Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scales III (FACES III) Test

Understand family closeness and flexibility under stress in about 8 minutes. Compare how things are now versus desired, to pinpoint strengths, gaps, and clear targets for therapy.
Start Online Test
Questions408 minutes
Hi! My name is Freudly, i am an AI therapist, I will give you an interpretation of the test after you complete it.
08:30
October 2, 2025
October 2, 2025
Material has been updated
28456 views
3227 completions
2719 likes
Share
Scale Explorer
How the Scales are Structured
example score
2/10
Emotional Bonding Discrepancy (Ideal vs. Actual) (EBD(vA)
Measures the gap between desired and current emotional closeness in the family, indicating how satisfied a person is with family cohesion.
Low gap
Moderate gap
High gap
03Low gap46Moderate gap710High gap
A score of 2 indicates a low ideal–reality gap, suggesting the current emotional connection is close to what is desired.
example score
6/10
Rules (Ideal–Actual Discrepancy) (R(D)
Measures the size of the gap between how structured and stable family rules are in reality versus how they are ideally desired to be.
Low gap
Moderate gap
High gap
03Low gap46Moderate gap710High gap
A score of 6 indicates a moderate discrepancy between desired and actual family rules, suggesting some dissatisfaction with how formalized or stable the norms feel.
example score
5/10
Roles (Ideal–Actual Discrepancy) (R(D)
Measures the gap between the family’s desired and actual distribution of roles and responsibilities.
Low mismatch
Moderate mismatch
High mismatch
03Low mismatch46Moderate mismatch710High mismatch
A score of 5 indicates a moderate mismatch between preferred and current family roles, suggesting some dissatisfaction with how responsibilities are allocated.
example score
3/10
Discipline (Ideal-Actual Discrepancy) (D(D)
Measures the gap between how much discipline the family wants and how much discipline it experiences in everyday life.
Low gap
Moderate gap
High gap
03Low gap46Moderate gap710High gap
A score of 3 indicates a low discrepancy between desired and actual family discipline, suggesting generally acceptable order and consistency with only minor unmet expectations.
example score
7/10
Control (Ideal-Real Discrepancy) (C(D)
Measures the gap between the family’s desired and current level of control and regulation in daily life.
Low gap
Moderate gap
High gap
03Low gap46Moderate gap710High gap
A score of 7 indicates a high mismatch between desired and current family control, suggesting notable dissatisfaction with how regulated family life feels.
example score
7/10
Leadership (Ideal-Actual Discrepancy) (L(D)
Measures the size of the gap between desired and actual leadership (guidance and responsibility distribution) within the family.
Small gap
Moderate gap
Large gap
03Small gap46Moderate gap710Large gap
A score of 7 indicates a large ideal-versus-reality gap in family leadership, suggesting notable dissatisfaction with how guidance or responsibilities are currently organized compared with what is desired.
example score
7/40
Family Adaptability Discrepancy (Ideal vs. Actual) (FAD(vA)
Measures the discrepancy between perceived current and desired family adaptability, indicating satisfaction with the family’s flexibility under stress.
Reality exceeds ideal
No gap
Ideal exceeds reality
-40-1Reality exceeds ideal0No gap140Ideal exceeds reality
A score of 7 indicates a small-to-moderate gap where the desired level of family adaptability is higher than the current perception, suggesting some dissatisfaction with flexibility.
example score
3/10
Interests and Recreation (Ideal–Actual Discrepancy) (IaR(D)
Measures the size of the gap between desired and actual shared interests and leisure time in the family.
Low gap
Moderate gap
High gap
03Low gap46Moderate gap710High gap
A score of 3 indicates a low gap, suggesting the family's current shared interests and leisure time are fairly close to what is desired.
example score
3/10
Friends (Ideal-Actual Discrepancy) (F(D)
Measures the gap between desired and actual family involvement in friendships, indicating how aligned social connectedness feels to the respondent.
