Mentality Type Assessment Test

In 6 minutes, clarify how you balance tradition and change and the thinking style you rely on. Use results to improve communication and tailor coaching, HR, and training plans.

Start Online Test

Questions: 316 minutes

Hi! My name is Freudly, i am an AI therapist, I will give you an interpretation of the test after you complete it.

08:30

October 2, 2025

October 2, 2025
Material has been updated

October 2, 2025
Material has been published

19661 view

1520 completions

1285 likes

Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

example score

10/31

Innovative (I)

Measures the degree to which a person favors innovation, rational experimentation, and personal achievement over established norms.

Low innovative

Moderate innovative

High innovative

0 – 10: Low innovative | 11 – 21: Moderate innovative | 22 – 31: High innovative

A score of 10 indicates a low innovative mentality, suggesting a relatively limited orientation toward novelty and individual achievement compared with more change-focused approaches.

example score

8/31

Traditional (T)

Measures the degree to which a person relies on tradition, established norms, and friendly, honest relationships within a collectivist outlook.

Low

Moderate

High

0 – 10: Low | 11 – 20: Moderate | 21 – 31: High

A score of 8 falls in the Low range, suggesting tradition and established norms are not a primary driver in how the person interprets situations and relates to others.

example score

12/31

Post-Innovative (P)

Measures the extent to which a person integrates and reinterprets innovations while prioritizing stability and horizontal individualism.

Low

Moderate

High

0 – 10: Low | 11 – 20: Moderate | 21 – 31: High

A score of 12 falls in the Moderate range, indicating a balanced tendency to incorporate new ideas while still leaning on stability and egalitarian, self-directed values.

example score

25/31

Transitional (T)

Measures the extent to which a person blends traditional, stability-oriented values with selective openness to new approaches within a vertical collectivist value frame.

Low

Moderate

High

0 – 10: Low | 11 – 21: Moderate | 22 – 31: High

A score of 25 falls in the High range, suggesting a strong tendency to combine established norms with some innovations while prioritizing group structure and hierarchy.

Start Online Test

just completed the test

DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

HR and Team Leads

41%OF USERS

They use it to understand whether employees prefer proven routines or new approaches so they can adapt communication, roles, and change management.

Coaches and Consultants

34%OF USERS

They take it to quickly spot a client’s thinking style and choose strategies that match their comfort with stability versus experimentation.

Career and Self-Development Seekers

25%OF USERS

They use it to clarify how they make decisions and whether they thrive more in structured environments or innovation-driven settings.

BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.

RESULTS YOU CAN ACTUALLY USE

What You’ll See After You Finish the Test

Scale Results
— Explained Clearly

Your scores across each test scale, translated into plain, usable insights. Not just numbers, but what they actually mean for your daily life, emotional state, and overall well-being.

AI-Powered
Interpretation

A structured, clinically grounded explanation. Our AI analyzes patterns and relationships between scales to provide a coherent interpretation — without alarmist language.

Statistical
Comparison

See how you compare to others. Your scores are placed in a statistical context, showing percentiles and trends based on anonymized platform data to help you understand what`s typical.

Practical
Recommendations

Actionable guidance tailored to your profile. Receive clear, realistic suggestions you can apply immediately — focused on coping, self-regulation, and realistic next steps.

AI-Detected
Insights

Key patterns you might not notice on your own. Surfacing subtle connections in your responses that help you better understand what may be driving your current results.

Discuss with
an AI Psychologist

Clarify, reflect, and explore right away. Talk through your outcomes, ask questions, and explore meanings in a calm, non-diagnostic dialogue environment.

Start Online Test

Used in 52+ countries

Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you finish the test, your results will be compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of the benchmarks we use to place your score in context.

Innovative (I)

Average

19.4

Normal range

15.3 — 23.5

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Traditional (T)

Average

12.6

Normal range

7.4 — 17.9

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Post-innovative (P)

Average

17.6

Normal range

13.5 — 21.7

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Transitional (T)

Average

19.3

Normal range

15.2 — 23.5

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Start Online Test

Featured On

Rated 4.8/5 by Our Customers

“Freudly really helped me discover parts of my personality I hadn’t noticed before. It strengthened the areas where I needed to grow and made me feel more grounded and confident in the parts that already worked well.”

