Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ) Test

Understand your team’s patient safety climate and attitudes in about 8 minutes. Get clear, actionable insights to strengthen teamwork, communication, and safety practices across your unit.
Start Online Test
Questions418 minutes
Hi! My name is Freudly, i am an AI therapist, I will give you an interpretation of the test after you complete it.
08:30
October 2, 2025
October 2, 2025
Material has been updated
20442 views
2022 completions
1745 likes
Share
Scale Explorer
How the Scales are Structured
example score
56/205
Safety Attitudes (SA)
Measures staff’s overall perception of and commitment to patient safety principles and safety culture within the organization.
Needs improvement
Developing
Strong
4195Needs improvement96150Developing151205Strong
A score of 56 falls in the “Needs improvement” range, indicating a generally less positive safety attitude and potential gaps in perceived safety culture and adherence to safety principles.
example score
25/30
Teamwork Climate (TC)
Assesses the degree of support, collaboration, and mutual assistance within the team.
Needs improvement
Adequate
Strong
616Needs improvement1723Adequate2430Strong
A score of 25 falls in the Strong range, suggesting a generally cohesive team climate with effective cooperation and mutual support.
example score
21/35
Safety Climate (SC)
Assesses how positively staff perceive workplace safety, including trust in safety measures and procedures.
Low
Moderate
High
716Low1725Moderate2635High
A score of 21 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting mixed perceptions of workplace safety and only partial confidence in current safety practices.
example score
11/25
Job Satisfaction (JS)
Measures how satisfied employees are with their job, working conditions, and professional fulfillment.
Low
Moderate
High
512Low1319Moderate2025High
A score of 11 falls in the Low range, indicating comparatively reduced job satisfaction and less positive perceptions of work and working conditions.
example score
15/20
Stress Recognition (SR)
Measures how well staff recognize the impact of stress on their work and regulate it in day-to-day clinical practice.
Low
Moderate
High
49Low1015Moderate1620High
A score of 15 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting a generally adequate ability to notice stress effects and use basic strategies to manage them, with room to strengthen consistency under pressure.
example score
13/25
Perceptions of Unit Management (PoUM)
Measures staff perceptions of how supportive and competent department management is regarding patient safety.
Low confidence
Mixed confidence
High confidence
514Low confidence1519Mixed confidence2025High confidence
A score of 13 falls in the Low confidence range, suggesting limited perceived support and involvement of department management in safety issues.
example score
13/25
Perceptions of Hospital Management (PoHM)
Measures how positively staff perceive clinic management decisions and policies related to maintaining patient safety.
Low
Moderate
High
511Low1218Moderate1925High
A score of 13 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting a mixed but generally acceptable view of management’s safety-related actions with room for improvement.
example score
16/20
Working Conditions (WC)
Assesses staff satisfaction with working conditions, including equipment adequacy, comfort, and workplace safety.
Needs improvement
Adequate
Strong
410Needs improvement1115Adequate1620Strong
A score of 16 falls in the Strong range, indicating generally positive perceptions of equipment, comfort, and workplace safety conditions.
Start Online Test
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS
Who Usually Takes This Test?
Hospital and clinic managers
41%OF USERS
Leaders and quality managers use it to gauge the safety culture, spot weak points in processes, and prioritize improvements.
Doctors and nurses
36%OF USERS
Clinical staff take it to share how safe and supported they feel at work and where teamwork or communication breaks down.
Patient safety specialists
23%OF USERS
Risk, compliance, and safety officers use it to monitor safety climate over time and evaluate the impact of training or policy changes.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
RESULTS YOU CAN ACTUALLY USE
What You’ll See After You Finish the Test
Scale Results
— Explained Clearly
Your scores across each test scale, translated into plain, usable insights. Not just numbers, but what they actually mean for your daily life, emotional state, and overall well-being.
AI-Powered
Interpretation
A structured, clinically grounded explanation. Our AI analyzes patterns and relationships between scales to provide a coherent interpretation — without alarmist language.
Statistical
Comparison
See how you compare to others. Your scores are placed in a statistical context, showing percentiles and trends based on anonymized platform data to help you understand what`s typical.
Practical
Recommendations
Actionable guidance tailored to your profile. Receive clear, realistic suggestions you can apply immediately — focused on coping, self-regulation, and realistic next steps.
AI-Detected
Insights
Key patterns you might not notice on your own. Surfacing subtle connections in your responses that help you better understand what may be driving your current results.
Discuss with
an AI Psychologist
Clarify, reflect, and explore right away. Talk through your outcomes, ask questions, and explore meanings in a calm, non-diagnostic dialogue environment.
Start Online Test
Used in 52+ countries
Benchmarking
See How You Compare
Once you finish the test, your results will be compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of the benchmarks we use to place your score in context.
Attitude Towards Safety (ATS)
Average
145
Normal range
122.5167.5
min.
41
max.
205
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Teamwork Atmosphere (TA)
Average
16.4
Normal range
12.420.4
min.
6
max.
30
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Atmosphere of Safety (AoS)
Average
21.7
Normal range
17.326
min.
7
max.
35
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Job Satisfaction (JS)
Average
18.6
Normal range
15.122.1
min.
5
max.
25
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Stress Recognition (SR)
Average
11
Normal range
8.114
min.
4
max.
20
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Perception of department management (Podm)
Average
11.7
Normal range
815.5
min.
5
max.
25
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Perception of Clinic Management (PoCM)
Average
17
Normal range
14.519.5
min.
5
max.
25
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Working Conditions (WC)
Average
12.9
Normal range
1015.8
min.
4
max.
20
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Featured On
Rated 4.8/5 by Our Customers
Freudly really helped me discover parts of my personality I hadn’t noticed before. It strengthened the areas where I needed to grow and made me feel more grounded and confident in the parts that already worked well.
Emma C., US
I wanted to understand how serious my ADHD is, and now I finally do. I also realized I need to work on my self-esteem. It has been low for a long time, and that makes daily life harder than it should be.
Mateo R., CA
Reading each question felt like someone really understood me. Even though I’ve already dealt with much of this, reflecting still helped me learn something new about myself.
Caroline F., US
The process is simple. The test covers everything you need, and you’ll get a clear breakdown of your results. For just a few dollars, it’s a great value.
Klara N., CZ
I kept thinking there might be a small chance, but now I know for sure. The questions were easy to understand, and the whole process was straightforward.
Bruno M., BR
I really enjoyed this experience. I learned a lot, and it helped me make sense of my thoughts and the feeling I’ve had for a long time that I may have grown up with undiagnosed ADHD.
Alice B., FR
Great platform — the insights were genuinely meaningful!
Daniel W., DE
Everything was easy to follow. The tools you get at the end are genuinely helpful for self-growth, and the price is very reasonable. I really appreciate that.
Sofia M., ES
Surprisingly accurate — honestly didn’t expect it to nail things so well.
Adir B., IL
There are lots of different tests to pick from, and the price is surprisingly low for how much insight you get.
Olivia W., CA
I was pleasantly surprised when I read the results. It was as if someone had sorted out my messy thoughts and given me useful tips to help me speak with more confidence.
Grace O., IE
It was really solid, very detailed, and it actually helped me make sense of a lot of things.
Carla T., TT
I was really impressed with the report. It was clear, thoughtful, and it reflected things I’ve been noticing about myself.
Jade H., US
The questions made me think deeply and helped me become more self-aware.
Brooke S., US
Reading through most of the questions made me feel understood. Although I’ve already worked through some of these issues, the questions still gave me useful insights and helped me learn more about myself.
Ryan M., US
I usually take one or two tests each month, and this has become a good way for me to see how I’m doing.
Lucas W., US
Most of the time, my results are in the 90 to 98th percentile compared to others. It really makes me feel like there’s something unique about me.
Ethan C., US
I tried out some of the AI’s suggestions, and to be honest, they worked much better than I thought they would. Maybe this thing really is smarter than me.
Reece D., AU
Trusted by 22k+ Users Worldwide
CLEAR ANSWERS TO COMMON QUESTIONS
Frequently Asked Questions

