Prices
Tests
FAQ
How sessions work
en
es
Log inSign up

Socionics Test

Understand your socionics type and complementary match in about 2 minutes. Three mini-tests boost accuracy and reveal strengths to improve communication, work fit, and relationships.
Start Online Test
Questions: 82 minutes
Hi! My name is Freudly, i am an AI therapist, I will give you an interpretation of the test after you complete it.
08:30
October 2, 2025
October 2, 2025
Material has been updated
28612 views
3242 completions
2269 likes
Share
Scale Explorer
How the Scales are Structured
example score
21/100
Sensing (S)
Sensory Perception measures how strongly you focus on concrete details, practicality, and tangible, experience-based information.
Low
Moderate
High
0 – 33: Low | 34 – 66: Moderate | 67 – 100: High
A score of 21 indicates relatively low sensorial perception, suggesting you may pay less attention to immediate physical details and rely more on impressions or abstract cues than on concrete facts.
example score
73/100
Introversion (I)
Measures preference for solitude, inward focus, and comfort with quieter, low-stimulation environments.
More Extraverted
Balanced
More Introverted
0 – 33: More Extraverted | 34 – 66: Balanced | 67 – 100: More Introverted
A score of 73 falls in the More Introverted range, suggesting a stronger tendency toward private reflection and independence over frequent social stimulation.
example score
17/100
Irrationality (I)
Irrationality measures spontaneity, flexibility, and how readily you adapt plans to changing circumstances.
Low
Moderate
High
0 – 33: Low | 34 – 66: Moderate | 67 – 100: High
A score of 17 falls in the Low range, suggesting a preference for structure and sticking to pre-set plans rather than acting spontaneously in the moment.
example score
30/100
Rationality (R)
Rationality measures preference for planning, structure, and adherence to rules versus flexibility and spontaneity.
More flexible
Balanced
More structured
0 – 33: More flexible | 34 – 66: Balanced | 67 – 100: More structured
A score of 30 suggests a more flexible, spontaneous style with less emphasis on strict planning and predictable routines.
example score
47/100
Ethics (E)
Ethics measures how much you attend to feelings, interpersonal dynamics, and maintaining a harmonious emotional atmosphere in communication.
Low
Moderate
High
0 – 33: Low | 34 – 66: Moderate | 67 – 100: High
A score of 47 suggests a moderate focus on emotions and relationships, balancing empathy and harmony-seeking with a more reserved or situational approach.
example score
66/100
Logic (L)
Logic measures the degree to which you favor objective analysis, factual reasoning, and structured decision-making.
More intuitive
Balanced
More logical
0 – 39: More intuitive | 40 – 69: Balanced | 70 – 100: More logical
A score of 66 suggests a balanced style that often relies on facts and consistency while still leaving room for context and interpersonal considerations.
example score
66/100
Intuition (I)
Intuition measures your tendency toward abstract thinking, noticing hidden connections, and focusing on future possibilities.
Concrete-focused
Balanced
Strongly intuitive
0 – 33: Concrete-focused | 34 – 66: Balanced | 67 – 100: Strongly intuitive
A score of 66 indicates a balanced style, with a notable but not dominant preference for abstract patterns and emerging possibilities.
example score
46/100
Extraversion (E)
Extraversion measures how strongly you orient toward social interaction, external stimulation, and active engagement with the outside world.
Introverted
Balanced
Extraverted
0 – 33: Introverted | 34 – 66: Balanced | 67 – 100: Extraverted
A score of 46 falls in the Balanced range, suggesting a mix of social engagement and comfort with solitude depending on the situation.
Start Online Test
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS
Who Usually Takes This Test?
Self-discovery seekers
41%OF USERS
They want a clearer picture of their strengths, blind spots, and how they come across to others using multiple angles of type identification.
Relationship compatibility explorers
34%OF USERS
They take it to understand why certain dynamics feel easy or tense and to find their likely complementary “better half” type.
Socionics learners and typers
25%OF USERS
They already study socionics and use the three tests to confirm a suspected type or compare results for higher confidence.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
RESULTS YOU CAN ACTUALLY USE
What You’ll See After You Finish the Test
Scale Results
— Explained Clearly
Your scores across each test scale, translated into plain, usable insights. Not just numbers, but what they actually mean for your daily life, emotional state, and overall well-being.
AI-Powered
Interpretation
A structured, clinically grounded explanation. Our AI analyzes patterns and relationships between scales to provide a coherent interpretation — without alarmist language.
Statistical
Comparison
See how you compare to others. Your scores are placed in a statistical context, showing percentiles and trends based on anonymized platform data to help you understand what`s typical.
Practical
Recommendations
Actionable guidance tailored to your profile. Receive clear, realistic suggestions you can apply immediately — focused on coping, self-regulation, and realistic next steps.
AI-Detected
Insights
Key patterns you might not notice on your own. Surfacing subtle connections in your responses that help you better understand what may be driving your current results.
Discuss with
an AI Psychologist
Clarify, reflect, and explore right away. Talk through your outcomes, ask questions, and explore meanings in a calm, non-diagnostic dialogue environment.
Start Online Test
Used in 52+ countries
Benchmarking
See How You Compare
Once you finish the test, your results will be compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of the benchmarks we use to place your score in context.
Sensory Perception (SP)
Average
58.9
Normal range
44 — 73.8
min.
0
max.
100
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Introversion (I)
Average
67.5
Normal range
49 — 86
min.
0
max.
100
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Irrationality (I)
Average
37.8
Normal range
22.8 — 52.8
min.
0
max.
100
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Rationality (R)
Average
40.6
Normal range
22.2 — 58.9
min.
0
max.
100
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Ethics (E)
Average
69.7
Normal range
54.1 — 85.4
min.
0
max.
100
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Logic (L)
Average
61.5
Normal range
42.7 — 80.4
min.
0
max.
100
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Intuition (I)
Average
29.3
Normal range
16.6 — 42.1
min.
0
max.
100
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Extraversion (E)
Average
55.2
Normal range
39.2 — 71.2
min.
0
max.
100
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Start Online Test
Featured On
Rated 4.8/5 by Our Customers
“Freudly really helped me discover parts of my personality I hadn’t noticed before. It strengthened the areas where I needed to grow and made me feel more grounded and confident in the parts that already worked well.”
— Emma C., US
“I wanted to understand how serious my ADHD is, and now I finally do. I also realized I need to work on my self-esteem. It has been low for a long time, and that makes daily life harder than it should be.”
— Mateo R., CA
“Reading each question felt like someone really understood me. Even though I’ve already dealt with much of this, reflecting still helped me learn something new about myself.”
— Caroline F., US
“The process is simple. The test covers everything you need, and you’ll get a clear breakdown of your results. For just a few dollars, it’s a great value.”
— Klara N., CZ
“I kept thinking there might be a small chance, but now I know for sure. The questions were easy to understand, and the whole process was straightforward.”
— Bruno M., BR
“I really enjoyed this experience. I learned a lot, and it helped me make sense of my thoughts and the feeling I’ve had for a long time that I may have grown up with undiagnosed ADHD.”
— Alice B., FR
“Great platform — the insights were genuinely meaningful!”
— Daniel W., DE
“Everything was easy to follow. The tools you get at the end are genuinely helpful for self-growth, and the price is very reasonable. I really appreciate that.”
— Sofia M., ES
“Surprisingly accurate — honestly didn’t expect it to nail things so well.”
— Adir B., IL
“There are lots of different tests to pick from, and the price is surprisingly low for how much insight you get.”
— Olivia W., CA
“I was pleasantly surprised when I read the results. It was as if someone had sorted out my messy thoughts and given me useful tips to help me speak with more confidence.”
— Grace O., IE
“It was really solid, very detailed, and it actually helped me make sense of a lot of things.”
— Carla T., TT
“I was really impressed with the report. It was clear, thoughtful, and it reflected things I’ve been noticing about myself.”
— Jade H., US
“The questions made me think deeply and helped me become more self-aware.”
— Brooke S., US
“Reading through most of the questions made me feel understood. Although I’ve already worked through some of these issues, the questions still gave me useful insights and helped me learn more about myself.”
— Ryan M., US
“I usually take one or two tests each month, and this has become a good way for me to see how I’m doing.”
— Lucas W., US
“Most of the time, my results are in the 90 to 98th percentile compared to others. It really makes me feel like there’s something unique about me.”
— Ethan C., US
“I tried out some of the AI’s suggestions, and to be honest, they worked much better than I thought they would. Maybe this thing really is smarter than me.”
— Reece D., AU
Trusted by 22k+ Users Worldwide
CLEAR ANSWERS TO COMMON QUESTIONS
Frequently Asked Questions

