Role Self-Efficacy Rating Scale Test

Understand your confidence across key life roles in about 5 minutes. This 24 item check gives a clear snapshot of strengths and gaps to guide coaching, career decisions, or targeted support.

Start Online Test

Questions: 245 minutes

Hi! My name is Freudly, i am an AI therapist, I will give you an interpretation of the test after you complete it.

08:30

October 2, 2025

October 2, 2025
Material has been updated

October 2, 2025
Material has been published

26238 views

1789 completions

1492 likes

Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

example score

81/144

Role Self-Efficacy (RS)

Measures confidence in one’s ability to perform effectively and achieve goals across everyday social roles.

Low

Moderate

High

24 – 87: Low | 88 – 111: Moderate | 112 – 144: High

A score of 81 falls in the Low range, indicating comparatively lower confidence in handling role-related responsibilities and achieving goals in key social contexts.

Start Online Test

just completed the test

DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Career changers and job seekers

41%OF USERS

People exploring new roles use it to see where they feel capable, where confidence drops, and what to strengthen for interviews and new responsibilities.

New leaders and managers

34%OF USERS

First-time supervisors take it to check their confidence in leading, influencing, and handling authority in everyday work situations.

Coaching and therapy clients

25%OF USERS

People working on self-development take it to identify which life roles feel solid and which trigger doubt so they can set focused goals.

BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.

RESULTS YOU CAN ACTUALLY USE

What You’ll See After You Finish the Test

Scale Results
— Explained Clearly

Your scores across each test scale, translated into plain, usable insights. Not just numbers, but what they actually mean for your daily life, emotional state, and overall well-being.

AI-Powered
Interpretation

A structured, clinically grounded explanation. Our AI analyzes patterns and relationships between scales to provide a coherent interpretation — without alarmist language.

Statistical
Comparison

See how you compare to others. Your scores are placed in a statistical context, showing percentiles and trends based on anonymized platform data to help you understand what`s typical.

Practical
Recommendations

Actionable guidance tailored to your profile. Receive clear, realistic suggestions you can apply immediately — focused on coping, self-regulation, and realistic next steps.

AI-Detected
Insights

Key patterns you might not notice on your own. Surfacing subtle connections in your responses that help you better understand what may be driving your current results.

Discuss with
an AI Psychologist

Clarify, reflect, and explore right away. Talk through your outcomes, ask questions, and explore meanings in a calm, non-diagnostic dialogue environment.

Start Online Test

Used in 52+ countries

Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you finish the test, your results will be compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of the benchmarks we use to place your score in context.

Role Self-Efficacy Scale (RSS)

Average

104.5

Normal range

84.4 — 124.5

min.

max.

144

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Start Online Test

Featured On

Rated 4.8/5 by Our Customers

“Freudly really helped me discover parts of my personality I hadn’t noticed before. It strengthened the areas where I needed to grow and made me feel more grounded and confident in the parts that already worked well.”

— Emma C., US

“I wanted to understand how serious my ADHD is, and now I finally do. I also realized I need to work on my self-esteem. It has been low for a long time, and that makes daily life harder than it should be.”

— Mateo R., CA

“Reading each question felt like someone really understood me. Even though I’ve already dealt with much of this, reflecting still helped me learn something new about myself.”

— Caroline F., US

“The process is simple. The test covers everything you need, and you’ll get a clear breakdown of your results. For just a few dollars, it’s a great value.”

— Klara N., CZ

“I kept thinking there might be a small chance, but now I know for sure. The questions were easy to understand, and the whole process was straightforward.”

— Bruno M., BR

“I really enjoyed this experience. I learned a lot, and it helped me make sense of my thoughts and the feeling I’ve had for a long time that I may have grown up with undiagnosed ADHD.”

— Alice B., FR

“Great platform — the insights were genuinely meaningful!”

— Daniel W., DE

“Everything was easy to follow. The tools you get at the end are genuinely helpful for self-growth, and the price is very reasonable. I really appreciate that.”

— Sofia M., ES

“Surprisingly accurate — honestly didn’t expect it to nail things so well.”

— Adir B., IL

“There are lots of different tests to pick from, and the price is surprisingly low for how much insight you get.”

— Olivia W., CA

“I was pleasantly surprised when I read the results. It was as if someone had sorted out my messy thoughts and given me useful tips to help me speak with more confidence.”

— Grace O., IE

“It was really solid, very detailed, and it actually helped me make sense of a lot of things.”

— Carla T., TT

“I was really impressed with the report. It was clear, thoughtful, and it reflected things I’ve been noticing about myself.”

— Jade H., US

“The questions made me think deeply and helped me become more self-aware.”

— Brooke S., US

“Reading through most of the questions made me feel understood. Although I’ve already worked through some of these issues, the questions still gave me useful insights and helped me learn more about myself.”

— Ryan M., US

“I usually take one or two tests each month, and this has become a good way for me to see how I’m doing.”

— Lucas W., US

“Most of the time, my results are in the 90 to 98th percentile compared to others. It really makes me feel like there’s something unique about me.”

— Ethan C., US

“I tried out some of the AI’s suggestions, and to be honest, they worked much better than I thought they would. Maybe this thing really is smarter than me.”

— Reece D., AU

Trusted by 22k+ Users Worldwide

CLEAR ANSWERS TO COMMON QUESTIONS

Frequently Asked Questions

Any questions left?

What does this assessment measure?

It measures perceived confidence in handling common social roles and achieving role-related goals. It focuses on perceived control and effectiveness in everyday role situations.

How long does it take to complete and how many items are included?

Completion typically takes about 5 minutes. The assessment includes 24 statements.

How should responses be selected?

Each statement should be rated based on typical experience rather than an ideal or intended self. If a situation is uncommon, responses should reflect the closest comparable role context.

How should the results be interpreted?

Higher scores indicate stronger perceived ability to act effectively and reach goals within roles. Lower scores suggest areas where confidence or role resources may be limited.

Can the results change over time?

Yes, scores may change with new experiences, training, feedback, or role demands. Reassessment can be used to monitor changes following targeted support or development.

WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

About This Assessment

Role Self-Efficacy Rating Scale Test

self-efficacy

This self-report measure assesses perceived confidence in performing effectively across common social and interpersonal roles. The Role Self-Efficacy Rating Scale is intended to capture role-specific beliefs about capability, goal attainment, and personal control in everyday contexts.

The instrument includes 24 items and typically takes about 5 minutes to complete. Respondents rate statements reflecting their current sense of effectiveness in roles that are personally relevant, supporting a brief profile of relative strengths and lower-confidence areas.

In applied settings, the Role Self-Efficacy Rating Scale may be used to inform case conceptualization and goal setting in counseling, coaching, and career-related services, with results interpreted in conjunction with clinical interview data and other assessment information. Authorship is commonly attributed to Albert Bandura.

Author: Albert Bandura

Literature: Bandura, A. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman. 1997.

Test Question Form