Cognitive Style Assessment Test

Understand how you process information and lean on social cues versus your own judgment in about 10 minutes. Useful for counseling, hiring, and research to improve fit, communication, and openness to change.
Start Online Test
Questions5410 minutes
Hi! My name is Freudly, i am an AI therapist, I will give you an interpretation of the test after you complete it.
08:30
October 2, 2025
October 2, 2025
Material has been updated
17374 views
991 completion
799 likes
Share
Scale Explorer
How the Scales are Structured
example score
9/24
Lie Scale (LS)
Assesses the likelihood that responses are influenced by socially desirable self-presentation rather than fully candid reporting.
Low
Moderate
High
612Low1318Moderate1924High
A score of 9 falls in the Low range, suggesting responses are generally likely to be straightforward with minimal tendency toward socially desirable answering.
example score
20/24
Social Environment (SE)
Assesses how autonomously a person interacts with the social environment versus relying on external social cues and norms in relationships.
More field-dependent
Balanced
More field-independent
612More field-dependent1318Balanced1924More field-independent
A score of 20 suggests a more field-independent style in social interactions, with stronger reliance on personal criteria and greater interpersonal autonomy.
example score
17/24
Ideology and Political Attitudes (IaPA)
Measures how independently a person forms opinions on ideological and political topics versus relying on external norms and prevailing views.
Externally oriented
Moderately independent
Highly independent
612Externally oriented1318Moderately independent1924Highly independent
A score of 17 suggests moderately independent thinking in ideological and political matters, with some openness to external perspectives and social context.
example score
14/24
Stereotypes and Social Attitudes (SaSA)
Assesses how strongly a person relies on social stereotypes and prevailing attitudes versus independent thinking in social situations.
More independent
Balanced
More stereotype-influenced
611More independent1218Balanced1924More stereotype-influenced
A score of 14 falls in the Balanced range, suggesting a mix of considering social attitudes while also using personal judgment in social contexts.
example score
13/24
Attitudes Toward Material Possessions (ATMP)
Measures how independently a person relates to and manages material possessions, belongings, and property versus relying on external norms or cues.
More norm-guided
Balanced
More self-directed
612More norm-guided1318Balanced1924More self-directed
A score of 13 indicates a generally balanced attitude toward possessions, combining personal preferences with some sensitivity to external expectations in managing belongings.
example score
13/24
Professional Activity (PA)
Assesses cognitive style in professional activity, including independence, initiative, and reliance on work standards versus personal criteria.
More field-dependent
Balanced
More field-independent
612More field-dependent1318Balanced1924More field-independent
A score of 13 falls in the Balanced range, suggesting a generally flexible professional style that combines attention to established standards with some independent initiative.
example score
14/24
Psychological Defense (PD)
Measures how strongly a person relies on psychological defenses under stress and how independently they cope with difficulties.
Lower defenses / more independent coping
Moderate defenses / balanced coping
Higher defenses / more externally driven coping
611Lower defenses / more independent coping1218Moderate defenses / balanced coping1924Higher defenses / more externally driven coping
A score of 14 indicates a moderate use of psychological defenses in stressful situations, with generally balanced independence in overcoming difficulties.
example score
10/24
Attitudes Toward Innovation (ATI)
Assesses readiness to accept and apply new ideas and the general attitude toward change and innovation across life contexts.
Low openness to innovation
Moderate openness to innovation
High openness to innovation
611Low openness to innovation1218Moderate openness to innovation1924High openness to innovation
A score of 10 indicates low openness to innovation, suggesting a preference for familiar approaches and greater caution toward changes or new ideas.
example score
13/24
Family Relationships (FR)
Measures how independently a person forms opinions and makes decisions in family life versus relying on family traditions and close relatives’ influence.
More tradition-oriented
Balanced autonomy
More self-directed
612More tradition-oriented1318Balanced autonomy1924More self-directed
A score of 13 suggests a balanced approach in family relationships, combining personal autonomy with consideration of family traditions and close others’ viewpoints.
example score
117/192
Field Independence–Field Dependence (FID)
Measures the extent to which a person relies on internal criteria versus external social cues and norms when processing information and forming judgments.
More field-independent
Balanced / mixed
More field-dependent
4896More field-independent97143Balanced / mixed144192More field-dependent
A score of 117 falls in the balanced range, suggesting a mixed tendency to use both personal standards and external context when making decisions and interpreting situations.
Start Online Test
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS
Who Usually Takes This Test?
HR and Talent Teams
41%OF USERS
Use it to understand how candidates and employees rely on external norms versus internal criteria, to improve selection, onboarding, and teamwork.
Psychologists and Coaches
34%OF USERS
Apply it in counseling to spot where a client is influenced by others’ opinions and to tailor development and communication strategies.
Researchers and Students
25%OF USERS
