Inventory of Statements About Self-Injury (ISAS) Test

Understand the motives behind self-injury in about 8 minutes. Get a clear, structured picture to guide support and therapy with less guesswork.
Start Online Test
Questions398 minutes
Hi! My name is Freudly, i am an AI therapist, I will give you an interpretation of the test after you complete it.
08:30
October 2, 2025
October 2, 2025
Material has been updated
17399 views
2002 completions
1737 likes
Share
Scale Explorer
How the Scales are Structured
example score
4/6
Self-Punishment (S)
This scale measures the extent to which self-injury is used to punish oneself or express self-directed dissatisfaction after perceived mistakes or failures.
Low
Moderate
High
01Low24Moderate56High
A score of 4 indicates a moderate tendency to use self-injury as a form of self-punishment or self-criticism in response to perceived shortcomings.
example score
3/6
Affect Regulation (AR)
Measures the extent to which self-injury is used to reduce or manage intense negative emotions.
Low
Moderate
High
02Low34Moderate56High
A score of 3 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting self-injury is sometimes used as a way to cope with emotional distress.
example score
3/6
Interpersonal Boundaries (IB)
This scale measures the extent to which self-injury is used to create or maintain distance from others and reinforce a sense of separateness.
Low
Moderate
High
02Low34Moderate56High
A score of 3 suggests a moderate tendency to use self-injury as a way to set interpersonal distance or emphasize individuality.
example score
2/6
Self-Care (S)
Measures the extent to which post-injury wound care is experienced as a self-nurturing act that provides temporary relief or satisfaction.
Low
Moderate
High
01Low24Moderate56High
A score of 2 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting wound care sometimes serves a self-nurturing function and may provide some temporary relief or satisfaction.
example score
2/6
Anti-Dissociation (A)
This scale measures the extent to which physical pain is used to counter emotional numbness and restore a sense of reality.
Low
Moderate
High
02Low34Moderate56High
A score of 2 suggests a low tendency to use pain specifically to feel real or break through emotional numbness.
example score
3/6
Suicide Prevention (SP)
This scale measures the extent to which self-injury is used to cope with suicidal thoughts as an alternative to a suicide attempt.
Low
Moderate
High
01Low24Moderate56High
A score of 3 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting self-injury is sometimes used as a coping strategy to manage suicidal thoughts rather than acting on them.
example score
1/6
Sensation Seeking (SS)
This scale measures the extent to which self-injurious behavior is used to seek intense, novel, or unusual sensations.
Low
Moderate
High
01Low24Moderate56High
A score of 1 suggests that seeking new or intense experiences is a minimal motive for self-injurious behavior relative to other possible functions.
example score
4/6
Peer Bonding (PB)
This scale measures the extent to which self-injury is used to fit in with peers, strengthen group bonds, or meet social expectations.
Low
Moderate
High
02Low34Moderate56High
A score of 4 suggests a moderate tendency to use self-injury in connection with peer belonging or social expectations.
example score
3/6
Interpersonal Influence (II)
Interpersonal Influence measures the extent to which self-injury is used to communicate distress or elicit care and support from others.
Low
Moderate
High
01Low24Moderate56High
A score of 3 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting self-injury may sometimes function as a way to signal emotional pain or prompt support from others.
example score
3/6
Significance (S)
This scale measures the extent to which self-injury is used to demonstrate toughness, endurance of pain, or strength to oneself or others.
Low
Moderate
High
02Low34Moderate56High
A score of 3 suggests a moderate tendency to use self-injury as a way to feel or show personal strength or the ability to tolerate pain.
example score
2/6
Signaling Distress (SD)
Measures the extent to which self-harm is used to express and validate experienced emotional distress.
Low
Moderate
High
02Low34Moderate56High
A score of 2 falls in the Low range, suggesting self-harm is less often used to express or validate emotional tension compared with higher scores.
example score
3/6
Revenge (R)
Measures the extent to which self-harm is used to indirectly express anger or punish someone else.
Low
Moderate
High
01Low24Moderate56High
A score of 3 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting revenge-related motives are present at a noticeable but not dominant level among possible reasons for self-harm.
example score
3/6
Autonomy (A)
Autonomy measures the extent to which self-injury is used to assert independence and signal reduced need for support from others.
Low autonomy function
Moderate autonomy function
High autonomy function
01Low autonomy function24Moderate autonomy function56High autonomy function
A score of 3 indicates a moderate tendency to use self-injury as a way to emphasize self-reliance or distance from others' help.
Start Online Test
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS
Who Usually Takes This Test?
People in active therapy
41%OF USERS
People who already self-injure and want to clarify the motives and triggers to guide ongoing treatment and coping plans.
Mental health clinicians
35%OF USERS
Therapists and clinicians use it to quickly structure a client’s reasons for self-injury and plan targeted support.
Researchers and trainees
24%OF USERS
Students and researchers in psychology or psychiatry use it to assess functions of self-injury for studies and clinical training.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
RESULTS YOU CAN ACTUALLY USE
What You’ll See After You Finish the Test
