Prices
Tests
FAQ
How sessions work
en
es
Log inSign up

Assessment of Social and Pedagogical Neglect in Children Test

Understand a child’s social and learning challenges in about 19 minutes. Combines input from parents, teachers, and a psychologist to pinpoint key areas and severity so you can plan support fast.
Start Online Test
Questions: 10319 minutes
Hi! My name is Freudly, i am an AI therapist, I will give you an interpretation of the test after you complete it.
08:30
October 2, 2025
October 2, 2025
Material has been updated
22485 views
2130 completions
1790 likes
Share
Scale Explorer
How the Scales are Structured
example score
7/10
In Kindergarten (IK)
Assesses how the kindergarten learning environment and everyday interactions influence the child's adaptation and relationships with teachers and peers.
Low difficulties
Elevated difficulties
0 – 8: Low difficulties | 9 – 10: Elevated difficulties
A score of 7 suggests generally manageable kindergarten-related difficulties, with some areas that may still affect comfort, behavior, or peer/teacher interactions.
example score
13/15
In the Family (ItF)
Assesses how the family environment and parenting conditions support or hinder the child’s development and socialization.
Favorable
Mixed/variable
Pronounced difficulties
0 – 5: Favorable | 6 – 10: Mixed/variable | 11 – 15: Pronounced difficulties
A score of 13 falls in the “Pronounced difficulties” range, suggesting the family educational microsystem is currently associated with significant challenges for the child’s development and socialization.
example score
22/50
Childrearing Microsocial Environment (CME)
Assesses how the family and educational setting may contribute to the child's socio-pedagogical difficulties through the educational microsystem.
Favorable / low concern
Moderate concern
Unfavorable / high concern
0 – 9: Favorable / low concern | 10 – 25: Moderate concern | 26 – 50: Unfavorable / high concern
A score of 22 falls in the Moderate concern range, suggesting noticeable but not extreme challenges in the child's educational microsystem that may be influencing adaptation and behavior.
example score
5/12
In Kindergarten (IK)
Assesses the child's level of anxiety in the preschool setting and how comfortably they adapt to the group environment.
Low
Elevated
0 – 8: Low | 9 – 12: Elevated
A score of 5 falls in the Low range, suggesting generally calm adjustment to the preschool group with no prominent anxiety signs in this setting.
example score
8/10
In the Family (ItF)
Measures the intensity of a child's anxiety associated with the family environment and relationships with close relatives.
Low
Moderate
High
0 – 3: Low | 4 – 6: Moderate | 7 – 10: High
A score of 8 falls in the High range, indicating pronounced family-related anxiety that may be reflected in the child's behavior and interactions at home.
example score
20/50
General Anxiety (GA)
Assesses the child’s overall anxiety level across everyday situations and contexts.
Low
Moderate
High
0 – 9: Low | 10 – 25: Moderate | 26 – 50: High
A score of 20 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting a noticeable but not pronounced level of general anxiety that may be associated with some adjustment or emotional difficulties.
example score
2/5
Play Reflection (PR)
Assesses how well the child can understand and analyze their own play activities.
Low reflection
Moderate reflection
High reflection
0 – 1: Low reflection | 2 – 3: Moderate reflection | 4 – 5: High reflection
A score of 2 indicates moderate game reflection, suggesting the child shows some ability to think about their play but may do so inconsistently or with limited detail.
example score
2/6
Play Activity (PA)
Assesses the child's engagement in play activities and initiative during games.
Low
Moderate
High
0 – 2: Low | 3 – 4: Moderate | 5 – 6: High
A score of 2 indicates low play engagement, with limited initiative or participation during games.
example score
3/7
Play Skills (PS)
Assesses how well a child has developed basic play skills needed for full participation in games.
Limited play skills
Developing play skills
Well-developed play skills
0 – 2: Limited play skills | 3 – 5: Developing play skills | 6 – 7: Well-developed play skills
A score of 3 suggests the child’s play skills are developing, with some key abilities present but not yet consistently used in gameplay.
example score
28/50
Activity Agent (AA)
Assesses the child’s development as an active subject of activity, including play skills, initiative, and reflection.
Low
Moderate
High
0 – 9: Low | 10 – 25: Moderate | 26 – 50: High
A score of 28 falls in the High range, suggesting relatively well-developed play activity, initiative, and reflective skills compared with lower scores.
example score
4/50
Communication Subject (CS)
Assesses the development of a child’s communicative traits and typical engagement in social interaction.
Adequate communicative development
Elevated communication difficulties
High communication difficulties
0 – 9: Adequate communicative development | 10 – 25: Elevated communication difficulties | 26 – 50: High communication difficulties
A score of 4 falls in the Adequate communicative development range, suggesting generally sufficient communicative traits with no pronounced indicators of reduced communicative activity on this scale.
example score
7/50
Self-Awareness (S)
Assesses the child’s level of self-awareness and self-identification as reflected in behavior and social adaptation.
Low risk indicators
Moderate risk indicators
High risk indicators
0 – 9: Low risk indicators | 10 – 25: Moderate risk indicators | 26 – 50: High risk indicators
A score of 7 falls in the Low risk indicators range, suggesting few observable signs of self-identification or self-esteem difficulties on this scale.
Start Online Test
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS
Who Usually Takes This Test?
School psychologists and counselors
41%OF USERS
Use it to quickly clarify whether a child’s difficulties reflect socio-pedagogical neglect and to outline priority support steps with input from adults around the child.
Class teachers and homeroom staff
34%OF USERS
Take it when a student shows persistent behavior, learning, or adaptation issues and a structured, multi-adult view is needed for referrals and interventions.
