Team Assessment Test

See how trust, accountability, and results are really working on your team in 3 minutes. A simple 15 question check that quickly spotlights weak points so you can improve collaboration fast.

Start Online Test

Questions: 153 minutes

Hi! My name is Freudly, i am an AI therapist, I will give you an interpretation of the test after you complete it.

08:30

October 2, 2025

October 2, 2025
Material has been updated

October 2, 2025
Material has been published

14043 views

1807 completions

1478 likes

Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

example score

7/9

Indifference to Results (ItR)

Indifference to outcomes measures how strongly team members prioritize shared results over individual agendas and how engaged they are in collective goals.

Low indifference

Moderate indifference

High indifference

3 – 5: Low indifference | 6 – 7: Moderate indifference | 8 – 9: High indifference

A score of 7 indicates a moderate level of indifference to outcomes, suggesting shared results matter but commitment may be inconsistent across the team.

example score

5/9

Low Demandingness (LD)

Non-demandingness reflects how low the team’s expectations and standards are for performance and accountability.

High standards

Mixed standards

Low standards

3 – 5: High standards | 6 – 7: Mixed standards | 8 – 9: Low standards

A score of 5 suggests the team generally maintains clear expectations and standards, with only occasional signs of settling for “good enough.”

example score

5/9

Irresponsibility (I)

Irresponsibility measures how consistently team members take ownership and follow through on commitments and outcomes.

Low

Moderate

High

3 – 5: Low | 6 – 7: Moderate | 8 – 9: High

A score of 5 indicates low irresponsibility, suggesting accountability is generally present with some occasional gaps in follow-through.

example score

6/9

Fear of Conflict (FoC)

Measures the extent to which the team avoids open disagreement and candid discussion, potentially leading to superficial consensus.

Low fear

Moderate fear

High fear

3 – 5: Low fear | 6 – 7: Moderate fear | 8 – 9: High fear

A score of 6 indicates a moderate tendency to avoid conflict, so important disagreements may be discussed cautiously or deferred.

example score

6/9

Distrust (D)

Measures the degree of mutual trust and openness among team members that supports candid collaboration.

Low distrust

Moderate distrust

High distrust

3 – 5: Low distrust | 6 – 7: Moderate distrust | 8 – 9: High distrust

A score of 6 indicates a moderate level of distrust, suggesting trust is uneven and some conversations may still feel guarded.

Start Online Test

just completed the test

DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Team leads and managers

41%OF USERS

They use it to pinpoint trust, conflict, and accountability issues and decide what to address first with the team.

HR and people partners

34%OF USERS

They run it to gauge team health across groups and guide coaching, training, or culture initiatives.

Project and product teams

25%OF USERS

They take it before or during a project to surface collaboration risks early and align on shared goals and responsibilities.

BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.

RESULTS YOU CAN ACTUALLY USE

What You’ll See After You Finish the Test

Scale Results
— Explained Clearly

Your scores across each test scale, translated into plain, usable insights. Not just numbers, but what they actually mean for your daily life, emotional state, and overall well-being.

AI-Powered
Interpretation

A structured, clinically grounded explanation. Our AI analyzes patterns and relationships between scales to provide a coherent interpretation — without alarmist language.

Statistical
Comparison

See how you compare to others. Your scores are placed in a statistical context, showing percentiles and trends based on anonymized platform data to help you understand what`s typical.

Practical
Recommendations

Actionable guidance tailored to your profile. Receive clear, realistic suggestions you can apply immediately — focused on coping, self-regulation, and realistic next steps.

AI-Detected
Insights

Key patterns you might not notice on your own. Surfacing subtle connections in your responses that help you better understand what may be driving your current results.

Discuss with
an AI Psychologist

Clarify, reflect, and explore right away. Talk through your outcomes, ask questions, and explore meanings in a calm, non-diagnostic dialogue environment.

Start Online Test

Used in 52+ countries

Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you finish the test, your results will be compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of the benchmarks we use to place your score in context.

Indifference to outcomes (Ito)

Average

7.3

Normal range

6.5 — 8

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Non-demandingness (N)

Average

4.6

Normal range

3.7 — 5.4

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Irresponsibility (I)

Average

6.5

Normal range

5.7 — 7.3

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Fear of Conflict (FoC)

Average

5.5

Normal range

4.4 — 6.5

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Distrust (D)

Average

5.3

Normal range

4.4 — 6.2

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Start Online Test

Featured On

Rated 4.8/5 by Our Customers

“Freudly really helped me discover parts of my personality I hadn’t noticed before. It strengthened the areas where I needed to grow and made me feel more grounded and confident in the parts that already worked well.”

