Decision-Making Questionnaire Test

Learn how you tend to make leadership decisions in just 4 minutes. Get a clear style profile that supports coaching, hiring, and better team communication.

Start Online Test

Questions: 204 minutes

Hi! My name is Freudly, i am an AI therapist, I will give you an interpretation of the test after you complete it.

08:30

October 2, 2025

October 2, 2025
Material has been updated

October 2, 2025
Material has been published

12981 view

1168 completions

897 likes

Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

example score

89/160

Behavioral (B)

Measures how strongly a person emphasizes relationships, collaboration, and people-centered considerations when making decisions.

Low

Moderate

High

20 – 66: Low | 67 – 113: Moderate | 114 – 160: High

A score of 89 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting a balanced tendency to consider team input and interpersonal factors while still using other decision cues when needed.

example score

112/160

Conceptual (C)

Measures the extent to which a person prefers strategic, creative, people-aware decision-making that considers multiple alternatives and values teamwork and independence.

Lower Conceptual

Moderate Conceptual

Higher Conceptual

20 – 66: Lower Conceptual | 67 – 113: Moderate Conceptual | 114 – 160: Higher Conceptual

A score of 112 falls in the Moderate Conceptual range, suggesting a solid preference for big-picture, creative thinking while still balancing it with other decision-making approaches.

example score

82/160

Analytical (A)

Measures the extent to which a person favors a fact-focused, logical, and thorough approach to decision-making under uncertainty.

Less Analytical

Moderately Analytical

Highly Analytical

20 – 66: Less Analytical | 67 – 113: Moderately Analytical | 114 – 160: Highly Analytical

A score of 82 suggests a moderately analytical decision-making style, indicating a balanced tendency to gather information and compare options without relying exclusively on extensive analysis.

example score

97/160

Directive (D)

Measures preference for a fast, control-oriented decision-making approach with low tolerance for ambiguity and minimal information use.

Low

Moderate

High

20 – 66: Low | 67 – 113: Moderate | 114 – 160: High

A score of 97 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting a balanced tendency toward quick, direct decisions while not relying exclusively on a highly directive approach.

Start Online Test

just completed the test

DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

New and aspiring managers

41%OF USERS

People stepping into leadership use it to understand their default decision style and how to adjust it for different team situations.

HR and talent assessors

35%OF USERS

Recruiters and HR specialists take it to compare leadership decision patterns for hiring, promotion, and succession planning.

Coaching and training participants

24%OF USERS

Leaders in workshops or coaching use it to spot strengths and blind spots in problem-solving and communication.

BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.

RESULTS YOU CAN ACTUALLY USE

What You’ll See After You Finish the Test

Scale Results
— Explained Clearly

Your scores across each test scale, translated into plain, usable insights. Not just numbers, but what they actually mean for your daily life, emotional state, and overall well-being.

AI-Powered
Interpretation

A structured, clinically grounded explanation. Our AI analyzes patterns and relationships between scales to provide a coherent interpretation — without alarmist language.

Statistical
Comparison

See how you compare to others. Your scores are placed in a statistical context, showing percentiles and trends based on anonymized platform data to help you understand what`s typical.

Practical
Recommendations

Actionable guidance tailored to your profile. Receive clear, realistic suggestions you can apply immediately — focused on coping, self-regulation, and realistic next steps.

AI-Detected
Insights

Key patterns you might not notice on your own. Surfacing subtle connections in your responses that help you better understand what may be driving your current results.

Discuss with
an AI Psychologist

Clarify, reflect, and explore right away. Talk through your outcomes, ask questions, and explore meanings in a calm, non-diagnostic dialogue environment.

Start Online Test

Used in 52+ countries

Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you finish the test, your results will be compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of the benchmarks we use to place your score in context.

Behavioral (B)

Average

91.2

Normal range

69.5 — 113

min.

max.

160

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Conceptual (C)

Average

77.3

Normal range

54.8 — 99.9

min.

max.

160

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Analytical (A)

Average

82.9

Normal range

58.8 — 107

min.

max.

160

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Directive (D)

Average

121.2

Normal range

101.9 — 140.5

min.

max.

160

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Start Online Test

Featured On

Rated 4.8/5 by Our Customers

“Freudly really helped me discover parts of my personality I hadn’t noticed before. It strengthened the areas where I needed to grow and made me feel more grounded and confident in the parts that already worked well.”