Low discrepancy
Moderate discrepancy
High discrepancy
03Low discrepancy46Moderate discrepancy710High discrepancy
A score of 3 suggests a low discrepancy between the desired and actual level of friendship involvement in the family, indicating generally aligned expectations.
example score
6/10
Time (Ideal-Actual Discrepancy) (T(D)
Measures the size of the gap between actual and desired time spent together as a family.
Small gap
Moderate gap
Large gap
03Small gap46Moderate gap710Large gap
A score of 6 indicates a moderate discrepancy between current and preferred family time together, suggesting some dissatisfaction with this aspect of family life.
example score
5/10
Decision-Making (Ideal-Actual Discrepancy) (D(D)
Measures how large the gap is between desired and actual involvement in family decision-making.
Low gap
Moderate gap
High gap
03Low gap46Moderate gap710High gap
A score of 5 falls in the Moderate gap range, suggesting a noticeable mismatch between preferred and current participation in family decisions.
example score
8/10
Family Boundaries (Ideal-Actual Discrepancy) (FB(D)
Measures how large the gap is between desired and actual family boundaries and personal space.
Small gap
Moderate gap
Large gap
03Small gap46Moderate gap710Large gap
A score of 8 indicates a large gap between ideal and current family boundaries, suggesting notable dissatisfaction with personal space or boundary clarity.
example score
18/40
Family Cohesion Discrepancy (Ideal vs. Actual) (FCD(vA)
Measures the gap between ideal and current family cohesion, indicating how closely expectations about emotional closeness match perceived reality.
Reality > ideal cohesion
Aligned expectations
Ideal > reality cohesion
-40-1Reality > ideal cohesion0Aligned expectations140Ideal > reality cohesion
A score of 18 indicates that the desired level of emotional closeness is notably higher than what is currently perceived, suggesting dissatisfaction with present family cohesion.
example score
9/10
Rules (R)
Rules measure how formalized, stable, and binding behavioral norms are within the family system.
Flexible
Balanced
Strict
03Flexible47Balanced810Strict
A score of 9 suggests very strict, strongly enforced family rules that emphasize order and consistency but may limit flexibility under stress.
example score
6/10
Roles (R)
Roles measure how clearly and consistently responsibilities and family functions are distributed among members.
Unclear roles
Mostly defined roles
Well-defined roles
03Unclear roles47Mostly defined roles810Well-defined roles
A score of 6 suggests that roles are generally allocated and understood, though some situations may still require clarification or renegotiation.
example score
3/10
Discipline (D)
Discipline measures how consistent, structured, and predictable family behavior and rules are in everyday life.
Low structure
Moderate structure
High structure
03Low structure47Moderate structure810High structure
A score of 3 suggests low structure, with family routines and rules tending to be less consistent and predictable.
example score
4/10
Control (C)
Control reflects how strongly family members’ behavior is regulated by rules and expectations versus allowed to be spontaneous and free.
Low control
Moderate control
High control
03Low control46Moderate control710High control
A score of 4 indicates moderate control, suggesting a balance between clear rules and room for flexibility and spontaneity in family interactions.
example score
4/10
Leadership (L)
Leadership measures how clearly guidance and responsibility are organized within the family system.
Low leadership
Moderate leadership
High leadership
03Low leadership46Moderate leadership710High leadership
A score of 4 indicates moderate leadership, suggesting some guidance is present but roles and responsibility may not be consistently defined.
example score
18/50
Family Adaptability Level (FAL)
Assesses how flexibly a family system can adjust roles and rules to cope with change and stress.
Rigid
Balanced
Chaotic
1021Rigid2230Balanced3150Chaotic
A score of 18 falls in the Rigid range, suggesting the family tends to respond to stress with limited flexibility and slower changes to established rules or roles.
example score
6/10
Interests and Recreation (IaR)
Measures the extent to which family members share common interests and spend leisure time together.
