Justice Sensitivity Scale Test

Understand how strongly you react to unfairness in about 8 minutes. Get clear insights into your thoughts, feelings, and responses to handle conflict and build resilience.

Start Online Test

Questions: 408 minutes

Hi! My name is Freudly, i am an AI therapist, I will give you an interpretation of the test after you complete it.

08:30

October 2, 2025

October 2, 2025
Material has been updated

October 2, 2025
Material has been published

10959 views

1180 completions

1046 likes

Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

example score

42/50

Perpetrator Sensitivity (PS)

Measures how strongly a person feels guilt or shame and urges to make amends when they believe their own actions have been unfair.

Low

Moderate

High

0 – 20: Low | 21 – 40: Moderate | 41 – 50: High

A score of 42 falls in the High range, suggesting a strong tendency to experience guilt or shame and to seek repair when you think you have acted unfairly.

example score

35/50

Beneficiary Sensitivity (BS)

Measures how strongly a person reacts to receiving unfair or undeserved advantages, including guilt and motivation to compensate.

Low sensitivity

Moderate sensitivity

High sensitivity

0 – 14: Low sensitivity | 15 – 34: Moderate sensitivity | 35 – 50: High sensitivity

A score of 35 indicates high sensitivity in the beneficiary position, suggesting a stronger tendency to feel uneasy about unfair advantages and to want to restore fairness.

example score

19/50

Observer Perspective (OP)

Measures how strongly you react to unfairness toward others, including moral outrage and motivation to support victims or sanction offenders.

Lower sensitivity

Moderate sensitivity

Higher sensitivity

0 – 19: Lower sensitivity | 20 – 38: Moderate sensitivity | 39 – 50: Higher sensitivity

A score of 19 falls in the Lower sensitivity range, suggesting you tend to experience relatively mild moral outrage and less urge to intervene when witnessing unfairness toward others.

example score

26/50

Victim Perspective (VP)

Measures how strongly a person tends to perceive themselves as a victim of unfairness and feel motivated to defend their own rights when treated unjustly.

Low

Moderate

High

0 – 20: Low | 21 – 39: Moderate | 40 – 50: High

A score of 26 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting a noticeable but not extreme tendency to feel personally wronged by unfair situations and to seek restoration of fairness in one’s favor.

Start Online Test

just completed the test

DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Conflict-prone team members

41%OF USERS

People who often feel tensions at work or in groups take it to understand what triggers their reactions to perceived unfairness and how they respond.

Highly empathetic individuals

34%OF USERS

Those who strongly feel others’ suffering or injustice use it to see whether they react more as a victim, observer, or protector and why it affects them.

Clients in counseling or coaching

25%OF USERS

People working on emotional regulation, boundaries, or relationship issues take it to clarify how sensitivity to injustice shapes their stress and decisions.

BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.

RESULTS YOU CAN ACTUALLY USE

What You’ll See After You Finish the Test

Scale Results
— Explained Clearly

Your scores across each test scale, translated into plain, usable insights. Not just numbers, but what they actually mean for your daily life, emotional state, and overall well-being.

AI-Powered
Interpretation

A structured, clinically grounded explanation. Our AI analyzes patterns and relationships between scales to provide a coherent interpretation — without alarmist language.

Statistical
Comparison

See how you compare to others. Your scores are placed in a statistical context, showing percentiles and trends based on anonymized platform data to help you understand what`s typical.

Practical
Recommendations

Actionable guidance tailored to your profile. Receive clear, realistic suggestions you can apply immediately — focused on coping, self-regulation, and realistic next steps.

AI-Detected
Insights

Key patterns you might not notice on your own. Surfacing subtle connections in your responses that help you better understand what may be driving your current results.

Discuss with
an AI Psychologist

Clarify, reflect, and explore right away. Talk through your outcomes, ask questions, and explore meanings in a calm, non-diagnostic dialogue environment.

Start Online Test

Used in 52+ countries

Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you finish the test, your results will be compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of the benchmarks we use to place your score in context.

Offender's Position (OP)

Average

22.6

Normal range

15.9 — 29.3

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Beneficiary's Position (BP)

Average

33.5

Normal range

26 — 40.9

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Witness testimony (Wt)

Average

35.3

Normal range

28.7 — 41.9

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Victim mentality (Vm)

Average

14.2

Normal range

5.4 — 23

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Start Online Test

Featured On

Rated 4.8/5 by Our Customers

“Freudly really helped me discover parts of my personality I hadn’t noticed before. It strengthened the areas where I needed to grow and made me feel more grounded and confident in the parts that already worked well.”

