Attributional Style Questionnaire (ASQ) Test

Understand how you explain life events and spot optimism or pessimism patterns in about 9 minutes. With 48 items, it delivers clear, actionable insights for counseling and tracking change over time.
Start Online Test
Questions489 minutes
Hi! My name is Freudly, i am an AI therapist, I will give you an interpretation of the test after you complete it.
08:30
October 2, 2025
October 2, 2025
Material has been updated
12758 views
1684 completions
1419 likes
Share
Scale Explorer
How the Scales are Structured
example score
11/24
Total Score (TS)
This scale summarizes a person’s overall attributional style on a continuum from more pessimistic to more optimistic explanations of life events.
More pessimistic
Mixed / balanced
More optimistic
-23More pessimistic48Mixed / balanced924More optimistic
A score of 11 falls in the “More optimistic” range, suggesting a tendency to explain events in a generally optimistic way across situations.
example score
4/24
Positive Events Total (PET)
This scale measures how optimistically a person explains positive events by attributing successes to stable and broadly applicable causes.
Low optimism for successes
Moderate optimism for successes
High optimism for successes
010Low optimism for successes1116Moderate optimism for successes1724High optimism for successes
A score of 4 falls in the low range, suggesting successes are more often explained as situational or less stable rather than enduring and universal.
example score
14/24
Negative Events Total (NET)
Measures how pessimistically versus optimistically a person tends to explain adverse (failure) events overall.
Optimistic
Mixed
Pessimistic
08Optimistic914Mixed1524Pessimistic
A score of 14 falls in the Mixed range, suggesting a balance between optimistic and pessimistic explanations of failures with a slight tilt toward pessimism.
example score
3/8
Self - Success (S-S)
Measures how strongly you attribute your successes to internal, personal causes rather than external factors.
Low personalization
Moderate personalization
High personalization
02Low personalization35Moderate personalization68High personalization
A score of 3 indicates a moderate tendency to see your achievements as partly driven by your own qualities and efforts, alongside situational factors.
example score
4/8
I Am a Failure (IAaF)
Measures the tendency to attribute failures to internal, personal causes (self-blame).
Low personalization
Moderate personalization
High personalization
02Low personalization35Moderate personalization68High personalization
A score of 4 indicates a moderate tendency to interpret failures as caused by one’s own actions or qualities, which may be accompanied by some self-criticism.
example score
4/8
Success Pervasiveness (SP)
Measures how broadly you generalize the causes of your successes across different areas of life versus seeing them as situation-specific.
Specific successes
Moderately broad
Highly broad
02Specific successes35Moderately broad68Highly broad
A score of 4 suggests a moderately broad style, meaning you sometimes extend the reasons for success to other life domains while still keeping some successes tied to specific contexts.
example score
6/8
Failure Globality (FG)
This scale measures how broadly you generalize the causes of your failures across different areas of life versus keeping them specific to a situation.
Specific view of failures
Mixed generalization
Broad generalization
02Specific view of failures35Mixed generalization68Broad generalization
A score of 6 suggests you tend to view failures as having broad, cross-situational causes rather than being limited to a specific context.
example score
4/8
Success Time (ST)
Measures how stable and consistent you perceive the causes of your successes to be over time.
Less stable
Moderately stable
Highly stable
02Less stable35Moderately stable68Highly stable
A score of 4 indicates a moderately stable view of success causes, suggesting you sometimes see achievements as driven by consistent factors and sometimes as more changeable.
example score
3/8
Stability of Failures (SoF)
Failure Time (FT) measures how permanent you tend to perceive the causes of negative events and setbacks to be.
More temporary
Moderately temporary
More lasting
02More temporary35Moderately temporary68More lasting
A score of 3 falls in the “Moderately temporary” range, suggesting you generally view failures as somewhat time-limited rather than enduring.
Start Online Test
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS
Who Usually Takes This Test?
Therapy and counseling clients
41%OF USERS
People in therapy or coaching take it to understand how they explain setbacks and successes and how that affects mood, motivation, and stress.
Psychology students and trainees
34%OF USERS
Students and early-career specialists use it to learn assessment skills and practice interpreting optimism–pessimism patterns.
Self-improvement seekers
25%OF USERS
Individuals curious about their mindset take it to spot habitual thinking patterns and track changes over time.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
RESULTS YOU CAN ACTUALLY USE
What You’ll See After You Finish the Test
Scale Results
— Explained Clearly
Your scores across each test scale, translated into plain, usable insights. Not just numbers, but what they actually mean for your daily life, emotional state, and overall well-being.
AI-Powered
Interpretation
A structured, clinically grounded explanation. Our AI analyzes patterns and relationships between scales to provide a coherent interpretation — without alarmist language.
Statistical
Comparison
See how you compare to others. Your scores are placed in a statistical context, showing percentiles and trends based on anonymized platform data to help you understand what`s typical.
Practical
Recommendations
Actionable guidance tailored to your profile. Receive clear, realistic suggestions you can apply immediately — focused on coping, self-regulation, and realistic next steps.
AI-Detected
Insights
Key patterns you might not notice on your own. Surfacing subtle connections in your responses that help you better understand what may be driving your current results.
Discuss with
an AI Psychologist
Clarify, reflect, and explore right away. Talk through your outcomes, ask questions, and explore meanings in a calm, non-diagnostic dialogue environment.
Start Online Test
Used in 52+ countries
Benchmarking
See How You Compare
Once you finish the test, your results will be compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of the benchmarks we use to place your score in context.
Final result (Fr)
Average
15.7
Normal range
1120.3
min.
-2
max.
24
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Summary of Positive Events (SoPE)
Average
10
Normal range
6.913.2
min.
0
max.
24
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Summary of adverse events (Soae)
Average
6.5
Normal range
3.49.6
min.
0
max.
24
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
I am success (Ias)
Average
2
Normal range
0.73.4
min.
0
max.
8
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
I am a failure (Iaaf)
Average
5.4
Normal range
4.36.4
min.
0
max.
8
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Breadth of Success (BoS)
Average
3
Normal range
1.84.3
min.
0
max.
8
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
The Extent of Failure (TEoF)
Average
3.9
Normal range
2.75.1
min.
0
max.
8
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Time of success (Tos)
Average
2.9
Normal range
1.93.9
min.
0
max.
8
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Time of Failures (ToF)
Average
6
Normal range
57
min.
0
max.
8
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Featured On
Rated 4.8/5 by Our Customers
Freudly really helped me discover parts of my personality I hadn’t noticed before. It strengthened the areas where I needed to grow and made me feel more grounded and confident in the parts that already worked well.
Emma C., US
I wanted to understand how serious my ADHD is, and now I finally do. I also realized I need to work on my self-esteem. It has been low for a long time, and that makes daily life harder than it should be.
Mateo R., CA
Reading each question felt like someone really understood me. Even though I’ve already dealt with much of this, reflecting still helped me learn something new about myself.
Caroline F., US
The process is simple. The test covers everything you need, and you’ll get a clear breakdown of your results. For just a few dollars, it’s a great value.
Klara N., CZ
I kept thinking there might be a small chance, but now I know for sure. The questions were easy to understand, and the whole process was straightforward.
Bruno M., BR
I really enjoyed this experience. I learned a lot, and it helped me make sense of my thoughts and the feeling I’ve had for a long time that I may have grown up with undiagnosed ADHD.
Alice B., FR
Great platform — the insights were genuinely meaningful!
Daniel W., DE
Everything was easy to follow. The tools you get at the end are genuinely helpful for self-growth, and the price is very reasonable. I really appreciate that.
Sofia M., ES
Surprisingly accurate — honestly didn’t expect it to nail things so well.
Adir B., IL
There are lots of different tests to pick from, and the price is surprisingly low for how much insight you get.
Olivia W., CA
I was pleasantly surprised when I read the results. It was as if someone had sorted out my messy thoughts and given me useful tips to help me speak with more confidence.
Grace O., IE
It was really solid, very detailed, and it actually helped me make sense of a lot of things.
Carla T., TT
I was really impressed with the report. It was clear, thoughtful, and it reflected things I’ve been noticing about myself.
Jade H., US
The questions made me think deeply and helped me become more self-aware.
Brooke S., US
Reading through most of the questions made me feel understood. Although I’ve already worked through some of these issues, the questions still gave me useful insights and helped me learn more about myself.
Ryan M., US
I usually take one or two tests each month, and this has become a good way for me to see how I’m doing.
Lucas W., US
Most of the time, my results are in the 90 to 98th percentile compared to others. It really makes me feel like there’s something unique about me.
Ethan C., US
I tried out some of the AI’s suggestions, and to be honest, they worked much better than I thought they would. Maybe this thing really is smarter than me.
Reece D., AU
Trusted by 22k+ Users Worldwide
CLEAR ANSWERS TO COMMON QUESTIONS
Frequently Asked Questions

