Synthetic Test

Understand your socionics type and relationship dynamics in about 3 minutes. A fast 16 question check that cross validates results and also suggests your complementary type for clearer self insight.

Start Online Test

Questions: 163 minutes

Hi! My name is Freudly, i am an AI therapist, I will give you an interpretation of the test after you complete it.

08:30

October 2, 2025

October 2, 2025
Material has been updated

October 2, 2025
Material has been published

26544 views

2520 completions

2136 likes

Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

example score

31/100

Irrationality (I)

Irrationality measures spontaneity and flexibility versus preference for structured plans and predictability.

Planned

Balanced

Spontaneous

0 – 33: Planned | 34 – 66: Balanced | 67 – 100: Spontaneous

A score of 31 falls in the Planned range, suggesting you tend to rely on structure and advance planning more than improvisation.

example score

34/100

Rationality (R)

Rationality measures your preference for planning, structure, and following established rules versus a more flexible, spontaneous approach.

Flexible

Balanced

Structured

0 – 39: Flexible | 40 – 69: Balanced | 70 – 100: Structured

A score of 34 suggests a more flexible, improvisational style with less emphasis on strict planning and rigid routines.

example score

42/100

Ethics (E)

Ethics measures how strongly you focus on emotions, interpersonal relationships, and the overall emotional atmosphere.

Lower focus on feelings

Balanced focus on feelings

High focus on feelings

0 – 39: Lower focus on feelings | 40 – 69: Balanced focus on feelings | 70 – 100: High focus on feelings

A score of 42 suggests a generally balanced attention to feelings and relationships, with empathy present but not consistently prioritized in every situation.

example score

79/100

Logic (L)

Logic measures preference for objective analysis and fact-based, structured decision-making.

Lower logic focus

Balanced

Higher logic focus

0 – 39: Lower logic focus | 40 – 69: Balanced | 70 – 100: Higher logic focus

A score of 79 falls in the Higher logic focus range, suggesting you tend to rely on rational evaluation and consistent criteria when forming judgments.

example score

23/100

Intuition (I)

Intuition measures your tendency toward abstract thinking, noticing hidden connections, and focusing on future possibilities.

Concrete-focused

Balanced

Highly intuitive

0 – 33: Concrete-focused | 34 – 66: Balanced | 67 – 100: Highly intuitive

A score of 23 falls in the Concrete-focused range, suggesting a stronger preference for practical, present-focused information over exploring abstract possibilities.

example score

18/100

Sensing (S)

Sensing measures how strongly you focus on concrete sensory details, practical facts, and immediate realities.

Low

Moderate

High

0 – 33: Low | 34 – 66: Moderate | 67 – 100: High

A score of 18 falls in the Low range, suggesting a weaker preference for sensory detail and practical fact-focus compared with more abstract or big-picture processing.

example score

89/100

Introversion (I)

Measures preference for inner-focused, solitary, and independently paced activities over frequent social engagement.

More Extraverted

Balanced

Highly Introverted

0 – 33: More Extraverted | 34 – 66: Balanced | 67 – 100: Highly Introverted

A score of 89 indicates a strong tendency to recharge in solitude, prefer calm settings, and keep a smaller, more selective social circle.

example score

64/100

Extraversion (E)

Extraversion measures how strongly a person is oriented toward external stimulation, social interaction, and active engagement with others.

Low

Moderate

High

0 – 39: Low | 40 – 69: Moderate | 70 – 100: High

A score of 64 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting a generally outgoing and engaged style with a balance between social activity and personal downtime.

Start Online Test

just completed the test

DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Self-discovery explorers

41%OF USERS

People who like personality frameworks and want a fast, clearer read on their core type by cross-checking results from multiple approaches.

Relationship compatibility seekers

34%OF USERS

Those curious about who they pair best with and want both their likely type and a complementary partner type to improve dating or communication.

Socionics learners and debaters

25%OF USERS

Users already studying socionics who take tests to confirm their typing, resolve contradictions, and decide whether to dig deeper or consult a specialist.

BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.

RESULTS YOU CAN ACTUALLY USE

What You’ll See After You Finish the Test

Scale Results
— Explained Clearly

Your scores across each test scale, translated into plain, usable insights. Not just numbers, but what they actually mean for your daily life, emotional state, and overall well-being.

AI-Powered
Interpretation

A structured, clinically grounded explanation. Our AI analyzes patterns and relationships between scales to provide a coherent interpretation — without alarmist language.

Statistical
Comparison

See how you compare to others. Your scores are placed in a statistical context, showing percentiles and trends based on anonymized platform data to help you understand what`s typical.

Practical
Recommendations

Actionable guidance tailored to your profile. Receive clear, realistic suggestions you can apply immediately — focused on coping, self-regulation, and realistic next steps.

AI-Detected
Insights

Key patterns you might not notice on your own. Surfacing subtle connections in your responses that help you better understand what may be driving your current results.

Discuss with
an AI Psychologist

Clarify, reflect, and explore right away. Talk through your outcomes, ask questions, and explore meanings in a calm, non-diagnostic dialogue environment.

Start Online Test

Used in 52+ countries

Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you finish the test, your results will be compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of the benchmarks we use to place your score in context.

