Home
Psychological tests
Russian-Language Causality Orientations Questionnaire

Russian-Language Causality Orientations Questionnaire Test

Understand what drives your choices in 15 minutes, from inner values to outside pressure to feeling stuck. Get a clear motivation profile to guide coaching, therapy, or personal change.

Start Online Test

Questions: 7815 minutes

Hi! My name is Freudly, i am an AI therapist, I will give you an interpretation of the test after you complete it.

08:30

October 2, 2025

October 2, 2025
Material has been updated

October 2, 2025
Material has been published

19886 views

1992 completions

1644 likes

Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

example score

136/182

Impersonal Orientation (IO)

Measures the tendency toward amotivation and learned helplessness, where behavior is more automatic and less self-determined.

Low

Moderate

High

26 – 90: Low | 91 – 145: Moderate | 146 – 182: High

A score of 136 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting a noticeable tendency toward feeling less effective and relying on habitual, less self-directed patterns in challenging situations.

example score

97/182

External (Control) (E()

Measures the extent to which a person’s choices and behavior are guided by external demands, rewards, and control cues rather than self-determined motives.

Low external control

Moderate external control

High external control

26 – 90: Low external control | 91 – 145: Moderate external control | 146 – 182: High external control

A score of 97 falls in the Moderate external control range, suggesting that external expectations and indicators of success often influence motivation and decision-making, though not overwhelmingly.

example score

64/182

Internal (Autonomy) (I()

Measures the extent to which a person tends to rely on internal motives, self-determination, and personal responsibility when making choices.

Low autonomy

Moderate autonomy

High autonomy

26 – 90: Low autonomy | 91 – 145: Moderate autonomy | 146 – 182: High autonomy

A score of 64 falls in the Low autonomy range, suggesting internal motives and self-directed choice are less consistently used as the primary driver in decisions.

Start Online Test

just completed the test

DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Self-growth seekers

41%OF USERS

People who want to understand what really drives their choices—inner values, external pressure, or a sense of helplessness—and how to change their patterns.

Psychologists and coaches

34%OF USERS

Specialists who use the questionnaire to clarify a client’s motivational orientation and tailor support for issues like procrastination, burnout, or goal-setting.

Students and researchers

25%OF USERS

Those studying motivation and self-determination who need a structured measure of autonomy, controlled motivation, and amotivation for coursework or studies.

BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.

RESULTS YOU CAN ACTUALLY USE

What You’ll See After You Finish the Test

Scale Results
— Explained Clearly

Your scores across each test scale, translated into plain, usable insights. Not just numbers, but what they actually mean for your daily life, emotional state, and overall well-being.

AI-Powered
Interpretation

A structured, clinically grounded explanation. Our AI analyzes patterns and relationships between scales to provide a coherent interpretation — without alarmist language.

Statistical
Comparison

See how you compare to others. Your scores are placed in a statistical context, showing percentiles and trends based on anonymized platform data to help you understand what`s typical.

Practical
Recommendations

Actionable guidance tailored to your profile. Receive clear, realistic suggestions you can apply immediately — focused on coping, self-regulation, and realistic next steps.

AI-Detected
Insights

Key patterns you might not notice on your own. Surfacing subtle connections in your responses that help you better understand what may be driving your current results.

Discuss with
an AI Psychologist

Clarify, reflect, and explore right away. Talk through your outcomes, ask questions, and explore meanings in a calm, non-diagnostic dialogue environment.

Start Online Test

Used in 52+ countries

Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you finish the test, your results will be compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of the benchmarks we use to place your score in context.

Impersonal orientation (Io)

Average

107.4

Normal range

85.7 — 129.1

min.

max.

182

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

External (control) (E()

Average

108.8

Normal range

85.5 — 132.1

min.

max.

182

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Internal (autonomy) (I()

Average

95.5

Normal range

73.9 — 117.2

min.

max.

182

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Start Online Test

Featured On

Rated 4.8/5 by Our Customers

“Freudly really helped me discover parts of my personality I hadn’t noticed before. It strengthened the areas where I needed to grow and made me feel more grounded and confident in the parts that already worked well.”