Include it in studies and coursework to measure field dependence/independence across life contexts and compare groups or outcomes.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
RESULTS YOU CAN ACTUALLY USE
What You’ll See After You Finish the Test
Scale Results
— Explained Clearly
Your scores across each test scale, translated into plain, usable insights. Not just numbers, but what they actually mean for your daily life, emotional state, and overall well-being.
AI-Powered
Interpretation
A structured, clinically grounded explanation. Our AI analyzes patterns and relationships between scales to provide a coherent interpretation — without alarmist language.
Statistical
Comparison
See how you compare to others. Your scores are placed in a statistical context, showing percentiles and trends based on anonymized platform data to help you understand what`s typical.
Practical
Recommendations
Actionable guidance tailored to your profile. Receive clear, realistic suggestions you can apply immediately — focused on coping, self-regulation, and realistic next steps.
AI-Detected
Insights
Key patterns you might not notice on your own. Surfacing subtle connections in your responses that help you better understand what may be driving your current results.
Discuss with
an AI Psychologist
Clarify, reflect, and explore right away. Talk through your outcomes, ask questions, and explore meanings in a calm, non-diagnostic dialogue environment.
Start Online Test
Used in 52+ countries
Benchmarking
See How You Compare
Once you finish the test, your results will be compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of the benchmarks we use to place your score in context.
Lie Scale (LS)
Average
16.9
Normal range
1419.9
min.
6
max.
24
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Social Environment (SE)
Average
17.8
Normal range
15.420.1
min.
6
max.
24
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Ideology and Political Relations (IaPR)
Average
11.9
Normal range
8.915
min.
6
max.
24
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Stereotypes and Social Attitudes (SaSA)
Average
14.9
Normal range
1217.8
min.
6
max.
24
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Attitude Towards Material Possessions (ATMP)
Average
11.7
Normal range
8.814.6
min.
6
max.
24
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Professional Activity (PA)
Average
15.6
Normal range
12.318.8
min.
6
max.
24
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Psychological Defense (PD)
Average
18.1
Normal range
15.520.6
min.
6
max.
24
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Attitude Toward Innovations (ATI)
Average
16.2
Normal range
13.319
min.
6
max.
24
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Family Relationships (FR)
Average
19.3
Normal range
16.721.8
min.
6
max.
24
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Pole-independence → Pole-dependence (P→P)
Average
85.7
Normal range
61110.5
min.
48
max.
192
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Featured On
Rated 4.8/5 by Our Customers
Freudly really helped me discover parts of my personality I hadn’t noticed before. It strengthened the areas where I needed to grow and made me feel more grounded and confident in the parts that already worked well.
Emma C., US
I wanted to understand how serious my ADHD is, and now I finally do. I also realized I need to work on my self-esteem. It has been low for a long time, and that makes daily life harder than it should be.
Mateo R., CA
Reading each question felt like someone really understood me. Even though I’ve already dealt with much of this, reflecting still helped me learn something new about myself.
Caroline F., US
The process is simple. The test covers everything you need, and you’ll get a clear breakdown of your results. For just a few dollars, it’s a great value.
Klara N., CZ
I kept thinking there might be a small chance, but now I know for sure. The questions were easy to understand, and the whole process was straightforward.
Bruno M., BR
I really enjoyed this experience. I learned a lot, and it helped me make sense of my thoughts and the feeling I’ve had for a long time that I may have grown up with undiagnosed ADHD.
Alice B., FR
Great platform — the insights were genuinely meaningful!
Daniel W., DE
Everything was easy to follow. The tools you get at the end are genuinely helpful for self-growth, and the price is very reasonable. I really appreciate that.
Sofia M., ES
Surprisingly accurate — honestly didn’t expect it to nail things so well.
Adir B., IL
There are lots of different tests to pick from, and the price is surprisingly low for how much insight you get.
Olivia W., CA
I was pleasantly surprised when I read the results. It was as if someone had sorted out my messy thoughts and given me useful tips to help me speak with more confidence.
Grace O., IE
It was really solid, very detailed, and it actually helped me make sense of a lot of things.
Carla T., TT
I was really impressed with the report. It was clear, thoughtful, and it reflected things I’ve been noticing about myself.
Jade H., US
The questions made me think deeply and helped me become more self-aware.
Brooke S., US
Reading through most of the questions made me feel understood. Although I’ve already worked through some of these issues, the questions still gave me useful insights and helped me learn more about myself.
Ryan M., US
I usually take one or two tests each month, and this has become a good way for me to see how I’m doing.
Lucas W., US
Most of the time, my results are in the 90 to 98th percentile compared to others. It really makes me feel like there’s something unique about me.
Ethan C., US
I tried out some of the AI’s suggestions, and to be honest, they worked much better than I thought they would. Maybe this thing really is smarter than me.
Reece D., AU
Trusted by 22k+ Users Worldwide
CLEAR ANSWERS TO COMMON QUESTIONS
Frequently Asked Questions

