Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (MAI-32) Test

Learn how well you monitor and adjust your thinking and study strategies in about 6 minutes. Get clear, actionable insight across 8 skill areas so you can learn faster and stay on track.
Start Online Test
Questions326 minutes
Hi! My name is Freudly, i am an AI therapist, I will give you an interpretation of the test after you complete it.
08:30
October 2, 2025
October 2, 2025
Material has been updated
15,914 views
1,277 completions
1,026 likes
Verified by Daniel Hall
Psychologist with 25 years of experience
Share
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

example score
129/160
Metacognitive Engagement (ME)
Metacognitive engagement measures overall awareness and regulation of one’s thinking processes, including planning, monitoring, and evaluating learning activity.
Low
Moderate
High
3274Low75117Moderate118160High
A score of 129 falls in the High range, suggesting strong skills in planning, monitoring, and adjusting strategies during intellectual work.
example score
39/60
Metacognitive Knowledge (MK)
Metacognitive Knowledge measures how well a person understands their own thinking processes, learning strategies, and when those strategies are most effective.
Low
Moderate
High
1227Low2844Moderate4560High
A score of 39 falls in the Moderate range, indicating generally adequate awareness of how you learn and which strategies work, with room to make this knowledge more consistent and explicit across tasks.
example score
16/25
Declarative Knowledge (DK)
Declared knowledge measures how clearly a person can consciously describe their own thinking and learning strategies.
Limited awareness
Developing awareness
Strong awareness
511Limited awareness1218Developing awareness1925Strong awareness
A score of 16 falls in the Developing awareness range, suggesting a moderately clear ability to articulate personal cognitive strategies with some room to refine and expand them.
example score
8/15
Procedural Knowledge (PK)
Procedural Knowledge measures how effectively a person can apply concrete strategies and methods to solve tasks during learning or intellectual work.
Developing
Adequate
Strong
37Developing811Adequate1215Strong
A score of 8 falls in the Adequate range, suggesting a generally workable use of problem-solving strategies with room to make them more consistent and flexible across tasks.
example score
16/20
Conditional Knowledge (CK)
Measures how well a person understands when and why to apply specific cognitive strategies depending on the situation.
Developing
Functional
Strong
410Developing1115Functional1620Strong
A score of 16 falls in the Strong range, suggesting a well-developed ability to choose strategies that fit the task and context.
example score
62/100
Metacognitive Regulation (MR)
Metacognitive Regulation measures how effectively a person plans, monitors, and adjusts their thinking and actions during intellectual activity.
Low
Moderate
High
2046Low4773Moderate74100High
A score of 62 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting generally adequate planning and self-monitoring with some room to strengthen adjustment strategies during tasks.
example score
12/20
Planning (P)
Planning measures how well a person sets goals in advance, chooses strategies, and allocates time and resources to complete a task.
Low
Moderate
High
49Low1015Moderate1620High
A score of 12 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting generally adequate planning with some room to make goals and strategies more explicit before starting tasks.
example score
6/10
Information Management Strategies (IMS)
Measures how effectively a person organizes, structures, and uses information to support learning and goal-directed work.
Developing
Functional
Strong
24Developing57Functional810Strong
A score of 6 indicates functional information management strategies, with generally effective organization and use of information but some room to strengthen consistency and efficiency.
example score
26/30
Component Monitoring (CM)
Component Control measures how well a person monitors and adjusts individual steps of task execution to detect and correct errors during activity.
Low
Moderate
High
615Low1623Moderate2430High
A score of 26 falls in the High range, suggesting strong step-by-step monitoring and timely adjustment of actions when issues arise.
example score
16/20
Error Correction Structure (ECS)
Measures how effectively a person identifies, analyzes, and adjusts their mistakes during task performance to improve future actions.
Developing
Adequate
Strong
49Developing1014Adequate1520Strong
A score of 16 falls in the Strong range, suggesting you typically notice errors promptly and make effective adjustments to your strategy during work or study.
example score
12/20
Evaluation (E)
Evaluation measures how well a person analyzes and judges the results of their own work to identify successes and areas to improve.
Limited evaluation
Moderate evaluation
Strong evaluation
49Limited evaluation1014Moderate evaluation1520Strong evaluation
A score of 12 indicates a moderate ability to evaluate outcomes, with some reflection on results but room to make conclusions and next steps more systematic.
Start Online Test
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

