Prices
Tests
FAQ
How sessions work
en
es
Log inSign up

Small Group Role Structure Assessment Test

See how each teammate tends to contribute in group work in about 3 minutes. Get a clear role map to reduce overlap, spot gaps, and collaborate more smoothly.
Start Online Test
Questions: 123 minutes
Hi! My name is Freudly, i am an AI therapist, I will give you an interpretation of the test after you complete it.
08:30
October 2, 2025
October 2, 2025
Material has been updated
21266 views
1867 completions
1637 likes
Share
Scale Explorer
How the Scales are Structured
example score
42/48
Methodical Approach (MA)
Measures how strongly a person prefers structured, rational, and consistent planning and execution when working in a group.
Flexible / Spontaneous
Balanced
Highly Methodical
12 – 23: Flexible / Spontaneous | 24 – 35: Balanced | 36 – 48: Highly Methodical
A score of 42 indicates a highly methodical approach, with a strong preference for planning, detail-checking, and orderly coordination of work steps.
example score
39/48
Normative Approach (NA)
Measures the extent to which a person relies on established norms and experience, weighs consequences, and seeks harmony when working in a group.
Low
Moderate
High
12 – 23: Low | 24 – 35: Moderate | 36 – 48: High
A score of 39 indicates a high normative approach, suggesting you tend to anchor new ideas in proven practices, consider requirements and consequences, and prioritize smooth coordination in the team.
example score
24/48
Spontaneous Approach (SA)
Measures the extent to which a person prefers unconstrained, independent, multi-threaded action and seeks recognition and influence in group work.
Structured
Flexible
Highly Spontaneous
12 – 23: Structured | 24 – 35: Flexible | 36 – 48: Highly Spontaneous
A score of 24 falls in the Flexible range, suggesting a moderate preference for freedom and self-directed action while still tolerating some structure in team settings.
example score
18/48
Conceptual Approach (CA)
Measures how strongly a person tends to generate new ideas, explore alternatives, and plan future-oriented solutions within group work.
Low
Moderate
High
12 – 23: Low | 24 – 35: Moderate | 36 – 48: High
A score of 18 falls in the Low range, suggesting a weaker preference for idea-generation and long-range conceptual planning compared with more action- or detail-focused approaches in the team.
Start Online Test
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS
Who Usually Takes This Test?
Project and Team Leads
41%OF USERS
They use it to quickly map who drives ideas, organization, analysis, execution, and coordination so responsibilities are clear from the start.
Newly Formed Teams
34%OF USERS
They take it during kickoff to see how everyone naturally works together and to prevent role confusion and bottlenecks.
Innovation and Product Squads
25%OF USERS
They rely on it in fast-moving work to identify strengths and missing roles before deadlines make trial-and-error too costly.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
RESULTS YOU CAN ACTUALLY USE
What You’ll See After You Finish the Test
Scale Results
— Explained Clearly
Your scores across each test scale, translated into plain, usable insights. Not just numbers, but what they actually mean for your daily life, emotional state, and overall well-being.
AI-Powered
Interpretation
A structured, clinically grounded explanation. Our AI analyzes patterns and relationships between scales to provide a coherent interpretation — without alarmist language.
Statistical
Comparison
See how you compare to others. Your scores are placed in a statistical context, showing percentiles and trends based on anonymized platform data to help you understand what`s typical.
Practical
Recommendations
Actionable guidance tailored to your profile. Receive clear, realistic suggestions you can apply immediately — focused on coping, self-regulation, and realistic next steps.
AI-Detected
Insights
Key patterns you might not notice on your own. Surfacing subtle connections in your responses that help you better understand what may be driving your current results.
Discuss with
an AI Psychologist
Clarify, reflect, and explore right away. Talk through your outcomes, ask questions, and explore meanings in a calm, non-diagnostic dialogue environment.
Start Online Test
Used in 52+ countries
Benchmarking
See How You Compare
Once you finish the test, your results will be compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of the benchmarks we use to place your score in context.
Methodological Approach (MA)
Average
25.5
Normal range
19 — 31.9
min.
12
max.
48
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Normative Approach (NA)
Average
29.8
Normal range
23.7 — 36
min.
12
max.
48
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Spontaneous Approach (SA)
Average
32.1
Normal range
26.4 — 37.7
min.
12
max.
48
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Conceptual Approach (CA)
Average
25.4
Normal range
19.5 — 31.3
min.
12
max.
48
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Start Online Test
Featured On
Rated 4.8/5 by Our Customers
“Freudly really helped me discover parts of my personality I hadn’t noticed before. It strengthened the areas where I needed to grow and made me feel more grounded and confident in the parts that already worked well.”
— Emma C., US
“I wanted to understand how serious my ADHD is, and now I finally do. I also realized I need to work on my self-esteem. It has been low for a long time, and that makes daily life harder than it should be.”
— Mateo R., CA
“Reading each question felt like someone really understood me. Even though I’ve already dealt with much of this, reflecting still helped me learn something new about myself.”
— Caroline F., US
“The process is simple. The test covers everything you need, and you’ll get a clear breakdown of your results. For just a few dollars, it’s a great value.”
— Klara N., CZ
“I kept thinking there might be a small chance, but now I know for sure. The questions were easy to understand, and the whole process was straightforward.”
— Bruno M., BR
“I really enjoyed this experience. I learned a lot, and it helped me make sense of my thoughts and the feeling I’ve had for a long time that I may have grown up with undiagnosed ADHD.”
— Alice B., FR
“Great platform — the insights were genuinely meaningful!”
— Daniel W., DE
“Everything was easy to follow. The tools you get at the end are genuinely helpful for self-growth, and the price is very reasonable. I really appreciate that.”
— Sofia M., ES
“Surprisingly accurate — honestly didn’t expect it to nail things so well.”
— Adir B., IL
“There are lots of different tests to pick from, and the price is surprisingly low for how much insight you get.”
— Olivia W., CA
“I was pleasantly surprised when I read the results. It was as if someone had sorted out my messy thoughts and given me useful tips to help me speak with more confidence.”
— Grace O., IE
“It was really solid, very detailed, and it actually helped me make sense of a lot of things.”
— Carla T., TT
“I was really impressed with the report. It was clear, thoughtful, and it reflected things I’ve been noticing about myself.”
— Jade H., US
“The questions made me think deeply and helped me become more self-aware.”
— Brooke S., US
“Reading through most of the questions made me feel understood. Although I’ve already worked through some of these issues, the questions still gave me useful insights and helped me learn more about myself.”
— Ryan M., US
“I usually take one or two tests each month, and this has become a good way for me to see how I’m doing.”
— Lucas W., US
“Most of the time, my results are in the 90 to 98th percentile compared to others. It really makes me feel like there’s something unique about me.”
— Ethan C., US
“I tried out some of the AI’s suggestions, and to be honest, they worked much better than I thought they would. Maybe this thing really is smarter than me.”
— Reece D., AU
Trusted by 22k+ Users Worldwide
CLEAR ANSWERS TO COMMON QUESTIONS
Frequently Asked Questions

