Ruminative Responses Scale (RRS-18) Test

Understand how much you get stuck in repetitive, distressing thoughts in about 4 minutes. Get clear, actionable insights to guide targeted coping strategies and track change over time.
Start Online Test
Questions184 minutes
Hi! My name is Freudly, i am an AI therapist, I will give you an interpretation of the test after you complete it.
08:30
October 2, 2025
October 2, 2025
Material has been updated
27579 views
1559 completions
1341 likes
Share
Scale Explorer
How the Scales are Structured
example score
7/12
Loneliness (L)
Assesses how strongly a person tends to dwell on feelings of loneliness and related thoughts.
Low
Moderate
High
35Low69Moderate1012High
A score of 7 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting a noticeable but not pronounced tendency to ruminate on loneliness-related experiences.
example score
6/12
Analysis (A)
Measures the tendency to reflect on low mood with some emotional distance rather than becoming absorbed in repetitive negative thinking.
Low analysis
Moderate analysis
High analysis
35Low analysis68Moderate analysis912High analysis
A score of 6 falls in the Moderate analysis range, suggesting a balanced level of reflective distancing that may sometimes support constructive problem-focused thinking.
example score
15/20
Searching for Global Explanations (SfGE)
Measures how strongly a person tends to ruminate on setbacks by searching for broad, global causes and meanings.
Low
Moderate
High
59Low1014Moderate1520High
A score of 15 falls in the High range, indicating a pronounced tendency to explain negative events through broad, global causes, which can reinforce unproductive repetitive thinking.
example score
21/28
Anergia (A)
Assesses how strongly a person tends to ruminate on tiredness and reduced energy.
Low
Moderate
High
713Low1420Moderate2128High
A score of 21 falls in the High range, suggesting a pronounced focus on fatigue and low energy in repetitive thinking.
example score
53/72
Rumination (R)
Assesses the tendency toward persistent, repetitive thinking about feelings and problems that can interfere with constructive problem-solving.
Low
Moderate
High
1835Low3654Moderate5572High
A score of 53 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting a noticeable tendency toward repetitive, cyclical thinking that may sometimes make it harder to move from reflection to action.
Start Online Test
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS
Who Usually Takes This Test?
Stuck in past thoughts
41%OF USERS
People who keep replaying upsetting events and want to know how strong their tendency to mentally “chew” on them really is.
Anxiety or low mood seekers
34%OF USERS
Those noticing anxiety or a drop in mood who suspect repetitive thinking is fueling it and want a quick check of rumination patterns.
Therapy-focused self trackers
25%OF USERS
Clients in counseling who want a clear baseline and a way to monitor whether targeted techniques are reducing unproductive looping thoughts.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
RESULTS YOU CAN ACTUALLY USE
What You’ll See After You Finish the Test
Scale Results
— Explained Clearly
Your scores across each test scale, translated into plain, usable insights. Not just numbers, but what they actually mean for your daily life, emotional state, and overall well-being.
AI-Powered
Interpretation
A structured, clinically grounded explanation. Our AI analyzes patterns and relationships between scales to provide a coherent interpretation — without alarmist language.
Statistical
Comparison
See how you compare to others. Your scores are placed in a statistical context, showing percentiles and trends based on anonymized platform data to help you understand what`s typical.
Practical
Recommendations
Actionable guidance tailored to your profile. Receive clear, realistic suggestions you can apply immediately — focused on coping, self-regulation, and realistic next steps.
AI-Detected
Insights
Key patterns you might not notice on your own. Surfacing subtle connections in your responses that help you better understand what may be driving your current results.
Discuss with
an AI Psychologist
Clarify, reflect, and explore right away. Talk through your outcomes, ask questions, and explore meanings in a calm, non-diagnostic dialogue environment.
Start Online Test
Used in 52+ countries
Benchmarking
See How You Compare
Once you finish the test, your results will be compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of the benchmarks we use to place your score in context.
Experiencing Loneliness (EL)
Average
9.3
Normal range
810.6
min.
3
max.
12
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Analysis (A)
Average
5.7
Normal range
4.56.9
min.
3
max.
12
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Searching for global explanations (Sfge)
Average
11.2
Normal range
8.613.8
min.
5
max.
20
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Anergy (A)
Average
13.1
Normal range
9.616.6
min.
7
max.
28
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Rumination Scale (RS)
Average
39.2
Normal range
31.646.9
min.
18
max.
72
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Featured On
Rated 4.8/5 by Our Customers
Freudly really helped me discover parts of my personality I hadn’t noticed before. It strengthened the areas where I needed to grow and made me feel more grounded and confident in the parts that already worked well.
Emma C., US
I wanted to understand how serious my ADHD is, and now I finally do. I also realized I need to work on my self-esteem. It has been low for a long time, and that makes daily life harder than it should be.
Mateo R., CA
Reading each question felt like someone really understood me. Even though I’ve already dealt with much of this, reflecting still helped me learn something new about myself.
Caroline F., US
The process is simple. The test covers everything you need, and you’ll get a clear breakdown of your results. For just a few dollars, it’s a great value.
Klara N., CZ
I kept thinking there might be a small chance, but now I know for sure. The questions were easy to understand, and the whole process was straightforward.
Bruno M., BR
I really enjoyed this experience. I learned a lot, and it helped me make sense of my thoughts and the feeling I’ve had for a long time that I may have grown up with undiagnosed ADHD.
Alice B., FR
Great platform — the insights were genuinely meaningful!
Daniel W., DE
Everything was easy to follow. The tools you get at the end are genuinely helpful for self-growth, and the price is very reasonable. I really appreciate that.
Sofia M., ES
Surprisingly accurate — honestly didn’t expect it to nail things so well.
Adir B., IL
There are lots of different tests to pick from, and the price is surprisingly low for how much insight you get.
Olivia W., CA
I was pleasantly surprised when I read the results. It was as if someone had sorted out my messy thoughts and given me useful tips to help me speak with more confidence.
Grace O., IE
It was really solid, very detailed, and it actually helped me make sense of a lot of things.
Carla T., TT
I was really impressed with the report. It was clear, thoughtful, and it reflected things I’ve been noticing about myself.
Jade H., US
The questions made me think deeply and helped me become more self-aware.
Brooke S., US
Reading through most of the questions made me feel understood. Although I’ve already worked through some of these issues, the questions still gave me useful insights and helped me learn more about myself.
Ryan M., US
I usually take one or two tests each month, and this has become a good way for me to see how I’m doing.
Lucas W., US
Most of the time, my results are in the 90 to 98th percentile compared to others. It really makes me feel like there’s something unique about me.
Ethan C., US
I tried out some of the AI’s suggestions, and to be honest, they worked much better than I thought they would. Maybe this thing really is smarter than me.
Reece D., AU
Trusted by 22k+ Users Worldwide
CLEAR ANSWERS TO COMMON QUESTIONS
Frequently Asked Questions