Disconnected leisure
Some shared interests
Strong shared leisure
03Disconnected leisure47Some shared interests810Strong shared leisure
A score of 6 suggests the family has a moderate level of shared interests and leisure time, with connection present but not consistently maintained.
example score
3/10
Friends (F)
Measures how much the family is socially connected through friendships outside the family, from isolation to many shared friends.
Low involvement
Moderate involvement
High involvement
03Low involvement47Moderate involvement810High involvement
A score of 3 suggests low family involvement in friendships outside the family, indicating relatively limited shared social connections.
example score
4/10
Time (T)
Assesses how much time family members spend together as an indicator of connectedness versus disconnection.
Low shared time
Moderate shared time
High shared time
03Low shared time47Moderate shared time810High shared time
A score of 4 suggests a moderate level of shared family time, indicating some togetherness alongside noticeable periods of separation.
example score
7/10
Decision Making (DM)
Measures how much family members participate in shared discussion and collective decision-making.
Low shared decision-making
Moderate shared decision-making
High shared decision-making
03Low shared decision-making47Moderate shared decision-making810High shared decision-making
A score of 7 suggests decisions are typically discussed together, though some choices may still be made independently by individual family members.
example score
2/10
Family Boundaries (FB)
Measures how clearly personal space and autonomy are separated among family members, reflecting the clarity of family boundaries.
Blurred boundaries
Moderately clear boundaries
Clear boundaries
03Blurred boundaries47Moderately clear boundaries810Clear boundaries
A score of 2 falls in the “Blurred boundaries” range, suggesting relatively limited separation of personal space and autonomy among family members.
example score
6/10
Emotional Bonding (EB)
Emotional connection measures the degree of emotional closeness, mutual support, and attachment among family members.
Low connection
Moderate connection
High connection
03Low connection47Moderate connection810High connection
A score of 6 indicates a moderate level of emotional closeness and support, suggesting connection is present while still allowing some interpersonal distance.
example score
34/50
Family Cohesion Level (FCL)
Measures the degree of emotional closeness and bonding among family members.
Lower cohesion
Connected
Very high cohesion
1036Lower cohesion3742Connected4350Very high cohesion
A score of 34 falls in the Lower cohesion range, suggesting comparatively more emotional distance and autonomy among family members at present.
Start Online Test
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS
Who Usually Takes This Test?
Couples in relationship strain
41%OF USERS
Partners take it to understand emotional closeness, conflict patterns, and how flexibly their family system responds to stress.
Parents navigating transitions
34%OF USERS
Parents use it during major changes (new baby, divorce, relocation, adolescence) to see what needs to shift in roles and connection.
Family therapy and counseling clients
25%OF USERS
Families in counseling complete it to compare how things are versus how they want them to be and set clear therapy goals.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
RESULTS YOU CAN ACTUALLY USE
What You’ll See After You Finish the Test
Scale Results
— Explained Clearly
Your scores across each test scale, translated into plain, usable insights. Not just numbers, but what they actually mean for your daily life, emotional state, and overall well-being.
AI-Powered
Interpretation
A structured, clinically grounded explanation. Our AI analyzes patterns and relationships between scales to provide a coherent interpretation — without alarmist language.
Statistical
Comparison
See how you compare to others. Your scores are placed in a statistical context, showing percentiles and trends based on anonymized platform data to help you understand what`s typical.
Practical
Recommendations
Actionable guidance tailored to your profile. Receive clear, realistic suggestions you can apply immediately — focused on coping, self-regulation, and realistic next steps.
AI-Detected
Insights
Key patterns you might not notice on your own. Surfacing subtle connections in your responses that help you better understand what may be driving your current results.
Discuss with
an AI Psychologist
Clarify, reflect, and explore right away. Talk through your outcomes, ask questions, and explore meanings in a calm, non-diagnostic dialogue environment.
Start Online Test
Used in 52+ countries
Benchmarking
See How You Compare
Once you finish the test, your results will be compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of the benchmarks we use to place your score in context.
