Home
Psychological tests
Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI)

Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) Test

Get a quick snapshot of your personality preferences across the MBTI dimensions in about 7 minutes. Clear, modern prompts deliver an easy starting point for self-reflection or group training.

Start Online Test

Questions: 367 minutes

Hi! My name is Freudly, i am an AI therapist, I will give you an interpretation of the test after you complete it.

08:30

October 2, 2025

October 2, 2025
Material has been updated

October 2, 2025
Material has been published

32418 views

13256 completions

3080 likes

Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

example score

1/9

Extraversion-Introversion (E)

This scale indicates whether your social and energy orientation leans more toward extraversion or introversion.

Leans Extraverted

Balanced

Leans Introverted

-9 – -1: Leans Extraverted | 0: Balanced | 1 – 9: Leans Introverted

A score of 1 falls in the “Leans Introverted” range, suggesting a slight preference for more inward-focused energy and reflection over outward engagement.

example score

1/9

Judging (J)–Perceiving (P) (J(()

This scale measures whether you tend to prefer structured, planned approaches (J) or flexible, spontaneous approaches (P) in everyday life.

Perceiving-leaning

Balanced

Judging-leaning

-9 – -1: Perceiving-leaning | 0: Balanced | 1 – 9: Judging-leaning

A score of 1 indicates a slight lean toward Judging, suggesting a mild preference for structure and planning while still remaining fairly flexible.

example score

1/9

Thinking–Feeling (T)

This scale measures whether you tend to make decisions more through logic and analysis or through feelings and personal values.

Thinking-leaning

Balanced

Feeling-leaning

-9 – -1: Thinking-leaning | 0: Balanced | 1 – 9: Feeling-leaning

A score of 1 falls in the Feeling-leaning range, suggesting a slight preference for considering values and interpersonal impact alongside logic when making decisions.

example score

2/9

Sensing (S)–Intuition (N) (S(()

This scale measures whether you tend to perceive information through concrete facts and sensory details versus intuitive, abstract patterns.

Sensing-leaning

Balanced

Intuition-leaning

-9 – -1: Sensing-leaning | 0: Balanced | 1 – 9: Intuition-leaning

A score of 2 indicates a slight preference for intuitive, big-picture interpretation over strictly concrete, detail-focused perception.

Start Online Test

just completed the test

DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Curious self-explorers

41%OF USERS

People who want a fast, easy snapshot of their personality preferences to better understand themselves and their relationships.

Students and trainees

33%OF USERS

Learners using it as a quick introduction to personality types for classes, workshops, or group exercises.

Coaches and facilitators

26%OF USERS

Professionals who use a short typing tool as a first step to start conversations about communication, motivation, and work style.

BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.

RESULTS YOU CAN ACTUALLY USE

What You’ll See After You Finish the Test

Scale Results
— Explained Clearly

Your scores across each test scale, translated into plain, usable insights. Not just numbers, but what they actually mean for your daily life, emotional state, and overall well-being.

AI-Powered
Interpretation

A structured, clinically grounded explanation. Our AI analyzes patterns and relationships between scales to provide a coherent interpretation — without alarmist language.

Statistical
Comparison

See how you compare to others. Your scores are placed in a statistical context, showing percentiles and trends based on anonymized platform data to help you understand what`s typical.

Practical
Recommendations

Actionable guidance tailored to your profile. Receive clear, realistic suggestions you can apply immediately — focused on coping, self-regulation, and realistic next steps.

AI-Detected
Insights

Key patterns you might not notice on your own. Surfacing subtle connections in your responses that help you better understand what may be driving your current results.

Discuss with
an AI Psychologist

Clarify, reflect, and explore right away. Talk through your outcomes, ask questions, and explore meanings in a calm, non-diagnostic dialogue environment.

Start Online Test

Used in 52+ countries

Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you finish the test, your results will be compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of the benchmarks we use to place your score in context.

(E) Extraversion - Introversion (I) ((E-I()

Average

-1.6

Normal range

-4 — 0.9

min.

-9

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

(J) Judging – Perceiving (P) ((J–P()

Average

-2.3

Normal range

-4.7 — 0.1

min.

-9

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

(T) Thinking – Feeling (F) ((T–F()

Average

1.3

Normal range

-1.5 — 4.2

min.

-9

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

(S) Sensing – Intuition (N) ((S–I()

Average

-3.5

Normal range

-6.1 — -1

min.

