Home
Psychological tests
Cognitive Errors in Sport Assessment

Cognitive Errors in Sport Assessment Test

In 5 minutes, learn how often thinking errors show up in sports and how well you notice and manage them under pressure. Fast, 27-item results guide targeted coaching, mental skills work, and sport psychology support.

Start Online Test

Questions: 275 minutes

Hi! My name is Freudly, i am an AI therapist, I will give you an interpretation of the test after you complete it.

08:30

October 2, 2025

October 2, 2025
Material has been updated

October 2, 2025
Material has been published

28847 views

3289 completions

2688 likes

Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

example score

8/36

Control (C)

Measures the athlete’s metacognitive control of thinking under stress, where lower scores indicate better control and higher scores indicate lower metacognitive activity.

High control

Moderate control

Low control

0 – 12: High control | 13 – 24: Moderate control | 25 – 36: Low control

A score of 8 falls in the High control range, suggesting well-organized and effectively coordinated thinking with active management of mental resources in stressful sports situations.

example score

13/36

Mindfulness (M)

Measures how often an athlete’s attention drifts from the present moment toward past or future thoughts during sports situations.

Present-focused

Mixed focus

Past/future-focused

0 – 12: Present-focused | 13 – 24: Mixed focus | 25 – 36: Past/future-focused

A score of 13 falls in the Mixed focus range, suggesting occasional difficulty staying fully in the present moment during sport-related situations.

example score

31/36

Situational Focus (SF)

Measures whether an athlete’s cognitive errors are more characteristic of training situations versus competitive situations.

Competition-leaning

Mixed

Training-leaning

0 – 12: Competition-leaning | 13 – 24: Mixed | 25 – 36: Training-leaning

A score of 31 indicates cognitive errors are more likely to occur during training sessions than during competitions.

example score

44/108

Overall Score (OS)

Measures the overall frequency and impact of cognitive errors in sports situations, reflecting stress resilience and thought control under pressure.

Low

Moderate

High

0 – 36: Low | 37 – 72: Moderate | 73 – 108: High

A score of 44 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting a noticeable but not extreme tendency toward cognitive errors and variable stress resilience in sport contexts.

Start Online Test

just completed the test

DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Competitive athletes under pressure

46%OF USERS

Athletes take it to spot distorted thoughts during training and competition and learn how well they can regain focus after mistakes or setbacks.

Coaches building mental routines

32%OF USERS

Coaches use it to identify when athletes’ thinking breaks down and to tailor feedback and pre-competition routines to reduce recurring errors.

Sport psychologists and counselors

22%OF USERS

Practitioners administer it to assess metacognitive control in sport-specific stress and guide targeted psychological interventions.

BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.

RESULTS YOU CAN ACTUALLY USE

What You’ll See After You Finish the Test

Scale Results
— Explained Clearly

Your scores across each test scale, translated into plain, usable insights. Not just numbers, but what they actually mean for your daily life, emotional state, and overall well-being.

AI-Powered
Interpretation

A structured, clinically grounded explanation. Our AI analyzes patterns and relationships between scales to provide a coherent interpretation — without alarmist language.

Statistical
Comparison

See how you compare to others. Your scores are placed in a statistical context, showing percentiles and trends based on anonymized platform data to help you understand what`s typical.

Practical
Recommendations

Actionable guidance tailored to your profile. Receive clear, realistic suggestions you can apply immediately — focused on coping, self-regulation, and realistic next steps.

AI-Detected
Insights

Key patterns you might not notice on your own. Surfacing subtle connections in your responses that help you better understand what may be driving your current results.

Discuss with
an AI Psychologist

Clarify, reflect, and explore right away. Talk through your outcomes, ask questions, and explore meanings in a calm, non-diagnostic dialogue environment.

Start Online Test

Used in 52+ countries

Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you finish the test, your results will be compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of the benchmarks we use to place your score in context.

Control (C)

Average

18.1

Normal range

13.5 — 22.7

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Mindfulness (M)

Average

16.2

Normal range

11.3 — 21

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Situationality (S)

Average

15.5

Normal range

9.4 — 21.5

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Overall Score (OS)

Average

Normal range

36.4 — 67.7

min.

max.

108

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Start Online Test

Featured On

Rated 4.8/5 by Our Customers

“Freudly really helped me discover parts of my personality I hadn’t noticed before. It strengthened the areas where I needed to grow and made me feel more grounded and confident in the parts that already worked well.”

