Ethnonational Attitudes Scale Test

Understand attitudes about nationality and ethnicity in just 3 minutes. This 14 item scale quickly maps key orientations to guide research, prevention work, and integration efforts.

Start Online Test

Questions: 143 minutes

Hi! My name is Freudly, i am an AI therapist, I will give you an interpretation of the test after you complete it.

08:30

October 2, 2025

October 2, 2025
Material has been updated

October 2, 2025
Material has been published

16485 views

1093 completions

882 likes

Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

example score

4/5

Negativistic Ethnonational Attitudes (NEA)

Measures the degree to which a person rejects or denies the importance of nationality and ethnic identity.

Low rejection

Moderate rejection

High rejection

1 – 2.3: Low rejection | 2.4 – 3.6: Moderate rejection | 3.7 – 5: High rejection

A score of 4 indicates a high tendency to view nationality and ethnic identity as unimportant or to react negatively to their significance.

example score

3/5

Neutral Ethnonational Attitudes (NEA)

This scale measures how indifferent or unconcerned a person is about national and ethnic identity issues.

Concerned

Somewhat neutral

Indifferent

1 – 2.4: Concerned | 2.5 – 3.4: Somewhat neutral | 3.5 – 5: Indifferent

A score of 3 falls in the “Somewhat neutral” range, suggesting a generally indifferent stance toward ethnonational issues with occasional relevance depending on context.

example score

2/5

Patriotic Attitudes (PA)

Measures pride in one’s national identity and a positive sense of connection with people of the same nationality.

Low

Moderate

High

1 – 2.3: Low | 2.4 – 3.6: Moderate | 3.7 – 5: High

A score of 2 indicates a low level of patriotic attitudes, suggesting limited pride in national identity and a weaker felt connection with people of the same nationality.

example score

2/5

Nationalistic Attitudes (NA)

Measures the degree of hostile, biased attitudes toward people of other nationalities.

Low

Moderate

High

1 – 2.3: Low | 2.4 – 3.6: Moderate | 3.7 – 5: High

A score of 2 indicates low nationalistic attitudes, suggesting relatively little hostility or bias toward other nationalities in the responses.

Start Online Test

just completed the test

DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Social science researchers

41%OF USERS

Researchers and students use it to quickly map group attitudes toward nationality and ethnicity for surveys, fieldwork, or theses.

Community integration practitioners

34%OF USERS

NGO staff, mediators, and integration program teams use it to spot tensions and tailor interventions in diverse communities.

Public sector analysts

25%OF USERS

Policy and municipal specialists use it to monitor intergroup sentiment and evaluate the impact of cohesion or prevention efforts.

BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.

RESULTS YOU CAN ACTUALLY USE

What You’ll See After You Finish the Test

Scale Results
— Explained Clearly

Your scores across each test scale, translated into plain, usable insights. Not just numbers, but what they actually mean for your daily life, emotional state, and overall well-being.

AI-Powered
Interpretation

A structured, clinically grounded explanation. Our AI analyzes patterns and relationships between scales to provide a coherent interpretation — without alarmist language.

Statistical
Comparison

See how you compare to others. Your scores are placed in a statistical context, showing percentiles and trends based on anonymized platform data to help you understand what`s typical.

Practical
Recommendations

Actionable guidance tailored to your profile. Receive clear, realistic suggestions you can apply immediately — focused on coping, self-regulation, and realistic next steps.

AI-Detected
Insights

Key patterns you might not notice on your own. Surfacing subtle connections in your responses that help you better understand what may be driving your current results.

Discuss with
an AI Psychologist

Clarify, reflect, and explore right away. Talk through your outcomes, ask questions, and explore meanings in a calm, non-diagnostic dialogue environment.

Start Online Test

Used in 52+ countries

Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you finish the test, your results will be compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of the benchmarks we use to place your score in context.

Negativistic ethno-national (Ne)

Average

Normal range

1.4 — 2.7

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Neutral ethnonational (Ne)

Average

3.3

Normal range

2.6 — 4

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Patriotic (P)

Average

3.6

Normal range

2.9 — 4.4

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Nationalistic (N)

Average

2.8

Normal range

2.2 — 3.3

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Start Online Test

Featured On

Rated 4.8/5 by Our Customers

“Freudly really helped me discover parts of my personality I hadn’t noticed before. It strengthened the areas where I needed to grow and made me feel more grounded and confident in the parts that already worked well.”

