Conscious Self-Regulation of Learning Activity Questionnaire Test

Understand how students plan, monitor, and adjust their learning in about 8 minutes. Get a clear snapshot of self-regulation strengths and gaps to guide coaching, counseling, or research.
Start Online Test
Questions408 minutes
Hi! My name is Freudly, i am an AI therapist, I will give you an interpretation of the test after you complete it.
08:30
October 2, 2025
October 2, 2025
Material has been updated
15370 views
1245 completions
1089 likes
Share
Scale Explorer
How the Scales are Structured
example score
8/16
Decision-Making (D)
Measures how consciously and independently a student makes and takes responsibility for decisions in learning activities.
Low
Moderate
High
48Low912Moderate1316High
A score of 8 falls in the Low range, suggesting decision-making in learning may be more impulsive or reliant on external guidance and can be harder to sustain independently.
example score
11/16
Adjustment (A)
Assesses how effectively a student makes timely and appropriate adjustments to their learning activities when conditions or progress change.
Low correction
Moderate correction
High correction
48Low correction912Moderate correction1316High correction
A score of 11 indicates a moderate ability to adjust study actions, suggesting generally adequate flexibility with some situations still requiring extra effort to modify plans or strategies.
example score
9/16
Evaluation of Results (EoR)
Measures how consistently and adequately a student evaluates the outcomes of their academic activities using stable criteria.
Unstable evaluation
Situational evaluation
Stable evaluation
48Unstable evaluation912Situational evaluation1316Stable evaluation
A score of 9 suggests evaluation of learning results is generally possible but may vary by situation and be influenced by external cues.
example score
13/16
Monitoring (M)
Measures how well a student monitors and controls their learning process and evaluates outcomes against clear success criteria.
Low control
Moderate control
High control
48Low control912Moderate control1316High control
A score of 13 falls in the High control range, suggesting well-developed criteria for success and consistent monitoring of learning outcomes.
example score
10/16
Planning (P)
Measures how well a student plans learning activities by selecting methods and steps to reach study goals.
Low planning
Moderate planning
High planning
48Low planning912Moderate planning1316High planning
A score of 10 indicates a moderate level of planning, with some structured goal-setting and method selection but room for more detailed and consistent planning.
example score
8/16
Planning (P)
Assesses how coherently and realistically a student constructs plans for their learning activities.
Low
Moderate
High
48Low912Moderate1316High
A score of 8 falls in the Low range, suggesting planning may be more situational and less organized than consistently structured.
example score
7/16
Forecasting (F)
Assesses how well a student anticipates likely events and outcomes in their academic activities to guide planning and decisions.
Low
Moderate
High
48Low912Moderate1316High
A score of 7 falls in the Low range, suggesting forecasting of study-related outcomes is less developed and may be used inconsistently during learning.
example score
10/16
Modeling (M)
Modeling measures how well a student consciously identifies, analyzes, and organizes the conditions that affect their learning activities.
Low
Moderate
High
48Low912Moderate1316High
A score of 10 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting a generally adequate ability to assess learning conditions with some inconsistencies in differentiating or systematizing them.
example score
13/16
Goal Setting (GS)
Assesses how consistently a student sets, organizes, and maintains goals for their learning activities.
Low
Moderate
High
48Low912Moderate1316High
A score of 13 falls in the High range, suggesting well-developed goal setting with generally stable, clearly formulated learning goals.
example score
8/16
Meaning Comprehension (MC)
Measures how clearly a student understands the personal meaning and significance of their educational activities.
Low
Moderate
High
48Low912Moderate1316High
A score of 8 falls in the Low range, suggesting the meaning of studying may be experienced as unclear or only superficially connected to personal goals.
example score
94/160
Overall Level of Self-Regulation (OLoS)
Measures the overall development of conscious self-regulation in learning activities, including planning, monitoring, and adjusting study actions toward goals.
Low
Moderate
High
4095Low96130Moderate131160High
A score of 94 falls in the Low range, suggesting less consistent conscious control and adjustment of learning activities relative to goals.
Start Online Test
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS
Who Usually Takes This Test?
University students improving study habits
46%OF USERS
They want to see how well they plan, monitor, and adjust their learning to study more effectively and stay motivated.
Students struggling with motivation
34%OF USERS
They take it to understand why they procrastinate or lose focus and which self-regulation skills need strengthening.
Educators and student counselors
20%OF USERS
They use the results to spot common self-regulation gaps and tailor support strategies for learners.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
RESULTS YOU CAN ACTUALLY USE
What You’ll See After You Finish the Test
Scale Results
— Explained Clearly
Your scores across each test scale, translated into plain, usable insights. Not just numbers, but what they actually mean for your daily life, emotional state, and overall well-being.
AI-Powered
Interpretation
A structured, clinically grounded explanation. Our AI analyzes patterns and relationships between scales to provide a coherent interpretation — without alarmist language.
Statistical
Comparison
See how you compare to others. Your scores are placed in a statistical context, showing percentiles and trends based on anonymized platform data to help you understand what`s typical.
Practical
Recommendations
Actionable guidance tailored to your profile. Receive clear, realistic suggestions you can apply immediately — focused on coping, self-regulation, and realistic next steps.
AI-Detected
Insights
Key patterns you might not notice on your own. Surfacing subtle connections in your responses that help you better understand what may be driving your current results.
Discuss with
an AI Psychologist
Clarify, reflect, and explore right away. Talk through your outcomes, ask questions, and explore meanings in a calm, non-diagnostic dialogue environment.
Start Online Test
Used in 52+ countries
Benchmarking
See How You Compare
Once you finish the test, your results will be compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of the benchmarks we use to place your score in context.
Decision Making (DM)
Average
11.5
Normal range
9.313.7
min.
4
max.
16
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Correction (C)
Average
7.1
Normal range
5.19
min.
4
max.
16
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Assessment of Results (AoR)
Average
10
Normal range
8.112
min.
4
max.
16
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Control (C)
Average
10.5
Normal range
8.312.6
min.
4
max.
16
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Programming (P)
Average
7.3
Normal range
5.39.4
min.
4
max.
16
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Planning (P)
Average
12.4
Normal range
10.913.9
min.
4
max.
16
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Forecasting (F)
Average
8.9
Normal range
6.811
min.
4
max.
16
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Modeling (M)
Average
11.2
Normal range
9.512.8
min.
4
max.
16
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Goal Setting (GS)
Average
9.2
Normal range
7.710.7
min.
4
max.
16
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Understanding Meaning (UM)
Average
8.3
Normal range
6.510.1
min.
4
max.
16
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Overall Regulation Level (ORL)
Average
74.2
Normal range
59.489.1
min.
40
max.
160
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Featured On
Rated 4.8/5 by Our Customers
Freudly really helped me discover parts of my personality I hadn’t noticed before. It strengthened the areas where I needed to grow and made me feel more grounded and confident in the parts that already worked well.
Emma C., US
I wanted to understand how serious my ADHD is, and now I finally do. I also realized I need to work on my self-esteem. It has been low for a long time, and that makes daily life harder than it should be.
Mateo R., CA
Reading each question felt like someone really understood me. Even though I’ve already dealt with much of this, reflecting still helped me learn something new about myself.
Caroline F., US
The process is simple. The test covers everything you need, and you’ll get a clear breakdown of your results. For just a few dollars, it’s a great value.
Klara N., CZ
I kept thinking there might be a small chance, but now I know for sure. The questions were easy to understand, and the whole process was straightforward.
Bruno M., BR
I really enjoyed this experience. I learned a lot, and it helped me make sense of my thoughts and the feeling I’ve had for a long time that I may have grown up with undiagnosed ADHD.
Alice B., FR
Great platform — the insights were genuinely meaningful!
Daniel W., DE
Everything was easy to follow. The tools you get at the end are genuinely helpful for self-growth, and the price is very reasonable. I really appreciate that.
Sofia M., ES
Surprisingly accurate — honestly didn’t expect it to nail things so well.
Adir B., IL
There are lots of different tests to pick from, and the price is surprisingly low for how much insight you get.
Olivia W., CA
I was pleasantly surprised when I read the results. It was as if someone had sorted out my messy thoughts and given me useful tips to help me speak with more confidence.
Grace O., IE
It was really solid, very detailed, and it actually helped me make sense of a lot of things.
Carla T., TT
I was really impressed with the report. It was clear, thoughtful, and it reflected things I’ve been noticing about myself.
Jade H., US
The questions made me think deeply and helped me become more self-aware.
Brooke S., US
Reading through most of the questions made me feel understood. Although I’ve already worked through some of these issues, the questions still gave me useful insights and helped me learn more about myself.
Ryan M., US
I usually take one or two tests each month, and this has become a good way for me to see how I’m doing.
Lucas W., US
Most of the time, my results are in the 90 to 98th percentile compared to others. It really makes me feel like there’s something unique about me.
Ethan C., US
I tried out some of the AI’s suggestions, and to be honest, they worked much better than I thought they would. Maybe this thing really is smarter than me.
Reece D., AU
Trusted by 22k+ Users Worldwide
CLEAR ANSWERS TO COMMON QUESTIONS
Frequently Asked Questions

