Signaling Systems Ratio Questionnaire Test

Understand whether you rely more on sensory detail or abstract concepts in about 11 minutes. Use the 57 quick items to improve communication, learning, and motivation.
Start Online Test
Questions5711 minutes
Hi! My name is Freudly, i am an AI therapist, I will give you an interpretation of the test after you complete it.
08:30
October 2, 2025
October 2, 2025
Material has been updated
25655 views
1336 completions
1178 likes
Share
Scale Explorer
How the Scales are Structured
example score
16/30
Imagination (I)
Measures the tendency toward dreaminess and impressionability, with lower scores reflecting stronger imaginative capacity.
More imaginative
Balanced
Less imaginative
613More imaginative1422Balanced2330Less imaginative
A score of 16 falls in the Balanced range, suggesting a moderate tendency toward dreaminess and impressionability.
example score
31/50
Self-Regulation (S)
Measures the ability to reflect on one’s actions and anticipate events, where lower scores indicate stronger self-regulation.
High self-regulation
Moderate self-regulation
Low self-regulation
1023High self-regulation2436Moderate self-regulation3750Low self-regulation
A score of 31 falls in the Moderate self-regulation range, suggesting an average tendency to reflect on actions and foresee outcomes.
example score
14/40
Analytical Thinking (AT)
Measures the tendency to analyze actions, their sequence, and the deliberateness of decisions, where lower scores reflect stronger analytical thinking.
Strong analytical thinking
Moderate analytical thinking
Lower analytical thinking
818Strong analytical thinking1929Moderate analytical thinking3040Lower analytical thinking
A score of 14 falls in the Strong analytical thinking range, suggesting a pronounced tendency to think through steps and decisions carefully.
example score
21/50
Willpower (W)
Assesses readiness for voluntary effort, persistence, and determination in goal-directed behavior.
Stronger willpower
Moderate willpower
Lower willpower
1023Stronger willpower2436Moderate willpower3750Lower willpower
A score of 21 falls in the Stronger willpower range, suggesting relatively well-developed volitional qualities and perseverance.
example score
21/30
Imagery-Based Memory (IM)
Assesses whether memory relies more on stable mental images versus more symbol- and logic-based encoding within the signaling systems framework.
More figurative (image-based)
Balanced
More symbolic/logical
614More figurative (image-based)1522Balanced2330More symbolic/logical
A score of 21 falls in the Balanced range, suggesting a fairly even use of imagery and symbolic/logical strategies in memory.
example score
21/45
Emotionality (E)
Emotionality reflects how vividly a person emotionally perceives events, their sensitivity, and potential mood variability (lower scores indicate greater emotional development).
More emotionally developed
Balanced emotionality
More restrained emotionality
921More emotionally developed2233Balanced emotionality3445More restrained emotionality
A score of 21 falls in the “More emotionally developed” range, suggesting vivid emotional responsiveness and sensitivity compared with higher scores on this scale.
example score
32/40
Activity (A)
Measures overall behavioral activity, tendency toward above-norm actions, and degree of social contact, with lower scores indicating higher activity.
High activity
Moderate activity
Lower activity
818High activity1929Moderate activity3040Lower activity
A score of 32 falls in the Lower activity range, suggesting comparatively less behavioral activation and social engagement than is typical on this scale.
example score
98/145
Second Signaling System (SSS)
Assesses the relative development of the second signaling system, reflecting abstract, verbal-logical processing (with lower scores indicating stronger development).
More developed
Mixed/average
Less developed
048More developed4997Mixed/average98145Less developed
A score of 98 falls in the “Less developed” range, suggesting comparatively lower reliance on abstract, verbal-logical signaling and a greater tilt toward concrete, image-based processing relative to this scale.
example score
72/145
First Signaling System (FSS)
Measures how strongly a person tends to rely on concrete, sensory impressions (first signaling system) rather than abstract symbols.
More primary-signal oriented
Balanced
Less primary-signal oriented
048More primary-signal oriented4997Balanced98145Less primary-signal oriented
A score of 72 falls in the Balanced range, suggesting a relatively even use of concrete sensory impressions and more symbolic, abstract processing.
example score
2/66
Signaling Ratio (SR) (SR()
Assesses the balance between Pavlov’s first (sensory-imagery) and second (symbolic-abstract) signaling systems based on the signal coefficient.
Second-system dominant
Balanced
First-system dominant
-66-1Second-system dominant0Balanced166First-system dominant
A score of 2 falls in the First-system dominant range, suggesting a slight preference for processing information through concrete sensory impressions over abstract symbols.
Start Online Test
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS
Who Usually Takes This Test?
Students and adult learners
41%OF USERS
They take it to understand whether they learn better through vivid examples and sensory detail or through concepts, symbols, and theory.
Managers and team leads
34%OF USERS
They use it to adapt communication, task framing, and motivation to how each person processes information.
Psychologists and coaches
25%OF USERS
They include it in assessments to quickly identify a client’s dominant thinking style and choose suitable interventions.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