Emotional Connection (the Ideal-Reality Gap) (EC(IG)
Average
3.2
Normal range
1.74.7
min.
0
max.
10
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Rules (Ideal vs. Reality Gap) (R(vRG)
Average
4.5
Normal range
2.96.2
min.
0
max.
10
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Roles (difference between ideal and reality) (R(biar)
Average
5
Normal range
3.56.4
min.
0
max.
10
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Discipline (gap between ideal and reality) (D(biar)
Average
6.9
Normal range
5.48.5
min.
0
max.
10
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Control (difference between ideal and reality) (C(biar)
Average
6.1
Normal range
4.67.5
min.
0
max.
10
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Leadership (Ideal vs. Reality Gap) (L(vRG)
Average
5.5
Normal range
46.9
min.
0
max.
10
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Family Adaptation (Ideal-Reality Gap) (FA(G)
Average
-10.8
Normal range
-21.60
min.
-40
max.
40
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Interests and Leisure (Ideal vs. Reality Gap) (IaL(vRG)
Average
3.5
Normal range
1.85.2
min.
0
max.
10
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Friends (the gap between ideal and reality) (F(gbiar)
Average
7.4
Normal range
5.89
min.
0
max.
10
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Time (difference between ideal and reality) (T(biar)
Average
5.2
Normal range
3.76.7
min.
0
max.
10
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Decision Making (The Gap Between Ideal and Reality) (DM(GBIaR)
Average
5.1
Normal range
3.76.6
min.
0
max.
10
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Family Boundaries (The Gap Between Ideal and Reality) (FB(GBIaR)
Average
7.3
Normal range
5.98.7
min.
0
max.
10
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Family cohesion (gap between ideal and reality) (Fc(biar)
Average
3.4
Normal range
-6.513.3
min.
-40
max.
40
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Rules (R)
Average
6.4
Normal range
4.97.9
min.
0
max.
10
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Roles (R)
Average
5.3
Normal range
3.96.6
min.
0
max.
10
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Discipline (D)
Average
7.2
Normal range
5.98.4
min.
0
max.
10
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Control (C)
Average
2.8
Normal range
1.54.1
min.
0
max.
10
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Leadership (L)
Average
3.8
Normal range
2.15.5
min.
0
max.
10
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Level of Family Adaptation (LoFA)
Average
27.8
Normal range
2233.6
min.
10
max.
50
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Interests and Leisure (IaL)
Average
7.1
Normal range
5.58.8
min.
0
max.
10
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Friends (F)
Average
6
Normal range
4.17.9
min.
0
max.
10
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Time (T)
Average
5.3
Normal range
3.77
min.
0
max.
10
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Decision Making (DM)
Average
4.7
Normal range
3.36.1
min.
0
max.
10
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Family Boundaries (FB)
Average
3.9
Normal range
2.35.5
min.
0
max.
10
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Emotional connection (Ec)
Average
6.9
Normal range
5.48.4
min.
0
max.
10
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Level of Family Cohesion (LoFC)
Average
28.1
Normal range
22.333.9
min.
10
max.
50
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Featured On
Rated 4.8/5 by Our Customers
Freudly really helped me discover parts of my personality I hadn’t noticed before. It strengthened the areas where I needed to grow and made me feel more grounded and confident in the parts that already worked well.
Emma C., US
I wanted to understand how serious my ADHD is, and now I finally do. I also realized I need to work on my self-esteem. It has been low for a long time, and that makes daily life harder than it should be.
Mateo R., CA
Reading each question felt like someone really understood me. Even though I’ve already dealt with much of this, reflecting still helped me learn something new about myself.
Caroline F., US
The process is simple. The test covers everything you need, and you’ll get a clear breakdown of your results. For just a few dollars, it’s a great value.
Klara N., CZ
I kept thinking there might be a small chance, but now I know for sure. The questions were easy to understand, and the whole process was straightforward.
