Home
Psychological tests
Group Cohesion Perception Questionnaire

Group Cohesion Perception Questionnaire Test

Understand how connected and unified your team feels in about 3 minutes. This 12 item check-in pinpoints trust, engagement, and morale so you can spot strengths and target support fast.

Start Online Test

Questions: 123 minutes

Hi! My name is Freudly, i am an AI therapist, I will give you an interpretation of the test after you complete it.

08:30

October 2, 2025

October 2, 2025
Material has been updated

October 2, 2025
Material has been published

29632 views

3038 completions

2440 likes

Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

example score

3/7

Unity (U)

Measures how strongly team members perceive the group as a unified whole with shared purpose and direction.

Low unity

Moderate unity

High unity

1 – 3: Low unity | 4 – 5: Moderate unity | 6 – 7: High unity

A score of 3 suggests a relatively low sense of unity, meaning the team may be experienced more as separate individuals than as a cohesive whole.

example score

5/7

Interaction (I)

Measures how frequently and closely group members interact with one another.

Limited interaction

Moderate interaction

High interaction

1 – 3: Limited interaction | 4 – 5: Moderate interaction | 6 – 7: High interaction

A score of 5 suggests a moderate level of interaction, with regular contact among members but not consistently close or frequent across the whole group.

example score

5/7

Similarity (S)

Measures how similar group members are perceived to be in attitudes, behaviors, or ways of working.

Low similarity

Moderate similarity

High similarity

1 – 3: Low similarity | 4 – 5: Moderate similarity | 6 – 7: High similarity

A score of 5 suggests a moderate sense that group members are alike, with noticeable common ground alongside some differences.

example score

4/7

Overall Group Cohesion Index (OGCI)

Measures how strongly team members perceive their group as bonded, integrated, and unified.

Low cohesion

Moderate cohesion

High cohesion

1 – 3: Low cohesion | 4 – 5: Moderate cohesion | 6 – 7: High cohesion

A score of 4 indicates moderate perceived cohesion, suggesting a basic sense of unity with room to strengthen alignment and mutual connection.

Start Online Test

just completed the test

DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Team leads and managers

44%OF USERS

They use it to quickly check how united their team feels and where communication or trust needs attention.

HR and people partners

33%OF USERS

They run it across teams to compare morale and cohesion and spot groups that need targeted support or development.

Project and scrum coordinators

23%OF USERS

They take it during project cycles to monitor engagement and alignment, especially when priorities or team members change.

BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.

RESULTS YOU CAN ACTUALLY USE

What You’ll See After You Finish the Test

Scale Results
— Explained Clearly

Your scores across each test scale, translated into plain, usable insights. Not just numbers, but what they actually mean for your daily life, emotional state, and overall well-being.

AI-Powered
Interpretation

A structured, clinically grounded explanation. Our AI analyzes patterns and relationships between scales to provide a coherent interpretation — without alarmist language.

Statistical
Comparison

See how you compare to others. Your scores are placed in a statistical context, showing percentiles and trends based on anonymized platform data to help you understand what`s typical.

Practical
Recommendations

Actionable guidance tailored to your profile. Receive clear, realistic suggestions you can apply immediately — focused on coping, self-regulation, and realistic next steps.

AI-Detected
Insights

Key patterns you might not notice on your own. Surfacing subtle connections in your responses that help you better understand what may be driving your current results.

Discuss with
an AI Psychologist

Clarify, reflect, and explore right away. Talk through your outcomes, ask questions, and explore meanings in a calm, non-diagnostic dialogue environment.

Start Online Test

Used in 52+ countries

Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you finish the test, your results will be compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of the benchmarks we use to place your score in context.

Unity (U)

Average

3.5

Normal range

2.7 — 4.2

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Interaction (I)

Average

5.2

Normal range

4.3 — 6

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Similarity (S)

Average

2.8

Normal range

1.8 — 3.9

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Overall Group Cohesion Score (OGCS)

Average

4.8

Normal range

4 — 5.5

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Start Online Test

Featured On

Rated 4.8/5 by Our Customers

“Freudly really helped me discover parts of my personality I hadn’t noticed before. It strengthened the areas where I needed to grow and made me feel more grounded and confident in the parts that already worked well.”