— Emma C., US

“I wanted to understand how serious my ADHD is, and now I finally do. I also realized I need to work on my self-esteem. It has been low for a long time, and that makes daily life harder than it should be.”

— Mateo R., CA

“Reading each question felt like someone really understood me. Even though I’ve already dealt with much of this, reflecting still helped me learn something new about myself.”

— Caroline F., US

“The process is simple. The test covers everything you need, and you’ll get a clear breakdown of your results. For just a few dollars, it’s a great value.”

— Klara N., CZ

“I kept thinking there might be a small chance, but now I know for sure. The questions were easy to understand, and the whole process was straightforward.”

— Bruno M., BR

“I really enjoyed this experience. I learned a lot, and it helped me make sense of my thoughts and the feeling I’ve had for a long time that I may have grown up with undiagnosed ADHD.”

— Alice B., FR

“Great platform — the insights were genuinely meaningful!”

— Daniel W., DE

“Everything was easy to follow. The tools you get at the end are genuinely helpful for self-growth, and the price is very reasonable. I really appreciate that.”

— Sofia M., ES

“Surprisingly accurate — honestly didn’t expect it to nail things so well.”

— Adir B., IL

“There are lots of different tests to pick from, and the price is surprisingly low for how much insight you get.”

— Olivia W., CA

“I was pleasantly surprised when I read the results. It was as if someone had sorted out my messy thoughts and given me useful tips to help me speak with more confidence.”

— Grace O., IE

“It was really solid, very detailed, and it actually helped me make sense of a lot of things.”

— Carla T., TT

“I was really impressed with the report. It was clear, thoughtful, and it reflected things I’ve been noticing about myself.”

— Jade H., US

“The questions made me think deeply and helped me become more self-aware.”

— Brooke S., US

“Reading through most of the questions made me feel understood. Although I’ve already worked through some of these issues, the questions still gave me useful insights and helped me learn more about myself.”

— Ryan M., US

“I usually take one or two tests each month, and this has become a good way for me to see how I’m doing.”

— Lucas W., US

“Most of the time, my results are in the 90 to 98th percentile compared to others. It really makes me feel like there’s something unique about me.”

— Ethan C., US

“I tried out some of the AI’s suggestions, and to be honest, they worked much better than I thought they would. Maybe this thing really is smarter than me.”

— Reece D., AU

Trusted by 22k+ Users Worldwide

CLEAR ANSWERS TO COMMON QUESTIONS

Frequently Asked Questions

Any questions left?

What does this assessment measure?

It measures team functioning across trust, conflict, commitment, accountability, and focus on collective results. Scores indicate areas that may interfere with effective collaboration.

How long does it take to complete and how many items are included?

Completion typically takes about 3 minutes. The questionnaire includes 15 items.

Who should complete the questionnaire?

All members of the team being evaluated should complete it. Results are most useful when participation is broad and ratings reflect the same team context.

How should items be answered?

Respond based on typical team behavior rather than isolated events. Use the first response that fits overall patterns.

How should results be interpreted and used?

Results are intended to identify strengths and potential risks, not to diagnose individuals. Use findings to guide team discussions and to set specific improvement actions.

WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

About This Assessment

Team Assessment Test

team climate arrange

This brief self-report tool is designed to support a structured discussion of team functioning. Team Assessment is based on Patrick M. Lencioni’s five dysfunctions framework and is intended as a quick screening of commonly reported barriers to effective collaboration.

The measure includes 15 items and typically requires about 3 minutes to complete. Items prompt respondents to rate perceptions of trust, openness to constructive conflict, commitment, accountability, and attention to collective results. Scores are generally interpreted at the team level to identify relative areas of strength and vulnerability.

Team Assessment is best used as an initial needs-assessment to guide facilitated feedback, goal setting, and follow-up interventions, rather than as a stand-alone diagnostic instrument.

Author: Patrick M. Lencioni

Literature: Lencioni, P. The five dysfunctions of a team: A leadership fable. Jossey-Bass. 2002.

Test Question Form