Good-Evil Test 2

See how you recognize and express good and harmful impulses in about 9 minutes. Fast, age-tuned results with 44 items that support coaching, counseling, and classroom insight.

Start Online Test

Questions: 449 minutes

Hi! My name is Freudly, i am an AI therapist, I will give you an interpretation of the test after you complete it.

08:30

October 2, 2025

October 2, 2025
Material has been updated

October 2, 2025
Material has been published

22928 views

2269 completions

1848 likes

Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

example score

25/90

Humanity (H)

Measures the overall balance between virtuous (good) and malevolent (evil) personality traits in everyday functioning.

Malevolent traits dominate

Balanced / slightly positive

Virtuous traits dominate

-40 – 0: Malevolent traits dominate | 1 – 9: Balanced / slightly positive | 10 – 90: Virtuous traits dominate

A score of 25 falls in the 'Virtuous traits dominate' range, suggesting a clear predominance of prosocial, ethical tendencies over malevolent ones.

example score

91/126

Evil (E)

Measures how strongly malevolent traits such as vanity, cunning, envy, cynicism, and abrasiveness are expressed in a person’s attitudes and behavior.

Low

Moderate

High

42 – 49: Low | 50 – 79: Moderate | 80 – 126: High

A score of 91 falls in the High range, suggesting a more pronounced expression of cynical, envious, or manipulative tendencies compared with typical levels for this scale.

example score

116/132

Goodness (G)

The Welcome (Goodness) scale measures the extent to which virtuous traits like humility, modesty, trust, responsibility, and benevolence are expressed in a person’s attitudes and behavior.

Lower expression

Moderate expression

High expression

44 – 74: Lower expression | 75 – 104: Moderate expression | 105 – 132: High expression

A score of 116 falls in the High expression range, suggesting well-developed benevolence and responsibility with a tendency toward honest, altruistic behavior.

Start Online Test

just completed the test

DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Curious teens and students

46%OF USERS

They take it to understand their own moral compass, reactions to everyday dilemmas, and what “good vs evil” looks like in their behavior.

School psychologists and counselors

34%OF USERS

They use it in consultations or group work to spot value conflicts, risk tendencies, and areas for resilience and guidance.

Teachers and youth mentors

20%OF USERS

They assign it in lessons or clubs to start discussions about ethics, responsibility, and peer behavior during the transition age.

BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.

RESULTS YOU CAN ACTUALLY USE

What You’ll See After You Finish the Test

Scale Results
— Explained Clearly

Your scores across each test scale, translated into plain, usable insights. Not just numbers, but what they actually mean for your daily life, emotional state, and overall well-being.

AI-Powered
Interpretation

A structured, clinically grounded explanation. Our AI analyzes patterns and relationships between scales to provide a coherent interpretation — without alarmist language.

Statistical
Comparison

See how you compare to others. Your scores are placed in a statistical context, showing percentiles and trends based on anonymized platform data to help you understand what`s typical.

Practical
Recommendations

Actionable guidance tailored to your profile. Receive clear, realistic suggestions you can apply immediately — focused on coping, self-regulation, and realistic next steps.

AI-Detected
Insights

Key patterns you might not notice on your own. Surfacing subtle connections in your responses that help you better understand what may be driving your current results.

Discuss with
an AI Psychologist

Clarify, reflect, and explore right away. Talk through your outcomes, ask questions, and explore meanings in a calm, non-diagnostic dialogue environment.

Start Online Test

Used in 52+ countries

Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you finish the test, your results will be compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of the benchmarks we use to place your score in context.

Humanity (Homework) (H()

Average

Normal range

3.9 — 52

min.

-40

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Evil (E)

Average

67.4

Normal range

52.8 — 82

min.

max.

126

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Welcome (W)

Average

109.9

Normal range

98.9 — 120.9

min.

max.

132

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Start Online Test

Featured On

Rated 4.8/5 by Our Customers

“Freudly really helped me discover parts of my personality I hadn’t noticed before. It strengthened the areas where I needed to grow and made me feel more grounded and confident in the parts that already worked well.”

— Emma C., US

“I wanted to understand how serious my ADHD is, and now I finally do. I also realized I need to work on my self-esteem. It has been low for a long time, and that makes daily life harder than it should be.”

