Leadership Style Assessment Test

Understand how your leadership balances results and relationships in about 20 minutes. Get a clear profile from real work scenarios and practical tips to adapt your approach.
Start Online Test
Questions2320 minutes
Hi! My name is Freudly, i am an AI therapist, I will give you an interpretation of the test after you complete it.
08:30
October 2, 2025
October 2, 2025
Material has been updated
24611 views
2272 completions
1936 likes
Share
Scale Explorer
How the Scales are Structured
example score
76/230
Integrative (I)
Measures how strongly you demonstrate an integrated leadership style that balances goal achievement with building strong relationships.
Limited integrated focus
Developing integration
Strong integrated style
080Limited integrated focus81160Developing integration161230Strong integrated style
A score of 76 indicates a limited integrated style, suggesting your current approach shows less consistent balance between task focus and relationship-building.
example score
130/230
Dedicated (D)
Measures how strongly you emphasize task execution and control over relationship-building in your leadership approach.
People-balanced
Task-leaning
Highly devoted
080People-balanced81160Task-leaning161230Highly devoted
A score of 130 falls in the Task-leaning range, indicating a clear preference for driving results through decisiveness, monitoring, and structured incentives with comparatively less focus on relationships.
example score
95/230
Sociable (S)
Measures the extent to which a leader prioritizes building relationships and a friendly team climate over driving task achievement.
Low sociability focus
Moderate sociability focus
High sociability focus
080Low sociability focus81160Moderate sociability focus161230High sociability focus
A score of 95 indicates a moderate Sociable style, suggesting you tend to support relationships and team harmony while maintaining some attention to results.
example score
143/230
Detached (D)
Measures how strongly a manager shows a Detached leadership style with low emphasis on both task achievement and relationship-building.
Low detached
Moderate detached
High detached
080Low detached81160Moderate detached161230High detached
A score of 143 falls in the Moderate detached range, suggesting a noticeable tendency toward stability-focused, cautious, and administrative leadership with comparatively limited emphasis on both results drive and interpersonal engagement.
Start Online Test
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS
Who Usually Takes This Test?
Newly promoted managers
41%OF USERS
People who just started leading a team take it to understand their default balance of task focus and relationship building and where they should adapt.
Experienced team leaders
34%OF USERS
Managers with a steady track record use it to spot blind spots, strengthen flexibility across situations, and improve team results and morale.
Coaching and training participants
25%OF USERS
Leaders in coaching, workshops, or development programs take it to get a clear baseline and concrete behaviors to work on next.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
RESULTS YOU CAN ACTUALLY USE
What You’ll See After You Finish the Test
Scale Results
— Explained Clearly
Your scores across each test scale, translated into plain, usable insights. Not just numbers, but what they actually mean for your daily life, emotional state, and overall well-being.
AI-Powered
Interpretation
A structured, clinically grounded explanation. Our AI analyzes patterns and relationships between scales to provide a coherent interpretation — without alarmist language.
Statistical
Comparison
See how you compare to others. Your scores are placed in a statistical context, showing percentiles and trends based on anonymized platform data to help you understand what`s typical.
Practical
Recommendations
Actionable guidance tailored to your profile. Receive clear, realistic suggestions you can apply immediately — focused on coping, self-regulation, and realistic next steps.
AI-Detected
Insights
Key patterns you might not notice on your own. Surfacing subtle connections in your responses that help you better understand what may be driving your current results.
Discuss with
an AI Psychologist
Clarify, reflect, and explore right away. Talk through your outcomes, ask questions, and explore meanings in a calm, non-diagnostic dialogue environment.
Start Online Test
Used in 52+ countries
Benchmarking
See How You Compare
Once you finish the test, your results will be compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of the benchmarks we use to place your score in context.
Comprehensive (C)
Average
127.2
Normal range
98.2156.3
min.
0
max.
230
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Devoted (D)
Average
152.1
Normal range
113.7190.4
min.
0
max.
230
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Sociable (S)
Average
129.9
Normal range
95164.8
min.
0
max.
230
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Detached (D)
Average
71.1
Normal range
32.4109.8
min.
0
max.
230
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Featured On
Rated 4.8/5 by Our Customers
Freudly really helped me discover parts of my personality I hadn’t noticed before. It strengthened the areas where I needed to grow and made me feel more grounded and confident in the parts that already worked well.
Emma C., US
I wanted to understand how serious my ADHD is, and now I finally do. I also realized I need to work on my self-esteem. It has been low for a long time, and that makes daily life harder than it should be.
Mateo R., CA
Reading each question felt like someone really understood me. Even though I’ve already dealt with much of this, reflecting still helped me learn something new about myself.
Caroline F., US
The process is simple. The test covers everything you need, and you’ll get a clear breakdown of your results. For just a few dollars, it’s a great value.
Klara N., CZ
I kept thinking there might be a small chance, but now I know for sure. The questions were easy to understand, and the whole process was straightforward.
Bruno M., BR
I really enjoyed this experience. I learned a lot, and it helped me make sense of my thoughts and the feeling I’ve had for a long time that I may have grown up with undiagnosed ADHD.
Alice B., FR
Great platform — the insights were genuinely meaningful!
Daniel W., DE
Everything was easy to follow. The tools you get at the end are genuinely helpful for self-growth, and the price is very reasonable. I really appreciate that.
Sofia M., ES
Surprisingly accurate — honestly didn’t expect it to nail things so well.
Adir B., IL
There are lots of different tests to pick from, and the price is surprisingly low for how much insight you get.
Olivia W., CA
I was pleasantly surprised when I read the results. It was as if someone had sorted out my messy thoughts and given me useful tips to help me speak with more confidence.
Grace O., IE
It was really solid, very detailed, and it actually helped me make sense of a lot of things.
Carla T., TT
I was really impressed with the report. It was clear, thoughtful, and it reflected things I’ve been noticing about myself.
Jade H., US
The questions made me think deeply and helped me become more self-aware.
Brooke S., US
Reading through most of the questions made me feel understood. Although I’ve already worked through some of these issues, the questions still gave me useful insights and helped me learn more about myself.
Ryan M., US
I usually take one or two tests each month, and this has become a good way for me to see how I’m doing.
Lucas W., US
Most of the time, my results are in the 90 to 98th percentile compared to others. It really makes me feel like there’s something unique about me.
Ethan C., US
I tried out some of the AI’s suggestions, and to be honest, they worked much better than I thought they would. Maybe this thing really is smarter than me.
Reece D., AU
Trusted by 22k+ Users Worldwide
CLEAR ANSWERS TO COMMON QUESTIONS
Frequently Asked Questions

