Home
Psychological tests
Metacognitive Components of Sport Performance

Metacognitive Components of Sport Performance Test

Understand how you manage thoughts and emotions in training and competition in about 7 minutes. Get clear, practical insights to boost focus, motivation, and resilience while reducing burnout risk.

Start Online Test

Questions: 367 minutes

Hi! My name is Freudly, i am an AI therapist, I will give you an interpretation of the test after you complete it.

08:30

October 2, 2025

October 2, 2025
Material has been updated

October 2, 2025
Material has been published

28999 views

2045 completions

1761 likes

Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

example score

3/7

Metacognitive Experiences (ME)

Measures the emotional accompaniment of thinking during sports, such as confidence, clarity, and perceived difficulty while performing and self-regulating.

Low

Moderate

High

1 – 2.91: Low | 2.92 – 5.43: Moderate | 5.44 – 7: High

A score of 3 indicates a moderate level of metacognitive experiences, suggesting generally stable but variable feelings of confidence and clarity during performance.

example score

3/7

Sport Performance Analysis and Evaluation (SPAaE)

Measures how well an athlete reflects on and evaluates their performance to consciously apply experience and improve effectiveness.

Low reflection

Moderate reflection

High reflection

1 – 4.29: Low reflection | 4.3 – 6.15: Moderate reflection | 6.16 – 7: High reflection

A score of 3 indicates a lower level of reflective analysis and performance evaluation, suggesting limited use of past experience to guide adjustments in training or competition.

example score

3/7

Error Monitoring (EM)

Measures how well an athlete notices mistakes and difficulties, analyzes them, and refocuses attention to regain effective performance.

Low monitoring

Moderate monitoring

High monitoring

1 – 2.84: Low monitoring | 2.85 – 5.26: Moderate monitoring | 5.27 – 7: High monitoring

A score of 3 indicates moderate error monitoring, suggesting you generally notice mistakes and can reorient attention, though consistency may vary under pressure.

example score

4/7

Pre-Performance Mindset Formation (PMF)

Measures how effectively an athlete uses cognitive strategies to enter and maintain an optimal competitive mindset in the moment.

Developing mindset

Situational mindset

Consistent optimal mindset

1 – 3.87: Developing mindset | 3.88 – 6.07: Situational mindset | 6.08 – 7: Consistent optimal mindset

A score of 4 indicates a situational ability to set and hold an effective mindset, with strategies that work in some contexts but may be less consistent under pressure.

example score

4/7

Adaptation to Change (AtC)

Measures how well an athlete monitors the situation and flexibly applies prior experience to adapt to changing sport demands.

Low adaptability

Moderate adaptability

High adaptability

1 – 3.69: Low adaptability | 3.7 – 5.69: Moderate adaptability | 5.7 – 7: High adaptability

A score of 4 indicates moderate adaptability, suggesting the athlete can adjust to some changes but may not consistently apply flexible metacognitive monitoring in new conditions.

example score

4/7

Goal-Oriented Organization of Sport Activity (GOoSA)

Measures how well an athlete sets personally meaningful goals and maintains a coherent athletic identity over time despite setbacks and uncertainty.

Low

Moderate

High

1 – 3.92: Low | 3.93 – 6.16: Moderate | 6.17 – 7: High

A score of 4 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting a generally workable ability to organize goals around one’s athletic identity, with some inconsistency under pressure or uncertainty.

Start Online Test

just completed the test

DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Competitive athletes under pressure

46%OF USERS

Athletes preparing for important competitions who want to manage focus, nerves, and decision-making when it matters most.

Coaches and sport psychologists

33%OF USERS

Practitioners who use the results to spot mental skill gaps and tailor training, feedback, and coping strategies.

Injury return and burnout risk

21%OF USERS

Athletes rebuilding confidence and consistency after setbacks who want to track emotions, motivation, and self-control in training.

BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.

RESULTS YOU CAN ACTUALLY USE

What You’ll See After You Finish the Test

Scale Results
— Explained Clearly

Your scores across each test scale, translated into plain, usable insights. Not just numbers, but what they actually mean for your daily life, emotional state, and overall well-being.

AI-Powered
Interpretation

A structured, clinically grounded explanation. Our AI analyzes patterns and relationships between scales to provide a coherent interpretation — without alarmist language.

Statistical
Comparison

See how you compare to others. Your scores are placed in a statistical context, showing percentiles and trends based on anonymized platform data to help you understand what`s typical.

Practical
Recommendations

Actionable guidance tailored to your profile. Receive clear, realistic suggestions you can apply immediately — focused on coping, self-regulation, and realistic next steps.

AI-Detected
Insights

Key patterns you might not notice on your own. Surfacing subtle connections in your responses that help you better understand what may be driving your current results.

Discuss with
an AI Psychologist

Clarify, reflect, and explore right away. Talk through your outcomes, ask questions, and explore meanings in a calm, non-diagnostic dialogue environment.

Start Online Test

Used in 52+ countries

Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you finish the test, your results will be compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of the benchmarks we use to place your score in context.