Any questions left?

What does this questionnaire measure?
It measures the tendency to engage in repetitive, unproductive thinking about problems, past events, and negative feelings. It focuses on persistent mental replay and analysis that does not lead to resolution.
How long does it take to complete and what is the format?
Completion typically takes about 4 minutes. It consists of 18 statements rated by selecting the response option that best matches usual thinking.
What time frame should be used when answering items?
Responses should reflect typical patterns rather than a single day. If unsure, select the option that best represents the most common experience.
How should results be interpreted?
Higher scores indicate a stronger tendency toward repetitive thinking and greater fixation on distressing content. Subscale scores can show the main direction of the repetitive thoughts.
Is this a diagnostic instrument for mental disorders?
It is a screening measure of a cognitive style and does not provide a diagnosis by itself. Results should be considered alongside clinical interview and other assessment information.
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES
About This Assessment

Ruminative Responses Scale (RRS-18) Test

This self-report measure assesses a person’s tendency to engage in repetitive, persistent thinking about distress and its implications. The Ruminative Responses Scale (RRS-18) is commonly used to characterize ruminative response styles associated with emotional distress.

It consists of 18 items and typically takes about 4 minutes to complete. Items query how individuals think or respond when feeling down or upset, supporting clinical case formulation and monitoring change over time. The measure is attributed to Sonja Lyubomirsky, Susan Nolen-Hoeksema, and Jannay Morrow.

Scores from the Ruminative Responses Scale (RRS-18) are interpreted as an index of ruminative tendency rather than as a standalone diagnosis, and should be considered alongside clinical interview data and other validated measures as appropriate.

Author: Jannay Morrow, Sonja Lyubomirsky, Susan Nolen-Hoeksema
Literature: Susan Nolen-Hoeksema. Responses to depression and their effects on the duration of depressive episodes. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 1991.; Treynor, W., Gonzalez, R., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. Rumination reconsidered: A psychometric analysis. Cognitive Therapy and Research. 2003.
Test Question Form
You Might Also Like
Ruminative Responses Scale (RRS)
This measure assesses habitual responses to distress, with emphasis on repe…
Start Test
Ruminative Response Scale (RRS-10)
This brief self-report measure assesses a person’s tendency to respond to d…
Start Test
Self-Determination Scale (SDS)
This brief self-report measure is used to assess perceived autonomy and sel…
Start Test
Comments
Leave a Comment