Leadership Assessment Test

Understand how employees view leadership trust, including effectiveness, integrity, and care in about 6 minutes. Get clear insights to guide coaching, strengthen communication, and improve team climate.

Start Online Test

Questions: 306 minutes

Hi! My name is Freudly, i am an AI therapist, I will give you an interpretation of the test after you complete it.

08:30

October 2, 2025

October 2, 2025
Material has been updated

October 2, 2025
Material has been published

18825 views

2304 completions

1947 likes

Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

example score

40/50

Care (C)

Measures how much a manager demonstrates attention, support, and involvement in employees’ needs and well-being.

Low care

Moderate care

High care

10 – 22: Low care | 23 – 37: Moderate care | 38 – 50: High care

A score of 40 falls in the High care range, indicating the manager is generally perceived as attentive and supportive toward the team.

example score

34/50

Integrity (I)

This scale measures how employees perceive a leader’s honesty, fairness, and adherence to ethical principles.

Low integrity trust

Moderate integrity trust

High integrity trust

10 – 22: Low integrity trust | 23 – 37: Moderate integrity trust | 38 – 50: High integrity trust

A score of 34 falls in the Moderate integrity trust range, suggesting generally positive perceptions of the leader’s ethics with some areas where confidence may be mixed.

example score

24/50

Results Orientation (RO)

Measures how effectively a manager achieves goals and ensures tasks are completed.

Low effectiveness

Moderate effectiveness

High effectiveness

10 – 22: Low effectiveness | 23 – 37: Moderate effectiveness | 38 – 50: High effectiveness

A score of 24 falls in the Moderate effectiveness range, suggesting task achievement is generally adequate but may be inconsistent in some situations.

example score

70/150

Overall Trust in Leadership (OTiL)

This scale measures employees’ overall level of trust in management based on perceived effectiveness, integrity, and care.

Low trust

Moderate trust

High trust

30 – 69: Low trust | 70 – 110: Moderate trust | 111 – 150: High trust

A score of 70 falls in the Moderate trust range, suggesting a generally acceptable perception of management with room to strengthen consistency and confidence.

Start Online Test

just completed the test

DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

HR and People Ops

41%OF USERS

Use it to quickly measure trust in managers, spot leadership risks, and plan training or culture initiatives.

Team Leaders and Managers

34%OF USERS

Take it to see how their effectiveness, integrity, and care are perceived by the team and what to improve.

Employees in Team Surveys

25%OF USERS

Complete it as part of internal feedback to share how much they trust leadership and why.

BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.

RESULTS YOU CAN ACTUALLY USE

What You’ll See After You Finish the Test

Scale Results
— Explained Clearly

Your scores across each test scale, translated into plain, usable insights. Not just numbers, but what they actually mean for your daily life, emotional state, and overall well-being.

AI-Powered
Interpretation

A structured, clinically grounded explanation. Our AI analyzes patterns and relationships between scales to provide a coherent interpretation — without alarmist language.

Statistical
Comparison

See how you compare to others. Your scores are placed in a statistical context, showing percentiles and trends based on anonymized platform data to help you understand what`s typical.

Practical
Recommendations

Actionable guidance tailored to your profile. Receive clear, realistic suggestions you can apply immediately — focused on coping, self-regulation, and realistic next steps.

AI-Detected
Insights

Key patterns you might not notice on your own. Surfacing subtle connections in your responses that help you better understand what may be driving your current results.

Discuss with
an AI Psychologist

Clarify, reflect, and explore right away. Talk through your outcomes, ask questions, and explore meanings in a calm, non-diagnostic dialogue environment.

Start Online Test

Used in 52+ countries

Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you finish the test, your results will be compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of the benchmarks we use to place your score in context.

Showing Care (SC)

Average

38.6

Normal range

32.5 — 44.7

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Integrity (I)

Average

27.6

Normal range

22.5 — 32.8

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Effectiveness (E)

Average

30.9

Normal range

23.8 — 38

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Overall assessment of the level of trust in management (Oaotlotim)

Average

97.9

Normal range

81.2 — 114.6

min.

max.

150

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Start Online Test

Featured On

Rated 4.8/5 by Our Customers

“Freudly really helped me discover parts of my personality I hadn’t noticed before. It strengthened the areas where I needed to grow and made me feel more grounded and confident in the parts that already worked well.”