— Emma C., US

“I wanted to understand how serious my ADHD is, and now I finally do. I also realized I need to work on my self-esteem. It has been low for a long time, and that makes daily life harder than it should be.”

— Mateo R., CA

“Reading each question felt like someone really understood me. Even though I’ve already dealt with much of this, reflecting still helped me learn something new about myself.”

— Caroline F., US

“The process is simple. The test covers everything you need, and you’ll get a clear breakdown of your results. For just a few dollars, it’s a great value.”

— Klara N., CZ

“I kept thinking there might be a small chance, but now I know for sure. The questions were easy to understand, and the whole process was straightforward.”

— Bruno M., BR

“I really enjoyed this experience. I learned a lot, and it helped me make sense of my thoughts and the feeling I’ve had for a long time that I may have grown up with undiagnosed ADHD.”

— Alice B., FR

“Great platform — the insights were genuinely meaningful!”

— Daniel W., DE

“Everything was easy to follow. The tools you get at the end are genuinely helpful for self-growth, and the price is very reasonable. I really appreciate that.”

— Sofia M., ES

“Surprisingly accurate — honestly didn’t expect it to nail things so well.”

— Adir B., IL

“There are lots of different tests to pick from, and the price is surprisingly low for how much insight you get.”

— Olivia W., CA

“I was pleasantly surprised when I read the results. It was as if someone had sorted out my messy thoughts and given me useful tips to help me speak with more confidence.”

— Grace O., IE

“It was really solid, very detailed, and it actually helped me make sense of a lot of things.”

— Carla T., TT

“I was really impressed with the report. It was clear, thoughtful, and it reflected things I’ve been noticing about myself.”

— Jade H., US

“The questions made me think deeply and helped me become more self-aware.”

— Brooke S., US

“Reading through most of the questions made me feel understood. Although I’ve already worked through some of these issues, the questions still gave me useful insights and helped me learn more about myself.”

— Ryan M., US

“I usually take one or two tests each month, and this has become a good way for me to see how I’m doing.”

— Lucas W., US

“Most of the time, my results are in the 90 to 98th percentile compared to others. It really makes me feel like there’s something unique about me.”

— Ethan C., US

“I tried out some of the AI’s suggestions, and to be honest, they worked much better than I thought they would. Maybe this thing really is smarter than me.”

— Reece D., AU

Trusted by 22k+ Users Worldwide

CLEAR ANSWERS TO COMMON QUESTIONS

Frequently Asked Questions

Any questions left?

What does this questionnaire measure?

It assesses typical motivational orientations used when making choices and responding to events. It distinguishes autonomy orientation, control orientation, and impersonal orientation.

How is it structured?

It includes 78 items that describe common situations and possible responses. Responses are rated using the provided scale for each item.

How long does it take to complete?

Average completion time is about 15 minutes. Time may vary depending on reading speed and response style.

How should items be answered?

Select the response that best matches the way one would usually think or act in the described situation. Answer all items and avoid overthinking individual questions.

How should results be interpreted?

Scores indicate the relative strength of each orientation and are not a clinical diagnosis. Interpretation should consider the assessment purpose and other available information.

WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

About This Assessment

Russian-language Causal Orientation Questionnaire, COQ Test

Russian-Language Causality Orientations Questionnaire Test

self-determination

This instrument assesses individual differences in motivational orientation in choice and goal-directed situations. The Russian-Language Causality Orientations Questionnaire is designed to characterize the relative tendency to act from internal endorsement, respond primarily to external demands or contingencies, or experience amotivation and perceived ineffectiveness.

The measure is grounded in self-determination theory and adapted from the General Causality Orientations Scale framework. It contains 78 items and typically requires about 15 minutes to complete.

Results from the Russian-Language Causality Orientations Questionnaire may be used in clinical, coaching, or research contexts to support formulation of motivational dynamics and to inform intervention planning, while remaining interpretable in conjunction with other clinical information.

Author: edward-l-deci, richard-m-ryan

Literature: Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum Press. 1985.; Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality. 1985.

Test Question Form