Any questions left?

What does this assessment measure?
It estimates a socionics type using three short methods: image-based associations and Jungian trait criteria. Results are intended for self-understanding and comparison across methods.
How long does it take and how many items are included?
Typical completion time is about 2 minutes. The assessment includes 8 items per run.
How should responses be selected in the image-based sections?
Select the option that most closely matches the immediate association, without extended analysis. Use consistent criteria across items.
How should results be interpreted when the three methods disagree?
If at least two methods indicate the same type, the estimate is usually more stable. If all three differ, the type may be unclear and may require additional study or observation.
What is the meaning of the suggested complementary type?
It is a proposed dual type associated with a potentially harmonious interaction pattern in socionics. It is a theoretical indicator and does not determine relationship outcomes.
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES
About This Assessment

Socionics Test

personality type

This brief self-report measure is intended to support exploratory classification of personality style within a socionics framework. The Socionics Test presents 8 items and typically takes about 2 minutes to complete. Authors listed: Isabel Briggs Myers; Katharine Cook Briggs.

Results are generally interpreted as an estimate of a preferred type pattern and may be used to guide self-reflection and discussion rather than to make diagnostic or high-stakes decisions. As with any short screening instrument, the Socionics Test should be interpreted cautiously and considered alongside other clinical information and longitudinal observation.

Author: Isabel Briggs Myers, Katharine Cook Briggs
Literature: Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources. 1992.; John, O. P., Donahue, E. M., & Kentle, R. L. The Big Five Inventory—Versions 4a and 54. University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research. 1991.; Goldberg, L. R. The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment. 1992.
Test Question Form
You Might Also Like
Victorian Gambling Screen (VGS)
This brief self-report screening measure is designed to assess gambling-rel…
Start Test
Relationship Diagnostic Test
This instrument is designed to assess evaluative and emotional attitudes to…
Start Test
Synthetic Test
This measure is a brief, self-report screening tool intended to support rap…
Start Test
Comments
Leave a Comment