Home
Psychological tests
Socio-Psychological Self-Assessment of the Team

Socio-Psychological Self-Assessment of the Team Test

In 6 minutes, see how students perceive class unity, belonging, and shared norms. A quick 28 item check that pinpoints cohesion gaps and guides targeted support.

Start Online Test

Questions: 286 minutes

Hi! My name is Freudly, i am an AI therapist, I will give you an interpretation of the test after you complete it.

08:30

October 2, 2025

October 2, 2025
Material has been updated

October 2, 2025
Material has been published

19208 views

2273 completions

2018 likes

Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

example score

2/4

Group Prototypicality (M) (GP()

Measures how cohesive and socio-psychologically “standard” the class feels to its members based on their shared perception of unity and norms.

Low

Medium

High

0 – 1.9: Low | 2 – 3: Medium | 3.1 – 4: High

A score of 2 falls in the Medium range, suggesting the class perceives some cohesion but also notices areas that may be causing difficulties in shared norms or unity.

Start Online Test

just completed the test

DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Classroom teachers

44%OF USERS

Teachers use it to quickly see how united the class feels and where relationships or roles may need support.

School psychologists

36%OF USERS

Psychologists administer it to assess class cohesion and group norms before planning interventions or preventive work.

Homeroom coordinators

20%OF USERS

Homeroom leaders take it when they need a fast snapshot of class climate to guide team-building and classroom activities.

BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.

RESULTS YOU CAN ACTUALLY USE

What You’ll See After You Finish the Test

Scale Results
— Explained Clearly

Your scores across each test scale, translated into plain, usable insights. Not just numbers, but what they actually mean for your daily life, emotional state, and overall well-being.

AI-Powered
Interpretation

A structured, clinically grounded explanation. Our AI analyzes patterns and relationships between scales to provide a coherent interpretation — without alarmist language.

Statistical
Comparison

See how you compare to others. Your scores are placed in a statistical context, showing percentiles and trends based on anonymized platform data to help you understand what`s typical.

Practical
Recommendations

Actionable guidance tailored to your profile. Receive clear, realistic suggestions you can apply immediately — focused on coping, self-regulation, and realistic next steps.

AI-Detected
Insights

Key patterns you might not notice on your own. Surfacing subtle connections in your responses that help you better understand what may be driving your current results.

Discuss with
an AI Psychologist

Clarify, reflect, and explore right away. Talk through your outcomes, ask questions, and explore meanings in a calm, non-diagnostic dialogue environment.

Start Online Test

Used in 52+ countries

Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you finish the test, your results will be compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of the benchmarks we use to place your score in context.

Community Standardness (M) (CS()

Average

Normal range

1.4 — 2.6

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Start Online Test

Featured On

Rated 4.8/5 by Our Customers

“Freudly really helped me discover parts of my personality I hadn’t noticed before. It strengthened the areas where I needed to grow and made me feel more grounded and confident in the parts that already worked well.”

— Emma C., US

“I wanted to understand how serious my ADHD is, and now I finally do. I also realized I need to work on my self-esteem. It has been low for a long time, and that makes daily life harder than it should be.”

— Mateo R., CA

“Reading each question felt like someone really understood me. Even though I’ve already dealt with much of this, reflecting still helped me learn something new about myself.”

— Caroline F., US

“The process is simple. The test covers everything you need, and you’ll get a clear breakdown of your results. For just a few dollars, it’s a great value.”

— Klara N., CZ

“I kept thinking there might be a small chance, but now I know for sure. The questions were easy to understand, and the whole process was straightforward.”

— Bruno M., BR

“I really enjoyed this experience. I learned a lot, and it helped me make sense of my thoughts and the feeling I’ve had for a long time that I may have grown up with undiagnosed ADHD.”

— Alice B., FR

“Great platform — the insights were genuinely meaningful!”

— Daniel W., DE

“Everything was easy to follow. The tools you get at the end are genuinely helpful for self-growth, and the price is very reasonable. I really appreciate that.”

— Sofia M., ES

“Surprisingly accurate — honestly didn’t expect it to nail things so well.”

— Adir B., IL

“There are lots of different tests to pick from, and the price is surprisingly low for how much insight you get.”

— Olivia W., CA

“I was pleasantly surprised when I read the results. It was as if someone had sorted out my messy thoughts and given me useful tips to help me speak with more confidence.”

— Grace O., IE

“It was really solid, very detailed, and it actually helped me make sense of a lot of things.”

— Carla T., TT

“I was really impressed with the report. It was clear, thoughtful, and it reflected things I’ve been noticing about myself.”

— Jade H., US

“The questions made me think deeply and helped me become more self-aware.”

— Brooke S., US

“Reading through most of the questions made me feel understood. Although I’ve already worked through some of these issues, the questions still gave me useful insights and helped me learn more about myself.”

— Ryan M., US

“I usually take one or two tests each month, and this has become a good way for me to see how I’m doing.”

— Lucas W., US

“Most of the time, my results are in the 90 to 98th percentile compared to others. It really makes me feel like there’s something unique about me.”

— Ethan C., US

“I tried out some of the AI’s suggestions, and to be honest, they worked much better than I thought they would. Maybe this thing really is smarter than me.”

— Reece D., AU

Trusted by 22k+ Users Worldwide

CLEAR ANSWERS TO COMMON QUESTIONS

Frequently Asked Questions

Any questions left?

What does this questionnaire measure?

It measures perceived class cohesion, shared values, and a sense of belonging. It reflects how the group views itself rather than an outside evaluation.

Who can complete it?

It is designed for school-age students who can read and answer short statements. It is used with intact classroom groups.

How long does it take and how many items are included?

Completion time is about 6 minutes. It includes 28 questions.

How should items be answered?

Each item should be answered based on current impressions of the class. Responses should be given independently without discussion with classmates.

How are results used?

Results summarize the group’s perceived unity and clarity of shared norms. They help identify areas that may need attention to support comfort and mutual understanding.

WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

About This Assessment

Socio-Psychological Self-Assessment of the Team Test

class climate

This brief self-report measure is intended to capture participants’ perceptions of their group as a cohesive, value-aligned collective. The Socio-Psychological Self-Assessment of the Team is used to obtain an internal view of group climate and perceived unity without relying on external ratings.

The instrument consists of 28 items and typically requires about 6 minutes to complete. Items ask respondents to reflect on shared norms, sense of belonging, and perceived alignment around common goals, supporting a rapid snapshot of perceived group cohesion and identification.

Results from the Socio-Psychological Self-Assessment of the Team may help inform classroom or small-group consultation by identifying areas of perceived strength and potential targets for improving communication, comfort, and mutual understanding. Authorship is commonly attributed to Rensis Likert.

Author: Rensis Likert

Literature: Wheelan, S. A. Creating effective teams: A guide for members and leaders. SAGE Publications. 2005.

Test Question Form