— Emma C., US

“I wanted to understand how serious my ADHD is, and now I finally do. I also realized I need to work on my self-esteem. It has been low for a long time, and that makes daily life harder than it should be.”

— Mateo R., CA

“Reading each question felt like someone really understood me. Even though I’ve already dealt with much of this, reflecting still helped me learn something new about myself.”

— Caroline F., US

“The process is simple. The test covers everything you need, and you’ll get a clear breakdown of your results. For just a few dollars, it’s a great value.”

— Klara N., CZ

“I kept thinking there might be a small chance, but now I know for sure. The questions were easy to understand, and the whole process was straightforward.”

— Bruno M., BR

“I really enjoyed this experience. I learned a lot, and it helped me make sense of my thoughts and the feeling I’ve had for a long time that I may have grown up with undiagnosed ADHD.”

— Alice B., FR

“Great platform — the insights were genuinely meaningful!”

— Daniel W., DE

“Everything was easy to follow. The tools you get at the end are genuinely helpful for self-growth, and the price is very reasonable. I really appreciate that.”

— Sofia M., ES

“Surprisingly accurate — honestly didn’t expect it to nail things so well.”

— Adir B., IL

“There are lots of different tests to pick from, and the price is surprisingly low for how much insight you get.”

— Olivia W., CA

“I was pleasantly surprised when I read the results. It was as if someone had sorted out my messy thoughts and given me useful tips to help me speak with more confidence.”

— Grace O., IE

“It was really solid, very detailed, and it actually helped me make sense of a lot of things.”

— Carla T., TT

“I was really impressed with the report. It was clear, thoughtful, and it reflected things I’ve been noticing about myself.”

— Jade H., US

“The questions made me think deeply and helped me become more self-aware.”

— Brooke S., US

“Reading through most of the questions made me feel understood. Although I’ve already worked through some of these issues, the questions still gave me useful insights and helped me learn more about myself.”

— Ryan M., US

“I usually take one or two tests each month, and this has become a good way for me to see how I’m doing.”

— Lucas W., US

“Most of the time, my results are in the 90 to 98th percentile compared to others. It really makes me feel like there’s something unique about me.”

— Ethan C., US

“I tried out some of the AI’s suggestions, and to be honest, they worked much better than I thought they would. Maybe this thing really is smarter than me.”

— Reece D., AU

Trusted by 22k+ Users Worldwide

CLEAR ANSWERS TO COMMON QUESTIONS

Frequently Asked Questions

Any questions left?

What does this assessment measure?

It measures the preferred orientation toward stability versus change in thinking and decision-making. Results are grouped into four mentality types.

Which mentality types are identified?

Traditional, Innovative, Transitional, and Post-innovative. Each type reflects a different balance of established approaches and new ideas.

How long does it take and how many items are included?

Estimated completion time is 6 minutes. The questionnaire contains 31 items.

How should responses be selected?

Select the option that best matches typical behavior and views rather than an ideal response. Answer all items without spending excessive time on any one question.

How are results used in practice?

Results support selection of communication approaches, coaching strategies, and development plans in work or training settings. They can also help structure team roles and manage change processes.

WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

About This Assessment

Methodology for Measuring Mentality Type Test

Mentality Type Assessment Test

cultural values

This measure is designed to characterize individual differences in preferred thinking strategies and orientation toward stability versus change. The Mentality Type Assessment uses a brief self-report format to support an initial understanding of how a person tends to perceive and interpret their environment.

It consists of 31 items and typically takes about 6 minutes to complete. Item responses are used to classify the respondent into one of several mentality profiles (e.g., traditional, innovative, transitional, post-innovative) based on relative endorsement patterns.

The Mentality Type Assessment may be used as an adjunct in coaching, organizational, or educational settings to inform communication style and planning, and results should be interpreted in context alongside other clinical or occupational information. The authorship is sometimes attributed to Carl G. Jung.

Author: Carl G. Jung

Literature: Hofstede, G. Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. SAGE Publications. 2001.

Test Question Form