— Emma C., US

“I wanted to understand how serious my ADHD is, and now I finally do. I also realized I need to work on my self-esteem. It has been low for a long time, and that makes daily life harder than it should be.”

— Mateo R., CA

“Reading each question felt like someone really understood me. Even though I’ve already dealt with much of this, reflecting still helped me learn something new about myself.”

— Caroline F., US

“The process is simple. The test covers everything you need, and you’ll get a clear breakdown of your results. For just a few dollars, it’s a great value.”

— Klara N., CZ

“I kept thinking there might be a small chance, but now I know for sure. The questions were easy to understand, and the whole process was straightforward.”

— Bruno M., BR

“I really enjoyed this experience. I learned a lot, and it helped me make sense of my thoughts and the feeling I’ve had for a long time that I may have grown up with undiagnosed ADHD.”

— Alice B., FR

“Great platform — the insights were genuinely meaningful!”

— Daniel W., DE

“Everything was easy to follow. The tools you get at the end are genuinely helpful for self-growth, and the price is very reasonable. I really appreciate that.”

— Sofia M., ES

“Surprisingly accurate — honestly didn’t expect it to nail things so well.”

— Adir B., IL

“There are lots of different tests to pick from, and the price is surprisingly low for how much insight you get.”

— Olivia W., CA

“I was pleasantly surprised when I read the results. It was as if someone had sorted out my messy thoughts and given me useful tips to help me speak with more confidence.”

— Grace O., IE

“It was really solid, very detailed, and it actually helped me make sense of a lot of things.”

— Carla T., TT

“I was really impressed with the report. It was clear, thoughtful, and it reflected things I’ve been noticing about myself.”

— Jade H., US

“The questions made me think deeply and helped me become more self-aware.”

— Brooke S., US

“Reading through most of the questions made me feel understood. Although I’ve already worked through some of these issues, the questions still gave me useful insights and helped me learn more about myself.”

— Ryan M., US

“I usually take one or two tests each month, and this has become a good way for me to see how I’m doing.”

— Lucas W., US

“Most of the time, my results are in the 90 to 98th percentile compared to others. It really makes me feel like there’s something unique about me.”

— Ethan C., US

“I tried out some of the AI’s suggestions, and to be honest, they worked much better than I thought they would. Maybe this thing really is smarter than me.”

— Reece D., AU

Trusted by 22k+ Users Worldwide

CLEAR ANSWERS TO COMMON QUESTIONS

Frequently Asked Questions

Any questions left?

What does this questionnaire measure?

It measures perceived cohesion within a work group. It focuses on perceived unity, trust, mutual understanding, engagement, and morale.

How long does it take and how many items are included?

Completion time is approximately 3 minutes. The questionnaire contains 12 items.

How should items be answered?

Select the response that best matches typical recent experience in the group. Answer all items without spending excessive time on any single item.

Who is an appropriate respondent?

Any current group member with sufficient contact to judge day-to-day interaction and climate. New members may respond if they have had enough exposure to form stable impressions.

How should results be interpreted and used?

Scores reflect perception and should be interpreted as indicators of strengths and areas for improvement in group functioning. Results are most informative when compared across teams or tracked over time.

WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

About This Assessment

Questionnaire for Measuring Perception of Group Cohesion Test

Group Cohesion Perception Questionnaire Test

group identity

This brief self-report measure is designed to assess perceptions of cohesion within a work or team setting. The Group Cohesion Perception Questionnaire focuses on respondents’ views of connection, unity, and interpersonal functioning in the group.

Developed by Albert V. Carron and Kenneth S. Spink, it contains 12 items and typically takes about 3 minutes to complete. Items query participants’ perceptions of mutual understanding, trust, engagement, and shared commitment, supporting a rapid snapshot of the group climate.

Scores from the Group Cohesion Perception Questionnaire may be used to inform team development efforts, monitor change over time, and compare perceived cohesion across groups, with interpretation guided by the assessment context and other available information.

Author: Albert V. Carron, Kenneth S. Spink

Literature: Campbell, D. T. Common fate, similarity, and other indices of the status of aggregates of persons as social entities. Behavioral Science. 1958.

Test Question Form