jade H., US

“The questions made me think deeply and helped me become more self-aware.”

— Brooke S., US

“Reading through most of the questions made me feel understood. Although I’ve already worked through some of these issues, the questions still gave me useful insights and helped me learn more about myself.”

— Ryan M., US

“I usually take one or two tests each month, and this has become a good way for me to see how I’m doing.”

— Lucas W., US

“Most of the time, my results are in the 90 to 98th percentile compared to others. It really makes me feel like there’s something unique about me.”

— Ethan C., US

“I tried out some of the AI’s suggestions, and to be honest, they worked much better than I thought they would. Maybe this thing really is smarter than me.”

— Reece D., AU

Trusted by 22k+ Users Worldwide

CLEAR ANSWERS TO COMMON QUESTIONS

Frequently Asked Questions

Any questions left?

What does this questionnaire measure?

It measures momentary metacognitive states during studying or test taking, including monitoring, planning, and self-checking. It provides an estimate of how well thinking and attention are being regulated while working on tasks.

When should it be administered?

It is intended for completion during or immediately after a learning or assessment activity. It is most informative when the situation is specific and recent.

How long does it take and how many items are included?

Completion time is about 4 minutes. The questionnaire includes 20 items.

How should responses be selected?

Select the option that best matches what was happening during the activity being evaluated. Respond to all items and avoid spending excessive time on any single item.

How should scores be interpreted?

Higher scores generally indicate stronger awareness and regulation of cognitive activity in the assessed situation, while lower scores suggest weaker monitoring and control. Results are typically used to identify patterns and targets for skills training rather than to assign a diagnosis.

WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

About This Assessment

Metacognitive States Questionnaire (SMI) Test

metacognition self-regulation

This self-report measure assesses metacognitive states during task performance, such as monitoring and regulating one’s thinking while learning or completing evaluative activities. The Metacognitive States Questionnaire (SMI) is intended to capture momentary aspects of cognitive self-awareness and self-control in achievement-related contexts.

The instrument includes 20 items and typically takes about 4 minutes to complete. It can be used in educational, coaching, or clinical-adjacent settings to support discussions about attention regulation, perceived cognitive control, and self-evaluative processes during performance demands. The Metacognitive States Questionnaire (SMI) is attributed to Adrian Wells.

Author: Adrian Wells

Literature: Flavell, J. H. Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist. 1979.; O’Neil, H. F., Jr., & Abedi, J. Reliability and validity of a state metacognitive inventory: Potential for alternative assessment. CRESST, University of California, Los Angeles. 1998.

Test Question Form