— Emma C., US

“I wanted to understand how serious my ADHD is, and now I finally do. I also realized I need to work on my self-esteem. It has been low for a long time, and that makes daily life harder than it should be.”

— Mateo R., CA

“Reading each question felt like someone really understood me. Even though I’ve already dealt with much of this, reflecting still helped me learn something new about myself.”

— Caroline F., US

“The process is simple. The test covers everything you need, and you’ll get a clear breakdown of your results. For just a few dollars, it’s a great value.”

— Klara N., CZ

“I kept thinking there might be a small chance, but now I know for sure. The questions were easy to understand, and the whole process was straightforward.”

— Bruno M., BR

“I really enjoyed this experience. I learned a lot, and it helped me make sense of my thoughts and the feeling I’ve had for a long time that I may have grown up with undiagnosed ADHD.”

— Alice B., FR

“Great platform — the insights were genuinely meaningful!”

— Daniel W., DE

“Everything was easy to follow. The tools you get at the end are genuinely helpful for self-growth, and the price is very reasonable. I really appreciate that.”

— Sofia M., ES

“Surprisingly accurate — honestly didn’t expect it to nail things so well.”

— Adir B., IL

“There are lots of different tests to pick from, and the price is surprisingly low for how much insight you get.”

— Olivia W., CA

“I was pleasantly surprised when I read the results. It was as if someone had sorted out my messy thoughts and given me useful tips to help me speak with more confidence.”

— Grace O., IE

“It was really solid, very detailed, and it actually helped me make sense of a lot of things.”

— Carla T., TT

“I was really impressed with the report. It was clear, thoughtful, and it reflected things I’ve been noticing about myself.”

— Jade H., US

“The questions made me think deeply and helped me become more self-aware.”

— Brooke S., US

“Reading through most of the questions made me feel understood. Although I’ve already worked through some of these issues, the questions still gave me useful insights and helped me learn more about myself.”

— Ryan M., US

“I usually take one or two tests each month, and this has become a good way for me to see how I’m doing.”

— Lucas W., US

“Most of the time, my results are in the 90 to 98th percentile compared to others. It really makes me feel like there’s something unique about me.”

— Ethan C., US

“I tried out some of the AI’s suggestions, and to be honest, they worked much better than I thought they would. Maybe this thing really is smarter than me.”

— Reece D., AU

Trusted by 22k+ Users Worldwide

CLEAR ANSWERS TO COMMON QUESTIONS

Frequently Asked Questions

Any questions left?

What does this questionnaire measure?

It assesses attitudes toward nationality and ethnicity. Results are summarized across four orientations: nationalist, patriotic, neutral, and negativistic.

How long does it take to complete?

Most respondents complete it in about 3 minutes. It includes 14 statements.

How should responses be selected?

Each statement should be rated based on current views rather than past beliefs. Responses should reflect the closest match, even if no option is perfect.

How are results interpreted?

Scores indicate the relative prominence of each orientation within an individual or group. Higher scores on an orientation suggest stronger endorsement of that stance.

What are appropriate uses for the results?

It is suited for research and applied screening in studies of intergroup attitudes and social cohesion. Results should be interpreted in context and not used as a standalone basis for individual decisions.

WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

About This Assessment

Ethnonational Attitudes Scale Test

ethnopsychology intergroup relations patriotism

This brief self-report measure is used to assess attitudes related to ethnicity and nationality. The Ethnonational Attitudes Scale provides a structured way to characterize respondents’ viewpoints in this domain (Berry).

The instrument consists of 14 items and typically takes about 3 minutes to complete. Items ask respondents to rate statements reflecting different evaluative stances toward one’s own and other groups, supporting use in research and applied settings where a concise index of ethnonational attitudes is needed.

Scores from the Ethnonational Attitudes Scale are intended to inform description of prevailing attitudinal patterns within individuals or groups and may be considered alongside other clinical, behavioral, or contextual data when interpreting intergroup perceptions.

Author: John W. Berry

Literature: Stephan, W. G., & Stephan, C. W. An integrated threat theory of prejudice. In S. Oskamp (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 2000.

Test Question Form