Any questions left?

What does this questionnaire measure?
It identifies the role a person most often takes in team workflow. It focuses on observable collaboration behaviors rather than broad personality traits.
Which roles are included in the results?
Results are organized across five roles: Creator, Initiator, Analyst, Implementer, and Coordinator. Each role reflects a different function in group work.
How should items be answered?
Select the option that best matches typical behavior in a group setting. Answer quickly and avoid overthinking individual items.
How long does it take and how many items are there?
Completion time is about 3 minutes. The questionnaire contains 12 items.
How should results be used in a team?
Results can clarify strengths, gaps, and likely role coverage across the group. They support role assignment and coordination but do not replace performance review or clinical assessment.
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES
About This Assessment
Definition of the Role Structure in a Small Group Test

Small Group Role Structure Assessment Test

team roledisc modelarrange

This brief questionnaire is designed to describe how individuals typically function within collaborative task-focused settings. The Small Group Role Structure Assessment provides a structured snapshot of role-related behavioral tendencies that may influence coordination, decision-making, and follow-through in small groups.

The measure includes 12 items and takes about 3 minutes to complete. Respondents select options that best reflect their usual behavior in a group context; results are intended to support discussion of team role distribution rather than to serve as a comprehensive personality evaluation.

Interpretation focuses on identifying predominant and less-preferred roles to clarify responsibilities, anticipate interaction patterns, and inform practical planning for teamwork. The Small Group Role Structure Assessment is attributed to R. F. Bales and J. L. Moreno.

Author: J. L. Moreno, R. F. Bales
Literature: Forsyth, D. R. Group dynamics. Wadsworth. 2010.
Test Question Form
You Might Also Like
At-Risk Children Identification
This brief screening tool is intended to support early identification of ch…
Start Test
Bullying Structure Identification Questionnaire
This questionnaire is designed to support structured screening of bullying-…
Start Test
Sexism Structure Questionnaire
This self-report measure is designed to assess endorsement of sexist belief…
Start Test
Comments
Leave a Comment