Home
Psychological tests
Social Responsibility Scale (SRS)

Social Responsibility Scale (SRS) Test

See how motivated someone is to follow social norms and take responsibility in just 3 minutes. Get a quick, practical snapshot for counseling, hiring, or research to support stronger group fit.

Start Online Test

Questions: 123 minutes

Hi! My name is Freudly, i am an AI therapist, I will give you an interpretation of the test after you complete it.

08:30

October 2, 2025

October 2, 2025
Material has been updated

October 2, 2025
Material has been published

16429 views

1705 completions

1375 likes

Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

example score

33/84

Level of Social Responsibility (LoSR)

Measures a person’s internal motivation to follow social norms and take responsibility within group and work relationships.

Low

Moderate

High

12 – 36: Low | 37 – 60: Moderate | 61 – 84: High

A score of 33 falls in the Low range, suggesting a lower tendency to assume responsibility and consistently adhere to group norms in social and work situations.

Start Online Test

just completed the test

DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

HR and team leads

41%OF USERS

They use it to gauge how reliably a candidate or employee will follow rules, handle shared duties, and fit into a team’s norms.

Counseling clients

34%OF USERS

They take it to understand their tendency to accept responsibility, respect boundaries, and navigate social expectations in relationships and work.

Researchers and students

25%OF USERS

They use it in studies or coursework to measure social responsibility and compare groups on adherence to norms and roles.

BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.

RESULTS YOU CAN ACTUALLY USE

What You’ll See After You Finish the Test

Scale Results
— Explained Clearly

Your scores across each test scale, translated into plain, usable insights. Not just numbers, but what they actually mean for your daily life, emotional state, and overall well-being.

AI-Powered
Interpretation

A structured, clinically grounded explanation. Our AI analyzes patterns and relationships between scales to provide a coherent interpretation — without alarmist language.

Statistical
Comparison

See how you compare to others. Your scores are placed in a statistical context, showing percentiles and trends based on anonymized platform data to help you understand what`s typical.

Practical
Recommendations

Actionable guidance tailored to your profile. Receive clear, realistic suggestions you can apply immediately — focused on coping, self-regulation, and realistic next steps.

AI-Detected
Insights

Key patterns you might not notice on your own. Surfacing subtle connections in your responses that help you better understand what may be driving your current results.

Discuss with
an AI Psychologist

Clarify, reflect, and explore right away. Talk through your outcomes, ask questions, and explore meanings in a calm, non-diagnostic dialogue environment.

Start Online Test

Used in 52+ countries

Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you finish the test, your results will be compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of the benchmarks we use to place your score in context.

Level of Social Responsibility (LoSR)

Average

64.9

Normal range

55.5 — 74.3

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Start Online Test

Featured On

Rated 4.8/5 by Our Customers

“Freudly really helped me discover parts of my personality I hadn’t noticed before. It strengthened the areas where I needed to grow and made me feel more grounded and confident in the parts that already worked well.”

— Emma C., US

“I wanted to understand how serious my ADHD is, and now I finally do. I also realized I need to work on my self-esteem. It has been low for a long time, and that makes daily life harder than it should be.”

— Mateo R., CA

“Reading each question felt like someone really understood me. Even though I’ve already dealt with much of this, reflecting still helped me learn something new about myself.”

— Caroline F., US

“The process is simple. The test covers everything you need, and you’ll get a clear breakdown of your results. For just a few dollars, it’s a great value.”

— Klara N., CZ

“I kept thinking there might be a small chance, but now I know for sure. The questions were easy to understand, and the whole process was straightforward.”

— Bruno M., BR

“I really enjoyed this experience. I learned a lot, and it helped me make sense of my thoughts and the feeling I’ve had for a long time that I may have grown up with undiagnosed ADHD.”

— Alice B., FR

“Great platform — the insights were genuinely meaningful!”

— Daniel W., DE

“Everything was easy to follow. The tools you get at the end are genuinely helpful for self-growth, and the price is very reasonable. I really appreciate that.”

— Sofia M., ES

“Surprisingly accurate — honestly didn’t expect it to nail things so well.”

— Adir B., IL

“There are lots of different tests to pick from, and the price is surprisingly low for how much insight you get.”

— Olivia W., CA

“I was pleasantly surprised when I read the results. It was as if someone had sorted out my messy thoughts and given me useful tips to help me speak with more confidence.”

— Grace O., IE

“It was really solid, very detailed, and it actually helped me make sense of a lot of things.”

— Carla T., TT

“I was really impressed with the report. It was clear, thoughtful, and it reflected things I’ve been noticing about myself.”

— Jade H., US

“The questions made me think deeply and helped me become more self-aware.”

— Brooke S., US

“Reading through most of the questions made me feel understood. Although I’ve already worked through some of these issues, the questions still gave me useful insights and helped me learn more about myself.”

— Ryan M., US

“I usually take one or two tests each month, and this has become a good way for me to see how I’m doing.”

— Lucas W., US

“Most of the time, my results are in the 90 to 98th percentile compared to others. It really makes me feel like there’s something unique about me.”

— Ethan C., US

“I tried out some of the AI’s suggestions, and to be honest, they worked much better than I thought they would. Maybe this thing really is smarter than me.”

— Reece D., AU

Trusted by 22k+ Users Worldwide

CLEAR ANSWERS TO COMMON QUESTIONS

Frequently Asked Questions

Any questions left?

What does this questionnaire measure?

It measures readiness to follow shared rules, meet role expectations, and accept responsibility within a group. It focuses on internal motivation to act in line with common ethical standards.

How long does it take and how many items are included?

Estimated completion time is about 3 minutes. It contains 12 items.

How should responses be selected?

Select the option that best matches typical behavior and attitudes. Use the first response that seems accurate rather than overanalyzing.

In what settings is it commonly used?

It is used in counseling, personnel assessment, and research when a brief estimate of social rule-following and responsibility is needed. Results support a rapid profile of social adaptation and accountability.

How should the results be interpreted?

Higher scores generally indicate stronger commitment to group norms and responsibility, while lower scores suggest less consistency in these areas. Results should be interpreted alongside other information rather than used as a standalone decision tool.

WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

About This Assessment

Social Responsibility Scale (SRS) Test

prosociality

This brief self-report measure is used to screen for an individual’s tendency to endorse and follow shared social norms and role expectations. The Social Responsibility Scale (SRS) provides a rapid indicator of attitudes related to responsibility toward others and adherence to group standards.

The instrument includes 12 items and typically requires about 3 minutes to complete. Items are answered in a fixed-response format and yield a summary score that may be used as a descriptive index in clinical, counseling, organizational, or research settings.

The Social Responsibility Scale (SRS) was authored by F. H. Gough. Interpretation should be integrated with collateral information and relevant contextual factors, and the scale is not intended as a stand-alone diagnostic tool.

Author: F. H. Gough

Literature: Berkowitz, L., & Lutterman, K. The traditionally socially responsible personality. Public Opinion Quarterly. 1968.; Schwartz, S. H. Normative influences on altruism. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. Academic Press. 1977.

Test Question Form