— Emma C., US

“I wanted to understand how serious my ADHD is, and now I finally do. I also realized I need to work on my self-esteem. It has been low for a long time, and that makes daily life harder than it should be.”

— Mateo R., CA

“Reading each question felt like someone really understood me. Even though I’ve already dealt with much of this, reflecting still helped me learn something new about myself.”

— Caroline F., US

“The process is simple. The test covers everything you need, and you’ll get a clear breakdown of your results. For just a few dollars, it’s a great value.”

— Klara N., CZ

“I kept thinking there might be a small chance, but now I know for sure. The questions were easy to understand, and the whole process was straightforward.”

— Bruno M., BR

“I really enjoyed this experience. I learned a lot, and it helped me make sense of my thoughts and the feeling I’ve had for a long time that I may have grown up with undiagnosed ADHD.”

— Alice B., FR

“Great platform — the insights were genuinely meaningful!”

— Daniel W., DE

“Everything was easy to follow. The tools you get at the end are genuinely helpful for self-growth, and the price is very reasonable. I really appreciate that.”

— Sofia M., ES

“Surprisingly accurate — honestly didn’t expect it to nail things so well.”

— Adir B., IL

“There are lots of different tests to pick from, and the price is surprisingly low for how much insight you get.”

— Olivia W., CA

“I was pleasantly surprised when I read the results. It was as if someone had sorted out my messy thoughts and given me useful tips to help me speak with more confidence.”

— Grace O., IE

“It was really solid, very detailed, and it actually helped me make sense of a lot of things.”

— Carla T., TT

“I was really impressed with the report. It was clear, thoughtful, and it reflected things I’ve been noticing about myself.”

— Jade H., US

“The questions made me think deeply and helped me become more self-aware.”

— Brooke S., US

“Reading through most of the questions made me feel understood. Although I’ve already worked through some of these issues, the questions still gave me useful insights and helped me learn more about myself.”

— Ryan M., US

“I usually take one or two tests each month, and this has become a good way for me to see how I’m doing.”

— Lucas W., US

“Most of the time, my results are in the 90 to 98th percentile compared to others. It really makes me feel like there’s something unique about me.”

— Ethan C., US

“I tried out some of the AI’s suggestions, and to be honest, they worked much better than I thought they would. Maybe this thing really is smarter than me.”

— Reece D., AU

Trusted by 22k+ Users Worldwide

CLEAR ANSWERS TO COMMON QUESTIONS

Frequently Asked Questions

Any questions left?

What does this questionnaire measure?

It assesses how often thinking errors occur in sport situations and how strongly they affect reactions. It also evaluates awareness of these errors and the ability to regulate thoughts under pressure.

How long does it take and how many items are included?

Completion typically takes about 5 minutes. The questionnaire contains 27 items.

Which situations should be considered when answering?

Consider typical training and competition situations, including mistakes, setbacks, and opponent pressure. Use the most common or recent pattern rather than a single unusual event.

How should responses be chosen if none seem to fit exactly?

Select the response that most closely matches the usual reaction. If uncertain, choose the option that reflects what happens more often.

How are results typically used?

Results can guide psychological skills training by identifying frequent thinking errors and areas for improved awareness and control. They may also support coaching decisions and targeted follow-up assessment.

WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

About This Assessment

Studying Cognitive Errors in Sports Test

Cognitive Errors in Sport Assessment Test

cognitive functions sport

This self-report measure evaluates common cognitive errors that can occur in athletic contexts and their perceived impact on performance and mood. The Cognitive Errors in Sport Assessment is intended to support clinical or sport psychology screening of maladaptive thinking patterns under training and competition stress. It consists of 27 items and takes about 5 minutes to complete.

Items ask respondents to rate typical reactions to challenging sport situations (e.g., setbacks, pressure, evaluation), with the goal of estimating the frequency of cognitive distortions and the athlete’s perceived awareness and control of these thinking patterns. Scores from the Cognitive Errors in Sport Assessment may be used to guide case formulation and to inform targets for cognitive-behavioral intervention or performance-focused psychological skills work. Authors referenced in the literature include Aaron T. Beck and David A. Clark.

Author: Aaron T. Beck, David A. Clark

Literature: Beck, A. T. Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders. International Universities Press. 1976.

Test Question Form