Type Identifier Test

Get a quick 5-minute snapshot of your socionics type and core preferences. Fast results help you spot patterns, blind spots, and where deeper observation may be needed.

Start Online Test

Questions: 245 minutes

Hi! My name is Freudly, i am an AI therapist, I will give you an interpretation of the test after you complete it.

08:30

October 2, 2025

October 2, 2025
Material has been updated

October 2, 2025
Material has been published

14559 views

1614 completions

1357 likes

Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

example score

3/6

Introversion (I)

Measures the degree to which you prefer inner reflection and a smaller social sphere over outward social engagement.

Low introversion

Moderate introversion

High introversion

0 – 2: Low introversion | 3 – 4: Moderate introversion | 5 – 6: High introversion

A score of 3 indicates a moderate introversion level, suggesting a balanced mix of reflection/solitude and comfort with social interaction.

example score

4/6

Extraversion (E)

This scale measures how strongly you orient toward the external world through social engagement, activity, and seeking new experiences.

Lower extraversion

Moderate extraversion

Higher extraversion

0 – 2: Lower extraversion | 3 – 4: Moderate extraversion | 5 – 6: Higher extraversion

A score of 4 suggests moderately expressed extraverted tendencies, with comfort in engaging outwardly while not needing constant stimulation or attention.

example score

2/6

Intuition (I)

This scale measures your tendency toward intuitive, abstract, future-oriented thinking and noticing hidden connections.

Lower intuition

Moderate intuition

Higher intuition

0 – 2: Lower intuition | 3 – 4: Moderate intuition | 5 – 6: Higher intuition

A score of 2 suggests a lower emphasis on intuition, with a preference for more concrete or present-focused information over exploring abstract possibilities.

example score

3/6

Sensing (S)

Measures preference for concrete sensory experience, practicality, and attention to tangible details versus intuitive abstraction.

More intuitive-leaning

Balanced

More sensory-leaning

0 – 2: More intuitive-leaning | 3 – 4: Balanced | 5 – 6: More sensory-leaning

A score of 3 falls in the Balanced range, suggesting a roughly even mix of attention to concrete details and openness to broader, more intuitive impressions.

example score

2/6

Ethics (E)

Measures orientation toward feelings, emotional cues, and interpersonal norms when evaluating situations and making decisions.

Low ethics focus

Moderate ethics focus

High ethics focus

0 – 2: Low ethics focus | 3 – 4: Moderate ethics focus | 5 – 6: High ethics focus

A score of 2 suggests a relatively low tendency to prioritize emotional dynamics and social-norm considerations compared with other decision cues.

example score

1/6

Logic (L)

This scale measures preference for objective, fact-based analysis and structured reasoning versus ethical, value-focused judgment.

Lower Logic

Mixed

Higher Logic

0 – 2: Lower Logic | 3 – 4: Mixed | 5 – 6: Higher Logic

A score of 1 falls in the Lower Logic range, suggesting you may rely less on formal analysis and structure and more on contextual or value-based cues when deciding.

example score

2/6

Irrationality (I)

This scale measures preference for flexibility and improvisation versus structured planning when organizing activities and making decisions.

More structured

Mixed style

More flexible

0 – 2: More structured | 3 – 4: Mixed style | 5 – 6: More flexible

A score of 2 falls in the “More structured” range, suggesting you tend to prefer clearer plans and frameworks over spontaneous adaptation in day-to-day choices.

example score

3/6

R (R)

This scale measures preference for structured, planned, and consistent action versus spontaneity.

More flexible

Balanced

More structured

0 – 2: More flexible | 3 – 4: Balanced | 5 – 6: More structured

A score of 3 suggests a balanced tendency to use planning and structure while still allowing room for situational flexibility.

Start Online Test

just completed the test

DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Socionics Curious Beginners

41%OF USERS

People new to socionics who want a quick first guess at their type before reading deeper or seeking feedback.

Type Theory Hobbyists

34%OF USERS

Fans of personality systems who compare different methods and take the questionnaire to see which preferences they consistently pick.

Typing Practitioners and Coaches

25%OF USERS

Professionals who use the test as a rough baseline and a teaching tool to show the limits of self-report typing.

BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.

RESULTS YOU CAN ACTUALLY USE

What You’ll See After You Finish the Test

Scale Results
— Explained Clearly

Your scores across each test scale, translated into plain, usable insights. Not just numbers, but what they actually mean for your daily life, emotional state, and overall well-being.

AI-Powered
Interpretation

A structured, clinically grounded explanation. Our AI analyzes patterns and relationships between scales to provide a coherent interpretation — without alarmist language.

Statistical
Comparison

See how you compare to others. Your scores are placed in a statistical context, showing percentiles and trends based on anonymized platform data to help you understand what`s typical.

Practical
Recommendations

Actionable guidance tailored to your profile. Receive clear, realistic suggestions you can apply immediately — focused on coping, self-regulation, and realistic next steps.

AI-Detected
Insights

Key patterns you might not notice on your own. Surfacing subtle connections in your responses that help you better understand what may be driving your current results.