Irrationality (I)

Average

51.2

Normal range

37.9 — 64.4

min.

max.

100

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Rationality (R)

Average

34.1

Normal range

21.4 — 46.8

min.

max.

100

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Ethics (E)

Average

39.7

Normal range

23.6 — 55.7

min.

max.

100

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Logic (L)

Average

42.6

Normal range

30.5 — 54.8

min.

max.

100

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Intuition (I)

Average

26.5

Normal range

8.7 — 44.2

min.

max.

100

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Sensing (S)

Average

34.3

Normal range

16.3 — 52.4

min.

max.

100

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Introversion (I)

Average

28.4

Normal range

10.9 — 45.8

min.

max.

100

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Extraversion (E)

Average

41.8

Normal range

25.5 — 58.1

min.

max.

100

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Start Online Test

Featured On

Rated 4.8/5 by Our Customers

“Freudly really helped me discover parts of my personality I hadn’t noticed before. It strengthened the areas where I needed to grow and made me feel more grounded and confident in the parts that already worked well.”

— Emma C., US

“I wanted to understand how serious my ADHD is, and now I finally do. I also realized I need to work on my self-esteem. It has been low for a long time, and that makes daily life harder than it should be.”

— Mateo R., CA

“Reading each question felt like someone really understood me. Even though I’ve already dealt with much of this, reflecting still helped me learn something new about myself.”

— Caroline F., US

“The process is simple. The test covers everything you need, and you’ll get a clear breakdown of your results. For just a few dollars, it’s a great value.”

— Klara N., CZ

“I kept thinking there might be a small chance, but now I know for sure. The questions were easy to understand, and the whole process was straightforward.”

— Bruno M., BR

“I really enjoyed this experience. I learned a lot, and it helped me make sense of my thoughts and the feeling I’ve had for a long time that I may have grown up with undiagnosed ADHD.”

— Alice B., FR

“Great platform — the insights were genuinely meaningful!”

— Daniel W., DE

“Everything was easy to follow. The tools you get at the end are genuinely helpful for self-growth, and the price is very reasonable. I really appreciate that.”

— Sofia M., ES

“Surprisingly accurate — honestly didn’t expect it to nail things so well.”

— Adir B., IL

“There are lots of different tests to pick from, and the price is surprisingly low for how much insight you get.”

— Olivia W., CA

“I was pleasantly surprised when I read the results. It was as if someone had sorted out my messy thoughts and given me useful tips to help me speak with more confidence.”

— Grace O., IE

“It was really solid, very detailed, and it actually helped me make sense of a lot of things.”

— Carla T., TT

“I was really impressed with the report. It was clear, thoughtful, and it reflected things I’ve been noticing about myself.”

— Jade H., US

“The questions made me think deeply and helped me become more self-aware.”

— Brooke S., US

“Reading through most of the questions made me feel understood. Although I’ve already worked through some of these issues, the questions still gave me useful insights and helped me learn more about myself.”

— Ryan M., US

“I usually take one or two tests each month, and this has become a good way for me to see how I’m doing.”

— Lucas W., US

“Most of the time, my results are in the 90 to 98th percentile compared to others. It really makes me feel like there’s something unique about me.”

— Ethan C., US

“I tried out some of the AI’s suggestions, and to be honest, they worked much better than I thought they would. Maybe this thing really is smarter than me.”

— Reece D., AU

Trusted by 22k+ Users Worldwide

CLEAR ANSWERS TO COMMON QUESTIONS

Frequently Asked Questions

Any questions left?

What does this assessment measure?

It screens for a socionic type using three complementary diagnostic formats. It also identifies a complementary (dual) type when at least two results match.

What is included in the three parts?

One part uses metaphors and images, one uses Jungian trait dimensions, and one assesses imaginal perception of personal qualities. The combined format supports cross-checking of results.

How long does it take and how many items are there?

Estimated completion time is about 3 minutes. The assessment contains 16 items.

How should results be interpreted if the three parts disagree?

If the same type appears in at least two parts, use that match as the working result. If all three differ, further study of socionics or consultation with a qualified specialist may be needed.

How should responses be provided?

Select the option that best matches typical behavior or preference rather than temporary mood. Answer all items without overthinking individual questions.

WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

About This Assessment

Synthetic Test

personality type

This measure is a brief, self-report screening tool intended to support rapid identification of personality-typology patterns. Synthetic Test is designed to provide an initial estimate of an individual’s profile based on responses to structured prompts.

The instrument contains 16 items and typically takes about 3 minutes to complete. It is attributed to Raymond B. Cattell. Results are best interpreted as provisional and should be integrated with other clinical information rather than used as a standalone basis for diagnosis or treatment planning.

In clinical or counseling contexts, Synthetic Test may be used to facilitate discussion of perceived traits and interpersonal style, clarify hypotheses for further assessment, and guide selection of additional measures when indicated.

Author: Raymond B. Cattell

Literature: Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources. 1992.; John, O. P., Donahue, E. M., & Kentle, R. L. The Big Five Inventory—Versions 4a and 54. University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research. 1991.; Goldberg, L. R. The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment. 1992.

Test Question Form