Subjectivity Level Assessment Test

Understand where a student is in building independence and self-direction in about 10 minutes. 54 quick items pinpoint a growth stage so educators can tailor support, goals, and challenges.

Start Online Test

Questions: 5410 minutes

Hi! My name is Freudly, i am an AI therapist, I will give you an interpretation of the test after you complete it.

08:30

October 2, 2025

October 2, 2025
Material has been updated

October 2, 2025
Material has been published

29936 views

2336 completions

1900 likes

Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

example score

53/100

Level of Subjectivity (LoS)

Measures the intensity of a person’s subjectivity, reflecting autonomy, initiative, and responsibility in their activities.

Low

Moderate

High

0 – 39: Low | 40 – 69: Moderate | 70 – 100: High

A score of 53 indicates a moderate level of subjectivity intensity, suggesting a developing capacity to act independently and take responsibility, with room to strengthen consistent initiative and self-directed regulation.

Start Online Test

just completed the test

DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

University students self-checking

46%OF USERS

Students take it to understand how independently they study and manage goals, and what to develop next.

Teachers and academic advisors

33%OF USERS

Educators use it to quickly spot students’ current stage and choose the right support and learning tasks.

School psychologists and counselors

21%OF USERS

Specialists administer it for fast diagnostics and tracking personal growth to guide individual development plans.

BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.

RESULTS YOU CAN ACTUALLY USE

What You’ll See After You Finish the Test

Scale Results
— Explained Clearly

Your scores across each test scale, translated into plain, usable insights. Not just numbers, but what they actually mean for your daily life, emotional state, and overall well-being.

AI-Powered
Interpretation

A structured, clinically grounded explanation. Our AI analyzes patterns and relationships between scales to provide a coherent interpretation — without alarmist language.

Statistical
Comparison

See how you compare to others. Your scores are placed in a statistical context, showing percentiles and trends based on anonymized platform data to help you understand what`s typical.

Practical
Recommendations

Actionable guidance tailored to your profile. Receive clear, realistic suggestions you can apply immediately — focused on coping, self-regulation, and realistic next steps.

AI-Detected
Insights

Key patterns you might not notice on your own. Surfacing subtle connections in your responses that help you better understand what may be driving your current results.

Discuss with
an AI Psychologist

Clarify, reflect, and explore right away. Talk through your outcomes, ask questions, and explore meanings in a calm, non-diagnostic dialogue environment.

Start Online Test

Used in 52+ countries

Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you finish the test, your results will be compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of the benchmarks we use to place your score in context.

Level of subjectivity intensity (Losi)

Average

74.5

Normal range

55.8 — 93.1

min.

max.

100

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Start Online Test

Featured On

Rated 4.8/5 by Our Customers

“Freudly really helped me discover parts of my personality I hadn’t noticed before. It strengthened the areas where I needed to grow and made me feel more grounded and confident in the parts that already worked well.”

— Emma C., US

“I wanted to understand how serious my ADHD is, and now I finally do. I also realized I need to work on my self-esteem. It has been low for a long time, and that makes daily life harder than it should be.”

— Mateo R., CA

“Reading each question felt like someone really understood me. Even though I’ve already dealt with much of this, reflecting still helped me learn something new about myself.”

— Caroline F., US

“The process is simple. The test covers everything you need, and you’ll get a clear breakdown of your results. For just a few dollars, it’s a great value.”

— Klara N., CZ

“I kept thinking there might be a small chance, but now I know for sure. The questions were easy to understand, and the whole process was straightforward.”

— Bruno M., BR

“I really enjoyed this experience. I learned a lot, and it helped me make sense of my thoughts and the feeling I’ve had for a long time that I may have grown up with undiagnosed ADHD.”

— Alice B., FR

“Great platform — the insights were genuinely meaningful!”

— Daniel W., DE

“Everything was easy to follow. The tools you get at the end are genuinely helpful for self-growth, and the price is very reasonable. I really appreciate that.”

— Sofia M., ES

“Surprisingly accurate — honestly didn’t expect it to nail things so well.”

— Adir B., IL

“There are lots of different tests to pick from, and the price is surprisingly low for how much insight you get.”

— Olivia W., CA

“I was pleasantly surprised when I read the results. It was as if someone had sorted out my messy thoughts and given me useful tips to help me speak with more confidence.”

— Grace O., IE

“It was really solid, very detailed, and it actually helped me make sense of a lot of things.”

— Carla T., TT

“I was really impressed with the report. It was clear, thoughtful, and it reflected things I’ve been noticing about myself.”

— Jade H., US

“The questions made me think deeply and helped me become more self-aware.”

— Brooke S., US

“Reading through most of the questions made me feel understood. Although I’ve already worked through some of these issues, the questions still gave me useful insights and helped me learn more about myself.”

— Ryan M., US

“I usually take one or two tests each month, and this has become a good way for me to see how I’m doing.”

— Lucas W., US

“Most of the time, my results are in the 90 to 98th percentile compared to others. It really makes me feel like there’s something unique about me.”

— Ethan C., US

“I tried out some of the AI’s suggestions, and to be honest, they worked much better than I thought they would. Maybe this thing really is smarter than me.”

— Reece D., AU

Trusted by 22k+ Users Worldwide

CLEAR ANSWERS TO COMMON QUESTIONS

Frequently Asked Questions

Any questions left?

What does this assessment measure?

It estimates the current stage of subjectivity expression in learning and everyday activity. Results are grouped into six stages from Observer to Creator.

How is the assessment structured?

It contains 54 items with short tasks and statements about typical actions and choices. Responses are scored to indicate the most characteristic stage pattern.

How long does it take to complete?

Estimated completion time is about 10 minutes. Most respondents finish within a single sitting without breaks.

How should items be answered?

Select the response that best matches usual behavior rather than an ideal or expected answer. Use the first response that seems accurate unless there is a clear reason to choose another.

How should the results be used?

The stage profile can guide educational support by identifying which self-management skills need strengthening. Results are descriptive and should not be treated as a clinical diagnosis.

WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

About This Assessment

Subjectivity Level Assessment Test

subjectivity

This measure is used to characterize perceived subjectivity and self-directed functioning in educational and everyday contexts. The Subjectivity Level Assessment is administered as a self-report questionnaire and is typically used to support descriptive profiling rather than diagnosis.

The instrument includes 54 items and generally requires about 10 minutes to complete. Item content is intended to capture how an individual positions themselves in learning and life activities, with results commonly interpreted in terms of progressive levels of personal agency and responsibility.

Although authorship is sometimes attributed to Julian B. Rotter, the Subjectivity Level Assessment is best used as an adjunct to clinical interview and other standardized measures, with findings integrated cautiously in light of setting, response style, and the specific decisions the assessment is intended to inform.

Author: Julian B. Rotter

Literature: Bandura, A. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman. 1997.

Test Question Form