Discuss with
an AI Psychologist

Clarify, reflect, and explore right away. Talk through your outcomes, ask questions, and explore meanings in a calm, non-diagnostic dialogue environment.

Start Online Test

Used in 52+ countries

Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you finish the test, your results will be compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of the benchmarks we use to place your score in context.

And (A)

Average

3.3

Normal range

2.3 — 4.3

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

E (E)

Average

1.9

Normal range

1.1 — 2.7

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

And (A)

Average

3.5

Normal range

2.5 — 4.6

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

C (C)

Average

2.8

Normal range

1.9 — 3.7

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

E (E)

Average

3.7

Normal range

2.8 — 4.6

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

L (L)

Average

2.3

Normal range

1.2 — 3.4

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

And (A)

Average

2.6

Normal range

1.6 — 3.6

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

R (R)

Average

4.4

Normal range

3.4 — 5.4

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Start Online Test

Featured On

Rated 4.8/5 by Our Customers

“Freudly really helped me discover parts of my personality I hadn’t noticed before. It strengthened the areas where I needed to grow and made me feel more grounded and confident in the parts that already worked well.”

— Emma C., US

“I wanted to understand how serious my ADHD is, and now I finally do. I also realized I need to work on my self-esteem. It has been low for a long time, and that makes daily life harder than it should be.”

— Mateo R., CA

“Reading each question felt like someone really understood me. Even though I’ve already dealt with much of this, reflecting still helped me learn something new about myself.”

— Caroline F., US

“The process is simple. The test covers everything you need, and you’ll get a clear breakdown of your results. For just a few dollars, it’s a great value.”

— Klara N., CZ

“I kept thinking there might be a small chance, but now I know for sure. The questions were easy to understand, and the whole process was straightforward.”

— Bruno M., BR

“I really enjoyed this experience. I learned a lot, and it helped me make sense of my thoughts and the feeling I’ve had for a long time that I may have grown up with undiagnosed ADHD.”

— Alice B., FR

“Great platform — the insights were genuinely meaningful!”

— Daniel W., DE

“Everything was easy to follow. The tools you get at the end are genuinely helpful for self-growth, and the price is very reasonable. I really appreciate that.”

— Sofia M., ES

“Surprisingly accurate — honestly didn’t expect it to nail things so well.”

— Adir B., IL

“There are lots of different tests to pick from, and the price is surprisingly low for how much insight you get.”

— Olivia W., CA

“I was pleasantly surprised when I read the results. It was as if someone had sorted out my messy thoughts and given me useful tips to help me speak with more confidence.”

— Grace O., IE

“It was really solid, very detailed, and it actually helped me make sense of a lot of things.”

— Carla T., TT

“I was really impressed with the report. It was clear, thoughtful, and it reflected things I’ve been noticing about myself.”

— Jade H., US

“The questions made me think deeply and helped me become more self-aware.”

— Brooke S., US

“Reading through most of the questions made me feel understood. Although I’ve already worked through some of these issues, the questions still gave me useful insights and helped me learn more about myself.”

— Ryan M., US

“I usually take one or two tests each month, and this has become a good way for me to see how I’m doing.”

— Lucas W., US

“Most of the time, my results are in the 90 to 98th percentile compared to others. It really makes me feel like there’s something unique about me.”

— Ethan C., US

“I tried out some of the AI’s suggestions, and to be honest, they worked much better than I thought they would. Maybe this thing really is smarter than me.”

— Reece D., AU

Trusted by 22k+ Users Worldwide

CLEAR ANSWERS TO COMMON QUESTIONS

Frequently Asked Questions

Any questions left?

What does this questionnaire measure?

It screens for preferences used to estimate a socionics type. Results are intended as an initial orientation rather than a definitive classification.

How is the questionnaire completed?

Each item presents two statements and requires selecting the statement that is closer to typical behavior or viewpoint. Responses should reflect usual patterns, not temporary mood or recent events.

How long does it take and how many items are included?

The short form includes 24 paired items. Typical completion time is about 5 minutes.

How accurate are the results?

Reliability is estimated at about 50%, so misclassification is common. Written self-report formats have limited ability to improve accuracy by adding more items.

How should the results be used?

Use the output as a working hypothesis to guide further review and comparison of types. Confirmation typically requires additional observation and structured feedback beyond a questionnaire.

WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

About This Assessment

Type Identifier Test

personality type

This self-report measure is intended to provide a brief snapshot of personality type preferences, based on forced-choice comparisons. The Type Identifier presents paired statements designed to elicit relative preferences that may be used to inform an initial typology hypothesis.

The instrument includes 24 items and typically requires about 5 minutes to complete. Results are best interpreted as provisional and should be integrated with additional clinical information (e.g., interview data, behavioral observations, and contextual factors), given the known limitations of brief questionnaire-based typing.

Although it is sometimes attributed to Isabel Briggs Myers and Katharine C. Briggs, the Type Identifier should be used as an exploratory aid rather than a standalone basis for classification or decision-making.

Author: Isabel Briggs Myers, Katharine C. Briggs

Literature: Jung, C. G. Psychological types. Princeton University Press. 1971.

Test Question Form