RESULTS YOU CAN ACTUALLY USE
What You’ll See After You Finish the Test
Scale Results
— Explained Clearly
Your scores across each test scale, translated into plain, usable insights. Not just numbers, but what they actually mean for your daily life, emotional state, and overall well-being.
AI-Powered
Interpretation
A structured, clinically grounded explanation. Our AI analyzes patterns and relationships between scales to provide a coherent interpretation — without alarmist language.
Statistical
Comparison
See how you compare to others. Your scores are placed in a statistical context, showing percentiles and trends based on anonymized platform data to help you understand what`s typical.
Practical
Recommendations
Actionable guidance tailored to your profile. Receive clear, realistic suggestions you can apply immediately — focused on coping, self-regulation, and realistic next steps.
AI-Detected
Insights
Key patterns you might not notice on your own. Surfacing subtle connections in your responses that help you better understand what may be driving your current results.
Discuss with
an AI Psychologist
Clarify, reflect, and explore right away. Talk through your outcomes, ask questions, and explore meanings in a calm, non-diagnostic dialogue environment.
Start Online Test
Used in 52+ countries
Benchmarking
See How You Compare
Once you finish the test, your results will be compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of the benchmarks we use to place your score in context.
Imagination (I)
Average
17.3
Normal range
12.821.8
min.
6
max.
30
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Self-regulation (S)
Average
34.7
Normal range
28.740.8
min.
10
max.
50
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Analytical thinking (At)
Average
25.6
Normal range
20.630.7
min.
8
max.
40
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Willpower (W)
Average
22.9
Normal range
1629.8
min.
10
max.
50
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Figurative Memory (FM)
Average
17.1
Normal range
13.420.9
min.
6
max.
30
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Emotionality (E)
Average
20.2
Normal range
13.826.6
min.
9
max.
45
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Activity (A)
Average
23.7
Normal range
19.228.2
min.
8
max.
40
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Second-order Signaling (SS)
Average
80.1
Normal range
56.8103.4
min.
0
max.
145
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Primalsignalness (P)
Average
108.5
Normal range
82.4134.7
min.
0
max.
145
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) (SR()
Average
-21
Normal range
-45.53.5
min.
-66
max.
66
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Featured On
Rated 4.8/5 by Our Customers
Freudly really helped me discover parts of my personality I hadn’t noticed before. It strengthened the areas where I needed to grow and made me feel more grounded and confident in the parts that already worked well.
Emma C., US
I wanted to understand how serious my ADHD is, and now I finally do. I also realized I need to work on my self-esteem. It has been low for a long time, and that makes daily life harder than it should be.
Mateo R., CA
Reading each question felt like someone really understood me. Even though I’ve already dealt with much of this, reflecting still helped me learn something new about myself.
Caroline F., US
The process is simple. The test covers everything you need, and you’ll get a clear breakdown of your results. For just a few dollars, it’s a great value.
Klara N., CZ
I kept thinking there might be a small chance, but now I know for sure. The questions were easy to understand, and the whole process was straightforward.
Bruno M., BR
I really enjoyed this experience. I learned a lot, and it helped me make sense of my thoughts and the feeling I’ve had for a long time that I may have grown up with undiagnosed ADHD.
Alice B., FR
Great platform — the insights were genuinely meaningful!
Daniel W., DE
Everything was easy to follow. The tools you get at the end are genuinely helpful for self-growth, and the price is very reasonable. I really appreciate that.
Sofia M., ES
Surprisingly accurate — honestly didn’t expect it to nail things so well.
Adir B., IL
There are lots of different tests to pick from, and the price is surprisingly low for how much insight you get.
Olivia W., CA
I was pleasantly surprised when I read the results. It was as if someone had sorted out my messy thoughts and given me useful tips to help me speak with more confidence.
Grace O., IE
It was really solid, very detailed, and it actually helped me make sense of a lot of things.
Carla T., TT
I was really impressed with the report. It was clear, thoughtful, and it reflected things I’ve been noticing about myself.
Jade H., US
The questions made me think deeply and helped me become more self-aware.
Brooke S., US
Reading through most of the questions made me feel understood. Although I’ve already worked through some of these issues, the questions still gave me useful insights and helped me learn more about myself.
Ryan M., US
I usually take one or two tests each month, and this has become a good way for me to see how I’m doing.
Lucas W., US
Most of the time, my results are in the 90 to 98th percentile compared to others. It really makes me feel like there’s something unique about me.
Ethan C., US
I tried out some of the AI’s suggestions, and to be honest, they worked much better than I thought they would. Maybe this thing really is smarter than me.
Reece D., AU
Trusted by 22k+ Users Worldwide
CLEAR ANSWERS TO COMMON QUESTIONS
Frequently Asked Questions

