Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scales III (FACES III) Test

Understand family closeness and flexibility under stress in about 8 minutes. Compare how things are now versus desired, to pinpoint strengths, gaps, and clear targets for therapy.
Start Online Test
Questions: 408 minutes
Hi! My name is Freudly, i am an AI therapist, I will give you an interpretation of the test after you complete it.
08:30
October 2, 2025
October 2, 2025
Material has been updated
28,465 views
3,242 completions
2,719 likes
Verified by Daniel Hall
Psychologist with 25 years of experience
Share
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

example score
2/10
Emotional Bonding Discrepancy (Ideal vs. Actual) (EBDvA)
Measures the gap between desired and current emotional closeness in the family, indicating how satisfied a person is with family cohesion.
Low gap
Moderate gap
High gap
0 – 3: Low gap | 4 – 6: Moderate gap | 7 – 10: High gap
A score of 2 indicates a low ideal–reality gap, suggesting the current emotional connection is close to what is desired.
example score
6/10
Rules (Ideal–Actual Discrepancy) (RAD)
Measures the size of the gap between how structured and stable family rules are in reality versus how they are ideally desired to be.
Low gap
Moderate gap
High gap
0 – 3: Low gap | 4 – 6: Moderate gap | 7 – 10: High gap
A score of 6 indicates a moderate discrepancy between desired and actual family rules, suggesting some dissatisfaction with how formalized or stable the norms feel.
example score
5/10
Roles (Ideal–Actual Discrepancy) (RAD)
Measures the gap between the family’s desired and actual distribution of roles and responsibilities.
Low mismatch
Moderate mismatch
High mismatch
0 – 3: Low mismatch | 4 – 6: Moderate mismatch | 7 – 10: High mismatch
A score of 5 indicates a moderate mismatch between preferred and current family roles, suggesting some dissatisfaction with how responsibilities are allocated.
example score
3/10
Discipline (Ideal-Actual Discrepancy) (DAD)
Measures the gap between how much discipline the family wants and how much discipline it experiences in everyday life.
Low gap
Moderate gap
High gap
0 – 3: Low gap | 4 – 6: Moderate gap | 7 – 10: High gap
A score of 3 indicates a low discrepancy between desired and actual family discipline, suggesting generally acceptable order and consistency with only minor unmet expectations.
example score
7/10
Control (Ideal-Real Discrepancy) (CRD)
Measures the gap between the family’s desired and current level of control and regulation in daily life.
Low gap
Moderate gap
High gap
0 – 3: Low gap | 4 – 6: Moderate gap | 7 – 10: High gap
A score of 7 indicates a high mismatch between desired and current family control, suggesting notable dissatisfaction with how regulated family life feels.
example score
7/10
Leadership (Ideal-Actual Discrepancy) (LAD)
Measures the size of the gap between desired and actual leadership (guidance and responsibility distribution) within the family.
Small gap
Moderate gap
Large gap
0 – 3: Small gap | 4 – 6: Moderate gap | 7 – 10: Large gap
A score of 7 indicates a large ideal-versus-reality gap in family leadership, suggesting notable dissatisfaction with how guidance or responsibilities are currently organized compared with what is desired.
example score
7/40
Family Adaptability Discrepancy (Ideal vs. Actual) (FADvA)
Measures the discrepancy between perceived current and desired family adaptability, indicating satisfaction with the family’s flexibility under stress.
Reality exceeds ideal
No gap
Ideal exceeds reality
-40 – -1: Reality exceeds ideal | 0: No gap | 1 – 40: Ideal exceeds reality
A score of 7 indicates a small-to-moderate gap where the desired level of family adaptability is higher than the current perception, suggesting some dissatisfaction with flexibility.
example score
3/10
Interests and Recreation (Ideal–Actual Discrepancy) (IaRAD)
Measures the size of the gap between desired and actual shared interests and leisure time in the family.
Low gap
Moderate gap
High gap
0 – 3: Low gap | 4 – 6: Moderate gap | 7 – 10: High gap
A score of 3 indicates a low gap, suggesting the family's current shared interests and leisure time are fairly close to what is desired.