Bruno M., BR
I really enjoyed this experience. I learned a lot, and it helped me make sense of my thoughts and the feeling I’ve had for a long time that I may have grown up with undiagnosed ADHD.
Alice B., FR
Great platform — the insights were genuinely meaningful!
Daniel W., DE
Everything was easy to follow. The tools you get at the end are genuinely helpful for self-growth, and the price is very reasonable. I really appreciate that.
Sofia M., ES
Surprisingly accurate — honestly didn’t expect it to nail things so well.
Adir B., IL
There are lots of different tests to pick from, and the price is surprisingly low for how much insight you get.
Olivia W., CA
I was pleasantly surprised when I read the results. It was as if someone had sorted out my messy thoughts and given me useful tips to help me speak with more confidence.
Grace O., IE
It was really solid, very detailed, and it actually helped me make sense of a lot of things.
Carla T., TT
I was really impressed with the report. It was clear, thoughtful, and it reflected things I’ve been noticing about myself.
Jade H., US
The questions made me think deeply and helped me become more self-aware.
Brooke S., US
Reading through most of the questions made me feel understood. Although I’ve already worked through some of these issues, the questions still gave me useful insights and helped me learn more about myself.
Ryan M., US
I usually take one or two tests each month, and this has become a good way for me to see how I’m doing.
Lucas W., US
Most of the time, my results are in the 90 to 98th percentile compared to others. It really makes me feel like there’s something unique about me.
Ethan C., US
I tried out some of the AI’s suggestions, and to be honest, they worked much better than I thought they would. Maybe this thing really is smarter than me.
Reece D., AU
Trusted by 22k+ Users Worldwide
CLEAR ANSWERS TO COMMON QUESTIONS
Frequently Asked Questions

Any questions left?

What does this questionnaire measure?
It measures two domains of family functioning: emotional closeness among family members and flexibility in responding to stress or change.
How is the questionnaire structured?
It contains 40 items rated for the family as it is now and as it is ideally preferred. This allows comparison of current functioning with expectations.
How long does it take to complete?
Average completion time is about 8 minutes. Time may vary based on reading speed and response style.
How should responses be chosen?
Select the option that best reflects typical family behavior rather than a single event. Use the same reference period across items.
What version of the questionnaire is used in practice?
The version commonly used is an adaptation that corrected issues found in earlier translations. This supports more consistent scoring and interpretation.
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES
About This Assessment
Family Adaptability and Cohesion Scale, FACES III Test

Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scales III (FACES III) Test

This measure is designed to support a brief assessment of family functioning, with emphasis on emotional bonding among family members and flexibility in response to stress. The Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scales III (FACES III) provides a structured self-report format for describing the family system as currently perceived and as ideally desired.

The instrument includes 40 items and typically takes about 8 minutes to complete. It yields indices related to family cohesion and adaptability that can be used to inform clinical case conceptualization, treatment planning, and monitoring of change over time. The scale was developed by Yoav Lavee and Joyce Portner.

In clinical and research contexts, the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scales III (FACES III) is commonly used to characterize perceived strengths and areas of strain within family relationships, while recognizing that results should be interpreted alongside collateral information and the broader clinical presentation.

Author: david-h-olson, Joyce Portner, Yoav Lavee
Literature: Olson, D. H. Circumplex model of marital and family systems. Journal of Family Therapy. 2000.; Nichols, M. P. Family therapy: Concepts and methods. Pearson. 2009.
Test Question Form
You Might Also Like
Team Group Cohesion Index
This brief self-report measure is used to estimate perceived cohesion and i…
Start Test
Seashore Group Cohesiveness Index
This brief self-report measure is used to screen perceived cohesion within…
Start Test
Somatic Adaptation Rating Scale
This brief self-report measure is used to screen for perceived somatic stra…
Start Test
Comments
Leave a Comment