Metacognitive experiences (Me)

Average

4.7

Normal range

3.7 — 5.8

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Analysis and Assessment of Diabetes Mellitus (AaAoDM)

Average

4.5

Normal range

3.8 — 5.3

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Error Monitoring (EM)

Average

4.3

Normal range

3.5 — 5

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Setting the Mindset (StM)

Average

2.5

Normal range

1.6 — 3.4

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Adaptation to Change (AtC)

Average

5.4

Normal range

4.4 — 6.3

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Target organization SD (ToS)

Average

3.5

Normal range

2.4 — 4.5

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Start Online Test

Featured On

Rated 4.8/5 by Our Customers

“Freudly really helped me discover parts of my personality I hadn’t noticed before. It strengthened the areas where I needed to grow and made me feel more grounded and confident in the parts that already worked well.”

— Emma C., US

“I wanted to understand how serious my ADHD is, and now I finally do. I also realized I need to work on my self-esteem. It has been low for a long time, and that makes daily life harder than it should be.”

— Mateo R., CA

“Reading each question felt like someone really understood me. Even though I’ve already dealt with much of this, reflecting still helped me learn something new about myself.”

— Caroline F., US

“The process is simple. The test covers everything you need, and you’ll get a clear breakdown of your results. For just a few dollars, it’s a great value.”

— Klara N., CZ

“I kept thinking there might be a small chance, but now I know for sure. The questions were easy to understand, and the whole process was straightforward.”

— Bruno M., BR

“I really enjoyed this experience. I learned a lot, and it helped me make sense of my thoughts and the feeling I’ve had for a long time that I may have grown up with undiagnosed ADHD.”

— Alice B., FR

“Great platform — the insights were genuinely meaningful!”

— Daniel W., DE

“Everything was easy to follow. The tools you get at the end are genuinely helpful for self-growth, and the price is very reasonable. I really appreciate that.”

— Sofia M., ES

“Surprisingly accurate — honestly didn’t expect it to nail things so well.”

— Adir B., IL

“There are lots of different tests to pick from, and the price is surprisingly low for how much insight you get.”

— Olivia W., CA

“I was pleasantly surprised when I read the results. It was as if someone had sorted out my messy thoughts and given me useful tips to help me speak with more confidence.”

— Grace O., IE

“It was really solid, very detailed, and it actually helped me make sense of a lot of things.”

— Carla T., TT

“I was really impressed with the report. It was clear, thoughtful, and it reflected things I’ve been noticing about myself.”

— Jade H., US

“The questions made me think deeply and helped me become more self-aware.”

— Brooke S., US

“Reading through most of the questions made me feel understood. Although I’ve already worked through some of these issues, the questions still gave me useful insights and helped me learn more about myself.”

— Ryan M., US

“I usually take one or two tests each month, and this has become a good way for me to see how I’m doing.”

— Lucas W., US

“Most of the time, my results are in the 90 to 98th percentile compared to others. It really makes me feel like there’s something unique about me.”

— Ethan C., US

“I tried out some of the AI’s suggestions, and to be honest, they worked much better than I thought they would. Maybe this thing really is smarter than me.”

— Reece D., AU

Trusted by 22k+ Users Worldwide

CLEAR ANSWERS TO COMMON QUESTIONS

Frequently Asked Questions

Any questions left?

What does this test measure?

It measures awareness and management of thoughts and feelings related to training and competition. Scores cover metacognitive knowledge, regulation, and sport-related emotional experiences.

Who is this test intended for?

It is intended for athletes in any sport and at any level. It may also be used by coaches or sport psychology staff to inform mental skills work.

How long does it take and how many questions are included?

Estimated completion time is about 7 minutes. The test includes 36 questions.

How should items be answered?

Select the response that best matches typical thoughts, decisions, and feelings in sport settings. Respond based on usual patterns rather than a single unusual event.

How are results used?

Results identify strengths and areas for improvement in mental monitoring, self-control strategies, and emotional responses during sport activity. They are intended to guide goal setting and targeted interventions, not to serve as a standalone diagnosis.

WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

About This Assessment

Metacognitive Components of Sports Activity Test

Metacognitive Components of Sport Performance Test

metacognition sport

This measure assesses self-reported metacognitive processes relevant to training and competition. The Metacognitive Components of Sport Performance is intended to characterize how individuals monitor and manage their thoughts, attention, and emotional responses in sport settings. It was developed by John H. Flavell and Adrian P. Wells.

The questionnaire consists of 36 items and typically takes about 7 minutes to complete. Item content broadly reflects awareness of one’s thinking, regulatory strategies used to guide performance-relevant cognition and behavior, and subjective experiences associated with sport participation. The Metacognitive Components of Sport Performance may be used to support case conceptualization, identify potential targets for psychological skills interventions, and monitor perceived change over time when interpreted alongside other clinical and performance-relevant information.

Author: Adrian P. Wells, John H. Flavell

Literature: Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 1994.

Test Question Form