Illness Locus of Control Questionnaire Test

In 4 minutes, see how someone views control over illness and treatment, from fatalism to autonomy. With 18 items, it quickly guides tailored support to boost engagement and outcomes.
Start Online Test
Questions184 minutes
Hi! My name is Freudly, i am an AI therapist, I will give you an interpretation of the test after you complete it.
08:30
October 2, 2025
October 2, 2025
Material has been updated
10822 views
809 completions
708 likes
Share
Scale Explorer
How the Scales are Structured
example score
10/24
Self-Reliance (S)
Measures the degree to which a person prefers to manage their illness and treatment independently, reflecting an internal locus of control in illness.
Low independence
Moderate independence
High independence
418Low independence1922Moderate independence2324High independence
A score of 10 falls in the Low independence range, suggesting a relatively limited tendency to take a self-directed role in managing illness and treatment.
example score
16/24
Shifting Responsibility (SR)
Measures the tendency to shift responsibility for illness treatment to doctors or external factors rather than actively participating in recovery.
Low
Moderate
High
48Low916Moderate1724High
A score of 16 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting a noticeable but not dominant tendency to rely on doctors or circumstances for treatment responsibility.
example score
16/24
Self-Blame (S)
Measures the tendency to blame oneself for becoming ill, often alongside doubting one’s ability to improve the condition through personal efforts.
Low self-blame
Moderate self-blame
High self-blame
49Low self-blame1016Moderate self-blame1724High self-blame
A score of 16 falls in the Moderate self-blame range, suggesting a noticeable tendency toward self-directed blame that may coexist with uncertainty about personal influence on recovery.
example score
14/24
Fatalism (F)
Measures the extent to which a person believes illness outcomes are predetermined by fate or external factors rather than influenced by personal actions.
Low fatalism
High fatalism
411Low fatalism1224High fatalism
A score of 14 falls in the High fatalism range, suggesting a stronger tendency to view health outcomes as largely outside personal control.
Start Online Test
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS
Who Usually Takes This Test?
Chronic illness patients
41%OF USERS
People managing long-term conditions who want to understand how their beliefs about control affect adherence and recovery.
In therapy or counseling
34%OF USERS
Clients working with a psychologist or counselor to explore responsibility, motivation, and coping patterns related to health.
Clinicians and researchers
25%OF USERS
Healthcare professionals and students who use the questionnaire to assess patient attitudes and tailor support strategies.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
RESULTS YOU CAN ACTUALLY USE
What You’ll See After You Finish the Test
Scale Results
— Explained Clearly
Your scores across each test scale, translated into plain, usable insights. Not just numbers, but what they actually mean for your daily life, emotional state, and overall well-being.
AI-Powered
Interpretation
A structured, clinically grounded explanation. Our AI analyzes patterns and relationships between scales to provide a coherent interpretation — without alarmist language.
Statistical
Comparison
See how you compare to others. Your scores are placed in a statistical context, showing percentiles and trends based on anonymized platform data to help you understand what`s typical.
Practical
Recommendations
Actionable guidance tailored to your profile. Receive clear, realistic suggestions you can apply immediately — focused on coping, self-regulation, and realistic next steps.
AI-Detected
Insights
Key patterns you might not notice on your own. Surfacing subtle connections in your responses that help you better understand what may be driving your current results.
Discuss with
an AI Psychologist
Clarify, reflect, and explore right away. Talk through your outcomes, ask questions, and explore meanings in a calm, non-diagnostic dialogue environment.
Start Online Test
Used in 52+ countries
Benchmarking
See How You Compare
Once you finish the test, your results will be compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of the benchmarks we use to place your score in context.
Independence (I)
Average
13.3
Normal range
10.516.2
min.
4
max.
24
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Shifting responsibility (Sr)
Average
13
Normal range
9.416.7
min.
4
max.
24
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Self-Blame (S)
Average
11.7
Normal range
9.114.3
min.
4
max.
24
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Fatalism (F)
Average
14.6
Normal range
11.118
min.
4
max.
24
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Featured On
Rated 4.8/5 by Our Customers
Freudly really helped me discover parts of my personality I hadn’t noticed before. It strengthened the areas where I needed to grow and made me feel more grounded and confident in the parts that already worked well.
Emma C., US
I wanted to understand how serious my ADHD is, and now I finally do. I also realized I need to work on my self-esteem. It has been low for a long time, and that makes daily life harder than it should be.
Mateo R., CA
Reading each question felt like someone really understood me. Even though I’ve already dealt with much of this, reflecting still helped me learn something new about myself.
Caroline F., US
The process is simple. The test covers everything you need, and you’ll get a clear breakdown of your results. For just a few dollars, it’s a great value.
Klara N., CZ
I kept thinking there might be a small chance, but now I know for sure. The questions were easy to understand, and the whole process was straightforward.
Bruno M., BR
I really enjoyed this experience. I learned a lot, and it helped me make sense of my thoughts and the feeling I’ve had for a long time that I may have grown up with undiagnosed ADHD.
Alice B., FR
Great platform — the insights were genuinely meaningful!
Daniel W., DE
Everything was easy to follow. The tools you get at the end are genuinely helpful for self-growth, and the price is very reasonable. I really appreciate that.
Sofia M., ES
Surprisingly accurate — honestly didn’t expect it to nail things so well.
Adir B., IL
There are lots of different tests to pick from, and the price is surprisingly low for how much insight you get.
Olivia W., CA
I was pleasantly surprised when I read the results. It was as if someone had sorted out my messy thoughts and given me useful tips to help me speak with more confidence.
Grace O., IE
It was really solid, very detailed, and it actually helped me make sense of a lot of things.
Carla T., TT
I was really impressed with the report. It was clear, thoughtful, and it reflected things I’ve been noticing about myself.
Jade H., US
The questions made me think deeply and helped me become more self-aware.
Brooke S., US
Reading through most of the questions made me feel understood. Although I’ve already worked through some of these issues, the questions still gave me useful insights and helped me learn more about myself.
Ryan M., US
I usually take one or two tests each month, and this has become a good way for me to see how I’m doing.
Lucas W., US
Most of the time, my results are in the 90 to 98th percentile compared to others. It really makes me feel like there’s something unique about me.
Ethan C., US
I tried out some of the AI’s suggestions, and to be honest, they worked much better than I thought they would. Maybe this thing really is smarter than me.
Reece D., AU
Trusted by 22k+ Users Worldwide
CLEAR ANSWERS TO COMMON QUESTIONS
Frequently Asked Questions