Any questions left?

What does this questionnaire measure?
It assesses conscious self-regulation of learning activities, including planning, monitoring, and adjusting study actions. It also reflects how effort is organized and how difficulties are handled.
Who can complete it?
It is intended for students in secondary or higher education and in training programs across fields of study. It may also be used in counseling and educational research.
How long does it take and how many items are included?
It includes 40 items and typically takes about 8 minutes to complete. Completion time may vary by reading speed.
How should items be answered?
Each item should be answered based on typical study behavior rather than an ideal standard. Responses should reflect usual patterns over time, not a single recent event.
How are results used?
Results indicate relative strengths and gaps in learning self-regulation and can guide targeted skill development. They are not a diagnosis and should be interpreted alongside other information.
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES
About This Assessment
Questionnaire on Mindful Regulation of Learning Activities, QMRLA Test

Conscious Self-Regulation of Learning Activity Questionnaire Test

This questionnaire is a brief self-report measure designed to assess how individuals consciously manage their learning processes. The Conscious Self-Regulation of Learning Activity Questionnaire focuses on perceived use of strategies such as planning, monitoring, and adjusting study-related actions in response to goals and challenges.

It includes 40 items and typically takes about 8 minutes to complete. Response patterns can be used to describe relative strengths and gaps in self-regulatory approach to learning and to inform educational or counseling discussions; interpretation should consider the respondent’s context and is not intended to serve as a standalone diagnostic indicator. Zimmerman and Schunk are cited as authors.

The Conscious Self-Regulation of Learning Activity Questionnaire may be used in educational settings and research to characterize self-regulation habits across different learning demands.

Author: Barry J. Zimmerman, Dale H. Schunk
Literature: Zimmerman, B. J. Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice. 2002.; Pintrich, P. R. The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation. Academic Press. 2000.
Test Question Form
You Might Also Like
Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ)
This self-report measure assesses common strategies people use to manage em…
Start Test
Academic Persistence Scale
This brief self-report measure evaluates a student’s tendency to persist wi…
Start Test
Comments
Leave a Comment