Dichotomous Thinking Inventory (DTI) Test

See how strongly you lean toward black and white thinking in just 3 minutes. Get quick, clear insight that supports better decisions, communication, and stress resilience.
Start Online Test
Questions153 minutes
Hi! My name is Freudly, i am an AI therapist, I will give you an interpretation of the test after you complete it.
08:30
October 2, 2025
October 2, 2025
Material has been updated
19015 views
2006 completions
1769 likes
Share
Scale Explorer
How the Scales are Structured
example score
13/30
Benefit-Based Thinking (BT)
Measures how strongly a person evaluates situations through a black-and-white lens of personal benefit versus lack of benefit.
Low benefit-focus
Moderate benefit-focus
High benefit-focus
513Low benefit-focus1422Moderate benefit-focus2330High benefit-focus
A score of 13 falls in the Low benefit-focus range, suggesting you tend to rely less on strict gain-vs-no-gain judgments when interpreting situations.
example score
16/30
Dichotomous Beliefs (DB)
Measures the tendency to hold black-and-white, either-or beliefs when interpreting situations and people.
Low
Moderate
High
010Low1120Moderate2130High
A score of 16 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting a noticeable but not dominant tendency to frame experiences in either-or terms.
example score
9/30
Preference for Dichotomous Thinking (PfDT)
Measures the extent to which a person prefers clear, opposing categories over nuanced evaluations when judging situations and people.
Low preference
Moderate preference
High preference
010Low preference1120Moderate preference2130High preference
A score of 9 suggests a low tendency to rely on black-and-white categories, with a greater openness to nuanced or mixed judgments.
example score
43/90
Dichotomous Thinking Level (DTL)
Measures the overall tendency to think in black-and-white extremes rather than considering nuanced intermediate options.
Low
Moderate
High
1539Low4064Moderate6590High
A score of 43 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting a noticeable but not dominant tendency toward dichotomous thinking, with some ability to recognize gray areas.
Start Online Test
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS
Who Usually Takes This Test?
Self-improvement seekers
41%OF USERS
People who want to understand why they swing between extremes in opinions, moods, or self-judgment and learn to think more flexibly.
Coaching and therapy clients
34%OF USERS
Clients taking an initial check-in to spot rigid thinking patterns that fuel conflict, anxiety, or burnout and guide the next steps in support.
HR and team leaders
25%OF USERS
Managers and HR specialists using a quick screen to identify all-or-nothing thinking that can affect teamwork, feedback reactions, and decision-making.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
RESULTS YOU CAN ACTUALLY USE
What You’ll See After You Finish the Test
Scale Results
— Explained Clearly
Your scores across each test scale, translated into plain, usable insights. Not just numbers, but what they actually mean for your daily life, emotional state, and overall well-being.
AI-Powered
Interpretation
A structured, clinically grounded explanation. Our AI analyzes patterns and relationships between scales to provide a coherent interpretation — without alarmist language.
Statistical
Comparison
See how you compare to others. Your scores are placed in a statistical context, showing percentiles and trends based on anonymized platform data to help you understand what`s typical.
Practical
Recommendations
Actionable guidance tailored to your profile. Receive clear, realistic suggestions you can apply immediately — focused on coping, self-regulation, and realistic next steps.
AI-Detected
Insights
Key patterns you might not notice on your own. Surfacing subtle connections in your responses that help you better understand what may be driving your current results.
Discuss with
an AI Psychologist
Clarify, reflect, and explore right away. Talk through your outcomes, ask questions, and explore meanings in a calm, non-diagnostic dialogue environment.
Start Online Test
Used in 52+ countries
Benchmarking
See How You Compare
Once you finish the test, your results will be compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of the benchmarks we use to place your score in context.
Thinking Based on the Principle of Benefit (TBotPoB)
Average
12.9
Normal range
8.317.4
min.
5
max.
30
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Dichotomous Beliefs (DB)
Average
18.9
Normal range
14.723
min.
0
max.
30
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Preference for dichotomy (Pfd)
Average
10.2
Normal range
5.215.2
min.
0
max.
30
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Level of dichotomous thinking (Lodt)
Average
46.8
Normal range
37.156.5
min.
15
max.
90
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Featured On
Rated 4.8/5 by Our Customers
Freudly really helped me discover parts of my personality I hadn’t noticed before. It strengthened the areas where I needed to grow and made me feel more grounded and confident in the parts that already worked well.
Emma C., US
I wanted to understand how serious my ADHD is, and now I finally do. I also realized I need to work on my self-esteem. It has been low for a long time, and that makes daily life harder than it should be.
Mateo R., CA
Reading each question felt like someone really understood me. Even though I’ve already dealt with much of this, reflecting still helped me learn something new about myself.
Caroline F., US
The process is simple. The test covers everything you need, and you’ll get a clear breakdown of your results. For just a few dollars, it’s a great value.
Klara N., CZ
I kept thinking there might be a small chance, but now I know for sure. The questions were easy to understand, and the whole process was straightforward.
Bruno M., BR
I really enjoyed this experience. I learned a lot, and it helped me make sense of my thoughts and the feeling I’ve had for a long time that I may have grown up with undiagnosed ADHD.
Alice B., FR
Great platform — the insights were genuinely meaningful!
Daniel W., DE
Everything was easy to follow. The tools you get at the end are genuinely helpful for self-growth, and the price is very reasonable. I really appreciate that.
Sofia M., ES
Surprisingly accurate — honestly didn’t expect it to nail things so well.
Adir B., IL
There are lots of different tests to pick from, and the price is surprisingly low for how much insight you get.
Olivia W., CA
I was pleasantly surprised when I read the results. It was as if someone had sorted out my messy thoughts and given me useful tips to help me speak with more confidence.
Grace O., IE
It was really solid, very detailed, and it actually helped me make sense of a lot of things.
Carla T., TT
I was really impressed with the report. It was clear, thoughtful, and it reflected things I’ve been noticing about myself.
Jade H., US
The questions made me think deeply and helped me become more self-aware.
Brooke S., US
Reading through most of the questions made me feel understood. Although I’ve already worked through some of these issues, the questions still gave me useful insights and helped me learn more about myself.
Ryan M., US
I usually take one or two tests each month, and this has become a good way for me to see how I’m doing.
Lucas W., US
Most of the time, my results are in the 90 to 98th percentile compared to others. It really makes me feel like there’s something unique about me.
Ethan C., US
I tried out some of the AI’s suggestions, and to be honest, they worked much better than I thought they would. Maybe this thing really is smarter than me.
Reece D., AU
Trusted by 22k+ Users Worldwide
CLEAR ANSWERS TO COMMON QUESTIONS
Frequently Asked Questions