Scale Results
— Explained Clearly
Your scores across each test scale, translated into plain, usable insights. Not just numbers, but what they actually mean for your daily life, emotional state, and overall well-being.
AI-Powered
Interpretation
A structured, clinically grounded explanation. Our AI analyzes patterns and relationships between scales to provide a coherent interpretation — without alarmist language.
Statistical
Comparison
See how you compare to others. Your scores are placed in a statistical context, showing percentiles and trends based on anonymized platform data to help you understand what`s typical.
Practical
Recommendations
Actionable guidance tailored to your profile. Receive clear, realistic suggestions you can apply immediately — focused on coping, self-regulation, and realistic next steps.
AI-Detected
Insights
Key patterns you might not notice on your own. Surfacing subtle connections in your responses that help you better understand what may be driving your current results.
Discuss with
an AI Psychologist
Clarify, reflect, and explore right away. Talk through your outcomes, ask questions, and explore meanings in a calm, non-diagnostic dialogue environment.
Start Online Test
Used in 52+ countries
Benchmarking
See How You Compare
Once you finish the test, your results will be compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of the benchmarks we use to place your score in context.
Self-punishment (S)
Average
4.1
Normal range
3.34.8
min.
0
max.
6
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Affective Regulation (AR)
Average
1.9
Normal range
0.93
min.
0
max.
6
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Interpersonal Boundaries (IB)
Average
2.8
Normal range
2.13.6
min.
0
max.
6
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Self-Care (S)
Average
3.4
Normal range
2.64.2
min.
0
max.
6
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Anti-dissociation (A)
Average
3
Normal range
2.23.9
min.
0
max.
6
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Suicide Prevention (SP)
Average
3.6
Normal range
2.64.7
min.
0
max.
6
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Seeking New Experiences (SNE)
Average
2.4
Normal range
1.33.4
min.
0
max.
6
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Bonding with Peers (BwP)
Average
2.5
Normal range
1.63.3
min.
0
max.
6
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Interpersonal Influence (II)
Average
1.6
Normal range
0.82.3
min.
0
max.
6
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Significance (S)
Average
4
Normal range
2.95.1
min.
0
max.
6
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Distress Definition (DD)
Average
2.2
Normal range
1.23.3
min.
0
max.
6
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Revenge (R)
Average
4.4
Normal range
3.35.5
min.
0
max.
6
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Autonomy (A)
Average
2.2
Normal range
1.23.2
min.
0
max.
6
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Featured On
Rated 4.8/5 by Our Customers
Freudly really helped me discover parts of my personality I hadn’t noticed before. It strengthened the areas where I needed to grow and made me feel more grounded and confident in the parts that already worked well.
Emma C., US
I wanted to understand how serious my ADHD is, and now I finally do. I also realized I need to work on my self-esteem. It has been low for a long time, and that makes daily life harder than it should be.
Mateo R., CA
Reading each question felt like someone really understood me. Even though I’ve already dealt with much of this, reflecting still helped me learn something new about myself.
Caroline F., US
The process is simple. The test covers everything you need, and you’ll get a clear breakdown of your results. For just a few dollars, it’s a great value.
Klara N., CZ
I kept thinking there might be a small chance, but now I know for sure. The questions were easy to understand, and the whole process was straightforward.
Bruno M., BR
I really enjoyed this experience. I learned a lot, and it helped me make sense of my thoughts and the feeling I’ve had for a long time that I may have grown up with undiagnosed ADHD.
Alice B., FR
Great platform — the insights were genuinely meaningful!
Daniel W., DE
Everything was easy to follow. The tools you get at the end are genuinely helpful for self-growth, and the price is very reasonable. I really appreciate that.
Sofia M., ES
Surprisingly accurate — honestly didn’t expect it to nail things so well.
Adir B., IL
There are lots of different tests to pick from, and the price is surprisingly low for how much insight you get.
Olivia W., CA
I was pleasantly surprised when I read the results. It was as if someone had sorted out my messy thoughts and given me useful tips to help me speak with more confidence.
Grace O., IE
It was really solid, very detailed, and it actually helped me make sense of a lot of things.
Carla T., TT
I was really impressed with the report. It was clear, thoughtful, and it reflected things I’ve been noticing about myself.
Jade H., US
The questions made me think deeply and helped me become more self-aware.
Brooke S., US
Reading through most of the questions made me feel understood. Although I’ve already worked through some of these issues, the questions still gave me useful insights and helped me learn more about myself.
Ryan M., US
I usually take one or two tests each month, and this has become a good way for me to see how I’m doing.
Lucas W., US
Most of the time, my results are in the 90 to 98th percentile compared to others. It really makes me feel like there’s something unique about me.
Ethan C., US
I tried out some of the AI’s suggestions, and to be honest, they worked much better than I thought they would. Maybe this thing really is smarter than me.
Reece D., AU
Trusted by 22k+ Users Worldwide
CLEAR ANSWERS TO COMMON QUESTIONS
Frequently Asked Questions

