Conflict Situations Questionnaire Test

Learn how you tend to respond to tension and disagreement in just 10 minutes. Five real-life scenarios deliver clear insights to sharpen communication and self-control at work or home.
Start Online Test
Questions510 minutes
Hi! My name is Freudly, i am an AI therapist, I will give you an interpretation of the test after you complete it.
08:30
October 2, 2025
October 2, 2025
Material has been updated
14903 views
1038 completions
900 likes
Share
Scale Explorer
How the Scales are Structured
example score
28/35
Irony (I)
Measures the tendency to use irony, sarcasm, and indirect verbal aggression in conflict situations.
Low
Moderate
High
514Low1524Moderate2535High
A score of 28 falls in the High range, suggesting irony and sarcasm are relatively common strategies you may use during disagreements.
example score
20/35
Partner Blaming (PB)
Measures the tendency to respond to conflict by blaming a partner and expressing anger through insults or threats.
Low accusing
Moderate accusing
High accusing
515Low accusing1625Moderate accusing2635High accusing
A score of 20 falls in the Moderate accusing range, suggesting you sometimes use blaming or harsh language in conflict but it is not your dominant approach.
example score
22/35
Problem-Solving Proposals (PP)
Measures the tendency to propose constructive solutions and compromises when facing a conflict situation.
Low solution focus
Moderate solution focus
High solution focus
515Low solution focus1625Moderate solution focus2635High solution focus
A score of 22 indicates a moderate tendency to look for constructive ways to resolve conflicts, with compromises considered in some situations.
example score
14/35
Expression of Feelings (EoF)
Measures how openly a person expresses their feelings and personal viewpoint during conflict communication.
Reserved expression
Situational openness
Open expression
515Reserved expression1625Situational openness2635Open expression
A score of 14 suggests you tend to hold back or soften emotional expression and your stance during conflicts, sharing them more selectively.
example score
24/35
Acknowledgment of Partner's Feelings (AoPF)
Measures how consistently a person acknowledges the other party’s feelings and goals while navigating conflict.
Low acknowledgment
Moderate acknowledgment
High acknowledgment
515Low acknowledgment1625Moderate acknowledgment2635High acknowledgment
A score of 24 indicates a generally steady tendency to take the partner’s emotions and motives into account in conflict, though this may vary by situation.
Start Online Test
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS
Who Usually Takes This Test?
Managers and Team Leads
41%OF USERS
They take it to understand their default conflict approach and improve how they handle disagreements, feedback, and tension within a team.
Couples and Close Partners
34%OF USERS
They use it to spot patterns in arguments and learn more constructive ways to communicate under stress.
HR and Training Participants
25%OF USERS
They take it during workshops or coaching to quickly map conflict styles and target specific communication and self-regulation skills.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
RESULTS YOU CAN ACTUALLY USE
What You’ll See After You Finish the Test
Scale Results
— Explained Clearly
Your scores across each test scale, translated into plain, usable insights. Not just numbers, but what they actually mean for your daily life, emotional state, and overall well-being.
AI-Powered
Interpretation
A structured, clinically grounded explanation. Our AI analyzes patterns and relationships between scales to provide a coherent interpretation — without alarmist language.
Statistical
Comparison
See how you compare to others. Your scores are placed in a statistical context, showing percentiles and trends based on anonymized platform data to help you understand what`s typical.
Practical
Recommendations
Actionable guidance tailored to your profile. Receive clear, realistic suggestions you can apply immediately — focused on coping, self-regulation, and realistic next steps.
AI-Detected
Insights
Key patterns you might not notice on your own. Surfacing subtle connections in your responses that help you better understand what may be driving your current results.
Discuss with
an AI Psychologist
Clarify, reflect, and explore right away. Talk through your outcomes, ask questions, and explore meanings in a calm, non-diagnostic dialogue environment.
Start Online Test
Used in 52+ countries
Benchmarking
See How You Compare
Once you finish the test, your results will be compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of the benchmarks we use to place your score in context.
Irony (I)
Average
18.6
Normal range
13.723.5
min.
5
max.
35
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Accusing a Partner (AaP)
Average
18.1
Normal range
13.522.8
min.
5
max.
35
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Proposed solution to the problem (Psttp)
Average
17.7
Normal range
12.822.7
min.
5
max.
35
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Expressing Your Feelings (EYF)
Average
14.8
Normal range
10.818.7
min.
5
max.
35
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Acknowledging Your Partner's Feelings (AYPF)
Average
15.8
Normal range
11.320.4
min.
5
max.
35
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Featured On
Rated 4.8/5 by Our Customers
Freudly really helped me discover parts of my personality I hadn’t noticed before. It strengthened the areas where I needed to grow and made me feel more grounded and confident in the parts that already worked well.
Emma C., US
I wanted to understand how serious my ADHD is, and now I finally do. I also realized I need to work on my self-esteem. It has been low for a long time, and that makes daily life harder than it should be.
Mateo R., CA
Reading each question felt like someone really understood me. Even though I’ve already dealt with much of this, reflecting still helped me learn something new about myself.
Caroline F., US
The process is simple. The test covers everything you need, and you’ll get a clear breakdown of your results. For just a few dollars, it’s a great value.
Klara N., CZ
I kept thinking there might be a small chance, but now I know for sure. The questions were easy to understand, and the whole process was straightforward.
Bruno M., BR
I really enjoyed this experience. I learned a lot, and it helped me make sense of my thoughts and the feeling I’ve had for a long time that I may have grown up with undiagnosed ADHD.
Alice B., FR
Great platform — the insights were genuinely meaningful!
Daniel W., DE
Everything was easy to follow. The tools you get at the end are genuinely helpful for self-growth, and the price is very reasonable. I really appreciate that.
Sofia M., ES
Surprisingly accurate — honestly didn’t expect it to nail things so well.
Adir B., IL
There are lots of different tests to pick from, and the price is surprisingly low for how much insight you get.
Olivia W., CA
I was pleasantly surprised when I read the results. It was as if someone had sorted out my messy thoughts and given me useful tips to help me speak with more confidence.
Grace O., IE
It was really solid, very detailed, and it actually helped me make sense of a lot of things.
Carla T., TT
I was really impressed with the report. It was clear, thoughtful, and it reflected things I’ve been noticing about myself.
Jade H., US
The questions made me think deeply and helped me become more self-aware.
Brooke S., US
Reading through most of the questions made me feel understood. Although I’ve already worked through some of these issues, the questions still gave me useful insights and helped me learn more about myself.
Ryan M., US
I usually take one or two tests each month, and this has become a good way for me to see how I’m doing.
Lucas W., US
Most of the time, my results are in the 90 to 98th percentile compared to others. It really makes me feel like there’s something unique about me.
Ethan C., US
I tried out some of the AI’s suggestions, and to be honest, they worked much better than I thought they would. Maybe this thing really is smarter than me.
Reece D., AU
Trusted by 22k+ Users Worldwide
CLEAR ANSWERS TO COMMON QUESTIONS
Frequently Asked Questions

