Group Reflectiveness Scale Test

See how ready your team is to step back, reflect, and improve in just 4 minutes. With 20 quick items, you get clear signals to strengthen communication and decisions at any stage.
Start Online Test
Questions204 minutes
Hi! My name is Freudly, i am an AI therapist, I will give you an interpretation of the test after you complete it.
08:30
October 2, 2025
October 2, 2025
Material has been updated
26881 view
1454 completions
1193 likes
Share
Scale Explorer
How the Scales are Structured
example score
3/5
Innovativeness (I)
Measures how open the team is to new ideas and willing it is to make changes when reflecting on its performance.
Low
Moderate
High
12.4Low2.54.4Moderate4.55High
A score of 3 indicates a moderate level of innovativeness, suggesting the team is somewhat receptive to new ideas and changes but may apply them selectively during reflection.
example score
4/5
Intragroup Relationship Reflection (IRR)
Measures how much the group focuses on discussing intragroup relationships and how they affect collaboration.
Low focus
Moderate focus
High focus
11.9Low focus23.9Moderate focus45High focus
A score of 4 indicates a high focus on reflecting on intragroup relationships and their impact on joint work.
example score
3/5
Metacognitive Awareness (MA)
Measures how well team members understand and keep track of one another’s knowledge and experience through shared reflection.
Low awareness
High awareness
13.3Low awareness3.45High awareness
A score of 3 indicates low metacognitive awareness, suggesting the team only inconsistently recognizes who knows what and where expertise sits during reflection.
example score
4/5
Alignment of Actions With Long-Term Goals (AoAWLG)
Measures how strongly the team’s reflection focuses on checking whether current actions align with long-term collaborative goals.
Low alignment focus
Moderate alignment focus
High alignment focus
12.9Low alignment focus34.5Moderate alignment focus4.65High alignment focus
A score of 4 indicates a moderate tendency to reflect on whether day-to-day decisions and actions support the team’s long-term goals, with room to make this linkage more consistent.
example score
3/5
Orientation Toward Experience Analysis (OTEA)
Measures how strongly the team tends to review and analyze past experiences to extract lessons and improve how it works together.
Low analysis
Moderate analysis
High analysis
12.9Low analysis34.4Moderate analysis4.55High analysis
A score of 3 indicates a moderate tendency to reflect on past work, with some learning discussions occurring but not yet consistently shaping team practices.
example score
2/5
Joint Discussion of Problems (JDoP)
Measures the team’s readiness to openly discuss current issues and jointly find solutions in real time.
Low
Moderate
High
12.3Low2.34.3Moderate4.35High
A score of 2 indicates a low tendency to bring up and resolve issues together in the moment, with discussions likely happening less often or less openly.
example score
3/5
Group Reflectiveness (GR)
Measures how well a team collectively reflects on its work, interactions, and goals to identify improvements.
Low
Moderate
High
12.9Low34.3Moderate4.45High
A score of 3 indicates a moderate level of group reflexivity, suggesting the team is able to discuss and review its process but may do so inconsistently or with limited depth.
example score
3/5
Analysis of Future Risks and Opportunities (AoFRaO)
Measures how much the team reflects together on potential future risks and opportunities in its work.
Limited outlook scanning
Situational outlook scanning
Proactive outlook scanning
12.6Limited outlook scanning2.64.5Situational outlook scanning4.55Proactive outlook scanning
A score of 3 indicates the team considers future risks and opportunities at times, but this analysis is not yet a consistent part of its joint reflection.
Start Online Test
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS
Who Usually Takes This Test?
Team Leads and Managers
41%OF USERS
They use it to gauge whether the team is ready to openly review work, surface issues, and agree on improvements.
Project and Scrum Teams
34%OF USERS
They take it during or after a project to check how comfortable the group is with retrospectives and changing how they work.
Coaches and HR Partners
25%OF USERS
They use it to quickly spot where a group may resist feedback, avoid difficult conversations, or need support to reflect productively.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
RESULTS YOU CAN ACTUALLY USE
What You’ll See After You Finish the Test
Scale Results
— Explained Clearly
Your scores across each test scale, translated into plain, usable insights. Not just numbers, but what they actually mean for your daily life, emotional state, and overall well-being.
AI-Powered
Interpretation
A structured, clinically grounded explanation. Our AI analyzes patterns and relationships between scales to provide a coherent interpretation — without alarmist language.
Statistical
Comparison
See how you compare to others. Your scores are placed in a statistical context, showing percentiles and trends based on anonymized platform data to help you understand what`s typical.
Practical
Recommendations
Actionable guidance tailored to your profile. Receive clear, realistic suggestions you can apply immediately — focused on coping, self-regulation, and realistic next steps.
AI-Detected
Insights
Key patterns you might not notice on your own. Surfacing subtle connections in your responses that help you better understand what may be driving your current results.
Discuss with
an AI Psychologist
Clarify, reflect, and explore right away. Talk through your outcomes, ask questions, and explore meanings in a calm, non-diagnostic dialogue environment.
Start Online Test
Used in 52+ countries
Benchmarking
See How You Compare
Once you finish the test, your results will be compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of the benchmarks we use to place your score in context.
Innovativeness (I)
Average
3
Normal range
2.33.7
min.
1
max.
5
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Reflection on Intragroup Relationships (RoIR)
Average
2.4
Normal range
1.83.1
min.
1
max.
5
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Metacognitive Awareness (MA)
Average
2.7
Normal range
2.13.3
min.
1
max.
5
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Alignment of actions with long-term goals (Aoawlg)
Average
2.2
Normal range
1.62.9
min.
1
max.
5
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Focus on Experience Analysis (FoEA)
Average
2
Normal range
1.32.8
min.
1
max.
5
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Joint Discussion of Issues (JDoI)
Average
3.5
Normal range
2.84.2
min.
1
max.
5
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Group Reflexivity (GR)
Average
3.3
Normal range
2.64.1
min.
1
max.
5
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Analysis of Future Risks and Opportunities (AoFRaO)
Average
2.2
Normal range
1.62.9
min.
1
max.
5
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Featured On
Rated 4.8/5 by Our Customers
Freudly really helped me discover parts of my personality I hadn’t noticed before. It strengthened the areas where I needed to grow and made me feel more grounded and confident in the parts that already worked well.
Emma C., US
I wanted to understand how serious my ADHD is, and now I finally do. I also realized I need to work on my self-esteem. It has been low for a long time, and that makes daily life harder than it should be.
Mateo R., CA
Reading each question felt like someone really understood me. Even though I’ve already dealt with much of this, reflecting still helped me learn something new about myself.
Caroline F., US
The process is simple. The test covers everything you need, and you’ll get a clear breakdown of your results. For just a few dollars, it’s a great value.
Klara N., CZ
I kept thinking there might be a small chance, but now I know for sure. The questions were easy to understand, and the whole process was straightforward.
Bruno M., BR
I really enjoyed this experience. I learned a lot, and it helped me make sense of my thoughts and the feeling I’ve had for a long time that I may have grown up with undiagnosed ADHD.
Alice B., FR
Great platform — the insights were genuinely meaningful!
Daniel W., DE
Everything was easy to follow. The tools you get at the end are genuinely helpful for self-growth, and the price is very reasonable. I really appreciate that.
Sofia M., ES
Surprisingly accurate — honestly didn’t expect it to nail things so well.
Adir B., IL
There are lots of different tests to pick from, and the price is surprisingly low for how much insight you get.
Olivia W., CA
I was pleasantly surprised when I read the results. It was as if someone had sorted out my messy thoughts and given me useful tips to help me speak with more confidence.
Grace O., IE
It was really solid, very detailed, and it actually helped me make sense of a lot of things.
Carla T., TT
I was really impressed with the report. It was clear, thoughtful, and it reflected things I’ve been noticing about myself.
Jade H., US
The questions made me think deeply and helped me become more self-aware.
Brooke S., US
Reading through most of the questions made me feel understood. Although I’ve already worked through some of these issues, the questions still gave me useful insights and helped me learn more about myself.
Ryan M., US
I usually take one or two tests each month, and this has become a good way for me to see how I’m doing.
Lucas W., US
Most of the time, my results are in the 90 to 98th percentile compared to others. It really makes me feel like there’s something unique about me.
Ethan C., US
I tried out some of the AI’s suggestions, and to be honest, they worked much better than I thought they would. Maybe this thing really is smarter than me.
Reece D., AU
Trusted by 22k+ Users Worldwide
CLEAR ANSWERS TO COMMON QUESTIONS
Frequently Asked Questions