example score
3/10
Friends (Ideal-Actual Discrepancy) (FAD)
Measures the gap between desired and actual family involvement in friendships, indicating how aligned social connectedness feels to the respondent.
Low discrepancy
Moderate discrepancy
High discrepancy
0 – 3: Low discrepancy | 4 – 6: Moderate discrepancy | 7 – 10: High discrepancy
A score of 3 suggests a low discrepancy between the desired and actual level of friendship involvement in the family, indicating generally aligned expectations.
example score
6/10
Time (Ideal-Actual Discrepancy) (TAD)
Measures the size of the gap between actual and desired time spent together as a family.
Small gap
Moderate gap
Large gap
0 – 3: Small gap | 4 – 6: Moderate gap | 7 – 10: Large gap
A score of 6 indicates a moderate discrepancy between current and preferred family time together, suggesting some dissatisfaction with this aspect of family life.
example score
5/10
Decision-Making (Ideal-Actual Discrepancy) (DMAD)
Measures how large the gap is between desired and actual involvement in family decision-making.
Low gap
Moderate gap
High gap
0 – 3: Low gap | 4 – 6: Moderate gap | 7 – 10: High gap
A score of 5 falls in the Moderate gap range, suggesting a noticeable mismatch between preferred and current participation in family decisions.
example score
8/10
Family Boundaries (Ideal-Actual Discrepancy) (FBAD)
Measures how large the gap is between desired and actual family boundaries and personal space.
Small gap
Moderate gap
Large gap
0 – 3: Small gap | 4 – 6: Moderate gap | 7 – 10: Large gap
A score of 8 indicates a large gap between ideal and current family boundaries, suggesting notable dissatisfaction with personal space or boundary clarity.
example score
18/40
Family Cohesion Discrepancy (Ideal vs. Actual) (FCDvA)
Measures the gap between ideal and current family cohesion, indicating how closely expectations about emotional closeness match perceived reality.
Reality > ideal cohesion
Aligned expectations
Ideal > reality cohesion
-40 – -1: Reality > ideal cohesion | 0: Aligned expectations | 1 – 40: Ideal > reality cohesion
A score of 18 indicates that the desired level of emotional closeness is notably higher than what is currently perceived, suggesting dissatisfaction with present family cohesion.
example score
9/10
Rules (R)
Rules measure how formalized, stable, and binding behavioral norms are within the family system.
Flexible
Balanced
Strict
0 – 3: Flexible | 4 – 7: Balanced | 8 – 10: Strict
A score of 9 suggests very strict, strongly enforced family rules that emphasize order and consistency but may limit flexibility under stress.
example score
6/10
Roles (R)
Roles measure how clearly and consistently responsibilities and family functions are distributed among members.
Unclear roles
Mostly defined roles
Well-defined roles
0 – 3: Unclear roles | 4 – 7: Mostly defined roles | 8 – 10: Well-defined roles
A score of 6 suggests that roles are generally allocated and understood, though some situations may still require clarification or renegotiation.
example score
3/10
Discipline (D)
Discipline measures how consistent, structured, and predictable family behavior and rules are in everyday life.
Low structure
Moderate structure
High structure
0 – 3: Low structure | 4 – 7: Moderate structure | 8 – 10: High structure
A score of 3 suggests low structure, with family routines and rules tending to be less consistent and predictable.
example score
4/10
Control (C)
Control reflects how strongly family members’ behavior is regulated by rules and expectations versus allowed to be spontaneous and free.
Low control
Moderate control
High control
0 – 3: Low control | 4 – 6: Moderate control | 7 – 10: High control
A score of 4 indicates moderate control, suggesting a balance between clear rules and room for flexibility and spontaneity in family interactions.
example score
4/10
Leadership (L)
Leadership measures how clearly guidance and responsibility are organized within the family system.
Low leadership
Moderate leadership
High leadership
0 – 3: Low leadership | 4 – 6: Moderate leadership | 7 – 10: High leadership
A score of 4 indicates moderate leadership, suggesting some guidance is present but roles and responsibility may not be consistently defined.