Any questions left?

What does this assessment measure?
It measures the degree to which thinking relies on external cues such as context, social norms, and other people’s opinions versus internal criteria and self-defined standards.
What areas of life are covered by the questions?
Items address social interaction, stereotypes and norms, work tasks, family relationships, possessions, ideology and politics, and responses to innovation and change.
How long does it take, and how many questions are included?
It contains 54 questions and typically takes about 10 minutes to complete.
How should responses be selected?
Answer each item based on typical behavior across most situations, not a single recent event. Use the first response that fits, and avoid overthinking or trying to give a preferred impression.
How are results used and interpreted?
Scores indicate a relative tendency toward field dependence or field independence overall and by context. Results support counseling, personnel decisions, and research when interpreted alongside other information.
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES
About This Assessment
Cognitive Style Assessment TSOV-4 Test

Cognitive Style Assessment Test

This measure is used to evaluate how an individual tends to perceive and process information across everyday contexts. The Cognitive Style Assessment is intended to characterize the degree to which a person relies on external cues and social norms versus internal criteria when forming judgments; it is commonly associated with the work of H. A. Witkin and R. J. Riding.

The instrument consists of 54 items and typically takes about 10 minutes to complete. Item content is framed in multiple life domains (e.g., social interaction, work-related situations, family relationships, and responses to change) to support a broad estimate of cognitive style. Results from the Cognitive Style Assessment may be used to inform case conceptualization, guide discussion in counseling, or support decision-making in research or organizational settings, with interpretation integrated with other clinical information.

Author: H. A. Witkin, R. J. Riding
Literature: Riding, R. J., & Cheema, I. Cognitive styles—An overview and integration. Educational Psychology. 1991.
Test Question Form
You Might Also Like
Communication Style Assessment
This measure is designed to characterize an individual’s typical interperso…
Start Test
Cognitive Avoidance Questionnaire (CAQ)
This self-report instrument is designed to assess patterns of cognitive avo…
Start Test
Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire (CFQ-7)
This brief self-report measure assesses the extent to which an individual b…
Start Test
Comments
Leave a Comment