— Mateo R., CA

“Reading each question felt like someone really understood me. Even though I’ve already dealt with much of this, reflecting still helped me learn something new about myself.”

— Caroline F., US

“The process is simple. The test covers everything you need, and you’ll get a clear breakdown of your results. For just a few dollars, it’s a great value.”

— Klara N., CZ

“I kept thinking there might be a small chance, but now I know for sure. The questions were easy to understand, and the whole process was straightforward.”

— Bruno M., BR

“I really enjoyed this experience. I learned a lot, and it helped me make sense of my thoughts and the feeling I’ve had for a long time that I may have grown up with undiagnosed ADHD.”

— Alice B., FR

“Great platform — the insights were genuinely meaningful!”

— Daniel W., DE

“Everything was easy to follow. The tools you get at the end are genuinely helpful for self-growth, and the price is very reasonable. I really appreciate that.”

— Sofia M., ES

“Surprisingly accurate — honestly didn’t expect it to nail things so well.”

— Adir B., IL

“There are lots of different tests to pick from, and the price is surprisingly low for how much insight you get.”

— Olivia W., CA

“I was pleasantly surprised when I read the results. It was as if someone had sorted out my messy thoughts and given me useful tips to help me speak with more confidence.”

— Grace O., IE

“It was really solid, very detailed, and it actually helped me make sense of a lot of things.”

— Carla T., TT

“I was really impressed with the report. It was clear, thoughtful, and it reflected things I’ve been noticing about myself.”

— Jade H., US

“The questions made me think deeply and helped me become more self-aware.”

— Brooke S., US

“Reading through most of the questions made me feel understood. Although I’ve already worked through some of these issues, the questions still gave me useful insights and helped me learn more about myself.”

— Ryan M., US

“I usually take one or two tests each month, and this has become a good way for me to see how I’m doing.”

— Lucas W., US

“Most of the time, my results are in the 90 to 98th percentile compared to others. It really makes me feel like there’s something unique about me.”

— Ethan C., US

“I tried out some of the AI’s suggestions, and to be honest, they worked much better than I thought they would. Maybe this thing really is smarter than me.”

— Reece D., AU

Trusted by 22k+ Users Worldwide

CLEAR ANSWERS TO COMMON QUESTIONS

Frequently Asked Questions

Any questions left?

What does this test measure?

It assesses how ethical values are perceived and how “good” and “evil” tendencies are expressed in thinking and behavior. It focuses on functional patterns, not only self-rating.

Who is the test intended for?

It is designed for teenagers and young adults. It is commonly used in educational and counseling settings focused on moral attitudes and personal guidelines.

How long does it take and how many items are included?

Estimated completion time is about 9 minutes. The questionnaire includes 44 items.

How should responses be provided?

Each item should be answered based on typical behavior and usual reactions rather than rare or extreme situations. Responses should be given without overthinking or trying to match a preferred image.

How should results be interpreted and used?

Scores describe relative strengths and imbalances in positive and negative ethical tendencies and their practical expression. Interpretation requires correct scoring and up-to-date norms, and results should be used alongside other information.

WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

About This Assessment

Good-Evil Test 2

moral morality

This instrument is designed to assess how an individual endorses and expresses morally valenced self-perceptions and attitudes. Good-Evil Test 2 provides a brief, structured approach for examining ethical self-appraisal and related dispositional tendencies in a clinical or educational context. It was developed by Delroy L. Paulhus and Robert A. Emmons.

The measure consists of 44 items and typically requires about 9 minutes to complete. Responses are intended to support interpretation of the respondent’s perceived alignment with prosocial versus antisocial qualities, with attention to how these themes may function in everyday decision-making and interpersonal behavior.

Good-Evil Test 2 is often considered when working with adolescents and young adults to inform case formulation, counseling goals, or psychoeducational discussion of values and moral reasoning. As with any self-report measure, results should be interpreted in conjunction with collateral information, clinical interview data, and appropriate scoring procedures, with attention to version-specific administration and norms.

Author: Delroy L. Paulhus, Robert A. Emmons

Literature: Haidt, J. The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. Pantheon Books. 2012.; Bandura, A. Moral disengagement: How people do harm and live with themselves. Worth Publishers. 2016.; Narvaez, D., & Lapsley, D. K. (Eds.). Personality, identity, and character: Explorations in moral psychology. Cambridge University Press. 2009.

Test Question Form