— Emma C., US

“I wanted to understand how serious my ADHD is, and now I finally do. I also realized I need to work on my self-esteem. It has been low for a long time, and that makes daily life harder than it should be.”

— Mateo R., CA

“Reading each question felt like someone really understood me. Even though I’ve already dealt with much of this, reflecting still helped me learn something new about myself.”

— Caroline F., US

“The process is simple. The test covers everything you need, and you’ll get a clear breakdown of your results. For just a few dollars, it’s a great value.”

— Klara N., CZ

“I kept thinking there might be a small chance, but now I know for sure. The questions were easy to understand, and the whole process was straightforward.”

— Bruno M., BR

“I really enjoyed this experience. I learned a lot, and it helped me make sense of my thoughts and the feeling I’ve had for a long time that I may have grown up with undiagnosed ADHD.”

— Alice B., FR

“Great platform — the insights were genuinely meaningful!”

— Daniel W., DE

“Everything was easy to follow. The tools you get at the end are genuinely helpful for self-growth, and the price is very reasonable. I really appreciate that.”

— Sofia M., ES

“Surprisingly accurate — honestly didn’t expect it to nail things so well.”

— Adir B., IL

“There are lots of different tests to pick from, and the price is surprisingly low for how much insight you get.”

— Olivia W., CA

“I was pleasantly surprised when I read the results. It was as if someone had sorted out my messy thoughts and given me useful tips to help me speak with more confidence.”

— Grace O., IE

“It was really solid, very detailed, and it actually helped me make sense of a lot of things.”

— Carla T., TT

“I was really impressed with the report. It was clear, thoughtful, and it reflected things I’ve been noticing about myself.”

— Jade H., US

“The questions made me think deeply and helped me become more self-aware.”

— Brooke S., US

“Reading through most of the questions made me feel understood. Although I’ve already worked through some of these issues, the questions still gave me useful insights and helped me learn more about myself.”

— Ryan M., US

“I usually take one or two tests each month, and this has become a good way for me to see how I’m doing.”

— Lucas W., US

“Most of the time, my results are in the 90 to 98th percentile compared to others. It really makes me feel like there’s something unique about me.”

— Ethan C., US

“I tried out some of the AI’s suggestions, and to be honest, they worked much better than I thought they would. Maybe this thing really is smarter than me.”

— Reece D., AU

Trusted by 22k+ Users Worldwide

CLEAR ANSWERS TO COMMON QUESTIONS

Frequently Asked Questions

Any questions left?

What does this questionnaire measure?

It measures perceived trust in management based on ratings of effectiveness, integrity, and demonstrated care. Results reflect how leadership is viewed within the team.

Who should complete the questionnaire?

It is intended for employees who can evaluate the day-to-day behavior of their direct manager or leadership group. Respondents should answer only for leaders they know well enough to rate.

How long does it take and how many items are included?

The questionnaire includes 30 items and typically takes about 6 minutes to complete. Most participants can finish in one sitting.

How should items be answered?

Select the response option that best matches observed behavior and typical situations. Use the full rating scale and avoid leaving items blank when possible.

How should results be interpreted and used?

Scores indicate relative strengths and weaknesses across effectiveness, integrity, and care. Results are used to guide feedback, communication improvements, and leadership development priorities.

WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

About This Assessment

Leadership Assessment Test

management arrange

In organizational settings, brief self-report measures can support a structured appraisal of perceived leadership and workplace trust. The Leadership Assessment is designed to capture respondents’ perceptions of leadership-related functioning and interpersonal credibility within a work group.

The measure consists of 30 items and typically requires about 6 minutes to complete. Item content generally targets perceptions of leader effectiveness, integrity, and care/concern, providing a snapshot of how leadership behaviors are experienced by employees. Bruce J. Avolio is cited in connection with the Leadership Assessment.

Results are typically interpreted at the scale level to inform feedback, coaching, and broader organizational climate discussions. As with other rating scales, findings should be considered in context and integrated with collateral information (e.g., other survey data or observational input) when used for decision-making.

Author: bernard-m-bass, Bruce J. Avolio

Literature: Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2002.

Test Question Form