example score
18/50
Family Adaptability Level (FAL)
Assesses how flexibly a family system can adjust roles and rules to cope with change and stress.
Rigid
Balanced
Chaotic
10 – 21: Rigid | 22 – 30: Balanced | 31 – 50: Chaotic
A score of 18 falls in the Rigid range, suggesting the family tends to respond to stress with limited flexibility and slower changes to established rules or roles.
example score
6/10
Interests and Recreation (IaR)
Measures the extent to which family members share common interests and spend leisure time together.
Disconnected leisure
Some shared interests
Strong shared leisure
0 – 3: Disconnected leisure | 4 – 7: Some shared interests | 8 – 10: Strong shared leisure
A score of 6 suggests the family has a moderate level of shared interests and leisure time, with connection present but not consistently maintained.
example score
3/10
Friends (F)
Measures how much the family is socially connected through friendships outside the family, from isolation to many shared friends.
Low involvement
Moderate involvement
High involvement
0 – 3: Low involvement | 4 – 7: Moderate involvement | 8 – 10: High involvement
A score of 3 suggests low family involvement in friendships outside the family, indicating relatively limited shared social connections.
example score
4/10
Time (T)
Assesses how much time family members spend together as an indicator of connectedness versus disconnection.
Low shared time
Moderate shared time
High shared time
0 – 3: Low shared time | 4 – 7: Moderate shared time | 8 – 10: High shared time
A score of 4 suggests a moderate level of shared family time, indicating some togetherness alongside noticeable periods of separation.
example score
7/10
Decision Making (DM)
Measures how much family members participate in shared discussion and collective decision-making.
Low shared decision-making
Moderate shared decision-making
High shared decision-making
0 – 3: Low shared decision-making | 4 – 7: Moderate shared decision-making | 8 – 10: High shared decision-making
A score of 7 suggests decisions are typically discussed together, though some choices may still be made independently by individual family members.
example score
2/10
Family Boundaries (FB)
Measures how clearly personal space and autonomy are separated among family members, reflecting the clarity of family boundaries.
Blurred boundaries
Moderately clear boundaries
Clear boundaries
0 – 3: Blurred boundaries | 4 – 7: Moderately clear boundaries | 8 – 10: Clear boundaries
A score of 2 falls in the “Blurred boundaries” range, suggesting relatively limited separation of personal space and autonomy among family members.
example score
6/10
Emotional Bonding (EB)
Emotional connection measures the degree of emotional closeness, mutual support, and attachment among family members.
Low connection
Moderate connection
High connection
0 – 3: Low connection | 4 – 7: Moderate connection | 8 – 10: High connection
A score of 6 indicates a moderate level of emotional closeness and support, suggesting connection is present while still allowing some interpersonal distance.
example score
34/50
Family Cohesion Level (FCL)
Measures the degree of emotional closeness and bonding among family members.
Lower cohesion
Connected
Very high cohesion
10 – 36: Lower cohesion | 37 – 42: Connected | 43 – 50: Very high cohesion
A score of 34 falls in the Lower cohesion range, suggesting comparatively more emotional distance and autonomy among family members at present.
Start Online Test
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Couples in relationship strain
41%OF USERS
Partners take it to understand emotional closeness, conflict patterns, and how flexibly their family system responds to stress.
Parents navigating transitions
34%OF USERS
Parents use it during major changes (new baby, divorce, relocation, adolescence) to see what needs to shift in roles and connection.
Family therapy and counseling clients
25%OF USERS
Families in counseling complete it to compare how things are versus how they want them to be and set clear therapy goals.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
RESULTS YOU CAN ACTUALLY USE