Any questions left?

What does this questionnaire measure?
It assesses habitual ways of explaining why positive and negative events happen. It focuses on whether causes are seen as stable or changeable, broad or situation-specific, and personal or external.
What is the format of the questionnaire?
It presents brief life scenarios and asks for ratings about the likely cause of each outcome. Responses are given on fixed rating scales.
How long does it take to complete and how many items are included?
Completion typically takes about 9 minutes. The questionnaire contains 48 items.
How should responses be completed?
Answer based on the first explanation that seems most likely, even if other explanations are possible. Use the full range of the rating scales when appropriate.
How are results used and what are the limits of interpretation?
Results describe attribution patterns linked to motivation, stress response, and vulnerability to low mood, and they may be used for screening or progress monitoring. They do not provide a standalone clinical diagnosis and should be interpreted in context.
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES
About This Assessment
Attribution Styles Test, ASQ

Attributional Style Questionnaire (ASQ) Test

This measure assesses an individual’s characteristic patterns of causal explanation for positive and negative life events. The Attributional Style Questionnaire (ASQ) presents a set of brief scenarios and asks respondents to generate and rate perceived causes across common attributional dimensions (e.g., internality, stability, and globality). It includes 48 items and typically takes about 9 minutes to complete.

Developed by C. S. Peterson and J. P. Semmel, the Attributional Style Questionnaire (ASQ) is used in clinical and research settings to characterize explanatory style and related cognitive vulnerability patterns. Results are commonly interpreted to inform case conceptualization and to support monitoring of cognitive change over time when used alongside other assessment data.

Author: C. S. Peterson, J. P. Semmel, m-e-p-seligman
Literature: Peterson, C., Semmel, A., von Baeyer, C., Abramson, L. Y., Metalsky, G. I., & Seligman, M. E. P. The attributional style questionnaire. Cognitive Therapy and Research. 1982.; Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. Optimism, coping, and health: Assessment and implications of generalized outcome expectancies. Health Psychology. 1985.; Seligman, M. E. P. Learned optimism: How to change your mind and your life. Knopf. 1991.
Test Question Form
You Might Also Like
Identity Style Inventory (ISI-5)
This measure is designed to evaluate individual differences in how people p…
Start Test
Conflict Resolution Styles Inventory (CRSI)
This measure is designed to assess how partners typically respond during in…
Start Test
Humor Styles Questionnaire (HSQ)
The measure assesses individual differences in the ways people typically us…
Start Test
Comments
Leave a Comment