Any questions left?

What does this questionnaire measure?
It assesses beliefs about control and responsibility in the context of illness and treatment. It yields scores for fatalism, shifting responsibility, self-blame, and autonomy.
How long does it take and how many items are included?
Estimated completion time is about 4 minutes. The questionnaire contains 18 items.
Who can complete this questionnaire?
It is intended for adults who are dealing with an illness or undergoing treatment. It may also be used with individuals who have difficulty identifying their role in recovery.
How should responses be given?
Each item should be answered based on typical thoughts or reactions to illness and treatment. Responses should reflect the current situation rather than an ideal or preferred stance.
How are results used in practice or research?
Scores support understanding of motivational and responsibility patterns that may affect adherence and coping. Results can guide selection of targeted support strategies and inform research analyses.
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES
About This Assessment
Questionnaire on the Locus of Control in Illness Test

Illness Locus of Control Questionnaire Test

This self-report measure assesses beliefs about personal and external control in the context of health and illness. The Illness Locus of Control Questionnaire provides a brief profile of perceived responsibility for health outcomes, which may inform clinical case conceptualization and treatment planning.

Developed by Kenneth A. Wallston and Barbara S. Wallston, it includes 18 items and typically takes about 4 minutes to complete. Item responses are used to characterize the individual’s orientation toward internal control versus reliance on chance or powerful others, which can be relevant to engagement with medical recommendations and coping behaviors.

The Illness Locus of Control Questionnaire is intended for use as an adjunct to clinical assessment and research when understanding health-related control beliefs is clinically salient.

Author: Barbara S. Wallston, Kenneth A. Wallston
Literature: Wallston, K. A., Wallston, B. S., & DeVellis, R. Development of the multidimensional health locus of control (MHLC) scales. Health Education Monographs. 1978.
Test Question Form
You Might Also Like
Locus of Control Scale
This measure assesses generalized expectancies regarding the degree to whic…
Start Test
Locus of Control
This measure is used to evaluate how an individual perceives control over l…
Start Test
Relationship Locus of Control Questionnaire
This measure examines perceived control within intimate or close interperso…
Start Test
Comments
Leave a Comment