Home
Psychological tests
Representational System Preference Test

Representational System Preference Test

Learn whether you process information mainly through images, sound, feelings, or logic in about 5 minutes. Use the insight to tailor communication for better coaching, teaching, therapy, and teamwork.

Start Online Test

Questions: 55 minutes

Hi! My name is Freudly, i am an AI therapist, I will give you an interpretation of the test after you complete it.

08:30

October 2, 2025

October 2, 2025
Material has been updated

October 2, 2025
Material has been published

15890 views

1073 completions

951 likes

Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

example score

13/20

Digital (D)

Measures the tendency to process information through logic, analysis, and internal verbal reasoning rather than primarily through sensory impressions.

Lower digital preference

Moderate digital preference

Higher digital preference

5 – 9: Lower digital preference | 10 – 15: Moderate digital preference | 16 – 20: Higher digital preference

A score of 13 falls in the moderate range, suggesting a balanced use of structured, analytical thinking alongside other representational systems.

example score

12/20

Visual (V)

Measures the degree to which a person tends to perceive and process information primarily through visual images and cues.

Low visual preference

Moderate visual preference

High visual preference

5 – 9: Low visual preference | 10 – 15: Moderate visual preference | 16 – 20: High visual preference

A score of 12 indicates a moderate preference for visual processing, suggesting visuals can be helpful but are not the only channel relied on.

example score

13/20

Auditory (A)

Measures the degree to which a person prefers processing and recalling information through sounds, speech, and intonation.

Low auditory preference

Moderate auditory preference

High auditory preference

5 – 10: Low auditory preference | 11 – 15: Moderate auditory preference | 16 – 20: High auditory preference

A score of 13 suggests a moderate auditory preference, indicating you often notice and use verbal cues and intonation, but other channels may be similarly influential.

example score

14/20

Kinesthetic (K)

Measures how strongly a person tends to perceive and process information through bodily sensations, movement, and hands-on experience.

Low

Moderate

High

5 – 9: Low | 10 – 15: Moderate | 16 – 20: High

A score of 14 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting a noticeable preference for learning and communicating through practical experience and physical sensations, though other channels may also be used.

Start Online Test

just completed the test

DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Coaches and therapists

41%OF USERS

They use it to quickly identify a client’s dominant perception channel and tailor questions, exercises, and communication.

Teachers and trainers

34%OF USERS

They take it to understand how learners best absorb information and adjust explanations, materials, and feedback.

Self-development seekers

25%OF USERS

They take it out of curiosity to learn how they think and communicate and to improve study, work, and relationships.

BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.

RESULTS YOU CAN ACTUALLY USE

What You’ll See After You Finish the Test

Scale Results
— Explained Clearly

Your scores across each test scale, translated into plain, usable insights. Not just numbers, but what they actually mean for your daily life, emotional state, and overall well-being.

AI-Powered
Interpretation

A structured, clinically grounded explanation. Our AI analyzes patterns and relationships between scales to provide a coherent interpretation — without alarmist language.

Statistical
Comparison

See how you compare to others. Your scores are placed in a statistical context, showing percentiles and trends based on anonymized platform data to help you understand what`s typical.

Practical
Recommendations

Actionable guidance tailored to your profile. Receive clear, realistic suggestions you can apply immediately — focused on coping, self-regulation, and realistic next steps.

AI-Detected
Insights

Key patterns you might not notice on your own. Surfacing subtle connections in your responses that help you better understand what may be driving your current results.

Discuss with
an AI Psychologist

Clarify, reflect, and explore right away. Talk through your outcomes, ask questions, and explore meanings in a calm, non-diagnostic dialogue environment.

Start Online Test

Used in 52+ countries

Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you finish the test, your results will be compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of the benchmarks we use to place your score in context.

Digital (D)

Average

13.7

Normal range

11.5 — 15.9

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Visual (V)

Average

15.4

Normal range

12.7 — 18.1

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Auditory (A)

Average

15.1

Normal range

12.8 — 17.5

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Kinesthetic (K)

Average

14.8

Normal range

12.8 — 16.8

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Start Online Test

Featured On

Rated 4.8/5 by Our Customers

“Freudly really helped me discover parts of my personality I hadn’t noticed before. It strengthened the areas where I needed to grow and made me feel more grounded and confident in the parts that already worked well.”