University students and learners
41%OF USERS
People who want to study smarter by spotting which planning, monitoring, and attention-control habits help or hurt their learning.
Coaches and trainers
34%OF USERS
Professionals who assess clients’ self-regulation skills to tailor study strategies, goal-setting, and progress checks.
Education and psychology researchers
25%OF USERS
Researchers who need a quick, structured measure of metacognitive regulation and its eight components for studies or program evaluation.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
RESULTS YOU CAN ACTUALLY USE

Scale Results
— Explained Clearly
Your scores across each test scale are translated into plain, usable insights. You won’t just get numbers — you’ll learn how your results impact your daily life, emotional state, and overall well-being.
AI-Powered
Interpretation
You’ll receive a structured, clinically-grounded explanation. Our AI analyzes patterns and relationships between scales to provide a coherent interpretation, without exaggerated language.
Statistical
Comparison
See how your results compare to others. Anonymized platform data is used to create a percentile scale, which identifies whether your results are typical.
Practical
Recommendations
You’ll receive clear, actionable guidance tailored to your profile. These easy-to-implement suggestions focus on coping, self-regulation, and realistic next steps.
AI-Powered
Insights
Get insights on behavioral and thought patterns you might not notice on your own. By uncovering subtle connections between your responses, you’ll better understand what may be driving your current results.
Discuss with
an AI Therapist
Clarify, reflect, and explore your results right away. Talk through your experience, ask questions, and explore meanings in a calm, non-diagnostic dialogue.
Start Online Test
Used in 52+ countries
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Metacognitive Engagement (ME)
Average
86.2
Normal range
67.3105
min.
32
max.
160
Majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Metacognitive Knowledge (MK)
Average
28.7
Normal range
2136.4
min.
12
max.
60
Majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Declared knowledge (Dk)
Average
11.5
Normal range
8.914.1
min.
5
max.
25
Majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Procedural Knowledge (PK)
Average
6.3
Normal range
4.68
min.
3
max.
15
Majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Conditional Knowledge (CK)
Average
12.2
Normal range
9.215.1
min.
4
max.
20
Majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Metacognitive Regulation (MR)
Average
71.3
Normal range
58.783.9
min.
20
max.
100
Majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Planning (P)
Average
8.7
Normal range
6.510.8
min.
4
max.
20
Majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Information Management Strategies (IMS)
Average
7.5
Normal range
6.18.9
min.
2
max.
10
Majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Component Control (CC)
Average
13.1
Normal range
9.216.9
min.
6
max.
30
Majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Error Correction Structure (ECS)
Average
8.6
Normal range
6.311
min.
4
max.
20
Majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Evaluation (E)
Average
13.1
Normal range
10.316
min.
4
max.
20
Majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Featured On
CLEAR ANSWERS TO COMMON QUESTIONS

Frequently Asked Questions

What does this questionnaire measure?
It measures metacognitive regulation during studying or other intellectual work. It focuses on how planning, monitoring, and evaluation are used to guide task performance.
How long does it take and how many items are included?
Completion typically takes about 6 minutes. The questionnaire includes 32 items.
What are the main areas covered?
Items cover eight areas of regulation, including planning, monitoring, evaluating outcomes, and attention control. Results can be reviewed as an overall profile and by these eight areas.
How should responses be selected?
Select the option that best matches typical behavior in learning or problem-solving situations. Use the same reference frame across all items and avoid overthinking individual statements.
How should results be interpreted?
Higher scores generally indicate more consistent use of regulation strategies, while lower scores suggest areas that may benefit from skill development. Results describe tendencies and do not provide a diagnosis.
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES
About This Assessment

Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (MAI-32) Test - Symptoms and Signs

This self-report measure evaluates perceived metacognitive knowledge and regulation during learning or other cognitively demanding activities. The Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (MAI-32) is intended to characterize how individuals monitor, plan, and evaluate their thinking and strategy use in task-focused contexts.

