Self-Efficacy in Relation to Illness Questionnaire Test

See how confident you feel managing illness and following care plans in about 2 minutes. Eight quick items help guide support and track confidence changes over treatment.
Start Online Test
Questions82 minutes
Hi! My name is Freudly, i am an AI therapist, I will give you an interpretation of the test after you complete it.
08:30
October 2, 2025
October 2, 2025
Material has been updated
18583 views
1117 completions
996 likes
Share
Scale Explorer
How the Scales are Structured
example score
19/56
Self-Efficacy Related to Illness and Treatment (SRtIaT)
Measures confidence in managing illness and following prescribed treatment tasks and recommendations.
Low self-efficacy
Moderate self-efficacy
High self-efficacy
832Low self-efficacy3340Moderate self-efficacy4156High self-efficacy
A score of 19 falls in the Low self-efficacy range, suggesting reduced confidence in managing illness demands and adhering to treatment as prescribed.
Start Online Test
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS
Who Usually Takes This Test?
People with chronic illness
44%OF USERS
They take it to gauge how confident they feel managing symptoms, sticking to treatment, and staying motivated day to day.
Patients starting treatment
33%OF USERS
They use it at diagnosis or early care to identify where they may need extra support to follow medical advice and cope.
Clinicians and researchers
23%OF USERS
They administer it to quickly assess patient readiness and track changes in self-confidence across treatment or studies.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
RESULTS YOU CAN ACTUALLY USE
What You’ll See After You Finish the Test
Scale Results
— Explained Clearly
Your scores across each test scale, translated into plain, usable insights. Not just numbers, but what they actually mean for your daily life, emotional state, and overall well-being.
AI-Powered
Interpretation
A structured, clinically grounded explanation. Our AI analyzes patterns and relationships between scales to provide a coherent interpretation — without alarmist language.
Statistical
Comparison
See how you compare to others. Your scores are placed in a statistical context, showing percentiles and trends based on anonymized platform data to help you understand what`s typical.
Practical
Recommendations
Actionable guidance tailored to your profile. Receive clear, realistic suggestions you can apply immediately — focused on coping, self-regulation, and realistic next steps.
AI-Detected
Insights
Key patterns you might not notice on your own. Surfacing subtle connections in your responses that help you better understand what may be driving your current results.
Discuss with
an AI Psychologist
Clarify, reflect, and explore right away. Talk through your outcomes, ask questions, and explore meanings in a calm, non-diagnostic dialogue environment.
Start Online Test
Used in 52+ countries
Benchmarking
See How You Compare
Once you finish the test, your results will be compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of the benchmarks we use to place your score in context.
Self-efficacy in relation to illness and treatment (Sirtiat)
Average
21.9
Normal range
13.430.4
min.
8
max.
56
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Featured On
Rated 4.8/5 by Our Customers
Freudly really helped me discover parts of my personality I hadn’t noticed before. It strengthened the areas where I needed to grow and made me feel more grounded and confident in the parts that already worked well.
Emma C., US
I wanted to understand how serious my ADHD is, and now I finally do. I also realized I need to work on my self-esteem. It has been low for a long time, and that makes daily life harder than it should be.
Mateo R., CA
Reading each question felt like someone really understood me. Even though I’ve already dealt with much of this, reflecting still helped me learn something new about myself.
Caroline F., US
The process is simple. The test covers everything you need, and you’ll get a clear breakdown of your results. For just a few dollars, it’s a great value.
Klara N., CZ
I kept thinking there might be a small chance, but now I know for sure. The questions were easy to understand, and the whole process was straightforward.
Bruno M., BR
I really enjoyed this experience. I learned a lot, and it helped me make sense of my thoughts and the feeling I’ve had for a long time that I may have grown up with undiagnosed ADHD.
Alice B., FR
Great platform — the insights were genuinely meaningful!
Daniel W., DE
Everything was easy to follow. The tools you get at the end are genuinely helpful for self-growth, and the price is very reasonable. I really appreciate that.
Sofia M., ES
Surprisingly accurate — honestly didn’t expect it to nail things so well.
Adir B., IL
There are lots of different tests to pick from, and the price is surprisingly low for how much insight you get.
Olivia W., CA
I was pleasantly surprised when I read the results. It was as if someone had sorted out my messy thoughts and given me useful tips to help me speak with more confidence.
Grace O., IE
It was really solid, very detailed, and it actually helped me make sense of a lot of things.
Carla T., TT
I was really impressed with the report. It was clear, thoughtful, and it reflected things I’ve been noticing about myself.
Jade H., US
The questions made me think deeply and helped me become more self-aware.
Brooke S., US
Reading through most of the questions made me feel understood. Although I’ve already worked through some of these issues, the questions still gave me useful insights and helped me learn more about myself.
Ryan M., US
I usually take one or two tests each month, and this has become a good way for me to see how I’m doing.
Lucas W., US
Most of the time, my results are in the 90 to 98th percentile compared to others. It really makes me feel like there’s something unique about me.
Ethan C., US
I tried out some of the AI’s suggestions, and to be honest, they worked much better than I thought they would. Maybe this thing really is smarter than me.
Reece D., AU
Trusted by 22k+ Users Worldwide
CLEAR ANSWERS TO COMMON QUESTIONS
Frequently Asked Questions

Any questions left?

What does this questionnaire measure?
It measures confidence in managing illness-related tasks and challenges. Items cover following treatment recommendations, maintaining motivation, and handling setbacks.
How long does it take to complete and how many items are included?
Completion typically takes about 2 minutes. It includes 8 items.
How should responses be rated?
Rate each item based on current confidence in completing the stated task. Use the full range of the response scale to reflect differences across items.
What should be done if an item does not seem to apply?
Select the response that best matches how confidence would be expected in a similar situation. Avoid leaving items unanswered unless instructed.
How are results typically used?
Scores are used to identify areas of lower confidence that may interfere with illness management. Repeat administration can track change over the course of care or study.
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES
About This Assessment
Self-Efficacy Questionnaire Regarding Illness Test

Self-Efficacy in Relation to Illness Questionnaire Test

This brief self-report measure evaluates perceived confidence in managing health-related demands and following treatment recommendations. The Self-Efficacy in Relation to Illness Questionnaire is intended to support a rapid appraisal of illness-management self-efficacy in clinical or research contexts.

The instrument includes 8 items and typically takes about 2 minutes to complete. Items ask respondents to rate their confidence in handling common challenges associated with illness (e.g., maintaining adherence and sustaining motivation), yielding an index of perceived capability relevant to coping and self-management. The Self-Efficacy in Relation to Illness Questionnaire has been attributed to Albert Bandura and Ralf Schwarzer.

Author: Albert Bandura, Ralf Schwarzer
Literature: Bandura, A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review. 1977.
Test Question Form
You Might Also Like
General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE)
This brief self-report measure assesses an individual’s perceived capacity…
Start Test
Types of Personal Role Self-Efficacy
This measure assesses an individual’s perceived confidence and competence a…
Start Test
Role Self-Efficacy Rating Scale
This self-report measure assesses perceived confidence in performing effect…
Start Test
Comments
Leave a Comment