Scale Results
— Explained Clearly
Your scores across each test scale are translated into plain, usable insights. You won’t just get numbers — you’ll learn how your results impact your daily life, emotional state, and overall well-being.
AI-Powered
Interpretation
You’ll receive a structured, clinically-grounded explanation. Our AI analyzes patterns and relationships between scales to provide a coherent interpretation, without exaggerated language.
Statistical
Comparison
See how your results compare to others. Anonymized platform data is used to create a percentile scale, which identifies whether your results are typical.
Practical
Recommendations
You’ll receive clear, actionable guidance tailored to your profile. These easy-to-implement suggestions focus on coping, self-regulation, and realistic next steps.
AI-Powered
Insights
Get insights on behavioral and thought patterns you might not notice on your own. By uncovering subtle connections between your responses, you’ll better understand what may be driving your current results.
Discuss with
an AI Therapist
Clarify, reflect, and explore your results right away. Talk through your experience, ask questions, and explore meanings in a calm, non-diagnostic dialogue.
Start Online Test
Used in 52+ countries
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Emotional Connection (the Ideal-Reality Gap) (EC(IG)
Average
3.2
Normal range
1.7 — 4.7
min.
0
max.
10
Majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Rules (Ideal vs. Reality Gap) (R(vRG)
Average
4.5
Normal range
2.9 — 6.2
min.
0
max.
10
Majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Roles (difference between ideal and reality) (R(biar)
Average
5
Normal range
3.5 — 6.4
min.
0
max.
10
Majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Discipline (gap between ideal and reality) (D(biar)
Average
6.9
Normal range
5.4 — 8.5
min.
0
max.
10
Majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Control (difference between ideal and reality) (C(biar)
Average
6.1
Normal range
4.6 — 7.5
min.
0
max.
10
Majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Leadership (Ideal vs. Reality Gap) (L(vRG)
Average
5.5
Normal range
4 — 6.9
min.
0
max.
10
Majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Family Adaptation (Ideal-Reality Gap) (FA(G)
Average
-10.8
Normal range
-21.6 — 0
min.
-40
max.
40
Majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Interests and Leisure (Ideal vs. Reality Gap) (IaL(vRG)
Average
3.5
Normal range
1.8 — 5.2
min.
0
max.
10
Majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Friends (the gap between ideal and reality) (F(gbiar)
Average
7.4
Normal range
5.8 — 9
min.
0
max.
10
Majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Time (difference between ideal and reality) (T(biar)
Average
5.2
Normal range
3.7 — 6.7
min.
0
max.
10
Majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Decision Making (The Gap Between Ideal and Reality) (DM(GBIaR)
Average
5.1
Normal range
3.7 — 6.6
min.
0
max.
10
Majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Family Boundaries (The Gap Between Ideal and Reality) (FB(GBIaR)
Average
7.3
Normal range
5.9 — 8.7
min.
0
max.
10
Majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Family cohesion (gap between ideal and reality) (Fc(biar)
Average
3.4
Normal range
-6.5 — 13.3
min.
-40
max.
40
Majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Rules (R)
Average
6.4
Normal range
4.9 — 7.9
min.
0
max.
10
Majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Roles (R)
Average
5.3
Normal range
3.9 — 6.6
min.
0
max.
10
Majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Discipline (D)
Average
7.2
Normal range
5.9 — 8.4
min.
0
max.
10
Majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Control (C)
Average
2.8
Normal range
1.5 — 4.1
min.
0
max.
10
Majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Leadership (L)
Average
3.8
Normal range
2.1 — 5.5
min.
0
max.
10
Majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Level of Family Adaptation (LoFA)
Average
27.8
Normal range
22 — 33.6
min.
10
max.
50
Majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Interests and Leisure (IaL)
Average
7.1
Normal range
5.5 — 8.8
min.
0
max.
10
Majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Friends (F)
Average
6
Normal range
4.1 — 7.9
min.
0
max.
10
Majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Time (T)
Average
5.3
Normal range
3.7 — 7
min.
0
max.
10
Majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Decision Making (DM)
Average
4.7
Normal range
3.3 — 6.1
min.
0
max.
10
Majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Family Boundaries (FB)
Average
3.9
Normal range
2.3 — 5.5
min.
0
max.
10
Majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Emotional connection (Ec)
Average
6.9
Normal range
5.4 — 8.4
min.
0
max.
10
Majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Level of Family Cohesion (LoFC)
Average
28.1
Normal range
22.3 — 33.9
min.
10
max.
50
Majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Start Online Test
Featured On
CLEAR ANSWERS TO COMMON QUESTIONS

