Comprehensive Metacognitive Potential Questionnaire Test
Understand how someone monitors and guides their own thinking in just 15 minutes. Get clear scores across key skills to spot strengths, blind spots, and practical growth areas for work or life.
Hi! My name is Freudly, i am an AI therapist, I will give you an interpretation of the test after you complete it.
08:30
Scale Explorer
How the Scales are Structured
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS
Who Usually Takes This Test?
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
RESULTS YOU CAN ACTUALLY USE
Benchmarking
See How You Compare
Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Interactional (I)
Average
41
Normal range
30 — 52
min.
10
max.
70
Majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Inhibitory (I)
Average
30.8
Normal range
23.1 — 38.6
min.
10
max.
70
Majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Monitoring (M)
Average
40
Normal range
31.8 — 48.3
min.
10
max.
70
Majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Procedural (P)
Average
50
Normal range
40 — 60
min.
10
max.
70
Majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Meta-emotional (M)
Average
47.8
Normal range
39.1 — 56.5
min.
10
max.
70
Majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Metacommunicative (M)
Average
32.6
Normal range
23.2 — 42.1
min.
10
max.
70
Majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Metaregulative (M)
Average
54.2
Normal range
45.1 — 63.3
min.
10
max.
70
Majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Metacognitive (M)
Average
50
Normal range
40.9 — 59
min.
10
max.
70
Majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Metacognitive Potential (MP)
Average
230.3
Normal range
165.8 — 294.9
min.
80
max.
560
Majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Featured On
CLEAR ANSWERS TO COMMON QUESTIONS
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this questionnaire measure?
It measures metacognitive potential, including awareness and regulation of thinking. It provides scores for eight subsystems such as monitoring, error detection, planning, and adjustment.
How long does it take and how many items are included?
Estimated completion time is about 15 minutes. The questionnaire includes 80 items.
How should items be answered?
Each item should be answered based on typical behavior rather than a single event. Avoid spending excessive time on any one item.
What do the results mean?
Results summarize relative strengths and areas for development across the eight subsystems. They describe patterns of metacognitive control and do not indicate clinical diagnosis.
Can it be used in workplace or leadership assessment?
It can be used to examine metacognitive regulation relevant to decision-making, task switching, and self-control in work settings. A research module may be added to focus on managerial activity when needed.
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES
About This Assessment
/https://freudly.ai/media/tests/584/image/1761051225_day_image_20251021_125345.png "Comprehensive Metacognitive Potential Questionnaire, COMP-U Test")
Comprehensive Metacognitive Potential Questionnaire Test - Symptoms and Signs
This instrument is designed to evaluate how an individual monitors and regulates their own thinking processes. The Comprehensive Metacognitive Potential Questionnaire provides a structured self-report approach to assessing metacognitive regulation and related capacities in a standardized format. Originally described by Adrian F. Wells.
The measure consists of 80 items and typically requires about 15 minutes to complete. Results are intended to support a profile of metacognitive strengths and vulnerabilities that may inform clinical formulation, psychoeducation, and treatment planning; the Comprehensive Metacognitive Potential Questionnaire is not a stand-alone diagnostic tool and should be interpreted in the context of other assessment data and the presenting concern.
Author: Adrian F. Wells
Literature: Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 1994.; Flavell, J. H. Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist. 1979.; Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation. Academic Press. 1990.
Comments
Leave a Comment