Home
Psychological tests
Multiple Stimulus Types Ambiguity Tolerance Scale-I (MSTAT-I)

Multiple Stimulus Types Ambiguity Tolerance Scale-I (MSTAT-I) Test

In 5 minutes, see whether you stay calm with uncertainty or need firm structure and clear control. Get fast, actionable insight for work, school, and relationships as change hits.

Start Online Test

Questions: 225 minutes

Hi! My name is Freudly, i am an AI therapist, I will give you an interpretation of the test after you complete it.

08:30

October 2, 2025

October 2, 2025
Material has been updated

October 2, 2025
Material has been published

13000 views

828 completions

723 likes

Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

example score

51/63

Attitudes Toward Ambiguous Situations (ATAS)

Measures how comfortable a person feels and how flexibly they respond in situations that are unclear or unpredictable.

Low tolerance

Moderate tolerance

High tolerance

9 – 25: Low tolerance | 26 – 43: Moderate tolerance | 44 – 63: High tolerance

A score of 51 falls in the High tolerance range, suggesting you generally stay calm and adapt effectively when situations are ambiguous or change unexpectedly.

example score

33/49

Attitudes Toward Complex Tasks (ATCT)

Measures how willing a person is to engage with complex, ambiguous tasks rather than avoid them.

Avoids challenge

Selective engagement

Embraces challenge

7 – 23: Avoids challenge | 24 – 39: Selective engagement | 40 – 49: Embraces challenge

A score of 33 suggests a moderate tendency to take on challenging tasks, with comfort increasing when goals or constraints are reasonably clear.

example score

9/21

Attitude Toward Novelty (ATN)

Measures how positively a person relates to new, unfamiliar situations and their willingness to experiment versus preferring the familiar.

Cautious with novelty

Balanced

Open to novelty

3 – 8: Cautious with novelty | 9 – 17: Balanced | 18 – 21: Open to novelty

A score of 9 falls in the Balanced range, suggesting a generally neutral-to-positive stance toward new situations with some preference for predictability in certain contexts.

example score

38/77

Acceptance vs. Avoidance of Uncertainty (AvAoU)

Assesses the extent to which a person tends to accept rather than avoid uncertain or ambiguous situations.

Avoids uncertainty

Mixed / situational

Accepts uncertainty

11 – 32: Avoids uncertainty | 33 – 55: Mixed / situational | 56 – 77: Accepts uncertainty

A score of 38 falls in the mixed range, suggesting a generally situational approach where uncertainty may be manageable in some contexts but still prompts a preference for clarity in others.

example score

46/77

Preference for Uncertainty (PfU)

Measures how strongly a person prefers uncertain, open-ended situations versus seeking clear and predictable outcomes.

Prefers certainty

Balanced

Prefers uncertainty

11 – 36: Prefers certainty | 37 – 59: Balanced | 60 – 77: Prefers uncertainty

A score of 46 falls in the Balanced range, suggesting moderate comfort with ambiguity while still valuing structure and predictability in some situations.

example score

104/154

Tolerance for Ambiguity (TfA)

Measures how comfortably a person can accept and function in ambiguous, complex, or unpredictable situations without excessive stress.

Low tolerance

Moderate tolerance

High tolerance

22 – 72: Low tolerance | 73 – 112: Moderate tolerance | 113 – 154: High tolerance

A score of 104 falls in the Moderate tolerance range, suggesting you generally cope with uncertainty reasonably well while still preferring clarity in some situations.

Start Online Test

just completed the test

DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Change and transition seekers

41%OF USERS

People facing a new job, move, breakup, or other life shift who want to understand how calmly they handle uncertainty and surprises.

Students and early career

34%OF USERS

Those choosing a major or career path who want to see whether they prefer clear rules or feel comfortable in open-ended, ambiguous tasks.

Managers and HR specialists

25%OF USERS

Leaders and recruiters using the results to understand how a person reacts to unclear goals, shifting priorities, and change at work.

BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.

RESULTS YOU CAN ACTUALLY USE

What You’ll See After You Finish the Test

Scale Results
— Explained Clearly

Your scores across each test scale, translated into plain, usable insights. Not just numbers, but what they actually mean for your daily life, emotional state, and overall well-being.

AI-Powered
Interpretation

A structured, clinically grounded explanation. Our AI analyzes patterns and relationships between scales to provide a coherent interpretation — without alarmist language.

Statistical
Comparison

See how you compare to others. Your scores are placed in a statistical context, showing percentiles and trends based on anonymized platform data to help you understand what`s typical.

Practical
Recommendations

Actionable guidance tailored to your profile. Receive clear, realistic suggestions you can apply immediately — focused on coping, self-regulation, and realistic next steps.

AI-Detected
Insights

Key patterns you might not notice on your own. Surfacing subtle connections in your responses that help you better understand what may be driving your current results.

Discuss with
an AI Psychologist

Clarify, reflect, and explore right away. Talk through your outcomes, ask questions, and explore meanings in a calm, non-diagnostic dialogue environment.

Start Online Test

Used in 52+ countries

Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you finish the test, your results will be compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of the benchmarks we use to place your score in context.