Frequently Asked Questions

What does this questionnaire measure?
It measures two domains of family functioning: emotional closeness among family members and flexibility in responding to stress or change.
How is the questionnaire structured?
It contains 40 items rated for the family as it is now and as it is ideally preferred. This allows comparison of current functioning with expectations.
How long does it take to complete?
Average completion time is about 8 minutes. Time may vary based on reading speed and response style.
How should responses be chosen?
Select the option that best reflects typical family behavior rather than a single event. Use the same reference period across items.
What version of the questionnaire is used in practice?
The version commonly used is an adaptation that corrected issues found in earlier translations. This supports more consistent scoring and interpretation.
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES
About This Assessment
Family Adaptability and Cohesion Scale, FACES III Test

Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scales III (FACES III) Test - Symptoms and Signs

family adaptationfamily

This measure is designed to support a brief assessment of family functioning, with emphasis on emotional bonding among family members and flexibility in response to stress. The Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scales III (FACES III) provides a structured self-report format for describing the family system as currently perceived and as ideally desired.

The instrument includes 40 items and typically takes about 8 minutes to complete. It yields indices related to family cohesion and adaptability that can be used to inform clinical case conceptualization, treatment planning, and monitoring of change over time. The scale was developed by Yoav Lavee and Joyce Portner.

In clinical and research contexts, the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scales III (FACES III) is commonly used to characterize perceived strengths and areas of strain within family relationships, while recognizing that results should be interpreted alongside collateral information and the broader clinical presentation.

Author: david-h-olson, Joyce Portner, Yoav Lavee
Literature: Olson, D. H. Circumplex model of marital and family systems. Journal of Family Therapy. 2000.; Nichols, M. P. Family therapy: Concepts and methods. Pearson. 2009.
Test Question Form
You Might Also Like
Team Group Cohesion Index
This brief self-report measure is used to estimate perceived cohesion and i…
Start Test
Seashore Group Cohesiveness Index
This brief self-report measure is used to screen perceived cohesion within…
Start Test
Somatic Adaptation Rating Scale
This brief self-report measure is used to screen for perceived somatic stra…
Start Test
Popular tests
Narcissistic Personality Inventory (NPI)
This self-report measure is used to assess narcissism as a personality trai…
Start Test
Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS)
This measure is used to rapidly quantify the current severity of obsessive…
Start Test
CRAFFT Screening Test (CRAFFT 2.1)
This brief screening measure is designed to identify potential alcohol and…
Start Test
Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)
This measure is commonly used to quickly screen for the presence and severi…
Start Test
Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI)
This self-report measure is used to assess occupational burnout symptoms in…
Start Test
Adolescent Anxiety Questionnaire
This measure is designed to support a brief appraisal of anxiety symptoms a…
Start Test
Emotional Creativity Inventory (ECI)
This self-report measure assesses individual differences in the originality…
Start Test
Horne–Ostberg Morningness–Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ)
Circadian preferences influence typical patterns of alertness and sleep tim…
Start Test
Ambivalent Sexism Inventory (ASI)
This measure is designed to assess attitudes toward women, including both o…
Start Test
Internalized Misogyny Scale (IMS)
This measure is designed to assess internalized negative beliefs and stereo…
Start Test
Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10)
This self-report measure assesses the degree to which individuals appraise…
Start Test
Impulsive Behavior Scale (SUPPS-P)
Impulsivity is a multidimensional construct that is often assessed with bri…
Start Test
Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment for Alcohol, Revised (CIWA-Ar)
This rating scale is used to rapidly assess the severity of alcohol withdra…
Start Test
Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS)
This measure provides a brief self-report assessment of current or typical…
Start Test
Light Triad Scale (LTS)
This self-report measure assesses prosocial personality tendencies and orie…
Start Test
Suicidal Ideation Scale
In clinical settings, the Suicidal Ideation Scale is used to structure an i…
Start Test
Body Dysmorphic Disorder Scale (BDD-D)
This brief self-report measure is designed to screen for and quantify distr…
Start Test
Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI)
This measure is a brief self-report inventory used to screen for anxiety sy…
Start Test
Differential Test of Perfectionism
This instrument is used to screen for perfectionism-related attitudes and t…
Start Test
Locus of Control Scale
This measure assesses generalized expectancies regarding the degree to whic…
Start Test
New Apathy Scale
This brief self-report measure is used to screen for apathy-related symptom…
Start Test
Perth Alexithymia Questionnaire (PAQ)
This measure assesses individual differences in alexithymia, including diff…
Start Test
Social Intelligence Scale
This brief self-report measure is designed to support rapid screening of in…
Start Test
Fear Test
This measure is designed to evaluate individual differences in fear-related…
Start Test
Neuroticism Level Scale
The measure is intended for brief screening of an individual’s propensity t…
Start Test
Aggressiveness Indicators Screening Questionnaire
This screening tool is designed to quickly identify behavioral indicators a…
Start Test
Comments
Leave a Comment