Social workers and guardians
25%OF USERS
Apply it to document signs of neglect-related risks and coordinate help plans by comparing parent, teacher, and specialist observations.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
RESULTS YOU CAN ACTUALLY USE
What You’ll See After You Finish the Test
Scale Results
— Explained Clearly
Your scores across each test scale, translated into plain, usable insights. Not just numbers, but what they actually mean for your daily life, emotional state, and overall well-being.
AI-Powered
Interpretation
A structured, clinically grounded explanation. Our AI analyzes patterns and relationships between scales to provide a coherent interpretation — without alarmist language.
Statistical
Comparison
See how you compare to others. Your scores are placed in a statistical context, showing percentiles and trends based on anonymized platform data to help you understand what`s typical.
Practical
Recommendations
Actionable guidance tailored to your profile. Receive clear, realistic suggestions you can apply immediately — focused on coping, self-regulation, and realistic next steps.
AI-Detected
Insights
Key patterns you might not notice on your own. Surfacing subtle connections in your responses that help you better understand what may be driving your current results.
Discuss with
an AI Psychologist
Clarify, reflect, and explore right away. Talk through your outcomes, ask questions, and explore meanings in a calm, non-diagnostic dialogue environment.
Start Online Test
Used in 52+ countries
Benchmarking
See How You Compare
Once you finish the test, your results will be compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of the benchmarks we use to place your score in context.
In kindergarten (Ik)
Average
4.2
Normal range
2.3 — 6
min.
0
max.
10
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
In the family (Itf)
Average
5.7
Normal range
3 — 8.4
min.
0
max.
15
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
V. Educational Microsystem (VEM)
Average
34.7
Normal range
28.4 — 41
min.
0
max.
50
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
At preschool (Ap)
Average
5
Normal range
3.5 — 6.6
min.
0
max.
12
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
In the Family (ItF)
Average
5.5
Normal range
4 — 7.1
min.
0
max.
10
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
IV. General Anxiety (IGA)
Average
33.2
Normal range
24.2 — 42.1
min.
0
max.
50
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Game Reflection (GR)
Average
2.3
Normal range
1.3 — 3.2
min.
0
max.
5
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Gaming Activity (GA)
Average
3.4
Normal range
2.7 — 4.2
min.
0
max.
6
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Gaming Abilities (GA)
Average
4.7
Normal range
3.4 — 6
min.
0
max.
7
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
III. The Subject of Activity (ITSoA)
Average
28.5
Normal range
21.6 — 35.5
min.
0
max.
50
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
II. The Subject of Communication (ITSoC)
Average
34.1
Normal range
25.1 — 43.1
min.
0
max.
50
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
I. The Subject of Self-Consciousness (ITSoS)
Average
35.1
Normal range
28.4 — 41.8
min.
0
max.
50
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Start Online Test
Featured On
Rated 4.8/5 by Our Customers
“Freudly really helped me discover parts of my personality I hadn’t noticed before. It strengthened the areas where I needed to grow and made me feel more grounded and confident in the parts that already worked well.”
— Emma C., US
“I wanted to understand how serious my ADHD is, and now I finally do. I also realized I need to work on my self-esteem. It has been low for a long time, and that makes daily life harder than it should be.”
— Mateo R., CA
“Reading each question felt like someone really understood me. Even though I’ve already dealt with much of this, reflecting still helped me learn something new about myself.”
— Caroline F., US
“The process is simple. The test covers everything you need, and you’ll get a clear breakdown of your results. For just a few dollars, it’s a great value.”
— Klara N., CZ
“I kept thinking there might be a small chance, but now I know for sure. The questions were easy to understand, and the whole process was straightforward.”
— Bruno M., BR
“I really enjoyed this experience. I learned a lot, and it helped me make sense of my thoughts and the feeling I’ve had for a long time that I may have grown up with undiagnosed ADHD.”
— Alice B., FR
“Great platform — the insights were genuinely meaningful!”
— Daniel W., DE
“Everything was easy to follow. The tools you get at the end are genuinely helpful for self-growth, and the price is very reasonable. I really appreciate that.”
— Sofia M., ES
“Surprisingly accurate — honestly didn’t expect it to nail things so well.”
— Adir B., IL
“There are lots of different tests to pick from, and the price is surprisingly low for how much insight you get.”
— Olivia W., CA
“I was pleasantly surprised when I read the results. It was as if someone had sorted out my messy thoughts and given me useful tips to help me speak with more confidence.”
— Grace O., IE
“It was really solid, very detailed, and it actually helped me make sense of a lot of things.”
— Carla T., TT
“I was really impressed with the report. It was clear, thoughtful, and it reflected things I’ve been noticing about myself.”
— Jade H., US
“The questions made me think deeply and helped me become more self-aware.”
— Brooke S., US
“Reading through most of the questions made me feel understood. Although I’ve already worked through some of these issues, the questions still gave me useful insights and helped me learn more about myself.”
— Ryan M., US
“I usually take one or two tests each month, and this has become a good way for me to see how I’m doing.”
— Lucas W., US
“Most of the time, my results are in the 90 to 98th percentile compared to others. It really makes me feel like there’s something unique about me.”
— Ethan C., US
“I tried out some of the AI’s suggestions, and to be honest, they worked much better than I thought they would. Maybe this thing really is smarter than me.”
— Reece D., AU
Trusted by 22k+ Users Worldwide
CLEAR ANSWERS TO COMMON QUESTIONS
Frequently Asked Questions