Attitude Towards Ambiguous Situations (ATAS)

Average

27.6

Normal range

17.9 — 37.3

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Attitude Towards Challenging Tasks (ATCT)

Average

21.5

Normal range

15.9 — 27.1

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Attitude Towards Novelty (ATN)

Average

9.3

Normal range

6.8 — 11.9

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Acceptance/Avoidance of Uncertainty (AoU)

Average

44.8

Normal range

35.6 — 53.9

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Preference for Uncertainty (PfU)

Average

57.5

Normal range

45 — 69.9

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Tolerance for Uncertainty (TfU)

Average

Normal range

58.8 — 93.1

min.

max.

154

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Start Online Test

Featured On

Rated 4.8/5 by Our Customers

“Freudly really helped me discover parts of my personality I hadn’t noticed before. It strengthened the areas where I needed to grow and made me feel more grounded and confident in the parts that already worked well.”

— Emma C., US

“I wanted to understand how serious my ADHD is, and now I finally do. I also realized I need to work on my self-esteem. It has been low for a long time, and that makes daily life harder than it should be.”

— Mateo R., CA

“Reading each question felt like someone really understood me. Even though I’ve already dealt with much of this, reflecting still helped me learn something new about myself.”

— Caroline F., US

“The process is simple. The test covers everything you need, and you’ll get a clear breakdown of your results. For just a few dollars, it’s a great value.”

— Klara N., CZ

“I kept thinking there might be a small chance, but now I know for sure. The questions were easy to understand, and the whole process was straightforward.”

— Bruno M., BR

“I really enjoyed this experience. I learned a lot, and it helped me make sense of my thoughts and the feeling I’ve had for a long time that I may have grown up with undiagnosed ADHD.”

— Alice B., FR

“Great platform — the insights were genuinely meaningful!”

— Daniel W., DE

“Everything was easy to follow. The tools you get at the end are genuinely helpful for self-growth, and the price is very reasonable. I really appreciate that.”

— Sofia M., ES

“Surprisingly accurate — honestly didn’t expect it to nail things so well.”

— Adir B., IL

“There are lots of different tests to pick from, and the price is surprisingly low for how much insight you get.”

— Olivia W., CA

“I was pleasantly surprised when I read the results. It was as if someone had sorted out my messy thoughts and given me useful tips to help me speak with more confidence.”

— Grace O., IE

“It was really solid, very detailed, and it actually helped me make sense of a lot of things.”

— Carla T., TT

“I was really impressed with the report. It was clear, thoughtful, and it reflected things I’ve been noticing about myself.”

— Jade H., US

“The questions made me think deeply and helped me become more self-aware.”

— Brooke S., US

“Reading through most of the questions made me feel understood. Although I’ve already worked through some of these issues, the questions still gave me useful insights and helped me learn more about myself.”

— Ryan M., US

“I usually take one or two tests each month, and this has become a good way for me to see how I’m doing.”

— Lucas W., US

“Most of the time, my results are in the 90 to 98th percentile compared to others. It really makes me feel like there’s something unique about me.”

— Ethan C., US

“I tried out some of the AI’s suggestions, and to be honest, they worked much better than I thought they would. Maybe this thing really is smarter than me.”

— Reece D., AU

Trusted by 22k+ Users Worldwide

CLEAR ANSWERS TO COMMON QUESTIONS

Frequently Asked Questions

Any questions left?

What does this questionnaire measure?

It measures comfort with unclear, complex, or unpredictable situations. It reflects preference for strict structure versus openness to multiple possible outcomes.

How is the questionnaire completed?

Read each statement and select the response that best matches typical attitudes and reactions. Answer all items and avoid spending too long on any single statement.

How long does it take and how many items are included?

Completion time is usually about 5 minutes. The questionnaire contains 22 items.

How should scores be interpreted?

Higher scores indicate greater tolerance for ambiguity and flexibility in uncertain conditions. Lower scores indicate a stronger need for clarity, predictability, and stable rules.

What are common uses of the results?

Results are used to describe how uncertainty may affect decision-making, learning, work behavior, and interpersonal functioning. They may inform counseling, training, or research when understanding responses to change is required.

WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

About This Assessment

Multiple Stimulus Types Ambiguity Tolerance Scale-I (MSTAT-I) Test

uncertainty tolerance

This measure evaluates individual differences in responses to ambiguous or uncertain situations. The Multiple Stimulus Types Ambiguity Tolerance Scale-I (MSTAT-I) is a brief self-report instrument intended to assess comfort with, or avoidance of, ambiguity in everyday contexts.

The instrument consists of 22 items and typically requires about 5 minutes to complete. It is commonly used in research and applied assessment settings to characterize ambiguity tolerance as a dispositional variable that may be relevant to decision-making, flexibility in changing circumstances, and preference for structure; it is not a diagnostic test. The Multiple Stimulus Types Ambiguity Tolerance Scale-I (MSTAT-I) was developed by Stanley Budner and David J. McLain.

Author: David J. McLain, Stanley Budner

Literature: Budner, S. Intolerance of ambiguity as a personality variable. Journal of Personality. 1962.; McLain, D. L. Evidence of the properties of an ambiguity tolerance measure: The Multiple Stimulus Types Ambiguity Tolerance Scale-II (MSTAT-II). Psychological Reports. 2009.; Furnham, A., & Marks, J. Tolerance of ambiguity: A review of the recent literature. Psychology. 2013.; McLain, D. L. The MSTAT-I: A new measure of an individual's tolerance for ambiguity. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 1993.

Test Question Form