Prices
Tests
FAQ
How sessions work
en
es
Log inSign up

Assessment of Educational Interaction Strategies With Children Test

Understand how an educator builds relationships with children in about 6 minutes. Get a clear read on personal vs rule focused style to guide coaching, training, and support.
Start Online Test
Questions: 306 minutes
Hi! My name is Freudly, i am an AI therapist, I will give you an interpretation of the test after you complete it.
08:30
October 2, 2025
October 2, 2025
Material has been updated
15635 views
1659 completions
1370 likes
Share
Scale Explorer
How the Scales are Structured
example score
98/150
Interaction Model (IM)
Measures whether a teacher’s interactions with students lean more toward an academic-disciplinary model or a person-centered model.
Person-centered
Mixed/Transitional
Academic-disciplinary
30 – 80: Person-centered | 81 – 100: Mixed/Transitional | 101 – 150: Academic-disciplinary
A score of 98 falls in the Mixed/Transitional range, indicating a generally balanced approach with a noticeable tilt toward academic-disciplinary structure.
Start Online Test
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS
Who Usually Takes This Test?
School and preschool teachers
46%OF USERS
They take it to understand whether they rely more on emotional connection or on rules and discipline in daily classroom situations.
Methodologists and supervisors
33%OF USERS
They use it in trainings, observations, and supervision to identify a teacher’s interaction style and plan targeted development.
Education program managers
21%OF USERS
They administer it across teams to compare approaches, spot common gaps, and improve student motivation and behavior outcomes.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
RESULTS YOU CAN ACTUALLY USE
What You’ll See After You Finish the Test
Scale Results
— Explained Clearly
Your scores across each test scale, translated into plain, usable insights. Not just numbers, but what they actually mean for your daily life, emotional state, and overall well-being.
AI-Powered
Interpretation
A structured, clinically grounded explanation. Our AI analyzes patterns and relationships between scales to provide a coherent interpretation — without alarmist language.
Statistical
Comparison
See how you compare to others. Your scores are placed in a statistical context, showing percentiles and trends based on anonymized platform data to help you understand what`s typical.
Practical
Recommendations
Actionable guidance tailored to your profile. Receive clear, realistic suggestions you can apply immediately — focused on coping, self-regulation, and realistic next steps.
AI-Detected
Insights
Key patterns you might not notice on your own. Surfacing subtle connections in your responses that help you better understand what may be driving your current results.
Discuss with
an AI Psychologist
Clarify, reflect, and explore right away. Talk through your outcomes, ask questions, and explore meanings in a calm, non-diagnostic dialogue environment.
Start Online Test
Used in 52+ countries
Benchmarking
See How You Compare
Once you finish the test, your results will be compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of the benchmarks we use to place your score in context.
Interaction Model (IM)
Average
104.6
Normal range
88 — 121.2
min.
30
max.
150
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Start Online Test
Featured On
Rated 4.8/5 by Our Customers
“Freudly really helped me discover parts of my personality I hadn’t noticed before. It strengthened the areas where I needed to grow and made me feel more grounded and confident in the parts that already worked well.”
— Emma C., US
“I wanted to understand how serious my ADHD is, and now I finally do. I also realized I need to work on my self-esteem. It has been low for a long time, and that makes daily life harder than it should be.”
— Mateo R., CA
“Reading each question felt like someone really understood me. Even though I’ve already dealt with much of this, reflecting still helped me learn something new about myself.”
— Caroline F., US
“The process is simple. The test covers everything you need, and you’ll get a clear breakdown of your results. For just a few dollars, it’s a great value.”
— Klara N., CZ
“I kept thinking there might be a small chance, but now I know for sure. The questions were easy to understand, and the whole process was straightforward.”
— Bruno M., BR
“I really enjoyed this experience. I learned a lot, and it helped me make sense of my thoughts and the feeling I’ve had for a long time that I may have grown up with undiagnosed ADHD.”
— Alice B., FR
“Great platform — the insights were genuinely meaningful!”
— Daniel W., DE
“Everything was easy to follow. The tools you get at the end are genuinely helpful for self-growth, and the price is very reasonable. I really appreciate that.”
— Sofia M., ES
“Surprisingly accurate — honestly didn’t expect it to nail things so well.”
— Adir B., IL
“There are lots of different tests to pick from, and the price is surprisingly low for how much insight you get.”
— Olivia W., CA
“I was pleasantly surprised when I read the results. It was as if someone had sorted out my messy thoughts and given me useful tips to help me speak with more confidence.”
— Grace O., IE
“It was really solid, very detailed, and it actually helped me make sense of a lot of things.”
— Carla T., TT
“I was really impressed with the report. It was clear, thoughtful, and it reflected things I’ve been noticing about myself.”
— Jade H., US
“The questions made me think deeply and helped me become more self-aware.”
— Brooke S., US
“Reading through most of the questions made me feel understood. Although I’ve already worked through some of these issues, the questions still gave me useful insights and helped me learn more about myself.”
— Ryan M., US
“I usually take one or two tests each month, and this has become a good way for me to see how I’m doing.”
— Lucas W., US
“Most of the time, my results are in the 90 to 98th percentile compared to others. It really makes me feel like there’s something unique about me.”
— Ethan C., US
“I tried out some of the AI’s suggestions, and to be honest, they worked much better than I thought they would. Maybe this thing really is smarter than me.”
— Reece D., AU
Trusted by 22k+ Users Worldwide
CLEAR ANSWERS TO COMMON QUESTIONS
Frequently Asked Questions

Any questions left?

What does this assessment measure?
It assesses typical strategies used when interacting with children in educational settings. Results reflect the degree of emphasis on a personal, relationship-focused approach versus an academic-disciplinary, rule-focused approach.
How is the assessment completed?
Thirty brief situations are presented, and each is rated based on the response that best matches usual practice. There are no correct or incorrect answers.
How long does it take?
Estimated completion time is about 6 minutes. Additional time may be needed if items are reviewed before selecting responses.
How should responses be chosen if more than one option seems applicable?
Select the option that best reflects the approach used most often. If uncertain, choose the response that would be used first in the situation.
How are results used?
Results provide a profile of interaction style and highlight areas that may benefit from skill development. They are commonly used to guide training, supervision, and reflective practice.
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES
About This Assessment
Studying pedagogical strategies for interacting with children Test

Assessment of Educational Interaction Strategies With Children Test

pedagogy

This measure evaluates educators’ approaches to interacting with children in common school-based situations. The Assessment of Educational Interaction Strategies With Children is intended to characterize whether a respondent tends to prioritize relational/emotional engagement or instructional and behavioral structure.

The instrument includes 30 items and takes about 6 minutes to complete. Respondents rate brief scenarios, and results are typically used to inform consultation, training, or supervision by identifying predominant interaction patterns and potential targets for professional development.

The Assessment of Educational Interaction Strategies With Children is attributed to D. P. Ausubel and is generally interpreted as a descriptive indicator of interaction style rather than a diagnostic tool.

Author: D. P. Ausubel
Literature: Pianta, R. C. Enhancing relationships between children and teachers. American Psychological Association. 1999.
Test Question Form
You Might Also Like
Degree of Development of Components of Pedagogical Interaction
This measure assesses a student’s perceptions of key elements of teacher–st…
Start Test
Interaction Style
This brief self-report measure is designed to characterize an individual’s…
Start Test
Interaction Tactics Questionnaire
This measure is designed to assess typical interpersonal approaches in situ…
Start Test
Comments
Leave a Comment