-9

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Start Online Test

Featured On

Rated 4.8/5 by Our Customers

“Freudly really helped me discover parts of my personality I hadn’t noticed before. It strengthened the areas where I needed to grow and made me feel more grounded and confident in the parts that already worked well.”

— Emma C., US

“I wanted to understand how serious my ADHD is, and now I finally do. I also realized I need to work on my self-esteem. It has been low for a long time, and that makes daily life harder than it should be.”

— Mateo R., CA

“Reading each question felt like someone really understood me. Even though I’ve already dealt with much of this, reflecting still helped me learn something new about myself.”

— Caroline F., US

“The process is simple. The test covers everything you need, and you’ll get a clear breakdown of your results. For just a few dollars, it’s a great value.”

— Klara N., CZ

“I kept thinking there might be a small chance, but now I know for sure. The questions were easy to understand, and the whole process was straightforward.”

— Bruno M., BR

“I really enjoyed this experience. I learned a lot, and it helped me make sense of my thoughts and the feeling I’ve had for a long time that I may have grown up with undiagnosed ADHD.”

— Alice B., FR

“Great platform — the insights were genuinely meaningful!”

— Daniel W., DE

“Everything was easy to follow. The tools you get at the end are genuinely helpful for self-growth, and the price is very reasonable. I really appreciate that.”

— Sofia M., ES

“Surprisingly accurate — honestly didn’t expect it to nail things so well.”

— Adir B., IL

“There are lots of different tests to pick from, and the price is surprisingly low for how much insight you get.”

— Olivia W., CA

“I was pleasantly surprised when I read the results. It was as if someone had sorted out my messy thoughts and given me useful tips to help me speak with more confidence.”

— Grace O., IE

“It was really solid, very detailed, and it actually helped me make sense of a lot of things.”

— Carla T., TT

“I was really impressed with the report. It was clear, thoughtful, and it reflected things I’ve been noticing about myself.”

— Jade H., US

“The questions made me think deeply and helped me become more self-aware.”

— Brooke S., US

“Reading through most of the questions made me feel understood. Although I’ve already worked through some of these issues, the questions still gave me useful insights and helped me learn more about myself.”

— Ryan M., US

“I usually take one or two tests each month, and this has become a good way for me to see how I’m doing.”

— Lucas W., US

“Most of the time, my results are in the 90 to 98th percentile compared to others. It really makes me feel like there’s something unique about me.”

— Ethan C., US

“I tried out some of the AI’s suggestions, and to be honest, they worked much better than I thought they would. Maybe this thing really is smarter than me.”

— Reece D., AU

Trusted by 22k+ Users Worldwide

CLEAR ANSWERS TO COMMON QUESTIONS

Frequently Asked Questions

Any questions left?

What does the assessment measure?

It estimates preference patterns across four dimensions: Extraversion–Introversion, Sensing–Intuition, Thinking–Feeling, and Judging–Perceiving. It provides an approximate type profile based on these preferences.

How long does it take and how many items are included?

Estimated completion time is about 7 minutes. The assessment contains 36 items.

How should responses be selected?

Select the option that best matches typical behavior in everyday situations. Avoid choosing based on rare events or an idealized self-image.

How accurate are the results?

Results are intended as a brief screening estimate and do not match the precision of official instruments. Use results as a starting point for self-reflection rather than a definitive classification.

How should results be interpreted?

The profile reflects current preference tendencies and may vary with context or stress. Reviewing the described strengths and challenges for the suggested type can support further exploration.

WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

About This Assessment

Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) Test

jungian typology personality type

This brief self-report measure uses the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) typology to provide an approximate profile of preference patterns. It is designed for rapid, introductory screening rather than comprehensive personality assessment.

The questionnaire includes 36 items and typically takes about 7 minutes to complete. Items sample everyday tendencies aligned with four dichotomies (Extraversion–Introversion, Sensing–Intuition, Thinking–Feeling, and Judging–Perceiving), yielding an estimated best-fit type.

This version was developed by Heidi Priebe (2015). Results from the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) framework should be interpreted cautiously, as they are not equivalent to scores from official, fully validated instruments and are best used as a starting point for discussion or further assessment.

Author: isabel-briggs-myers, katharine-c-briggs

Literature: Myers, I. B., McCaulley, M. H., Quenk, N. L., & Hammer, A. L. MBTI manual: A guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Consulting Psychologists Press. 1998.

Test Question Form