— Emma C., US

“I wanted to understand how serious my ADHD is, and now I finally do. I also realized I need to work on my self-esteem. It has been low for a long time, and that makes daily life harder than it should be.”

— Mateo R., CA

“Reading each question felt like someone really understood me. Even though I’ve already dealt with much of this, reflecting still helped me learn something new about myself.”

— Caroline F., US

“The process is simple. The test covers everything you need, and you’ll get a clear breakdown of your results. For just a few dollars, it’s a great value.”

— Klara N., CZ

“I kept thinking there might be a small chance, but now I know for sure. The questions were easy to understand, and the whole process was straightforward.”

— Bruno M., BR

“I really enjoyed this experience. I learned a lot, and it helped me make sense of my thoughts and the feeling I’ve had for a long time that I may have grown up with undiagnosed ADHD.”

— Alice B., FR

“Great platform — the insights were genuinely meaningful!”

— Daniel W., DE

“Everything was easy to follow. The tools you get at the end are genuinely helpful for self-growth, and the price is very reasonable. I really appreciate that.”

— Sofia M., ES

“Surprisingly accurate — honestly didn’t expect it to nail things so well.”

— Adir B., IL

“There are lots of different tests to pick from, and the price is surprisingly low for how much insight you get.”

— Olivia W., CA

“I was pleasantly surprised when I read the results. It was as if someone had sorted out my messy thoughts and given me useful tips to help me speak with more confidence.”

— Grace O., IE

“It was really solid, very detailed, and it actually helped me make sense of a lot of things.”

— Carla T., TT

“I was really impressed with the report. It was clear, thoughtful, and it reflected things I’ve been noticing about myself.”

— Jade H., US

“The questions made me think deeply and helped me become more self-aware.”

— Brooke S., US

“Reading through most of the questions made me feel understood. Although I’ve already worked through some of these issues, the questions still gave me useful insights and helped me learn more about myself.”

— Ryan M., US

“I usually take one or two tests each month, and this has become a good way for me to see how I’m doing.”

— Lucas W., US

“Most of the time, my results are in the 90 to 98th percentile compared to others. It really makes me feel like there’s something unique about me.”

— Ethan C., US

“I tried out some of the AI’s suggestions, and to be honest, they worked much better than I thought they would. Maybe this thing really is smarter than me.”

— Reece D., AU

Trusted by 22k+ Users Worldwide

CLEAR ANSWERS TO COMMON QUESTIONS

Frequently Asked Questions

Any questions left?

What does this questionnaire measure?

It measures how strongly unfairness is noticed and how it tends to affect thoughts, emotions, and actions. It summarizes typical reactions across common situations.

What types of situations are included?

Items describe everyday examples of unfair treatment, loss, or unequal outcomes. Responses focus on perceived injustice and likely reactions.

How should responses be selected?

Select the option that best matches what would usually be felt or done in similar situations. Use the full range of response options when appropriate.

How long does it take and how many items are there?

Completion time is about 8 minutes. The questionnaire includes 40 items.

How are results typically used?

Scores indicate relative sensitivity to unfairness and common response patterns. Results may support counseling, conflict work, and research on emotional and behavioral functioning.

WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

About This Assessment

Justice Sensitivity Scale Test

justice

This measure assesses individual differences in reactivity to perceived unfairness in everyday situations. The Justice Sensitivity Scale is used to characterize how strongly a person notices and responds to perceived justice violations across common contexts.

Items sample cognitive appraisals, emotional responses, and behavioral tendencies related to unfair treatment. It consists of 40 items and typically takes about 8 minutes to complete. Authors: E. Allan Lind and J. Stacy Adams.

In clinical and research settings, the Justice Sensitivity Scale can support case formulation by identifying patterns of sensitivity that may contribute to interpersonal conflict, distress, or coping responses when fairness concerns are salient.

Author: E. Allan Lind, J. Stacy Adams

Literature: Schmitt, M., Neumann, R., & Montada, L. Dispositional sensitivity to befallen injustice. Social Justice Research. 1995.

Test Question Form