Street Peer Group Test

In 3 minutes, it clarifies how strongly a teen connects with street crews and whether those ties may be risky. With 12 items, it quickly flags where prevention and support should focus.
Start Online Test
Questions123 minutes
Hi! My name is Freudly, i am an AI therapist, I will give you an interpretation of the test after you complete it.
08:30
October 2, 2025
October 2, 2025
Material has been updated
11071 view
653 completions
562 likes
Share
Scale Explorer
How the Scales are Structured
example score
52/60
Total Score (TS)
Measures how socially oriented versus antisocial the teenager’s street group is.
Antisocial orientation
Mostly entertainment/idleness
Typical peer group
1217Antisocial orientation1842Mostly entertainment/idleness4360Typical peer group
A score of 52 falls in the Typical peer group range, suggesting involvement in a socially normative group with varied interests beyond the group.
Start Online Test
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS
Who Usually Takes This Test?
School psychologists and counselors
41%OF USERS
They use it to quickly spot which students may be influenced by risky peer groups and plan targeted support.
Youth outreach social workers
34%OF USERS
They administer it during street or community work to map a teen’s crew ties and prioritize prevention steps.
Juvenile justice case teams
25%OF USERS
They use it in assessments to understand peer influence patterns and tailor supervision, mentoring, and interventions.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
RESULTS YOU CAN ACTUALLY USE
What You’ll See After You Finish the Test
Scale Results
— Explained Clearly
Your scores across each test scale, translated into plain, usable insights. Not just numbers, but what they actually mean for your daily life, emotional state, and overall well-being.
AI-Powered
Interpretation
A structured, clinically grounded explanation. Our AI analyzes patterns and relationships between scales to provide a coherent interpretation — without alarmist language.
Statistical
Comparison
See how you compare to others. Your scores are placed in a statistical context, showing percentiles and trends based on anonymized platform data to help you understand what`s typical.
Practical
Recommendations
Actionable guidance tailored to your profile. Receive clear, realistic suggestions you can apply immediately — focused on coping, self-regulation, and realistic next steps.
AI-Detected
Insights
Key patterns you might not notice on your own. Surfacing subtle connections in your responses that help you better understand what may be driving your current results.
Discuss with
an AI Psychologist
Clarify, reflect, and explore right away. Talk through your outcomes, ask questions, and explore meanings in a calm, non-diagnostic dialogue environment.
Start Online Test
Used in 52+ countries
Benchmarking
See How You Compare
Once you finish the test, your results will be compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of the benchmarks we use to place your score in context.
Points scored (Ps)
Average
45.1
Normal range
37.752.5
min.
12
max.
60
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Featured On
Rated 4.8/5 by Our Customers
Freudly really helped me discover parts of my personality I hadn’t noticed before. It strengthened the areas where I needed to grow and made me feel more grounded and confident in the parts that already worked well.
Emma C., US
I wanted to understand how serious my ADHD is, and now I finally do. I also realized I need to work on my self-esteem. It has been low for a long time, and that makes daily life harder than it should be.
Mateo R., CA
Reading each question felt like someone really understood me. Even though I’ve already dealt with much of this, reflecting still helped me learn something new about myself.
Caroline F., US
The process is simple. The test covers everything you need, and you’ll get a clear breakdown of your results. For just a few dollars, it’s a great value.
Klara N., CZ
I kept thinking there might be a small chance, but now I know for sure. The questions were easy to understand, and the whole process was straightforward.
Bruno M., BR
I really enjoyed this experience. I learned a lot, and it helped me make sense of my thoughts and the feeling I’ve had for a long time that I may have grown up with undiagnosed ADHD.
Alice B., FR
Great platform — the insights were genuinely meaningful!
Daniel W., DE
Everything was easy to follow. The tools you get at the end are genuinely helpful for self-growth, and the price is very reasonable. I really appreciate that.
Sofia M., ES
Surprisingly accurate — honestly didn’t expect it to nail things so well.
Adir B., IL
There are lots of different tests to pick from, and the price is surprisingly low for how much insight you get.
Olivia W., CA
I was pleasantly surprised when I read the results. It was as if someone had sorted out my messy thoughts and given me useful tips to help me speak with more confidence.
Grace O., IE
It was really solid, very detailed, and it actually helped me make sense of a lot of things.
Carla T., TT
I was really impressed with the report. It was clear, thoughtful, and it reflected things I’ve been noticing about myself.
Jade H., US
The questions made me think deeply and helped me become more self-aware.
Brooke S., US
Reading through most of the questions made me feel understood. Although I’ve already worked through some of these issues, the questions still gave me useful insights and helped me learn more about myself.
Ryan M., US
I usually take one or two tests each month, and this has become a good way for me to see how I’m doing.
Lucas W., US
Most of the time, my results are in the 90 to 98th percentile compared to others. It really makes me feel like there’s something unique about me.
Ethan C., US
I tried out some of the AI’s suggestions, and to be honest, they worked much better than I thought they would. Maybe this thing really is smarter than me.
Reece D., AU
Trusted by 22k+ Users Worldwide
CLEAR ANSWERS TO COMMON QUESTIONS
Frequently Asked Questions

Any questions left?

What does this questionnaire measure?
It estimates how likely a teenager is to be involved with different types of street-based peer groups. It also distinguishes between groups that are generally prosocial and groups associated with higher social risk.
Who is the questionnaire designed for?
It is intended for use with teenagers. It supports school-based and community-based professionals who conduct screening, prevention, or support planning.
How long does it take and how many questions are included?
Typical completion time is about 3 minutes. The questionnaire includes 12 items.
How should items be answered?
Responses should reflect current or recent real-world group involvement rather than opinions or hypothetical choices. Each item should be answered based on the best available knowledge.
How should results be used?
Results indicate areas for follow-up, monitoring, and targeted prevention or support. They are not a diagnosis and should be interpreted with additional information from the broader assessment context.
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES
About This Assessment
Your street crew Test

Street Peer Group Test

Peer affiliations can shape adolescents’ behavior and value formation. Street Peer Group is a brief self-report measure intended to screen perceived involvement with different peer networks, including groups that may be associated with elevated psychosocial risk. It was developed by Thomas J. Dishion and Kenneth A. Dodge.

The questionnaire includes 12 items and typically requires about 3 minutes to complete. Results are used to support clinical or school-based case formulation by characterizing the respondent’s reported peer-group context and identifying areas where additional assessment or preventive intervention may be warranted. Street Peer Group should be interpreted in conjunction with other clinical information and collateral sources when available.

Author: Kenneth A. Dodge, Thomas J. Dishion
Literature: Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Earls, F. Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science. 1997.
Test Question Form
You Might Also Like
Company Business Culture Assessment
Organizational culture can be difficult to infer from operational metrics a…
Start Test
Comments
Leave a Comment