— Emma C., US

“I wanted to understand how serious my ADHD is, and now I finally do. I also realized I need to work on my self-esteem. It has been low for a long time, and that makes daily life harder than it should be.”

— Mateo R., CA

“Reading each question felt like someone really understood me. Even though I’ve already dealt with much of this, reflecting still helped me learn something new about myself.”

— Caroline F., US

“The process is simple. The test covers everything you need, and you’ll get a clear breakdown of your results. For just a few dollars, it’s a great value.”

— Klara N., CZ

“I kept thinking there might be a small chance, but now I know for sure. The questions were easy to understand, and the whole process was straightforward.”

— Bruno M., BR

“I really enjoyed this experience. I learned a lot, and it helped me make sense of my thoughts and the feeling I’ve had for a long time that I may have grown up with undiagnosed ADHD.”

— Alice B., FR

“Great platform — the insights were genuinely meaningful!”

— Daniel W., DE

“Everything was easy to follow. The tools you get at the end are genuinely helpful for self-growth, and the price is very reasonable. I really appreciate that.”

— Sofia M., ES

“Surprisingly accurate — honestly didn’t expect it to nail things so well.”

— Adir B., IL

“There are lots of different tests to pick from, and the price is surprisingly low for how much insight you get.”

— Olivia W., CA

“I was pleasantly surprised when I read the results. It was as if someone had sorted out my messy thoughts and given me useful tips to help me speak with more confidence.”

— Grace O., IE

“It was really solid, very detailed, and it actually helped me make sense of a lot of things.”

— Carla T., TT

“I was really impressed with the report. It was clear, thoughtful, and it reflected things I’ve been noticing about myself.”

— Jade H., US

“The questions made me think deeply and helped me become more self-aware.”

— Brooke S., US

“Reading through most of the questions made me feel understood. Although I’ve already worked through some of these issues, the questions still gave me useful insights and helped me learn more about myself.”

— Ryan M., US

“I usually take one or two tests each month, and this has become a good way for me to see how I’m doing.”

— Lucas W., US

“Most of the time, my results are in the 90 to 98th percentile compared to others. It really makes me feel like there’s something unique about me.”

— Ethan C., US

“I tried out some of the AI’s suggestions, and to be honest, they worked much better than I thought they would. Maybe this thing really is smarter than me.”

— Reece D., AU

Trusted by 22k+ Users Worldwide

CLEAR ANSWERS TO COMMON QUESTIONS

Frequently Asked Questions

Any questions left?

What does this questionnaire measure?

It identifies a preferred decision-making style used in leadership and problem-solving situations. Results are reported across four styles: directive, analytical, conceptual, and behavioral.

How long does it take to complete and how many items are included?

Estimated completion time is about 4 minutes. The questionnaire contains 20 items.

What type of questions are asked?

Items present work-related situations and response options. The selected options indicate the approach most often used when making decisions.

How should the items be answered?

Select the option that best reflects typical behavior rather than an ideal response. Answer all items using a consistent frame of reference.

How should the results be used?

Results describe tendencies, not fixed traits or performance levels. They can support coaching, training, and selection decisions when interpreted with other relevant information.

WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

About This Assessment

Decision-Making Questionnaire Test

management arrange decision making

This measure is designed to assess individual tendencies in decision-making, particularly in applied or leadership-related contexts. The Decision-Making Questionnaire is commonly used to characterize how a person typically approaches choices and problem-solving under varying demands. It was developed by Irving L. Janis and Leon Mann.

The instrument consists of 20 items and typically requires about 4 minutes to complete. Responses are used to support a structured description of decision-making approach and may inform discussion of strengths, constraints, and situational fit.

In clinical, coaching, or organizational settings, results from the Decision-Making Questionnaire are generally interpreted as descriptive rather than diagnostic and are best integrated with collateral information (e.g., interview data, observed behavior, and contextual factors).

Author: Irving L. Janis, Leon Mann

Literature: Rowe, A. J., & Boulgarides, J. D. Decision styles: A perspective. Leadership & Organization Development Journal. 1983.; Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. Decision-making style: The development and assessment of a new measure. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 1995.

Test Question Form