It consists of 32 items and typically requires about 6 minutes to complete. Responses can be used to summarize overall metacognitive awareness and to examine patterns across facets of self-regulation relevant to study skills, training, and performance monitoring. The Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (MAI-32) is most appropriately interpreted alongside other clinical or educational data and the specific demands of the setting.

Author: gregory-schraw, john-h-flavell
Literature: Flavell, J. H. Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist. 1979.; Pintrich, P. R. The role of metacognitive knowledge in learning, teaching, and assessing. Theory Into Practice. 2002.; Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 1994.
Test Question Form
You Might Also Like
Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (MAI)
This self-report measure is used to assess awareness and regulation of one’…
Start Test
Metacognitive Behavior Self-Assessment Scale
This self-report measure evaluates perceived metacognitive behaviors relate…
Start Test
Metacognitive Components of Sport Performance
This measure assesses self-reported metacognitive processes relevant to tra…
Start Test
Popular tests
Narcissistic Personality Inventory (NPI)
This self-report measure is used to assess narcissism as a personality trai…
Start Test
Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS)
This measure is used to rapidly quantify the current severity of obsessive…
Start Test
CRAFFT Screening Test (CRAFFT 2.1)
This brief screening measure is designed to identify potential alcohol and…
Start Test
Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)
This measure is commonly used to quickly screen for the presence and severi…
Start Test
Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI)
This self-report measure is used to assess occupational burnout symptoms in…
Start Test
Adolescent Anxiety Questionnaire
This measure is designed to support a brief appraisal of anxiety symptoms a…
Start Test
Emotional Creativity Inventory (ECI)
This self-report measure assesses individual differences in the originality…
Start Test
Horne–Ostberg Morningness–Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ)
Circadian preferences influence typical patterns of alertness and sleep tim…
Start Test
Ambivalent Sexism Inventory (ASI)
This measure is designed to assess attitudes toward women, including both o…
Start Test
Internalized Misogyny Scale (IMS)
This measure is designed to assess internalized negative beliefs and stereo…
Start Test
Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10)
This self-report measure assesses the degree to which individuals appraise…
Start Test
Impulsive Behavior Scale (SUPPS-P)
Impulsivity is a multidimensional construct that is often assessed with bri…
Start Test
Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment for Alcohol, Revised (CIWA-Ar)
This rating scale is used to rapidly assess the severity of alcohol withdra…
Start Test
Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS)
This measure provides a brief self-report assessment of current or typical…
Start Test
Light Triad Scale (LTS)
This self-report measure assesses prosocial personality tendencies and orie…
Start Test
Suicidal Ideation Scale
In clinical settings, the Suicidal Ideation Scale is used to structure an i…
Start Test
Body Dysmorphic Disorder Scale (BDD-D)
This brief self-report measure is designed to screen for and quantify distr…
Start Test
Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI)
This measure is a brief self-report inventory used to screen for anxiety sy…
Start Test
Differential Test of Perfectionism
This instrument is used to screen for perfectionism-related attitudes and t…
Start Test
Locus of Control Scale
This measure assesses generalized expectancies regarding the degree to whic…
Start Test
New Apathy Scale
This brief self-report measure is used to screen for apathy-related symptom…
Start Test
Perth Alexithymia Questionnaire (PAQ)
This measure assesses individual differences in alexithymia, including diff…
Start Test
Social Intelligence Scale
This brief self-report measure is designed to support rapid screening of in…
Start Test
Fear Test
This measure is designed to evaluate individual differences in fear-related…
Start Test
Neuroticism Level Scale
The measure is intended for brief screening of an individual’s propensity t…
Start Test
Aggressiveness Indicators Screening Questionnaire
This screening tool is designed to quickly identify behavioral indicators a…
Start Test
Comments
Leave a Comment