Any questions left?

What does this assessment measure?
It screens for signs of socio-pedagogical neglect and related difficulties in behavior, interaction, and adjustment. It also indicates the main areas affected and the estimated severity.
Who completes the forms?
Ratings are provided by a teacher, a psychologist or school mental health specialist, and a parent or guardian. Using multiple raters supports comparison across settings.
How long does it take and how many items are included?
Typical completion time is about 19 minutes. The form includes 103 items.
How are results determined?
Each rater scores key indicators, and the combined profile is compared with external symptom sets linked to socio-pedagogical neglect. The output summarizes whether indicators are present, which domains are most affected, and severity level.
How should results be used?
Results support initial orientation and selection of priority targets for corrective or support planning. Findings should be interpreted with other available clinical and educational information.
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES
About This Assessment
Diagnosis of Social and Pedagogical Neglect in Children, MEDOS Test

Assessment of Social and Pedagogical Neglect in Children Test

adaptationdeviations

This measure is designed to screen for indicators of social and educational neglect and related functional concerns in children. The Assessment of Social and Pedagogical Neglect in Children uses structured ratings from adults who know the child in different contexts to support an integrated view of behavior, adaptation, and psychosocial functioning.

The instrument contains 103 items and typically requires about 19 minutes to complete. Ratings may be compared across informants to identify the presence and relative severity of concerns and to help clarify areas where additional assessment or targeted supports may be indicated. In bibliographic listings, it is sometimes attributed to Thomas M. Achenbach.

Interpretation of results from the Assessment of Social and Pedagogical Neglect in Children should be integrated with clinical interview data, educational records, and other relevant measures, particularly when informing educational planning or service coordination.

Author: Thomas M. Achenbach
Literature: Kazdin, A. E. Conduct disorders in childhood and adolescence. Sage Publications. 1995.
Test Question Form
You Might Also Like
Assessment of Pedagogical Stereotyping Level
This measure is intended to evaluate the extent to which educators rely on…
Start Test
Professional Pedagogical Tolerance Assessment
This instrument is designed to assess tolerance-related attitudes and behav…
Start Test
Express Assessment of Teachers' Pedagogical Orientation
This brief self-report measure is designed to screen teachers’ professional…
Start Test
Comments
Leave a Comment