— Emma C., US

“I wanted to understand how serious my ADHD is, and now I finally do. I also realized I need to work on my self-esteem. It has been low for a long time, and that makes daily life harder than it should be.”

— Mateo R., CA

“Reading each question felt like someone really understood me. Even though I’ve already dealt with much of this, reflecting still helped me learn something new about myself.”

— Caroline F., US

“The process is simple. The test covers everything you need, and you’ll get a clear breakdown of your results. For just a few dollars, it’s a great value.”

— Klara N., CZ

“I kept thinking there might be a small chance, but now I know for sure. The questions were easy to understand, and the whole process was straightforward.”

— Bruno M., BR

“I really enjoyed this experience. I learned a lot, and it helped me make sense of my thoughts and the feeling I’ve had for a long time that I may have grown up with undiagnosed ADHD.”

— Alice B., FR

“Great platform — the insights were genuinely meaningful!”

— Daniel W., DE

“Everything was easy to follow. The tools you get at the end are genuinely helpful for self-growth, and the price is very reasonable. I really appreciate that.”

— Sofia M., ES

“Surprisingly accurate — honestly didn’t expect it to nail things so well.”

— Adir B., IL

“There are lots of different tests to pick from, and the price is surprisingly low for how much insight you get.”

— Olivia W., CA

“I was pleasantly surprised when I read the results. It was as if someone had sorted out my messy thoughts and given me useful tips to help me speak with more confidence.”

— Grace O., IE

“It was really solid, very detailed, and it actually helped me make sense of a lot of things.”

— Carla T., TT

“I was really impressed with the report. It was clear, thoughtful, and it reflected things I’ve been noticing about myself.”

— Jade H., US

“The questions made me think deeply and helped me become more self-aware.”

— Brooke S., US

“Reading through most of the questions made me feel understood. Although I’ve already worked through some of these issues, the questions still gave me useful insights and helped me learn more about myself.”

— Ryan M., US

“I usually take one or two tests each month, and this has become a good way for me to see how I’m doing.”

— Lucas W., US

“Most of the time, my results are in the 90 to 98th percentile compared to others. It really makes me feel like there’s something unique about me.”

— Ethan C., US

“I tried out some of the AI’s suggestions, and to be honest, they worked much better than I thought they would. Maybe this thing really is smarter than me.”

— Reece D., AU

Trusted by 22k+ Users Worldwide

CLEAR ANSWERS TO COMMON QUESTIONS

Frequently Asked Questions

Any questions left?

What does this test measure?

It screens for a preferred representational system used to perceive and organize information: visual, auditory, kinesthetic, or digital. Results indicate a tendency, not a fixed trait.

How long does it take and how many items are included?

Estimated completion time is about 5 minutes. The form includes 5 questions.

How should responses be selected?

Choose the option that best matches the typical, first response in everyday situations. Avoid selecting what seems most desirable or appropriate.

How are results interpreted?

Scores reflect a relative preference among the four systems rather than ability or accuracy. A close score pattern may indicate mixed or flexible processing.

What are appropriate uses and limitations?

Results may inform communication, coaching, teaching, or clinical interviewing by matching language to a likely preference. It is not a diagnostic instrument and should not be used as the sole basis for clinical decisions.

WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

About This Assessment

Representational System Preference Test

representational system

This brief self-report measure is used to screen for an individual’s preferred modality for perceiving and processing information, as conceptualized in representational systems. The Representational System Preference Test is typically used to identify relative preferences across visual, auditory, kinesthetic, and analytically oriented (often termed “digital”) channels.

It consists of 5 items and takes about 5 minutes to complete. Content is generally framed as forced-choice or preference-based questions intended to highlight the modality a respondent most often relies on in thinking and communication. Results are usually interpreted descriptively to inform communication style, coaching, or clinical rapport-building rather than as a diagnostic indicator. A version of the measure is commonly attributed in secondary sources to Richard Bandler and John Grinder; interpretive conventions for the Representational System Preference Test may vary across editions and translations.

Author: John Grinder, Richard Bandler

Literature: Lewis, B. A., & Pucelik, R. F. Magic of NLP demystified. Metamorphous Press. 1982.; Bandler, R., & Grinder, J. The structure of magic I: A book about language and therapy. Science and Behavior Books. 1975.; Hall, L. M., & Bodenhamer, B. The user’s manual for the brain: The complete manual for neuro-linguistic programming practitioner certification. Crown House Publishing. 2004.

Test Question Form