Any questions left?

What does this assessment measure?
It identifies preferred ways of responding during interpersonal conflict. It highlights common interaction strategies used under tension.
What is the format of the questions?
Each item presents a brief conflict scenario with several possible responses. The selected options indicate the strategies most likely to be used in similar situations.
How long does it take to complete?
Most administrations take about 10 minutes. The questionnaire contains 5 items.
How should responses be selected?
Select the response option that best matches typical behavior rather than an ideal response. Answer based on usual patterns across situations.
How should results be interpreted?
Results describe tendencies, not fixed traits or diagnoses. They can be used to target communication and self-regulation skills in training, counseling, or team development.
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES
About This Assessment
Conflict Situations Test

Conflict Situations Questionnaire Test

This questionnaire is designed to assess how an individual typically responds to interpersonal disagreement or tension. The Conflict Situations Questionnaire uses brief scenario-based prompts to elicit preferred conflict-management responses in everyday contexts.

The measure includes 5 items and takes about 10 minutes to complete. Responses are intended to characterize common interaction patterns under stress and can inform clinical formulation, coaching, or skills-focused interventions targeting communication and self-regulation.

The Conflict Situations Questionnaire is attributed to Wigboldus, D., and Thomas, K. W. Results should be interpreted in the context of other clinical information rather than as a standalone diagnostic indicator.

Author: Thomas, K. W., Wigboldus, D.
Literature: Mayer, J. D., Salovey, P., & Caruso, D. R. Emotional intelligence: New ability or eclectic traits? American Psychologist. 2008.
Test Question Form
You Might Also Like
Nonverbal Behavior Strategies in Conflict Situations
This brief self-report measure examines typical nonverbal response patterns…
Start Test
Conflict Behavior Strategies
This measure assesses an individual’s preferred approaches to managing inte…
Start Test
Comments
Leave a Comment