Any questions left?

What does this questionnaire measure?
It estimates the balance between two information-processing modes: reliance on concrete sensory impressions and reliance on abstract symbols and concepts.
How should the items be answered?
Select the option that best matches typical behavior, not an ideal response. Answer every item using first impressions and avoid overanalysis.
How long does it take to complete?
Average completion time is about 11 minutes. The questionnaire contains 57 items.
What do the results mean?
Scores indicate whether image-based processing or symbol-based processing is more prominent, or whether the two are balanced. Results describe cognitive preferences and do not determine ability, intelligence, or clinical status.
How can the results be used in practice?
Results can guide communication methods, learning supports, and task framing by matching information to the preferred processing mode. They are most useful when considered alongside other assessment information.
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES
About This Assessment
Questionnaire on the Balance of Signaling Systems Test

Signaling Systems Ratio Questionnaire Test

This measure is designed to characterize individual differences in reliance on perceptual, image-based impressions versus more abstract, symbol-mediated processing. The Signaling Systems Ratio Questionnaire provides an index of the relative balance between these information-processing tendencies.

The instrument consists of 57 items and typically requires about 11 minutes to complete. It is commonly used as a brief self-report screener to support clinical interviewing, psychoeducational formulation, or consultation when cognitive style may influence learning, communication, or problem-solving. The Signaling Systems Ratio Questionnaire was developed by Albert Mehrabian and is generally interpreted in terms of a relative preference for concrete, sensory-affective cues versus verbal-conceptual representations.

Author: Albert Mehrabian
Literature: McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. Personality in adulthood: A five-factor theory perspective. Guilford Press. 1990.; Anastasi, A., & Urbina, S. Psychological testing. Prentice Hall. 1997.
Test Question Form
You Might Also Like
Assessment of the Structure of Signaling Systems
This measure is designed to characterize individual differences in informat…
Start Test
Attitudes Toward Lying Questionnaire
This questionnaire assesses how an individual evaluates the acceptability a…
Start Test
Hex Signaletics Questionnaire
This brief self-report measure is designed to support rapid, high-level cha…
Start Test
Comments
Leave a Comment