Any questions left?

What does this questionnaire measure?
It measures staff perceptions of patient safety and the day-to-day safety climate in a clinical setting. It also reflects teamwork, communication, and support for safe practice.
Who should complete it?
It is intended for clinical and non-clinical staff who work within a healthcare organization. It may be used with individuals or whole teams.
How long does it take and how many items are included?
Average completion time is about 8 minutes. The questionnaire includes 41 statements.
How should responses be given?
Select the option that best matches typical conditions rather than rare events. Answer all items using the same reference period and work area.
How are results used?
Results are summarized to identify strengths and areas needing improvement in safety-related processes and communication. They can guide targeted actions such as training, workflow changes, or team interventions.
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES
About This Assessment
Attitude Towards Safety, SAQ Test

Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ) Test

This measure is used to assess staff perceptions of safety-related climate and teamwork within health care settings. The Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ) provides a structured way to identify strengths and areas for improvement in organizational attitudes linked to patient safety.

It consists of 41 items and typically takes about 8 minutes to complete. Items are presented as statements rated by respondents to characterize aspects of safety culture, including communication practices and perceived support for safe care. The Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ) is commonly used for quality improvement efforts, such as tracking change over time and informing targeted interventions. Original development is attributed to John B. Sexton and Robert L. Helmreich.

Author: John B. Sexton, Robert L. Helmreich
Literature: Edmondson, A. C. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly. 1999.; Flin, R., Burns, C., Mearns, K., Yule, S., & Robertson, E. Measuring safety climate in health care. Quality & Safety in Health Care. 2006.; Sexton, J. B., Helmreich, R. L., Neilands, T. B., Rowan, K., Vella, K., Boyden, J., Roberts, P. R., & Thomas, E. J. The Safety Attitudes Questionnaire: psychometric properties, benchmarking data, and emerging research. BMC Health Services Research. 2006.
Test Question Form
You Might Also Like
Danger and Safety Needs Questionnaire
This brief self-report measure assesses individual preferences related to r…
Start Test
Sense of Safety Questionnaire (SQ)
This self-report measure assesses an individual’s perceived safety and capa…
Start Test
Personal Safety State Assessment
This measure evaluates perceived personal safety and related feelings of st…
Start Test
Comments
Leave a Comment