Any questions left?

What does this questionnaire measure?
It measures the tendency to think in rigid either-or categories and to prefer extreme judgments over nuanced options.
How long does it take and how many items are included?
Completion typically takes about 3 minutes. The questionnaire includes 15 statements.
How should the statements be answered?
Select the response option that best matches the usual way of thinking, even if it does not fit every situation. Avoid spending too much time on any one item.
What do the results mean?
Higher scores indicate a stronger tendency toward black-and-white thinking. Lower scores indicate greater tolerance for mixed or uncertain outcomes.
How can the results be used?
Results can inform psychological work, coaching, or workplace development by identifying rigid patterns that may contribute to conflict, stress, or burnout. They can support planning interventions that increase flexibility and consideration of alternatives.
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES
About This Assessment
Dichotomous Thinking Questionnaire, DTI Test

Dichotomous Thinking Inventory (DTI) Test

This self-report measure is designed to screen for a cognitive style characterized by rigid, all-or-none evaluations. The Dichotomous Thinking Inventory (DTI) asks respondents to endorse statements reflecting polarized judgments and limited tolerance for nuance.

The instrument contains 15 items and typically requires about 3 minutes to complete. It may be used in clinical or counseling contexts as an adjunct to broader assessment to inform case formulation, psychoeducation, and treatment planning.

Scores from the Dichotomous Thinking Inventory (DTI) can help identify a tendency toward black-and-white appraisal patterns that may be relevant to emotional reactivity, interpersonal conflict, or maladaptive decision-making. Results should be interpreted in context and are not intended to serve as a standalone diagnostic indicator.

Author: aaron-t-beck
Literature: Fairburn, C. G. Cognitive behavior therapy and eating disorders. Guilford Press. 2008.; Oshio, A. Development and validation of the dichotomous thinking inventory. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal. 2009.
Test Question Form
You Might Also Like
Thinking Style Assessment
This self-report measure is designed to characterize an individual’s prefer…
Start Test
Thinking Profile
This measure is designed to characterize individual differences in cognitiv…
Start Test
Critical Thinking Test for Adolescents
This brief screening measure is designed to sample core reasoning and evalu…
Start Test
Comments
Leave a Comment