Any questions left?

What does this assessment measure?
It measures a team’s readiness to examine its joint work from an outside perspective. It focuses on openness to change, willingness to discuss errors, and attention to improvement.
Who should complete it?
It is intended for members of a team working together on shared tasks. It may be used in operational teams, project groups, or cross-functional groups.
When should it be administered?
It can be administered during a project to guide adjustments or after completion to support review. It is suitable at any stage when reflection is required.
How long does it take and how many items are included?
Estimated completion time is about 4 minutes. The questionnaire includes 20 items.
How should results be interpreted?
Higher scores indicate greater readiness for open discussion and process review, while lower scores indicate barriers to reflection. Results are best used to set priorities for communication, learning from errors, and decision-making practices.
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES
About This Assessment
Group Reflexivity Test

Group Reflectiveness Scale Test

In team-based review and learning contexts, the Group Reflectiveness Scale provides a brief self-report measure of participants’ perceived readiness to step back and evaluate how the group works. Developed by Donald A. Schön and Chris Argyris, it is intended to inform structured discussion of team processes and opportunities for improvement.

The measure consists of 20 items and typically takes about 4 minutes to complete. Items focus on attitudes and openness toward collective reflection, including willingness to examine mistakes, consider alternative approaches, and engage in candid discussion. Results from the Group Reflectiveness Scale are commonly used as a screening snapshot to guide facilitation, coaching, or debriefing by identifying areas where additional support for reflective practice may be indicated.

Author: Chris Argyris, Donald A. Schön
Literature: West, M. A. Reflexivity and work group effectiveness: A conceptual integration. In M. A. West (Ed.), Handbook of work group psychology. John Wiley & Sons. 1996.
Test Question Form
You Might Also Like
Reflectiveness Questionnaire
This self-report measure is designed to assess individual differences in re…
Start Test
Class Group Reflexivity
This measure is used in school and adolescent group settings to examine how…
Start Test
Reflectiveness Questionnaire
Assessment of reflective self-focus and the tendency to monitor and evaluat…
Start Test
Comments
Leave a Comment