Any questions left?

What does this questionnaire assess?
It assesses the reasons and functions linked to self-injurious behavior. It also records basic information about frequency and types of actions.
Who is this questionnaire intended for?
It is intended for people who have already engaged in self-injury. It is not designed for initial screening or to determine whether self-injury is present.
What time frame should be used when answering?
Use the time frame stated in each item. If no time frame is stated, answer based on typical patterns.
How long does it take to complete and how many items are included?
Completion time is about 8 minutes. The questionnaire includes 39 items.
How should responses be selected if more than one reason applies?
Select the response that best matches what usually applies. If several reasons apply equally, select the option that fits most often.
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES
About This Assessment

Inventory of Statements About Self-Injury (ISAS) Test

This measure is designed to support clinical understanding of non-suicidal self-injury and related motivations. The Inventory of Statements About Self-Injury (ISAS) is a self-report questionnaire intended for individuals with a history of self-injurious behavior, focusing on characterizing behavior patterns and the functions the behavior may serve.

The instrument includes 39 items and typically requires about 8 minutes to complete. It can be used to organize information about frequency and methods of self-injury and to evaluate commonly endorsed reasons for the behavior in clinical or research contexts. The Inventory of Statements About Self-Injury (ISAS) was developed by E. D. Klonsky and C. R. Glenn and is not intended as a standalone diagnostic tool or as a primary screening measure in the absence of reported self-injury.

Author: C. R. Glenn, E. D. Klonsky
Literature: Nock, M. K. Self-injury. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology. 2010.; Klonsky, E. D., & Glenn, C. R. Assessing the functions of non-suicidal self-injury: Psychometric properties of the Inventory of Statements About Self-injury (ISAS). Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment. 2009.
Test Question Form
You Might Also Like
Adolescent Self-Assertion Characteristics
This self-report questionnaire assesses how adolescents typically respond i…
Start Test
Persuasion Conditions and Techniques
This brief self-report measure, Persuasion Conditions and Techniques, is de…
Start Test
Self-Injurious Behavior Motives Scale
This measure is designed to clarify the functions that may maintain self-in…
Start Test
Comments
Leave a Comment