Any questions left?

What does this assessment measure?
It measures leadership behavior across two dimensions: focus on results and focus on working relationships. Scores indicate the degree of balance between these dimensions and the likely style pattern.
How long does it take and how many items are included?
Typical completion time is about 20 minutes. The assessment includes 23 items.
What type of questions are used?
Items describe common workplace situations and ask for responses that reflect typical behavior. The focus is on practical actions rather than abstract preferences.
How are results reported?
Results classify responses into four leadership style patterns based on the two dimensions. A profile also highlights alternative approaches that may fit different conditions.
How should responses be selected?
Select the option that best matches usual behavior in real work conditions. Avoid choosing answers based on an ideal or expected role.
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES
About This Assessment
Your leadership style Test

Leadership Style Assessment Test

This measure is designed to help managers and other team leaders reflect on how they typically guide work and relate to staff. The Leadership Style Assessment provides a structured self-report snapshot of leadership approach, with attention to balancing task focus and interpersonal relationship focus.

The instrument includes 23 items and generally takes about 20 minutes to complete. Responses are used to characterize patterns consistent with distinct leadership styles based on the combination of goal-directed behavior and relationship-oriented behavior. Development is commonly attributed to Ralph K. White and Ronald Lippitt.

Results from the Leadership Style Assessment can inform coaching, leadership development, and supervision by identifying current tendencies and highlighting situationally appropriate alternative approaches. Interpretation should be integrated with other sources of information (e.g., observed behavior, performance feedback, and context) rather than used as a stand-alone indicator of effectiveness.

Author: kurt-lewin, Ralph K. White, Ronald Lippitt
Literature: Yukl, G. Leadership in organizations. Prentice Hall. 1998.
Test Question Form
You Might Also Like
Workgroup Leadership Style Questionnaire
This questionnaire is designed to assess perceived leadership behaviors wit…
Start Test
Leadership Style Questionnaire
This measure is used to characterize leadership-related interaction pattern…
Start Test
Leadership Effectiveness Scale
The measure is designed to support evaluation of leadership-related behavio…
Start Test
Comments
Leave a Comment